{"id":248620,"date":"2021-05-24T12:34:31","date_gmt":"2021-05-24T07:04:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=248620"},"modified":"2021-06-04T12:23:36","modified_gmt":"2021-06-04T06:53:36","slug":"trade-mark","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/24\/trade-mark\/","title":{"rendered":"[Name-Logo Dispute] Telangana HC | \u2018GSK\u2019 being widely known mark: GSK Life Sciences (P) Ltd. ordered to suitably delete word \u2018GSK\u2019; No violation of S. 35, TM Act found"},"content":{"rendered":"

Telangana High Court: <\/strong>Abhinand Kumar Shavili, J., addressed a matter wherein the name and logo of a company were in dispute.<\/p>\n

Instant petition was filed to seek a writ of mandamus.<\/p>\n

Petitioner\u2019s contention was that it is a registered company under the Companies Act, 1956. Respondent 3 approached the 2nd<\/sup> respondent under Section 22 of the Companies Act (now Section 16 of the new Companies Act, 2013) disputing the name and logo of the petitioner as the same was resembling with the 3rd<\/sup> respondents\u2019 name and logo.<\/p>\n

Analysis and Decision<\/u>\u00a0<\/u><\/span><\/h3>\n

GSK \u2013 Widely Known<\/u><\/span><\/h4>\n

Bench stated that 2nd<\/sup> respondent had rightly passed orders directing the petitioner to change the name suitably by deleting the word \u2018GSK\u2019 from its existing name as it was similar to that of 3rd<\/sup> respondent and was widely known as GSK even prior to the incorporation of the petitioner-company.<\/p>\n

What had 2nd<\/sup> respondent Ordered?<\/em><\/p>\n

2nd<\/sup> respondent had ordered the name of the petitioner\u2019s company be changed suitably by deleting the word \u2018GSK\u2019 from its existing name within a period of 3 months from the date of that order.<\/p>\n

Contention of \u2018Limitation\u2019 \u2013 Rejected<\/em><\/p>\n

With regard to the contention of limitation raised by the petitioner that the application filed by respondent 3 before 2nd<\/sup> respondent was barred by limitation, Court noted that the said application was filed under the old Act where the period of limitation was 5 years and the petitioner\u2019s company was incorporated in 2008, whereas the 3rd<\/sup> respondent had filed an application before the 2nd<\/sup> respondent in 2012 which would mean that 3rd<\/sup> respondent has filed well within the period of limitation<\/p>\n

Contention with respect to \u2013Orders passed by 2nd respondent contrary to Trade Marks Act, 1999<\/em><\/p>\n

Petitioner failed to show how Section 35 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 was being violated, more so, petitioner itself was not registered under the Trade Marks Act, 1999. Hence the said contention was also rejected.<\/p>\n

Therefore, in view of the above, Court did not find it appropriate to interfere with the case of the petitioner and the petition was dismissed. [G.S.K. Life Sciences (P) Ltd. v. Union of \u00a0India, 2021 SCC OnLine TS 634<\/b><\/a>, decided on 20-04-2021]<\/p>\n

\n

Also, Read what Section 35 Trademarks Act, 1999<\/a> is?<\/p>\n

Section 35<\/a>: <\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

Saving for use of name, address or description of goods or services, – Nothing in this Act shall entitle the proprietor or a registered user of a registered trade mark to interfere with any bona fide use by a person of his own name or that of his place of business, or of the name, or of the name of the place of business, of any of his predecessors in \u00a0business, or the use by any person of any bona fide description of the character or quality of his goods or services.\u201d <\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Telangana High Court: Abhinand Kumar Shavili, J., addressed a matter wherein the name and logo of a company were in dispute. Instant <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[9271,45953,27643,29785,32057,33941,3221],"class_list":["post-248620","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-copyright","tag-gsk","tag-intellectual-property","tag-law","tag-limitation-period","tag-telangana-high-court","tag-Trademark"],"yoast_head":"\n[Name-Logo Dispute] Telangana HC | \u2018GSK\u2019 being widely known mark: GSK Life Sciences (P) Ltd. ordered to suitably delete word \u2018GSK\u2019; No violation of S. 35, TM Act found | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Trade Mark\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/24\/trade-mark\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"[Name-Logo Dispute] Telangana HC | \u2018GSK\u2019 being widely known mark: GSK Life Sciences (P) Ltd. ordered to suitably delete word \u2018GSK\u2019; No violation of S. 35, TM Act found\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Trade Mark\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/24\/trade-mark\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-05-24T07:04:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-06-04T06:53:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/AP-TELANGANA-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/24\/trade-mark\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/24\/trade-mark\/\",\"name\":\"[Name-Logo Dispute] Telangana HC | \u2018GSK\u2019 being widely known mark: GSK Life Sciences (P) Ltd. ordered to suitably delete word \u2018GSK\u2019; No violation of S. 35, TM Act found | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-05-24T07:04:31+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-06-04T06:53:36+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"description\":\"Trade Mark\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/24\/trade-mark\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/24\/trade-mark\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/24\/trade-mark\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"[Name-Logo Dispute] Telangana HC | \u2018GSK\u2019 being widely known mark: GSK Life Sciences (P) Ltd. ordered to suitably delete word \u2018GSK\u2019; No violation of S. 35, TM Act found\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"[Name-Logo Dispute] Telangana HC | \u2018GSK\u2019 being widely known mark: GSK Life Sciences (P) Ltd. ordered to suitably delete word \u2018GSK\u2019; No violation of S. 35, TM Act found | SCC Times","description":"Trade Mark","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/24\/trade-mark\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"[Name-Logo Dispute] Telangana HC | \u2018GSK\u2019 being widely known mark: GSK Life Sciences (P) Ltd. ordered to suitably delete word \u2018GSK\u2019; No violation of S. 35, TM Act found","og_description":"Trade Mark","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/24\/trade-mark\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-05-24T07:04:31+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-06-04T06:53:36+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/AP-TELANGANA-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/24\/trade-mark\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/24\/trade-mark\/","name":"[Name-Logo Dispute] Telangana HC | \u2018GSK\u2019 being widely known mark: GSK Life Sciences (P) Ltd. ordered to suitably delete word \u2018GSK\u2019; No violation of S. 35, TM Act found | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-05-24T07:04:31+00:00","dateModified":"2021-06-04T06:53:36+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"description":"Trade Mark","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/24\/trade-mark\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/24\/trade-mark\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/24\/trade-mark\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"[Name-Logo Dispute] Telangana HC | \u2018GSK\u2019 being widely known mark: GSK Life Sciences (P) Ltd. ordered to suitably delete word \u2018GSK\u2019; No violation of S. 35, TM Act found"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":305882,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/28\/delhi-hc-grants-interim-injunction-to-smithkline-beecham-limited-for-its-gsk-mark-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":248620,"position":0},"title":"Delhi High Court grants interim injunction to SmithKline Beecham Limited for its \u2018GSK\u2019 mark","author":"Editor","date":"October 28, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cConsidering that the plaintiff operates in the pharmaceutical and medicinal sector and is also registered for the \u2018GSK\u2019 mark, the use of an identical mark, especially in an identical colour combination, is clearly dishonest and mala fide.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":282948,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/02\/section-138-ni-act-compounding-of-offence-amicable-settlement-dispute-memorandum-of-undertsnading-concivtion-confirm-telangana-high-court-supreme-court-legal-research-updates-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":248620,"position":1},"title":"Section 138 NI Act| Conviction cannot be confirmed once parties enter into MoU for amicable settlement of dispute: Supreme Court","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"February 2, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court observed that such settlement is nothing but a compounding of the offence and hence, the Court cannot override such compounding and impose its will.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Section 138 NI Act| Conviction cannot be confirmed once parties enter into MoU for amicable settlement of dispute: Supreme Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-255.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":268722,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/20\/tel-hc-interim-protection-under-s-9-ac-act-for-a-commercial-dispute-to-be-sought-in-a-commercial-court-only\/","url_meta":{"origin":248620,"position":2},"title":"Telangana HC | Interim protection under S. 9 A&C Act for a commercial dispute to be sought in a commercial court only","author":"Editor","date":"June 20, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Telangana High Court: The Division Bench of P. Naveen Rao and Sambasivarao Naidu, JJ. allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned order holding a dispute arising out of an agreement concerning immovable property which is exclusively used in trade or commerce and whose \u2018specified value\u2019 is more than one\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":325067,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/25\/court-must-give-reasons-for-releasing-amount-u-s-19-msme-act-telhc\/","url_meta":{"origin":248620,"position":3},"title":"Court must give reasons for releasing the amount under Section 19 of MSME Act, 2006: Telangana High Court","author":"Simranjeet","date":"June 25, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court is empowered to permit release of such percentage of amount under Section 19 of the MSME Act, 2006, deposited to the supplier as it considers reasonable under the circumstances of the case, subject to such condition as it deems necessary to impose.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Telangana High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Telangana-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":313393,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/08\/limitation-period-for-arbitration-to-be-decided-by-arbitral-tribunal-while-passing-order-u-s-20-ac-act-telhc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":248620,"position":4},"title":"\u2018Limitation period for arbitration to be decided by Arbitral Tribunal while passing order u\/s 20 of A&C Act\u2019; Telangana HC appoints nominee arbitrator u\/s 11(6)","author":"Simranjeet","date":"February 8, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIt is a well-settled law that while deciding the question of appointment of arbitrator, the Court shall not touch the merits of the case as it may cause prejudice to the case of the parties.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"telangana high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/telangana-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/telangana-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/telangana-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/telangana-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":320553,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/22\/supreme-court-imposes-5-lakhs-cost-telangana-classic-case-officials-expected-protect-preserve-forests-abdicated-their-role\/","url_meta":{"origin":248620,"position":5},"title":"Supreme Court imposes Rs. 5 lakhs cost on Telangana for abdication of duty to protect and preserve forests","author":"Apoorva","date":"April 22, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cHuman beings indulge themselves in selective amnesia when it comes to fathom the significance of forests. It is the forests which give life to the Earth by replacing carbon dioxide with oxygen, thereby providing a hospitable environment for the steady growth of diverse life forms.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"5 lakhs cost on State of Telangana","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/5-lakhs-cost-on-State-of-Telangana.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/5-lakhs-cost-on-State-of-Telangana.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/5-lakhs-cost-on-State-of-Telangana.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/5-lakhs-cost-on-State-of-Telangana.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/248620","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=248620"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/248620\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=248620"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=248620"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=248620"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}