{"id":249482,"date":"2021-06-09T15:07:41","date_gmt":"2021-06-09T09:37:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=249482"},"modified":"2021-06-11T10:04:48","modified_gmt":"2021-06-11T04:34:48","slug":"adultery","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/09\/adultery\/","title":{"rendered":"Del HC | Whether woman is party to adultery\/bigamy so as to refuse relief under DV Act is a matter of trial: HC refuses to quash lower court orders"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Delhi High Court: <\/strong>Subramonium Prasad, J., refused to grant relief to the petitioner against orders of the lower court restraining him from dispossessing the respondent from the subject property and also directing him to pay monthly maintenance to her.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>Factual Matrix<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Respondent had filed an application under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. It was stated that the respondent met petitioner in the year 2009 when she was already married. In the year 2014 after obtaining divorce, the respondent got married to the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">It is further stated that the petitioner in order to induce respondent to marry him did not disclose his marital status to her. Though petitioner executed a Marriage Agreement to how his genuineness and responsibility towards the respondent and her child from a prior marriage.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Respondent was subjected to physical and mental abuse by the petitioner. Hence, respondent had filed an FIR against the petitioner. Respondent also sought a restraining order from being evicted from the rented accommodation.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><u>Analysis, Law and Decision<\/u><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">High Court expressed that DV Act is meant to provide for the rights of women to secure housing. \u00a0The Act also provides for the right of a woman to reside in her matrimonial home or shared household, whether or not she has any title or rights in such home or household.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">What does the aggrieved have to show?<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Aggrieved person has to show that the aggrieved person and the respondent (man) lived together in a shared household.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Marriage Deed was filed which recorded that after the marriage parties will reside together as husband and wife and will be faithful towards each other. There were photographs of the petitioner and respondent that gave the impression that the parties were living together as husband and wife and had married each other.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">As per the school record of the child, petitioner was the father of the child. Copies of the bank accounts were filed wherein the petitioner has been shown as a nominee of the account held by the respondent.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">High Court noted that the couple held themselves out in the society as being akin to spouses which fact was evident from marriage-cum-agreement deed, affidavits, the school records of the child and the bank statements of the respondent.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In the present matter, respondent was told that the wife of the petitioner was on dialysis and that she would die soon.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Petitioners\u2019 contention was that he had not entered into any rental agreement and the agreements, affidavits and the photographs produced by the respondent were not genuine.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><u>Bigamous and Adulterous Relationship?<\/u><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bench expressed that question as to whether the respondent herein has been duped by the petitioner or whether she was a party to an adulterous and bigamous relationship or not and whether her conduct would not entitle her to any protection under the DV Act can be determined only after the evidence is led.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Metropolitan Magistrate, after the evidence led, had concluded that the respondent was not entitled to the protection of the DV Act and hence shall return the respondent the amount received by her as interim maintenance.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">High Court held that the matter be heard by the trial court and should be decided finally within a period of 1 year. [Parveen Tandon v. Tanika Tandon, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/S3FSmA02\"><b>2021 SCC OnLine Del 3044<\/b><\/a>, decided on 7-06-2021]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Advocates before the Court:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For the Petitioner: Utkarsh and Anshu Priyanka, Advocates.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For the Respondent: Kamal Anand, Advocate<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Delhi High Court: Subramonium Prasad, J., refused to grant relief to the petitioner against orders of the lower court restraining him from <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[46175,30319,46174,19581,2543,30317,2641,46173,2640,21374,43050,2642,16701],"class_list":["post-249482","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-adulterous","tag-aggrieved-person","tag-bigamous","tag-child","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-dv-act","tag-husband","tag-marriage-agreement","tag-matrimonial_home","tag-protection-of-women-from-domestic-violence-act","tag-shared-household","tag-wife","tag-women-rights"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Del HC | Whether woman is party to adultery\/bigamy so as to refuse relief under DV Act is a matter of trial: HC refuses to quash lower court orders | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Adultery and Bigamy\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/09\/adultery\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Del HC | Whether woman is party to adultery\/bigamy so as to refuse relief under DV Act is a matter of trial: HC refuses to quash lower court orders\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Adultery and Bigamy\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/09\/adultery\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-06-09T09:37:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-06-11T04:34:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2021\\\/06\\\/09\\\/adultery\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2021\\\/06\\\/09\\\/adultery\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"headline\":\"Del HC | Whether woman is party to adultery\\\/bigamy so as to refuse relief under DV Act is a matter of trial: HC refuses to quash lower court orders\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-06-09T09:37:41+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-06-11T04:34:48+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2021\\\/06\\\/09\\\/adultery\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":595,\"commentCount\":0,\"keywords\":[\"Adulterous\",\"Aggrieved person\",\"Bigamous\",\"child\",\"Delhi High Court\",\"DV ACT\",\"husband\",\"Marriage Agreement\",\"matrimonial home\",\"Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act\",\"Shared Household\",\"wife\",\"women rights\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2021\\\/06\\\/09\\\/adultery\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2021\\\/06\\\/09\\\/adultery\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2021\\\/06\\\/09\\\/adultery\\\/\",\"name\":\"Del HC | Whether woman is party to adultery\\\/bigamy so as to refuse relief under DV Act is a matter of trial: HC refuses to quash lower court orders | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-06-09T09:37:41+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-06-11T04:34:48+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"description\":\"Adultery and Bigamy\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2021\\\/06\\\/09\\\/adultery\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2021\\\/06\\\/09\\\/adultery\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2021\\\/06\\\/09\\\/adultery\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Del HC | Whether woman is party to adultery\\\/bigamy so as to refuse relief under DV Act is a matter of trial: HC refuses to quash lower court orders\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_1\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Del HC | Whether woman is party to adultery\/bigamy so as to refuse relief under DV Act is a matter of trial: HC refuses to quash lower court orders | SCC Times","description":"Adultery and Bigamy","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/09\/adultery\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Del HC | Whether woman is party to adultery\/bigamy so as to refuse relief under DV Act is a matter of trial: HC refuses to quash lower court orders","og_description":"Adultery and Bigamy","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/09\/adultery\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-06-09T09:37:41+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-06-11T04:34:48+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/09\/adultery\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/09\/adultery\/"},"author":{"name":"Bhumika Indulia","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"headline":"Del HC | Whether woman is party to adultery\/bigamy so as to refuse relief under DV Act is a matter of trial: HC refuses to quash lower court orders","datePublished":"2021-06-09T09:37:41+00:00","dateModified":"2021-06-11T04:34:48+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/09\/adultery\/"},"wordCount":595,"commentCount":0,"keywords":["Adulterous","Aggrieved person","Bigamous","child","Delhi High Court","DV ACT","husband","Marriage Agreement","matrimonial home","Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act","Shared Household","wife","women rights"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/09\/adultery\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/09\/adultery\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/09\/adultery\/","name":"Del HC | Whether woman is party to adultery\/bigamy so as to refuse relief under DV Act is a matter of trial: HC refuses to quash lower court orders | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-06-09T09:37:41+00:00","dateModified":"2021-06-11T04:34:48+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"description":"Adultery and Bigamy","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/09\/adultery\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/09\/adultery\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/09\/adultery\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Del HC | Whether woman is party to adultery\/bigamy so as to refuse relief under DV Act is a matter of trial: HC refuses to quash lower court orders"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":233038,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/29\/del-hc-no-exception-to-remedy-against-orders-of-custody-under-domestic-violence-act-court-dismisses-s-482-crpc-petition-in-view-of-s-29-dv-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":249482,"position":0},"title":"Del HC | &#8220;No exception to remedy against orders of custody under Domestic Violence Act&#8221;: Court dismisses S. 482 CrPC petition in view of S. 29 DV Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 29, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Jyoti Singh, J., while addressing the maintainability and legality of a petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 held that, legislature in its wisdom has provided for Appeal under Section 29 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 against all \"orders\" and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":222898,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/06\/cal-hc-a-mother-is-entitled-to-claim-relief-under-domestic-violence-act-against-his-son-law-on-aggrieved-person-under-dv-act-restated\/","url_meta":{"origin":249482,"position":1},"title":"Cal HC | A mother is entitled to claim relief under Domestic Violence Act against his son; law on &#8220;aggrieved person&#8221; under DV Act restated","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 6, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court:\u00a0Madhumati Mitra, J., dismissed an application filed against the order of the Sessions Judge whereby he upheld the order passed by the Magistrate who had directed the petitioner to pay monthly monetary relief to his mother and also her medical expenses. The respondent, the mother of the petitioner,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":279335,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/09\/can-a-wife-claim-maintenance-under-s-125-crpc-after-obtaining-a-maintenance-order-in-her-favour-under-dv-act-bombay-hc-answers\/","url_meta":{"origin":249482,"position":2},"title":"Can a wife claim maintenance under S. 125, CrPC after obtaining a maintenance order in her favour under DV Act? Bombay HC answers","author":"Editor","date":"December 9, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Bombay High Court: In a case where simultaneous maintenance claims were under different enactments, S.G. Mehare, J., held that mere obtaining of a maintenance order under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (DV Act), will not disentitle the wife from seeking maintenance under Section 125,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Bombay-High-Court-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":234194,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/19\/madras-hc-limitation-provided-under-crpc-is-applicable-to-complainants-under-domestic-violence-act-court-rejects-complaint-filed-after-lapse-of-1-yr-10-months\/","url_meta":{"origin":249482,"position":3},"title":"Madras HC | Limitation provided under CrPC is applicable to complaints under Domestic Violence Act: Court rejects complaint filed after lapse of 1 yr 10 months","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 19, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court:\u00a0 G.K. Ilanthiraiyan, J., quashed the proceedings filed under the Domestic Violence Act in light of being barred by limitation. The instant petition was filed to quash the Domestic Violence proceedings under the Domestic Violence Act. Petitioner and respondent are husband and wife, due to some misunderstanding between\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":256682,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/03\/maintenance-overlapping-jurisdiction\/","url_meta":{"origin":249482,"position":4},"title":"Maintenance &#038; Overlapping Jurisdiction |  Maintenance can be claimed under DV Act even if already granted under S. 125 CrPC: Del HC reiterates","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 3, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Amit Bansal, J., reversed the order of the trial court as it dismissed the application filed by the petitioner under Section 26 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act only on the basis that it had been filed towards execution of maintenance already granted. Instant\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":329859,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/02\/magistrate-can-grant-interim-residence-order-before-trial-if-plea-prima-facie-discloses-domestic-violence-jk-high-court-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":249482,"position":5},"title":"Magistrate can grant interim Residence Order before Trial if plea Prima Facie discloses Domestic Violence: J&amp;K High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"September 2, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cResidence order is an urgent relief to protect a woman from her taking shelter on road. Therefore, passing of an interim order of the nature as defined under Section 19 of the Act is well within the jurisdiction of a Magistrate.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jammu-and-Kashmir-and-Ladakh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jammu-and-Kashmir-and-Ladakh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jammu-and-Kashmir-and-Ladakh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jammu-and-Kashmir-and-Ladakh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/249482","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=249482"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/249482\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=249482"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=249482"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=249482"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}