{"id":248340,"date":"2021-05-18T09:00:31","date_gmt":"2021-05-18T03:30:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=248340"},"modified":"2021-05-21T11:46:57","modified_gmt":"2021-05-21T06:16:57","slug":"sexual-harassment-at-workplacetri-hc-tribunal-is-the-court-of-first-instance-not-open-for-the-litigant-to-approach-the-high-court-as-a-court-of-first-instance","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/18\/sexual-harassment-at-workplacetri-hc-tribunal-is-the-court-of-first-instance-not-open-for-the-litigant-to-approach-the-high-court-as-a-court-of-first-instance\/","title":{"rendered":"[Sexual harassment at Workplace]Tri HC| Tribunal is the court of first instance; Not open for the litigant to approach the High Court as a court of first instance"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Tripura High Court:<\/strong> Arindam Lodh, J., dismissed a petition which was filed by the petitioner to resolve her grievance in consonance with the provisions of the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The petitioner was posted at Indian Council of Agricultural Research Centre [ICAR] for North Eastern Hills Region, Tripura Centre and during her service she had submitted a complaint on 05-12-2018 alleging sexual harassment as contemplated under Section 9 of the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 [Act of 2013]. After which internal complaints committee had submitted its report where the committee had exonerated the respondent 6. The petitioner then had preferred an appeal against the said recommendation by the committee under Section 18(1) of the Act of 2013. Since the said statutory appeal is still not disposed off, the petitioner had approached this court by way of invoking the jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00a0Mr B. Majumder, Assistant S.G., counsel for the respondent had raised a preliminary objection in regard to the jurisdiction of this court to grant the reliefs as sought for by the petitioner. He had contended that the grievances of the petitioner related to \u201cservice matters\u201d and in view of notification under Section 14(2) of the A.T. Act, the appropriate forum was the CAT being the court of first instance for the purpose of adjudication of disputes relating to \u201cservice matters\u201d.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The main argument of the counsel of the petitioner, Mr . Somik Deb and Mr S. Bhattacharjee on the question of maintainability was that the petitioner being aggrieved of the recommendation made by the Local Complaints Committee had preferred an appeal and since the appeal was not disposed off for a considerable period of time, the petitioner approached this court for a direction upon the concerned respondents to dispose of the appeal within a certain period of time. However, it was noticed that at prayer 2 of the writ petition, the petitioner had sought for a direction upon the appellate authority to accept the additional ground on the report of the External Committee. He further contended that that subject of sexual harassment has not been included in the definition of \u201cservice matters\u201d as contemplated under Section 3(q) of the A.T.Act, 1985.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court opined that Section 11 of the Act of 2013 makes it clear that where the \u2018respondent\u2019 is an employee and the Internal Committee or the Local Committee proceeds to make inquiry into the complaint, it will be an inquiry in accordance with the provisions of service rules. Thus, the intention of the legislature was to make an inquiry into the complaint in accordance with the provisions of the service rules. <em>The proceedings undertaken by the Internal Complaints Committee of the respondent No.2 and the reports of the Committee thereof [Annexure 5 to the writ petition], on the face of it reveals that the Committee has taken into account the service rules i.e. CCS (CCA) Rules and CCS (Conduct) Rules. Section 19(i) of the Act of 2013 makes it clear that the employer is duty bound to treat sexual harassment as a \u2018misconduct\u2019 under the service rule and initiate action for such \u2018misconduct\u2019. Section 13(2) further makes it clear that where the Internal Committee or the Local Committee, as the case may be arrives at a conclusion that the allegation against the respondent has not been proved, it shall recommend to the employer that no action is required to be taken in the matter. <\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court found that the bare perusal of the Section 14 of the CAT makes it abundantly clear that all \u201cservice matters\u201d pertaining to service in connection with the affairs of the Union can be decided by the Tribunal.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court while dismissing the petition held that internal inquiry as initiated on the basis of the complaint of the petitioner falls within the ambit of the definitions of \u201cservice matters\u201d. Thus, in the conscious consideration of this court, the Tribunal will have jurisdiction to decide the said aspect. The Court quoted the Constitutional Bench of the Supreme Court in <em>L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India<\/em>, (1997) 3 SCC 261 where it was held that <em>Tribunal is the court of first instance and it will not be open for the litigant to approach the High Court as a court of first instance (Para 93).<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The court explained that the grievance of the petitioner falls within the ambit of \u201cdisciplinary matters\u201d which is inclusive of the definition of \u201cservice matters\u201d as contemplated under Section 3(q) of the A.T.Act,1985.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">[Rekha Das v. Union of India, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/F1XdS8ew\"><b><span id=\"Highlight_0000\" class=\"Highlight\">2021<\/span>\u00a0SCC OnLine Tri 274<\/b><\/a>, decided on 17-05-2021]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>Suchita Shukla, Editorial Assistant has put this report together\u00a0<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Tripura High Court: Arindam Lodh, J., dismissed a petition which was filed by the petitioner to resolve her grievance in consonance with <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[16941,2850,39704],"class_list":["post-248340","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-crime-against-women","tag-sexual_harassment","tag-sexual-harassment-at-work-place"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>[Sexual harassment at Workplace]Tri HC| Tribunal is the court of first instance; Not open for the litigant to approach the High Court as a court of first instance | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/18\/sexual-harassment-at-workplacetri-hc-tribunal-is-the-court-of-first-instance-not-open-for-the-litigant-to-approach-the-high-court-as-a-court-of-first-instance\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"[Sexual harassment at Workplace]Tri HC| Tribunal is the court of first instance; Not open for the litigant to approach the High Court as a court of first instance\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Tripura High Court: Arindam Lodh, J., dismissed a petition which was filed by the petitioner to resolve her grievance in consonance with\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/18\/sexual-harassment-at-workplacetri-hc-tribunal-is-the-court-of-first-instance-not-open-for-the-litigant-to-approach-the-high-court-as-a-court-of-first-instance\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-05-18T03:30:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-05-21T06:16:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/Tripura-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/18\/sexual-harassment-at-workplacetri-hc-tribunal-is-the-court-of-first-instance-not-open-for-the-litigant-to-approach-the-high-court-as-a-court-of-first-instance\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/18\/sexual-harassment-at-workplacetri-hc-tribunal-is-the-court-of-first-instance-not-open-for-the-litigant-to-approach-the-high-court-as-a-court-of-first-instance\/\",\"name\":\"[Sexual harassment at Workplace]Tri HC| Tribunal is the court of first instance; Not open for the litigant to approach the High Court as a court of first instance | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-05-18T03:30:31+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-05-21T06:16:57+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/18\/sexual-harassment-at-workplacetri-hc-tribunal-is-the-court-of-first-instance-not-open-for-the-litigant-to-approach-the-high-court-as-a-court-of-first-instance\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/18\/sexual-harassment-at-workplacetri-hc-tribunal-is-the-court-of-first-instance-not-open-for-the-litigant-to-approach-the-high-court-as-a-court-of-first-instance\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/18\/sexual-harassment-at-workplacetri-hc-tribunal-is-the-court-of-first-instance-not-open-for-the-litigant-to-approach-the-high-court-as-a-court-of-first-instance\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"[Sexual harassment at Workplace]Tri HC| Tribunal is the court of first instance; Not open for the litigant to approach the High Court as a court of first instance\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"[Sexual harassment at Workplace]Tri HC| Tribunal is the court of first instance; Not open for the litigant to approach the High Court as a court of first instance | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/18\/sexual-harassment-at-workplacetri-hc-tribunal-is-the-court-of-first-instance-not-open-for-the-litigant-to-approach-the-high-court-as-a-court-of-first-instance\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"[Sexual harassment at Workplace]Tri HC| Tribunal is the court of first instance; Not open for the litigant to approach the High Court as a court of first instance","og_description":"Tripura High Court: Arindam Lodh, J., dismissed a petition which was filed by the petitioner to resolve her grievance in consonance with","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/18\/sexual-harassment-at-workplacetri-hc-tribunal-is-the-court-of-first-instance-not-open-for-the-litigant-to-approach-the-high-court-as-a-court-of-first-instance\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-05-18T03:30:31+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-05-21T06:16:57+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/Tripura-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/18\/sexual-harassment-at-workplacetri-hc-tribunal-is-the-court-of-first-instance-not-open-for-the-litigant-to-approach-the-high-court-as-a-court-of-first-instance\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/18\/sexual-harassment-at-workplacetri-hc-tribunal-is-the-court-of-first-instance-not-open-for-the-litigant-to-approach-the-high-court-as-a-court-of-first-instance\/","name":"[Sexual harassment at Workplace]Tri HC| Tribunal is the court of first instance; Not open for the litigant to approach the High Court as a court of first instance | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-05-18T03:30:31+00:00","dateModified":"2021-05-21T06:16:57+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/18\/sexual-harassment-at-workplacetri-hc-tribunal-is-the-court-of-first-instance-not-open-for-the-litigant-to-approach-the-high-court-as-a-court-of-first-instance\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/18\/sexual-harassment-at-workplacetri-hc-tribunal-is-the-court-of-first-instance-not-open-for-the-litigant-to-approach-the-high-court-as-a-court-of-first-instance\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/18\/sexual-harassment-at-workplacetri-hc-tribunal-is-the-court-of-first-instance-not-open-for-the-litigant-to-approach-the-high-court-as-a-court-of-first-instance\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"[Sexual harassment at Workplace]Tri HC| Tribunal is the court of first instance; Not open for the litigant to approach the High Court as a court of first instance"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":226014,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/21\/madras-hc-sexual-harassment-of-women-at-workplace-prevention-prohibition-and-redressal-act-2013-cannot-be-misused-by-women-to-harass-someone-with-non-existent-allegations\/","url_meta":{"origin":248340,"position":0},"title":"Madras HC | POSH Act cannot be misused by women to harass someone with non-existent allegations","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 21, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court: A Division Bench of M. Sathyanarayanan and R. Hemalatha, JJ., while addressing the issue of Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace, held that, \u201cSexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 is intended to have an equal standing for women in the work\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":240363,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/09\/ker-hc-will-provisions-of-posh-2013-cover-only-an-express-or-implied-sexual-advance-sexual-undertone-or-unwelcome-behaviour-which-has-a-sexual-tone-behind-it-under-its-umbrella-lets-read-what\/","url_meta":{"origin":248340,"position":1},"title":"Ker HC | Will provisions of POSH, 2013 cover only an express or implied sexual advance, sexual undertone or unwelcome behaviour which has a sexual tone behind it under its umbrella? Let&#8217;s read what HC says","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 9, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court:\u00a0The Division Bench of A.M. Shaffique and Gopinath P., JJ., while observing a matter in regard to sexual harassment at workplace stated that, In order to take action under the 2013 Act, the acts complained of should come within the purview of Section 2(n) and Section 3 of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":220736,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/11\/aspiring-safer-workplaces-blindspot-in-the-sexual-harassment-law-in-india\/","url_meta":{"origin":248340,"position":2},"title":"Aspiring Safer Workplaces; Blindspot in the sexual harassment law in India\u00a0","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 11, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"by Simran Jain\u2020","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/image-123.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/image-123.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/image-123.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/image-123.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/image-123.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":269830,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/08\/need-for-inclusion-of-lgbtqia-under-the-sexual-harassment-of-women-at-workplace-prevention-prohibition-and-redressal-act-2013\/","url_meta":{"origin":248340,"position":3},"title":"Need for Inclusion of LGBTQIA+ under the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 8, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"by Dr Manika Kamthan*","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Op Ed","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/Op_Ed_by_Manika_Kamthan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/Op_Ed_by_Manika_Kamthan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/Op_Ed_by_Manika_Kamthan.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/Op_Ed_by_Manika_Kamthan.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/Op_Ed_by_Manika_Kamthan.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":251596,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/22\/sexual-harassment-3\/","url_meta":{"origin":248340,"position":4},"title":"Kar HC | A Mangalore University professor being accused of sexual harassment by a student; Court observes \u201cHe that takes the procedural sword shall perish with that sword\u201d","author":"Editor","date":"July 22, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: M Nagprasanna, J., allowed the petition and quashed the impugned second show cause notice holding The University is at liberty to initiate proceedings against the petitioner under the Service Rules by following the procedures stipulated therein. The petitioner presently working in the cadre of Professor at the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":276542,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/03\/posh-delhi-high-court-baffling-to-see-that-a-law-graduate-himself-demands-assistance-of-person-with-legal-background-for-enquiry-before-icc\/","url_meta":{"origin":248340,"position":5},"title":"[POSH] Delhi High Court | Baffling to see that a law graduate himself demands assistance of person with legal background for enquiry before Internal Complaints Committee","author":"Editor","date":"November 3, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"If the Court would allow such an interpretation, then this provision would become redundant, and a floodgate of law graduates, who may not be enrolled with the bar councils to become an \u2018advocate\u2019 but are still practicing law, would pour in. The purpose of keeping the proceedings fact-based and free\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"competitive exam","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/248340","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=248340"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/248340\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=248340"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=248340"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=248340"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}