{"id":248282,"date":"2022-05-16T10:00:01","date_gmt":"2022-05-16T04:30:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=248282"},"modified":"2022-05-12T20:36:01","modified_gmt":"2022-05-12T15:06:01","slug":"know-thy-judge-justice-m-r-shah","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/16\/know-thy-judge-justice-m-r-shah\/","title":{"rendered":"Know Thy Judge | Justice M. R. Shah"},"content":{"rendered":"

Early life<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n
\n

Born on 16-05-1958, Justice Mukeshkumar Rasikbhai Shah graduated (B.Sc.) in 1979 and completed his LL.B from Gujarat University in 1982. He started his career as an advocate on 19-07-1982 and practiced in the Gujarat High Court in Civil, Criminal, Constitutional, Taxation, Labour, Service and Company matters and specialized in Land, Constitutional, Education, Excise, Custom matters.[1]<\/a><\/p>\n

Later on, Justice M R Shah was appointed as an Additional Judge of the Gujarat High Court on 07-03-2004 and was made a permanent Judge on 22-06-2005. In August, 2018 he was appointed as Chief Justice of Patna High Court and in the same year, on 02-11-2018 he got elevated as a Judge of the Supreme Court of India. He is due to retire on May 15, 2023.[2]<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Career as an Advocate [1982-2005]<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n
\n

Justice M R Shah practiced as an advocate in the High Court of Gujarat immediately after completing his degree in Law. He was the Additional Standing Counsel for Central government and Retainer Counsel for C.B.I. He had also represented various Municipalities, Nagarpalikas, Panchayats, educational Institutions and Insurance Companies. Having served the High Court of Gujarat as an advocate for more than 20 years, Justice M R Shah had appeared in large number of cases in various branches of law including matters of constitutional importance and involving great public interest.[3]<\/a><\/p>\n

Following are some of the significant cases represented by Justice M R Shah as a counsel:<\/p>\n

Elecon Engineering Co. Ltd. v. Union of India,<\/em> 2002 SCC OnLine Guj 465<\/a><\/p>\n

Alembic Glass Industries Ltd. v. Union of India<\/em>, 2002 SCC OnLine Guj 457<\/a><\/p>\n

Rutu Auto Gas Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India<\/em>, 2000 SCC OnLine Guj 498<\/a><\/p>\n

Taluka Development Officer v. Dhurabhai Virabhai Vankar,<\/em> 2002 SCC OnLine Guj 606\u00a0<\/a><\/p>\n

Vira Veja Sondarva v. Conservator of Forest<\/em>, 2000 SCC OnLine Guj 605<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Notable Judgments at High Court of Gujarat [2005-2018]<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n
\n

Gujarat State Road Transport Corpn. v. Firoze M. Mogal, <\/strong>2013 SCC OnLine Guj 8638<\/a><\/p>\n

The 5-judge Bench of Ravi R. Tripathi, Jayant Patel,\u00a0M.R. Shah, J.B. Pardiwala and A.G. Uraizee, JJ. had put an end to the controversial issue by holding\u00a0that in a petition for a relief under Article 226 of the Constitution, the Tribunal whose order is impugned in the petition must be made a party to the petition so that the writ sought from the Court can go against the Tribunal but if the petition is for a relief under Article 227 of the Constitution, the Tribunal, whose order is impugned in the petition, need not be made a party to the petition. The jurisdiction which the High Court exercises under Article 227 is of superintendence, a jurisdiction somewhat analogous to the revisional jurisdiction which the High Courts have under diverse statutes. By entertaining a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution, the High Court does not seek to exercise jurisdiction to issue any high prerogative writ.<\/p>\n

\n

Asset Reconstruction Co. (India) Ltd. v. Revenue Authority, <\/strong>2016 SCC OnLine Guj 9228<\/a><\/p>\n

The 3-judge Bench of M.R. Shah, J.B. Pardiwala and N.V. Anjaria, JJ. held that the power of attorney in question and the rights conferred in favour of the power of attorney holder were liable to be and\/or subjected to the stamp duty under Article 45(f) of the Stamp Act. No error and\/or illegality had been committed by the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority in holding that the power of attorney in question is subjected to stamp duty as per Article 45(f) of the Stamp Act.<\/p>\n

\n

Vijaysinh v. State of Gujarat,<\/strong> 2014 SCC OnLine Guj 14498<\/a><\/p>\n

The 3-judge Bench of Jayant Patel,\u00a0M.R. Shah\u00a0and K.S. Jhaveri, JJ. had reached to the findings that if the order of detention is challenged at pre-execution stage under Article 226 of the Constitution, the High Court by way of self-imposed restriction may examine as to whether the case is covered by the criteria laid down by the Apex Court in the case of\u00a0Addl. Secy. To the Govt. of India<\/em>\u00a0v.\u00a0Alka Subhash Gadia (Smt.)<\/em>\u00a0(supra) and\u00a0Deepak Bajaj<\/em>\u00a0v.\u00a0State of Maharashtra<\/em>, reported in\u00a0(2008) 16 SCC 14\u00a0(supra) and thereafter may call for the relevant record from the detaining authority, but such would depend upon sound exercise of judicial discretion of the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution and it cannot be said that in all cases, it would be obligatory for the High Court to satisfy itself as to whether the detention order is passed in consonance with the scheme of the enactment under which the detention order is passed or whether the detention order suffers from the vice of illegality or not, save and except the criteria as laid down by the Apex Court in the case of\u00a0Addl. Secy. To the Govt. of India<\/em>\u00a0v.\u00a0Alka Subhash Gadia (Smt.)<\/em> and\u00a0Deepak Bajaj<\/em>\u00a0v.\u00a0State of Maharashtra<\/em>, reported in\u00a0(2008) 16 SCC 14.<\/p>\n

\n

Miru Adam Rahima v. State of Gujarat,<\/strong> 2006 SCC OnLine Guj 83<\/a><\/p>\n

R.S. Garg and\u00a0M.R. Shah, JJ. challenging the constitutional validity of Section 2(e), definition of \u201cPrivate Armed Force\u201d, Section 3, Section 4 and Section 5 of the Gujarat Prohibition of Maintenance of Private Armed Force Act, 1989 (9 of 1989)\u00a0\u00a0inter alia that a bare perusal of the provisions of law would show that these are ultra vires the Constitution, affect the fundamental rights of the petitioners and the landlords and adversely affect their right to livelihood. A bare reading of Sections 2(e), 3, 4 and 5 do not show that it puts any check on any of the fundamental right of a Simrakha\/member of the Private Armed Force nor does it curtail the rights or makes an onslaught on the rights of a landholder to have a private armed guard. After giving our due and anxious consideration to the provisions of law and for the reasons aforesaid, we do not find any reason to hold that the above-referred provisions are ultra vires the Constitution.<\/p>\n

\n

Remarkable Judgments at the Supreme Court<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n
\n

POCSO Offenders<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Nawabuddin v. State of Uttarakhand<\/strong>, 2022 SCC OnLine SC 161<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

In a case where a 65-year-old man committed aggravated penetrative sexual assault on his 4-year-old neighbor, the bench of MR Shah* and BV Nagarathna, JJ has observed that any act of sexual assault or sexual harassment to the children should be viewed very seriously and all such offences of sexual assault, sexual harassment on the children have to be dealt with in a stringent manner and no leniency should be shown to a person who has committed the offence under the POCSO Act.<\/p>\n

Read more\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

Bullet Train Project\u00a0 <\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

National High Speed Rail Corporation Limited v. Montecarlo Ltd.,<\/strong> 2022 SCC OnLine SC 111<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

In the Bullet Train Project case where Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) had rejected Montecarlo Limited\u2019s technical bid, the bench of MR Shah*<\/strong> and AS Bopanna, JJ., held that under the contractual obligation, it was not open for National High Speed Rail Corporation Limited (NHSRCL) and\/or even the Republic of India to deviate from any of the terms and conditions of the loan agreement and\/or the decision of JICC\/JICA.
\nRead more\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

Retrospective Applicability of Arbitration Amendment Act, 2015 <\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Ellora Paper Mills Ltd. v. State of Madhya Pradesh<\/strong>, 2022 SCC OnLine SC 8<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

Applying the rule against bias and neutrality of the Arbitrator, the Division Bench of M.R. Shah*<\/strong> and B.V. Nagarathna, jj., reiterated that when the arbitration clause is found to be foul with Section 12 (5), the appointment of the arbitrator would be beyond the pale of the arbitration agreement.<\/p>\n

Read more\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

Conundrum of res judicata<\/em> and rejection of plaint <\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Srihari Hanumandas Totala v. Hemant Vithal Kamat<\/strong>, 2021 SCC OnLine SC 565<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

A Division Bench comprising of Dr D.Y. Chandrachud and M.R. Shah, JJ. upheld the order of the Karnataka High Court whereby an application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC (Rejection of plaint<\/em>) filed by the appellant was dismissed.\u00a0 While deciding the appeal, the Supreme Court summarised the guiding principles for deciding an application under Order 7 Rule 11(d<\/em>) of CPC.<\/p>\n

Read more\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

Kerala Assembly Ruckus<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

State of Kerala v. K. Ajith<\/strong>, 2021 SCC OnLine SC 510<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

A Division Bench of Dr D.Y. Chandrachud and M.R. Shah, JJ. upheld the order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvananthapuram, who refused to consent to the application filed by the Public Prosecutor under Section 321 CrPC for withdrawal of a criminal case filed against six MLAs in relation to the ruckus and damage of public property caused by them in an unfortunate incident that occurred in the Kerala Legislative Assembly in March 2015.<\/p>\n

All attempts of the accused MLAs seeking\u00a0to claim immunity under Article 194 of the Constitution of India were rejected by the Supreme Court while observing:<\/p>\n

\u201cPrivileges and immunities are not gateways to claim exemptions from the general law of the land, particularly as in this case, the criminal law which governs the action of every citizen.\u201d<\/p>\n

<\/em>Read more\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Fake Compensation Claims <\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Safiq Ahmed v. ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd.,<\/strong> 2021 SCC OnLine SC 1259<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

After it was brought to the Court\u2019s notice that several fake claim petitions were being filed for getting compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act as well as under the Workmen Compensation Act, the bench of MR Shah and Sanjiv Khanna, JJ has issues notice to the Ministry of Transport, Government of India seeking its response and suggestions on how to curb the menace of filing false\/fake claim petitions.<\/p>\n

Read more\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

[Covid-19] <\/strong>National Task Force<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Union of India v. Rakesh Malhotra, <\/strong>2021 SCC OnLine SC 375<\/a><\/p>\n

With the number of COVID-19 cases skyrocketing and nation facing severe shortage of oxygen, leading to several deaths, the bench of Dr. DY Chandrachud and MR Shah, JJ has set up a 12-member National Task Force to\u00a0<\/strong>formulate a methodology for the scientific allocation of oxygen to the States and UTs.<\/p>\n

(i) The methodology adopted by the Union Government for computing the requirement of oxygen of the States and Union Territories1 ; (ii) The need to manage available resources of oxygen to optimise their availability for the National Capital Territory of Delhi2 , which is dependent on: \u00b7 An efficient supply chain; \u00b7 Proper distribution of oxygen from the supply points to hospitals; and \u00b7 Building buffer stocks of oxygen; and (iii) Actual availability of oxygen.<\/p>\n

Read more…<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Permanent Commission to Women in Army<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Lt. Col. Nitisha v. Union of India,<\/strong>\u00a02021 SCC OnLine SC 261<\/a><\/p>\n

In major win for women Officer in Indian Army, the division bench of\u00a0Dr. DY Chandrachud*<\/strong>\u00a0and MR Shah, JJ has held that the administrative requirement imposed by the Indian Army authorities while considering the case of the Women Short Service Commissions Officers (WSSCO) for the grant of Permanent Commission (PC), of benchmarking these officers with the officers lowest in merit in the corresponding male batch is arbitrary and irrational. The Court hence, directed that the such requirement shall not be enforced while implementing the decision in\u00a0Secretary, Ministry of Defence v. Babita Puniya;,\u00a0<\/strong>(2020) 7 SCC 469<\/a>.<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/strong>Read more…<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Loan Moratorium Case<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Small Scale Industries Manufacturers Association v. Union of India,<\/strong>\u00a02021 SCC OnLine SC 246<\/a><\/p>\n

In an important verdict concerning the Small Scale Industries, particularly the MSMEs, facing the financial strain due to the Corona Virus Pandemic, the 3-judge bench of Ashok Bhushan, R. Subhash Reddy and\u00a0MR Shah*,<\/strong>\u00a0JJ has held that there shall not be any charge of interest on interest\/compound interest\/penal interest from any of the borrowers who availed RBI\u2019s loan moratorium scheme for the period between March 1, 2020 till August 31, 2020 during the COVID-19 lockdown. The Court held that whatever the amount is recovered by way of interest on interest\/compound interest\/penal interest for the period during the moratorium, the same shall be refunded and be adjusted\/given credit in the next instalment of the loan account.<\/p>\n

The Court, however, refused to extend the moratorium period and also refused to grant the relief of total waiver of interest.\u00a0<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

Read more…<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Insolvency Bankruptcy Code <\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Arun Kumar Jagatramka v. Jindal Steel and Power Ltd<\/strong>.,<\/strong>\u00a02021 SCC OnLine SC 220<\/a><\/p>\n

The bench of\u00a0Dr. DY Chandrachud*<\/strong>\u00a0and MR Shah, JJ has held that a person who is ineligible under Section 29A of the Insolvency Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) to submit a resolution plan, is also barred from proposing a scheme of compromise and arrangement under Section 230 of the Companies Act, 2013.<\/p>\n

\n

\u201cSection 29A has been construed to be a crucial link in ensuring that the objects of the IBC are not defeated by allowing \u201cineligible persons\u201d, including but not confined to those in the management who have run the company aground, to return in the new avatar of resolution applicants.\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Read more…<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Constitutionality of GST on lotteries <\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Skill Lotto Solutions v. Union of India<\/strong>,\u00a02020 SCC OnLine SC 990<\/a><\/p>\n

The 3-judge bench of Ashok Bhushan, R. Subhash Reddy and MR Shah, JJ has upheld the constitutionality of imposition of GST on lotteries, betting and gambling.<\/p>\n

Whether the inclusion of actionable claim in the definition of goods as given in Section 2(52) of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 is contrary to the legal meaning of goods and unconstitutional?<\/strong><\/h4>\n

The inclusion of actionable claim in definition \u201cgoods\u201d as given in Section 2(52) of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 is not contrary to the legal meaning of goods nor it is in conflict with the definition of goods given under Article 366(12).<\/p>\n

\n

\u201cThe Constitution framers were well aware of the definition of goods as occurring in the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 when the Constitution was enforced. By providing an inclusive definition of goods in Article 366(12), the Constitution framers never intended to give any restrictive meaning of goods.\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Read more…<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

\u00a0<\/strong>Domestic Violence<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

[Satish Chander Ahuja v. Sneha Ahuja,\u00a0<\/strong>2020 SCC OnLine SC 841<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

\u201cThe domestic violence in this country is rampant and several women encounter violence in some form or the other or almost every day, however, it is the least reported form of cruel behavior. A woman resigns her fate to the never-ending cycle of enduring violence and discrimination as a daughter, a sister, a wife, a mother, a partner or a single woman in her lifetime.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Answering important question pertaining to the interpretation and working of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (DV Act) in relation to right of residence in the shared household, the 3-judge bench of Ashok Bhushan, R. Subhash Reddy and MR Shah, JJ has held that<\/p>\n

\n

\u201cThe living of woman in a household has to refer to a living which has some permanency. Mere fleeting or casual living at different places shall not make a shared household.\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Read more…<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Coparcenary Rights of Daughters<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma,\u00a0<\/strong>(2020) 9 SCC 1 ]<\/strong><\/p>\n

The 3-judge bench of Arun Mishra, SA Nazeer and MR Shah, JJheld that daughters have right in coparcenary by birth and that it is not necessary that the father coparcener should be living when the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 came into force.<\/p>\n

\n

\u201cThe conferral of right is by birth, and the rights are given in the same manner with incidents of coparcenary as that of a son and she is treated as a coparcener in the same manner with the same rights as if she had been a son at the time of birth.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Read more…<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Kunal Kamra and Rachita Taneja contempt cases\u00a0<\/a><\/h4>\n

Shrirang Katneshwarkar v. Kunal Kamra<\/strong>,\u00a02020 SCC OnLine SC 1041<\/a>\u00a0and\u00a0<\/strong>Aditya Kashyap v. Rachita Taneja<\/strong>,\u00a02020 SCC OnLine SC 1042\u00a0<\/a><\/p>\n

The 3-judge bench of Ashok Bhushan, R. Subhash Reddy and MR Shah, JJ issued notice to cartoonist Rachita Taneja and comedian Kunal Kamra in two separate cases relating contemptuous social media posts. Read more…<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Death Row Convicts<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Ankush Maruti Shinde v. State of Maharashtra,<\/strong>\u00a02019 SCC OnLine SC 317<\/a><\/p>\n

The 3-judge bench of Dr. AK Sikri, SA Nazeer and\u00a0MR Shah<\/strong>, JJ has acquitted 6 death row convicts and has directed reinvestigation in a crime that was committed in June, 2003. The Court was hearing the case where 5 people were brutally killed and a woman was raped. However, the accused were falsely implicated in the matter as they were all nomadic tribes coming from the lower strata of the society and are very poor labourers.<\/p>\n

Read more…<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

\u00a0<\/strong>Judgments of the Constitution Bench of which Justice M R Shah has been part of<\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/h3>\n
\n

Land Acquisition<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Indore Development Authority v. Manohar Lal Sharma,<\/strong>\u00a02020 SCC OnLine SC 316<\/a><\/p>\n

In a landmark ruling the 5-judge bench of Arun Mishra, Indira Banerjee, Vineet Saran, MR Shah, and Ravindra Bhat, JJ has unanimously held that\u00a0the land owners who had refused to accept compensation or who sought reference for higher compensation, cannot claim that the acquisition proceedings had lapsed under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013<\/em>\u00a0(Land Acquisition Act, 2013).<\/p>\n

The bench also held that under the provisions of Section 24(1)(a) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, in case the award is not made as on 1.1.2014, the date of commencement of Act of 2013, there is no lapse of proceedings. Compensation has to be determined under the provisions of Act of 2013. <\/strong><\/p>\n

Read more…<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Sub-classification of Scheduled Castes<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

State of Punjab v. Davinder Singh,\u00a02020 SCC OnLine SC 677<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

\n

“The aspiration of equal treatment of the lowest strata, to whom the fruits of the reservation have not effectively reached, remains a dream. At the same time, various castes by and large remain where they were, and they remain unequals, are they destined to carry their backwardness till eternity?\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

After noticing that a 5-Judge Bench in\u00a0E.V. Chinnaiah v. State of A.P.,<\/strong>\u00a0(2005) 1 SCC 394<\/strong><\/a>, is required to be revisited, the 5-judge bench of Arun Mishra, Indira Banerjee, Vineet Saran, MR Shah and Aniruddha Bose, JJ has referred the matter to a larger bench. While doing so, the Court observed:<\/p>\n

\n

\u201cReservation was not contemplated for all the time by the framers of the Constitution.\u00a0 On the one hand, there is no exclusion of those who have come up, on the other hand, if sub\u00acclassification is denied, it would defeat right to equality by treating unequal as equal. \u201c<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Read more…<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

\u00a0Applicability of SARFAESI Act to Co\u00adoperative Banks<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Pandurang Ganpati Chaugale v. Vishwasrao Patil Murgud Sahakari Bank Ltd,\u00a0\u00a02020 SCC OnLine SC 431\u00a0<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

The 5-judge bench of Arun Mishra, Indira Banerjee, Vineet Saran, MR Shah and Aniruddha Bose, JJ has held that<\/p>\n

\n

\u201c\u2019banking\u2019 relating to co\u00adoperatives can be included within the purview of Entry 45 of List I, and it cannot be said to be over inclusion to cover provisions of recovery by co\u00adoperative banks in the SARFAESI Act.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Read more…<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

\n

NDPS Act <\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Mukesh v. State (Narcotic Branch of Delhi),<\/strong>\u00a02020 SCC OnLine SC 700<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

The 5-judge Constitution bench of Arun Mishra, Indira Banerjee, Vineet Saran, MR Shah and S. Ravindra Bhat, JJ has held that the accused under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) is not entitled to an acquittal as a blanket rule merely because the complainant is the investigating officer. The Court said that<\/p>\n

\n

\u201c\u2026 merely because the informant is the investigator, by that itself the investigation would not suffer the vice of unfairness or bias and therefore on the sole ground that informant is the investigator, the accused is not entitled to acquittal. The matter has to be decided on a case to case basis.\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Read more…<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

U.P. Sugar Mill<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

West UP Sugar Mills Association v. State of Uttar Pradesh,<\/strong>\u00a02020 SCC OnLine SC 380<\/a><\/p>\n

The 5-judge bench of Arun Mishra, Indira Banerjee and Vineet Saran, M.R. Shah and Aniruddha Bose, JJ., held that once the Central Government having exercised the power under Entries 33 and 34 List III of seventh Schedule and fixed the \u201cminimum price\u201d, the State Government cannot fix the \u201cminimum price\u201d of sugarcane. By virtue of Entries 33 and 34 List III of seventh Schedule, both the Central Government as well as the State Government have the power to fix the price of sugarcane. The Court, however, clarified that<\/p>\n

\n

\u201cit is always open for the State Government to fix the \u201cadvised price\u201d which is always higher than the \u201cminimum price\u201d, in view of the relevant provisions of the Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966, which has been issued in exercise of powers under Section 16 of the U.P. Sugarcane (Regulation of Supply and Purchase) Act, 1953.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Read more…<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

100% reservation for Scheduled Tribe candidates for the post of teachers<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Chebrolu Leela Prasad Rao v. State of Andhra Pradesh,\u00a0<\/strong>2020 SCC OnLine SC 383<\/a><\/p>\n

Holding the Government Office Ms. No.3 dated 10.1.2000 issued by the erstwhile State of Andhra Pradesh providing 100% reservation to the Scheduled Tribe candidates out of whom 33.1\/3% shall be women for the post of teachers in the schools in the scheduled areas in the State of Andhra Pradesh, unconstitutional, the 5-judge bench of Arun Mishra, Indira Banerjee, Vineet Saran, MR Shah and Aniruddha Bose, JJ has held that\u00a0there was no rhyme or reason with the State Government to resort to 100% reservation<\/em><\/strong>.<\/em><\/p>\n

Read more…<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

\u2020Editorial Assistant, EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

[1]<\/a> https:\/\/gujarathighcourt.nic.in\/cjjfull?jid=15<\/a><\/p>\n

[2]<\/a> https:\/\/main.sci.gov.in\/chief-justice-judges<\/a><\/p>\n

[3]<\/a> https:\/\/gujarathighcourt.nic.in\/cjjfull?jid=15<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

by Kamini Sharma\u2020<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":248284,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[38347],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-248282","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-judges-information"],"yoast_head":"\nKnow Thy Judge | Justice M. R. Shah | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/16\/know-thy-judge-justice-m-r-shah\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Know Thy Judge | Justice M. R. Shah\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"by Kamini Sharma\u2020\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/16\/know-thy-judge-justice-m-r-shah\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-05-16T04:30:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-40.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"16 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/16\/know-thy-judge-justice-m-r-shah\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/16\/know-thy-judge-justice-m-r-shah\/\",\"name\":\"Know Thy Judge | Justice M. R. Shah | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/16\/know-thy-judge-justice-m-r-shah\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/16\/know-thy-judge-justice-m-r-shah\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-40.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-05-16T04:30:01+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/16\/know-thy-judge-justice-m-r-shah\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/16\/know-thy-judge-justice-m-r-shah\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/16\/know-thy-judge-justice-m-r-shah\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-40.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-40.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/16\/know-thy-judge-justice-m-r-shah\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Know Thy Judge | Justice M. R. Shah\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Know Thy Judge | Justice M. R. Shah | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/16\/know-thy-judge-justice-m-r-shah\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Know Thy Judge | Justice M. R. Shah","og_description":"by Kamini Sharma\u2020","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/16\/know-thy-judge-justice-m-r-shah\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-05-16T04:30:01+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-40.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"16 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/16\/know-thy-judge-justice-m-r-shah\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/16\/know-thy-judge-justice-m-r-shah\/","name":"Know Thy Judge | Justice M. R. Shah | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/16\/know-thy-judge-justice-m-r-shah\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/16\/know-thy-judge-justice-m-r-shah\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-40.jpg","datePublished":"2022-05-16T04:30:01+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/16\/know-thy-judge-justice-m-r-shah\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/16\/know-thy-judge-justice-m-r-shah\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/16\/know-thy-judge-justice-m-r-shah\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-40.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-40.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/16\/know-thy-judge-justice-m-r-shah\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Know Thy Judge | Justice M. R. Shah"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-40.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":240235,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/05\/justice-g-r-udhwani-of-gujarat-high-court-passes-away-during-covid-19-treatment\/","url_meta":{"origin":248282,"position":0},"title":"Justice G.R. Udhwani of Gujarat High Court passes away during COVID-19 treatment","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 5, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Justice G.R. Udhwani Justice G.R. Udhwani of Gujarat High Court passed away while undergoing treatment for Coronavirus (COVID-19). [Source: PTI] BACKGROUND Born on 25-11-1961 at Ahmedabad in the family of a businessman. Graduated in B.Com from Navgujarat Mahavidhyalaya, Ahmedabad in 1983. Obtained Law Degree from Sir L.A. Shah Law College,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Hot Off The Press"","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/GR-Udhwani.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/GR-Udhwani.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/GR-Udhwani.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/GR-Udhwani.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/GR-Udhwani.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":7110,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/07\/11\/appointment-of-judges-in-the-gujarat-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":248282,"position":1},"title":"Appointment & Transfer of Judges in the Gujarat & Allahabad High Court","author":"Sucheta","date":"July 11, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Shri Justice Subodhkumar Gunvantlal Shah, Shri Justice Satish Hemchandra Vora, and Shri Justice Ghanshyam Raghumal Udhwani, Additional Judges of the Gujarat High Court appointed as the Judges of the Gujarat High Court with effect from the date they assume charge of their respective offices.\u00a0Shri Justice Rajendra Dhirajlal Kothari appointed as\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Appointments & Transfers"","block_context":{"text":"Appointments & Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":297808,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/27\/justice-ashish-jitendra-desai-38th-chief-justice-of-the-high-court-of-kerala\/","url_meta":{"origin":248282,"position":2},"title":"Know Thy Judge | Justice Ashish Jitendra Desai: 38th Chief Justice of the High Court of Kerala","author":"Ritu","date":"July 27, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Justice Ashish J. Desai was appointed as 38th Chief Justice of Kerala High Court and took oath of office on 22-07-2023.","rel":"","context":"In "Know thy Judge"","block_context":{"text":"Know thy Judge","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/judges-information\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"justice ashish jitendra desai","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/justice-ashish-jitendra-desai.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/justice-ashish-jitendra-desai.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/justice-ashish-jitendra-desai.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/justice-ashish-jitendra-desai.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":292255,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/15\/supreme-court-of-india-know-thy-judge-justice-mr-shah-retires-career-and-tenure\/","url_meta":{"origin":248282,"position":3},"title":"Justice M.R. Shah Retires: A Look at his Dynamic Tenure and Decisions","author":"Sucheta","date":"May 15, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"After an active tenure of 4.5 years at the Supreme Court, which includes authoring of nearly 700+ decisions, Justice Mukeshkumar Rasikbhai Shah retires today.","rel":"","context":"In "Know thy Judge"","block_context":{"text":"Know thy Judge","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/judges-information\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"justice m.r. shah","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/justice-m.r.-shah.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/justice-m.r.-shah.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/justice-m.r.-shah.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/justice-m.r.-shah.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":296809,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/14\/know-thy-judge-supreme-court-of-india-justice-aravind-kumar-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":248282,"position":4},"title":"Know Thy Judge | Supreme Court of India: Justice Aravind Kumar","author":"Sucheta","date":"July 14, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Prior to his elevation to the Supreme Court, Justice Aravind Kumar, as Chief Justice of Gujarat High Court, took steps to tackle pendency of cases and initiated the conversion of roadways buses into schools for poor children.","rel":"","context":"In "Know thy Judge"","block_context":{"text":"Know thy Judge","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/judges-information\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"justice aravind kumar","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/justice-aravind-kumar.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/justice-aravind-kumar.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/justice-aravind-kumar.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/justice-aravind-kumar.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":283224,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/05\/supreme-court-judges-president-assent-legal-updates-knowledge-news-collegium\/","url_meta":{"origin":248282,"position":5},"title":"Know Thy Judge| 5 Judges who have received President\u2019s nod for appointment as Supreme Court Judges","author":"Editor","date":"February 5, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"With the Govt. of India notifying the appointment of the Judges, read more about the new appointees and what it means for Supreme Court\u2019s Judges\u2019 strength.","rel":"","context":"In "Appointments & Transfers"","block_context":{"text":"Appointments & Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-61.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/248282","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=248282"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/248282\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/248284"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=248282"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=248282"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=248282"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}