{"id":249912,"date":"2021-06-17T17:06:07","date_gmt":"2021-06-17T11:36:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=249912"},"modified":"2021-06-18T10:30:31","modified_gmt":"2021-06-18T05:00:31","slug":"contempt-of-court","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/17\/contempt-of-court\/","title":{"rendered":"Madras HC | Sons turning turtle after giving undertaking to vacate their father’s premises is Contempt of Court: Read synopsis of Court’s opinion"},"content":{"rendered":"

Madras High Court: <\/strong>The Division Bench of P.N. Prakash and R. Pongiappan, JJ., addressed a contempt petition filed under Section 10 of the Contempt of Courts Act.<\/p>\n

Petitioner aged 87 years old was blessed with 5 children. He was in service when his children were young and was allotted a plot by the Tamil Nadu Housing Board, wherein he built a two-storeyed house. After his retirement, he started living peacefully with his wife and 4th<\/sup> son viz. Laxmi Rajah on the first floor. Apart from this he also owned a few more properties in and around Chennai.<\/p>\n

After the death of his wife, petitioners\u2019 children started demanding their shares in the properties and two of his sons Vijay and Suraj took possession of the ground floor and after a year started giving him trouble.<\/p>\n

Due to the fear of being dispossessed from the house, a settlement deed in favour of the 4th<\/sup> son was executed.<\/p>\n

On being infuriated with the above stated, the 4th<\/sup> son\u2019s wife assaulted the petitioner and the other three daughter-in-law lodged a police complaint against the petitioner based on which an enquiry was conducted and the case as closeld as the same was a \u2018civil dispute\u2019.<\/p>\n

The disgruntled sons gave a complaint of cheating and fraudulent transaction against their father. Again, the same was closed as \u201cfamily quarrel\u201d.<\/p>\n

Vijay and Suraj filed a suit before the VII Additional City Civil Court for partition alleging that their father the petitioner did not have any means to purchase the Anna Nagar house property and it was bought with the funds of their grandfather and hence, they have a share in it.<\/p>\n

The above mentioned two sons also assaulted their father, after which the petitioner sought protection under the Tamil Nadu Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007.<\/p>\n

Police filed an FIR against the two sons for the offences under Sections 294(b), 352 and 506(I) Penal Code, 1860 and Section 24 of the Tamil Nadu Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007.<\/p>\n

Two sons pleaded to Murthi at Metropolitan Magistrate\u2019s house to withdraw the complaint and they will vacate the premises and show the bonafide they filed a written memo of undertaking before the Metropolitan Magistrate.<\/p>\n

Reason for filing the present petition<\/strong><\/p>\n

After earning freedom, the two sons turned turtle, reneged from their undertaking and refused to vacate the premises and therefore, Murthi\/ Petitioner was before this Court with the instant contempt petition.<\/span><\/p>\n

Analysis, Law and Decision<\/u><\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n

Whether the undertaking given by Vijay and Suraj before the Metropolitan Magistrate was under coercion when they were in police custody or they gave it voluntarily?<\/p>\n

Bench noted that when Vijay and Suraj\u2019s counsel submitted before the Court that if some more time would be granted, they would vacate the house, the duo refused to toe their counsel\u2019s line as well. Mainly they stuck on to the issue that their father did not give any share to them in his property.<\/p>\n

Order passed by the V MM stated that the advocate for the accused pleaded to the V MM not to remand the accused and only thereafter, Murthi came into the picture, resulting in the duo filing a memo of undertaking to vacate the house, followed by Murthi filing a memo accepting the undertaking given by his sons.<\/p>\n

Court expressed that the accused were represented by an advocate at the time of remand, and he would not have been so guile to make his clients file a memo of undertaking had the V MM been disinclined to remand them in judicial custody.<\/p>\n

In view of the above, it is limpid that the alleged contemnors had filed an undertaking into the Court, which they had no intention of honouring, and had successfully extricated themselves from remand proceedings and their contention that the undertaking was given by them under coercion defies credulity.<\/p>\n

Power of High Court to punish for Contempt of Courts subordinate to it, is recognized in Section 10 of the Contempt of Courts Act and it is well settled that a wilful breach of an undertaking given to the Court would constitute civil contempt.<\/p>\n

Therefore, the subsequent act of deliberately reneging from the terms of the undertaking by the alleged contemnors constitutes a serious interference in the administration of justice, and the respondents were held to be guilty of Section 2(b) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.<\/p>\n

The contempt petition was allowed.[P.S. Murthi v. P.S. Vijay, 2021 SCC OnLine Mad 2052<\/b><\/a>, decided on 04-06-2021]<\/p>\n

\n

Advocates before the Court:<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n

For petitioner:\u00a0 Mr. T. Arun Kumar <\/span>for M\/s. Tamizh Law Firm<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

For respondents: Mr. V. Krishnamoorthy<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Madras High Court: The Division Bench of P.N. Prakash and R. Pongiappan, JJ., addressed a contempt petition filed under Section 10 of <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[22484,11821,3227,29785,43373,33138,3590,31070,37772,46254],"class_list":["post-249912","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-assault","tag-contempt-of-court","tag-custody","tag-law","tag-madras","tag-metropolitan-magistrate","tag-property","tag-senior-citizen","tag-undertaking","tag-widower"],"yoast_head":"\nMadras HC | Sons turning turtle after giving undertaking to vacate their father's premises is Contempt of Court: Read synopsis of Court's opinion | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"contempt of court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/17\/contempt-of-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Madras HC | Sons turning turtle after giving undertaking to vacate their father's premises is Contempt of Court: Read synopsis of Court's opinion\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"contempt of court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/17\/contempt-of-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-06-17T11:36:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-06-18T05:00:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/madras-high-court1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/17\/contempt-of-court\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/17\/contempt-of-court\/\",\"name\":\"Madras HC | Sons turning turtle after giving undertaking to vacate their father's premises is Contempt of Court: Read synopsis of Court's opinion | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-06-17T11:36:07+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-06-18T05:00:31+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"description\":\"contempt of court\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/17\/contempt-of-court\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/17\/contempt-of-court\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/17\/contempt-of-court\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Madras HC | Sons turning turtle after giving undertaking to vacate their father’s premises is Contempt of Court: Read synopsis of Court’s opinion\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Madras HC | Sons turning turtle after giving undertaking to vacate their father's premises is Contempt of Court: Read synopsis of Court's opinion | SCC Times","description":"contempt of court","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/17\/contempt-of-court\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Madras HC | Sons turning turtle after giving undertaking to vacate their father's premises is Contempt of Court: Read synopsis of Court's opinion","og_description":"contempt of court","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/17\/contempt-of-court\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-06-17T11:36:07+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-06-18T05:00:31+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/madras-high-court1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/17\/contempt-of-court\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/17\/contempt-of-court\/","name":"Madras HC | Sons turning turtle after giving undertaking to vacate their father's premises is Contempt of Court: Read synopsis of Court's opinion | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-06-17T11:36:07+00:00","dateModified":"2021-06-18T05:00:31+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"description":"contempt of court","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/17\/contempt-of-court\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/17\/contempt-of-court\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/17\/contempt-of-court\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Madras HC | Sons turning turtle after giving undertaking to vacate their father’s premises is Contempt of Court: Read synopsis of Court’s opinion"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":279665,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/15\/madras-high-court-dismisses-contempt-proceedings-against-presiding-officer-of-family-court-imposes-rs-50000-costs-on-the-petitioner-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":249912,"position":0},"title":"Madras High Court dismisses contempt proceedings against presiding officer of family Court; Imposes Rs. 50,000 costs on the petitioner","author":"Editor","date":"December 15, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court held that the contempt petition is not maintainable and barred by limitation. Thus, dismissed contempt proceedings against the presiding officer of Family Court as he was not the presiding officer when the order was passed.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Madras-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":235383,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/05\/madras-hc-does-doctrine-of-merger-makes-a-distinction-between-an-order-of-reversal-modification-or-an-order-of-confirmation-hc-explains-in-a-contempt-petition\/","url_meta":{"origin":249912,"position":1},"title":"Madras HC | Does doctrine of merger make a distinction between an order of reversal, modification or an order of confirmation? HC explains in a Contempt Petition","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 5, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court:\u00a0N. Anand Venkatesh, J., while addressing the contempt petition held that, \"The doctrine of merger does not make a distinction between an order of reversal, modification or an order of confirmation.\" Petitioners Counsel, N.G.R Prasad and Sathish Parasaran, Senior Counsel on behalf of the respondent, represented the parties\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":258874,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/22\/madras-hc-takes-suo-motu-cognizance-of-objectionable-clip-including-court-proceedings-doing-rounds-in-social-media\/","url_meta":{"origin":249912,"position":2},"title":"Madras HC takes suo motu cognizance of objectionable clip including Court proceedings doing rounds in social media, Directs registration of FIR","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 22, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court: The Division Bench of P.N. Prakash and R. Hemalatha, JJ., noted that a video clipping showing the online Court proceedings of one of the brother Judges, in which, a male was found engaged in eroticism with a lady was going viral on social media. High Court stated\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":375632,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/13\/mad-hc-scandalous-allegations-against-judges-constitute-criminal-contempt\/","url_meta":{"origin":249912,"position":3},"title":"Scandalous allegations against Judges constitute criminal contempt: Madras HC grants final opportunity to tender unconditional apology","author":"Soumya Yadav","date":"February 13, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cInstead of expressing regret or tendering an apology, he persisted with such allegations and even called upon the Court to tender an apology.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Scandalous allegations against Judges","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Scandalous-allegations-against-Judges.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Scandalous-allegations-against-Judges.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Scandalous-allegations-against-Judges.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Scandalous-allegations-against-Judges.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":273838,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/16\/madras-high-court-contempt-of-court-savukku-shankar-you-tube-suo-motu-judiciary-dishonest-and-corrupt-simple-imprisonment-red-aepixon-article-191a-constitution-article-192-rule-8\/","url_meta":{"origin":249912,"position":4},"title":"Madras High Court finds YouTuber Savukku guilty of criminal contempt; sentenced him to six months imprisonment for derogatory remarks on the higher Judiciary","author":"Editor","date":"September 16, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court: In a suo motu contempt petition against the YouTuber Savukku Shankar, the division bench of G.R. Swaminathan and B. Pugalendhi, JJ. has held Savukku guilty for criminal contempt for proclaiming in the public domain that all Judges are corrupt and dishonest, as it was not a slip\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":233261,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/01\/madras-hc-schools-violating-court-order-of-40-only-fees-collection-shall-be-subject-to-contempt-proceedings\/","url_meta":{"origin":249912,"position":5},"title":"Madras HC | Schools violating Court Order of 40% only fees collection shall be subject to Contempt Proceedings","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 1, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court:\u00a0N. Anand Venkatesh, J., stated that in case the Schools are violating the High Court's earlier Order with regard to collection of only 40% tuition fees by unaided private institutions during the academic year 2019-2020, Contempt proceedings shall be instituted. Petition was filed seeking writ of mandamus directing\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/249912","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=249912"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/249912\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=249912"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=249912"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=249912"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}