{"id":249774,"date":"2021-06-14T16:47:44","date_gmt":"2021-06-14T11:17:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=249774"},"modified":"2021-06-18T10:43:21","modified_gmt":"2021-06-18T05:13:21","slug":"explained-scope-of-section-80-ia5-of-the-income-tax-act-1961-with-respect-to-determination-of-quantum-of-deduction-under-section-80-ia1","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/14\/explained-scope-of-section-80-ia5-of-the-income-tax-act-1961-with-respect-to-determination-of-quantum-of-deduction-under-section-80-ia1\/","title":{"rendered":"Explained| Scope of Section 80-IA(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 with respect to determination of quantum of deduction under Section 80-IA(1)"},"content":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court<\/strong>: Interpreting the true scope of Section 80-IA(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the bench of L. Nageswara Rao*<\/strong> and Vineet Saran, JJ has held that the scope of sub-section (5) of Section 80- IA of the Act is limited to determination of quantum of deduction under sub-section (1) of Section 80-IA of the Act by treating \u2018eligible business\u2019 as the \u2018only source of income\u2019.<\/p>\n

Provision in question <\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Sub-section (1) and sub-section (5) of Section 80-IA which are relevant for these Appeals are as under:<\/p>\n

\u201c80-IA. Deductions in respect of profits and gains from industrial undertakings or enterprises engaged in infrastructure development, etc.\u2014 (1) Where the gross total income of an assessee includes any profits and gains derived by an undertaking or an enterprise from any business referred to in sub-section (4) (such business being hereinafter referred to as the eligible business), there shall, in accordance with and subject to the provisions of this section, be allowed, in computing the total income of the assessee, a deduction of an amount equal to hundred per cent. of the profits and gains derived from such business for ten consecutive assessment years.<\/em><\/p>\n

* * * *<\/em><\/p>\n

(5) Notwithstanding anything contained in any other provision of this Act, the profits and gains of an eligible business to which the provisions of subsection (1) apply shall, for the purposes of determining the quantum of deduction under that sub-section for the assessment year immediately succeeding the initial assessment year or any subsequent assessment year, be computed as if such eligible business were the only source of income of the assessee during the previous year relevant to the initial assessment year and to every subsequent assessment year up to and including the assessment year for which the determination is to be made.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

The essential ingredients of Section 80-IA (1) of the Act are:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. a) the \u2018gross total income\u2019 of an assessee should include profits and gains;<\/li>\n
  2. b) those profits and gains are derived by an undertaking or an enterprise from a business referred to in subsection (4);<\/li>\n
  3. c) the assessee is entitled for deduction of an amount equal to 100% of the profits and gains derived from such business for 10 consecutive assessment years; and<\/li>\n
  4. d) in computing the \u2018total income\u2019 of the Assessee, such deduction shall be allowed.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    The import of Section 80-IA is that the \u2018total income\u2019 of an assessee is computed by taking into account the allowable deduction of the profits and gains derived from the \u2018eligible business\u2019.<\/p>\n

    Background<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

    In the case at hand, the \u2018gross total income\u2019 of the Assessee for the assessment year 2002-03 was less than the quantum of deduction determined under Section 80-IA of the Act. The Assessee contended that income from all other heads including \u2018income from other sources\u2019, in addition to \u2018business income\u2019, have to be taken into account for the purpose of allowing the deductions available to the Assessee, subject to the ceiling of \u2018gross total income\u2019. The Appellate Authority was of the view that there is no limitation on deduction admissible under Section 80-IA of the Act to income under the head \u2018business\u2019 only.<\/p>\n

    The Court was hearing a case where the Revenue had argued that sub-section (5) of Section 80-IA refers to computation of quantum of deduction being limited from \u2018eligible business\u2019 by taking it as the only source of income.<\/p>\n

    \n

    \u201c\u2026 the language of sub-section (5) makes it clear that deduction contemplated in sub-section (1) is only with respect to the income from \u2018eligible business\u2019 which indicates that there is a cap in sub-section (1) that the deduction cannot exceed the \u2018business income\u2019.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

    On the other hand, the Assessee had argued that sub-section (5) pertains only to determination of the quantum of deduction under sub-section (1) by treating the \u2018eligible business\u2019 as the only source of income.<\/p>\n

    The claim of the Assessee was that in computing its \u2018total income\u2019, deductions available to it have to be set-off against the \u2018gross total income\u2019, while the Revenue contends that it is only the \u2018business income\u2019 which has to be taken into account for the purpose of setting-off the deductions under Sections 80-IA and 80-IB of the Act<\/p>\n

    Analysis and conclusion <\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

    In Synco Industries Ltd. v. Assessing Officer, Income Tax, Mumbai, (2008) 4 SCC 22<\/strong>, the Supreme Court was concerned with Section 80-I of the Act. Section 80-I(6), which is in pari materia<\/em> to Section 80-IA(5), is as follows:<\/p>\n

    \u201c 80-I(6) Notwithstanding anything contained in any other provision of this Act, the profits and gains of an industrial undertaking or a ship or the business of a hotel or the business of repairs to ocean-going vessels or other powered craft to which the provisions of sub-section (1) apply shall, for the purposes of determining the quantum of deduction under subsection (1) for the assessment year immediately succeeding the initial assessment year or any subsequent assessment year, be computed as if such industrial undertaking or ship or the business of the hotel or the business of repairs to ocean-going vessels or other powered craft were the only source of income of the assessee during the previous years relevant to the initial assessment year and to every subsequent assessment year up to and including the assessment year for which the determination is to be made.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

    It was held in Synco Industries that<\/p>\n

      \n
    • for the purpose of calculating the deduction under Section 80-I, loss sustained in other divisions or units cannot be taken into account as sub-section (6) contemplates that only profits from the industrial undertaking shall be taken into account as it was the only source of income.<\/li>\n
    • Section 80-I(6) of the Act dealt with actual computation of deduction whereas Section 80-I(1) of the Act dealt with the treatment to be given to such deductions in order to arrive at the total income of the assessee.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

      In CIT (Central), Madras v. Canara Workshops (P) Ltd., Kodialball, Mangalore, (1986) 3 SCC 538<\/strong>, the question that arose for consideration before this Court related to computation of the profits for the purpose of deduction under Section 80-E, as it then existed, after setting off the loss incurred by the assessee in the manufacture of alloy steels. Section 80-E of the Act, as it then existed, permitted deductions in respect of profits and gains attributable to the business of generation or distribution of electricity or any other form of power or of construction, manufacture or production of any one or more of the articles or things specified in the list in the Fifth Schedule. It was argued on behalf of the Revenue that the profits from the automobile ancillaries industry of the assessee must be reduced by the loss suffered by the assessee in the manufacture of alloy steels.<\/p>\n

      The Court was, however, not in agreement with the submissions made by the Revenue. It was, hence, held that the profits and gains by an industry entitled to benefit under Section 80-E cannot be reduced by the loss suffered by any other industry or industries owned by the assessee.<\/p>\n

      Referring to the aforesaid authorities, the Court held that<\/p>\n

      \n

      “… Sub-section (5) cannot be pressed into service for reading a limitation of the deduction under sub-section (1) only to \u2018business income\u2019.”<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

      [CIT v. Reliance Energy Ltd., 2021 SCC OnLine SC 349<\/b><\/a>, decided on 28.04.2021]<\/p>\n

      \n

      Judgment by: Justice L. Nageswara Rao\u00a0<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

      Know Thy Judge| Justice L. Nageswara Rao<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n