{"id":248703,"date":"2021-05-25T21:51:01","date_gmt":"2021-05-25T16:21:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=248703"},"modified":"2021-06-04T12:08:10","modified_gmt":"2021-06-04T06:38:10","slug":"administration-of-justice","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/25\/administration-of-justice\/","title":{"rendered":"Madras HC | &#8220;Not fair to expect judges to expend too much time, energy in proof-reading&#8221;: HC stresses counsels should reflect &#8216;distilled understanding&#8217; while preparing drafts"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Madras High Court:<\/strong> G.R. Swaminathan, J., emphasised that all stakeholders in the process of administration of justice should discharge their commitments sincerely.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The High Court was set to dispose of a second appeal filed before it in a suit for malicious prosecution. The defendants in the suit had earlier filed a complaint against the plaintiff, who was acquitted by the Judicial Magistrate. Alleging that it was a false complaint filed only to victimise him, the plaintiff filed a suit for malicious prosecution claiming damages from the defendants. The trial court dismissed the plaintiff&#8217;s suit, but the first Appellate Court ruled in his favour. Aggrieved, the defendants filed the second appeal which was before the High Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Noting the &#8216;substantial questions of law&#8217; on which the second appeal was admitted, the High Court went on to observe that the formulation conveyed no meaning, it made no sense at all.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;<em>Choosing to be frank with an eye on future<\/em>&#8220;, the Court recorded that although Section 100(4) CPC states that where the High Court is satisfied that a substantial question of law is involved in any case, it shall formulate that question, what mostly happens in practice is not in strict consonance with the statutory mandate.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court said:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;<em>Since Section 100(3) CPC states that the appeal memorandum shall precisely state the substantial question of law involved in the appeal, once the Judge is satisfied that a case has been made out for admitting the second appeal, instead of independently formulating the substantial question of law arising in the appeal, instruction is given to the stenographer to copy down certain particular grounds from the appeal memorandum<\/em>.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">It further noted that if the counsel&#8217;s formulation is flawed and defective, the Court record also carries the same vice. Underscoring the commitment that Justice and the judicial system demands, the Court observed:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;<em>Since the judicial workload is staggering, it is not fair to expect the judges to expend too much time and energy in proof-reading. The counsel must assume greater responsibility. They must deeply study the case record. Their grasp of the legal principles must be thorough and accurate. The distilled understanding must be reflected in the appeal grounds. They must be properly drafted. There should not be grammatical and spelling errors. The role of stenographers and typists is equally significant. Only if all the stakeholders discharge their commitments sincerely, howlers like what we saw now can be avoided.<\/em>&#8220;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Then, the High Court reframed the substantial questions of law involved in the second appeal and decided the appeal on merits holding that only Defendant 1 (out of six defendants) was liable; and the plaintiff was awarded damages amounting to Rs 50,000 with interest. The full report of this case where the High Court has had an elaborate discussion on liability in a suit for malicious prosecution, can be read here: <strong>\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/25\/malicious-prosecution\/\">LINK<\/a><\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">[M. Abubaker v. Abdul Kareem, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/H5XO11FW\"><b>2021 SCC OnLine Mad 1934<\/b><\/a>, decided on 21-4-2021 ]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/25\/malicious-prosecution\/\">https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/25\/malicious-prosecution\/<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Madras High Court: G.R. Swaminathan, J., emphasised that all stakeholders in the process of administration of justice should discharge their commitments sincerely. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[7381,11801,3658,44642,45982,29785,43373,36368],"class_list":["post-248703","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-administration-of-justice","tag-high-court","tag-Judges","tag-judicial-system","tag-judicial-workload","tag-law","tag-madras","tag-malicious-prosecution"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Madras HC | &quot;Not fair to expect judges to expend too much time, energy in proof-reading&quot;: HC stresses counsels should reflect &#039;distilled understanding&#039; while preparing drafts | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Administration of Justice\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/25\/administration-of-justice\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Madras HC | &quot;Not fair to expect judges to expend too much time, energy in proof-reading&quot;: HC stresses counsels should reflect &#039;distilled understanding&#039; while preparing drafts\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Administration of Justice\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/25\/administration-of-justice\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-05-25T16:21:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-06-04T06:38:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/madras-high-court1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/25\/administration-of-justice\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/25\/administration-of-justice\/\",\"name\":\"Madras HC | \\\"Not fair to expect judges to expend too much time, energy in proof-reading\\\": HC stresses counsels should reflect 'distilled understanding' while preparing drafts | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-05-25T16:21:01+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-06-04T06:38:10+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"description\":\"Administration of Justice\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/25\/administration-of-justice\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/25\/administration-of-justice\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/25\/administration-of-justice\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Madras HC | &#8220;Not fair to expect judges to expend too much time, energy in proof-reading&#8221;: HC stresses counsels should reflect &#8216;distilled understanding&#8217; while preparing drafts\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Madras HC | \"Not fair to expect judges to expend too much time, energy in proof-reading\": HC stresses counsels should reflect 'distilled understanding' while preparing drafts | SCC Times","description":"Administration of Justice","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/25\/administration-of-justice\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Madras HC | \"Not fair to expect judges to expend too much time, energy in proof-reading\": HC stresses counsels should reflect 'distilled understanding' while preparing drafts","og_description":"Administration of Justice","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/25\/administration-of-justice\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-05-25T16:21:01+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-06-04T06:38:10+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/madras-high-court1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/25\/administration-of-justice\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/25\/administration-of-justice\/","name":"Madras HC | \"Not fair to expect judges to expend too much time, energy in proof-reading\": HC stresses counsels should reflect 'distilled understanding' while preparing drafts | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-05-25T16:21:01+00:00","dateModified":"2021-06-04T06:38:10+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"description":"Administration of Justice","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/25\/administration-of-justice\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/25\/administration-of-justice\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/25\/administration-of-justice\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Madras HC | &#8220;Not fair to expect judges to expend too much time, energy in proof-reading&#8221;: HC stresses counsels should reflect &#8216;distilled understanding&#8217; while preparing drafts"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":248691,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/25\/malicious-prosecution\/","url_meta":{"origin":248703,"position":0},"title":"Madras HC | Who is liable in suit for malicious prosecution; what is duty of civil court; where lies onus of proof? HC answers all,\u00a0 says no &#8216;second agnipariksha&#8217; for plaintiff","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 25, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court: G.R. Swaminathan, J., held that to succeed in a suit for malicious prosecution, the acquittal of the plaintiff alone is not sufficient. Rather, the plaintiff is obliged to prove (i) that the prosecution was without any reasonable and probable cause, and (ii) that it was instituted with\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":310432,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/31\/sc-compromise-between-parties-is-not-termination-of-proceedings-in-a-suit-for-malicious-prosecution-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":248703,"position":1},"title":"Never Reported Judgment| Compromise between parties is not termination of proceedings in a suit for malicious prosecution [(1952) 2 SCC 446]","author":"Editor","date":"December 31, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"This report covers the Supreme Court's Never Reported Judgment dating back to the year 1952 on malicious prosecution.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cases Reported&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"compromise not termination of proceedings in malicious prosecution","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/compromise-not-termination-of-proceedings-in-malicious-prosecution.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/compromise-not-termination-of-proceedings-in-malicious-prosecution.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/compromise-not-termination-of-proceedings-in-malicious-prosecution.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/compromise-not-termination-of-proceedings-in-malicious-prosecution.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":325301,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/28\/jharkhand-hc-quashes-criminal-proceedings-against-century-cement\/","url_meta":{"origin":248703,"position":2},"title":"\u2018Typical example of frivolous litigants abusing the Court process\u2019; Jharkhand HC quashes criminal proceedings against Century Cement","author":"Arushi","date":"June 28, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court stated that when the case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 was already filed by the petitioners, Respondent 2 had all the opportunity to defend in that pending complaint case, and without doing so, present complaint case was filed implicating the petitioners.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Jharkhand High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":234721,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/24\/del-hc-website-publishing-malicious-and-defamatory-articles-against-daniel-snyder-directed-to-take-down-such-articles\/","url_meta":{"origin":248703,"position":3},"title":"Del HC | Website publishing malicious and defamatory articles against Daniel Snyder, directed to take down such articles","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 24, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Mukta Gupta, J., granted ad-interim injunction and directed the meaww.com to take down defamatory and malicious articles against Daniel Snyder. Plaintiff sought exemption from filing the originals documents and attested affidavits in support of the plaint, statement of truth and the certificate under Section 65-B of the Indian\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":325480,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/02\/by-passing-procedures-quashing-criminal-prosecution-obtaining-apology-letter-for-violence-inside-college-campus-teachers-not-interest-of-justice-madras-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":248703,"position":4},"title":"Quashing criminal prosecution by obtaining apology letter for violence inside college campus by teachers is not in interest of justice: Madras HC","author":"Apoorva","date":"July 2, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhen the specific overt act attracting prosecution for criminal offence been made out by the prosecution, if at all the accused wants to plead guilty, it should be done in the manner known to law under Section 482 of CrPC\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":233887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/13\/cal-hc-plea-of-absolute-privilege-protects-a-statement-in-civil-defamation-however-false-and-defamatory-it-may-be-even-though-made-with-malicious-motive\/","url_meta":{"origin":248703,"position":5},"title":"Cal HC | Plea of absolute privilege protects a statement in civil defamation, however false and defamatory it may be, even though made with malicious motive","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 13, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court:\u00a0Debangsu Basak, J., while addressing a matter with regard to defamation, observed that \"in a civil action for defamation, the plea of absolute privilege protects a statement as no action would lie for it, however false and defamatory it may be, even though, it was made maliciously and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/248703","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=248703"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/248703\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=248703"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=248703"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=248703"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}