{"id":248254,"date":"2021-05-15T15:31:12","date_gmt":"2021-05-15T10:01:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=248254"},"modified":"2021-05-21T11:38:18","modified_gmt":"2021-05-21T06:08:18","slug":"mv-acthp-hc%e2%94%82-once-a-document-has-been-admitted-in-evidence-any-objection-regarding-its-admissibility-or-mode-of-proof-later-is-irregular","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/15\/mv-acthp-hc%e2%94%82-once-a-document-has-been-admitted-in-evidence-any-objection-regarding-its-admissibility-or-mode-of-proof-later-is-irregular\/","title":{"rendered":"[MV Act]HP HC\u2502 Once a document has been admitted in evidence; any objection regarding its admissibility or mode of proof later is irregular"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Himachal Pradesh High Court: <\/strong>Vivek Thakur J. allowed the appeal and compensated the appellants because of false denial on thepart of respondents regarding compromise deed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The facts of the case are such that the Bus Stand Hamirpur is adjacent to the house of the appellants\u00a0 and is separated by brick wall over a retaining wall and on 30.3.2017 at about 8 AM his scooty was parked in his courtyard adjacent to retaining wall whereupon brick wall of Bus Stand was existing and at that time when respondent 2 was parking his bus towards petrol pump of HRTC located at Bus Stand Hamirpur, the bus had hit the wall and with its impact wall collapsed and debris had fallen on scooty of appellant. The incident was informed to the police wherein respondent 2 entered into a compromise and a compromise deed was reduced into writing which was signed by respondent 2 and appellant and also by witnesses and therefore, report with police was not recorded formally. Later, a claim petition for recovery of damages was filed which was dismissed. Aggrieved by the said dismissal order instant appeal was filed for re-evaluation of evidence and witnesses.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Counsels for the respondents have denied the occurrence as well as causing of damage to scooty and compromise in the matter by respondent 2 was also denied.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court observed that denial of execution of a document is one thing, whereas, objection with respect to admissibility or mode of proof is another thing. Even where execution of a document has been denied, a party has a right to raise objection with respect to admissibility as well as mode of proof at the time of its production and exhibition.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court observed that in the present case, at the time of accepting the documents i.e. compromise no objection with respect to admissibility of these documents and mode of proof was raised. Therefore, these documents are to be considered to have been placed on record in accordance with law and are to be admitted in evidence. However, genuineness, correctness of contents and relevancy thereof may be determined by Court by taking into consideration the contents thereof or other material on record<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court relied on judgment <em>P.C. Thomas v. P.M. Ismail, <\/em>AIR 2010 SC 905 and observed that once a document has been admitted in evidence and marked as an exhibit, the objection that it should not have been admitted in evidence or that mode adopted for proving the documents is irregular, cannot be allowed to be raised at any stage subsequent to marking of document as exhibit.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court thus held <em>\u201call grounds in reference regarding damage probability caused to scooty and compromise arrived at between appellant and respondent No.2 has been established on record. However, evidence to quantify the damage for which appellant is entitled has not been established by leading cogent and reliable evidence.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In view of the above, appeal was partly allowed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">[Sahil Kumar v. HRTC, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/ID3b6tSV\"><b>2021 SCC OnLine HP 4568<\/b><\/a>, decided on 13-05-2021]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>Arunima Bose, Editorial Assistant has put this report together\u00a0<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Counsel for appellants: Mr. P.M. Negi,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Counsel for respondents: Mr. Vikas Rajput and Mr. Arun Raj<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Himachal Pradesh High Court: Vivek Thakur J. allowed the appeal and compensated the appellants because of false denial on thepart of respondents <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":222107,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[13321,45201,2521,45898,3770],"class_list":["post-248254","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-admissibility","tag-document","tag-Evidence","tag-exhibit","tag-proof"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>[MV Act]HP HC\u2502 Once a document has been admitted in evidence; any objection regarding its admissibility or mode of proof later is irregular | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/15\/mv-acthp-hc\u2502-once-a-document-has-been-admitted-in-evidence-any-objection-regarding-its-admissibility-or-mode-of-proof-later-is-irregular\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"[MV Act]HP HC\u2502 Once a document has been admitted in evidence; any objection regarding its admissibility or mode of proof later is irregular\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Himachal Pradesh High Court: Vivek Thakur J. allowed the appeal and compensated the appellants because of false denial on thepart of respondents\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/15\/mv-acthp-hc\u2502-once-a-document-has-been-admitted-in-evidence-any-objection-regarding-its-admissibility-or-mode-of-proof-later-is-irregular\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-05-15T10:01:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-05-21T06:08:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/15\/mv-acthp-hc%e2%94%82-once-a-document-has-been-admitted-in-evidence-any-objection-regarding-its-admissibility-or-mode-of-proof-later-is-irregular\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/15\/mv-acthp-hc%e2%94%82-once-a-document-has-been-admitted-in-evidence-any-objection-regarding-its-admissibility-or-mode-of-proof-later-is-irregular\/\",\"name\":\"[MV Act]HP HC\u2502 Once a document has been admitted in evidence; any objection regarding its admissibility or mode of proof later is irregular | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/15\/mv-acthp-hc%e2%94%82-once-a-document-has-been-admitted-in-evidence-any-objection-regarding-its-admissibility-or-mode-of-proof-later-is-irregular\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/15\/mv-acthp-hc%e2%94%82-once-a-document-has-been-admitted-in-evidence-any-objection-regarding-its-admissibility-or-mode-of-proof-later-is-irregular\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-05-15T10:01:12+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-05-21T06:08:18+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/15\/mv-acthp-hc%e2%94%82-once-a-document-has-been-admitted-in-evidence-any-objection-regarding-its-admissibility-or-mode-of-proof-later-is-irregular\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/15\/mv-acthp-hc%e2%94%82-once-a-document-has-been-admitted-in-evidence-any-objection-regarding-its-admissibility-or-mode-of-proof-later-is-irregular\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/15\/mv-acthp-hc%e2%94%82-once-a-document-has-been-admitted-in-evidence-any-objection-regarding-its-admissibility-or-mode-of-proof-later-is-irregular\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/15\/mv-acthp-hc%e2%94%82-once-a-document-has-been-admitted-in-evidence-any-objection-regarding-its-admissibility-or-mode-of-proof-later-is-irregular\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"[MV Act]HP HC\u2502 Once a document has been admitted in evidence; any objection regarding its admissibility or mode of proof later is irregular\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"[MV Act]HP HC\u2502 Once a document has been admitted in evidence; any objection regarding its admissibility or mode of proof later is irregular | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/15\/mv-acthp-hc\u2502-once-a-document-has-been-admitted-in-evidence-any-objection-regarding-its-admissibility-or-mode-of-proof-later-is-irregular\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"[MV Act]HP HC\u2502 Once a document has been admitted in evidence; any objection regarding its admissibility or mode of proof later is irregular","og_description":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: Vivek Thakur J. allowed the appeal and compensated the appellants because of false denial on thepart of respondents","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/15\/mv-acthp-hc\u2502-once-a-document-has-been-admitted-in-evidence-any-objection-regarding-its-admissibility-or-mode-of-proof-later-is-irregular\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-05-15T10:01:12+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-05-21T06:08:18+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/15\/mv-acthp-hc%e2%94%82-once-a-document-has-been-admitted-in-evidence-any-objection-regarding-its-admissibility-or-mode-of-proof-later-is-irregular\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/15\/mv-acthp-hc%e2%94%82-once-a-document-has-been-admitted-in-evidence-any-objection-regarding-its-admissibility-or-mode-of-proof-later-is-irregular\/","name":"[MV Act]HP HC\u2502 Once a document has been admitted in evidence; any objection regarding its admissibility or mode of proof later is irregular | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/15\/mv-acthp-hc%e2%94%82-once-a-document-has-been-admitted-in-evidence-any-objection-regarding-its-admissibility-or-mode-of-proof-later-is-irregular\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/15\/mv-acthp-hc%e2%94%82-once-a-document-has-been-admitted-in-evidence-any-objection-regarding-its-admissibility-or-mode-of-proof-later-is-irregular\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","datePublished":"2021-05-15T10:01:12+00:00","dateModified":"2021-05-21T06:08:18+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/15\/mv-acthp-hc%e2%94%82-once-a-document-has-been-admitted-in-evidence-any-objection-regarding-its-admissibility-or-mode-of-proof-later-is-irregular\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/15\/mv-acthp-hc%e2%94%82-once-a-document-has-been-admitted-in-evidence-any-objection-regarding-its-admissibility-or-mode-of-proof-later-is-irregular\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/15\/mv-acthp-hc%e2%94%82-once-a-document-has-been-admitted-in-evidence-any-objection-regarding-its-admissibility-or-mode-of-proof-later-is-irregular\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/15\/mv-acthp-hc%e2%94%82-once-a-document-has-been-admitted-in-evidence-any-objection-regarding-its-admissibility-or-mode-of-proof-later-is-irregular\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"[MV Act]HP HC\u2502 Once a document has been admitted in evidence; any objection regarding its admissibility or mode of proof later is irregular"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":206412,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/07\/authorities-instructed-to-construct-retaining-wall-by-pwd-to-protect-house-of-petitioner-himachal-pradesh-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":248254,"position":0},"title":"Authorities instructed to construct retaining wall by PWD to protect house of petitioner: Himachal Pradesh HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 7, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Sanjay Karol, ACJ and Sandeep Sharma, J. directed the authorities to take necessary action and resolve the grievances of the petitioner. The PIL by way of a letter has been addressed to the Court wherein it was alleged that the house\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":288717,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/07\/admissibility-of-documents-in-evidence-in-civil-cases-marking-of-documents-as-exhibits-and-objections-to-documents-being-taken-on-record\/","url_meta":{"origin":248254,"position":1},"title":"Admissibility of Documents in Evidence in Civil Cases \u2015 Marking of Documents as Exhibits and Objections to Documents Being Taken on Record","author":"Editor","date":"April 7, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"by Amira Abdul Razaq\u2020","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Admissibility of Evidence in Civil Proceedings","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1033.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1033.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1033.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1033.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":205421,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/17\/party-cannot-be-denied-its-right-if-court-doesnt-exhibit-evidence-despite-reference-claimants-awarded-compensation-under-mv-act-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":248254,"position":2},"title":"Party cannot be denied its right if Court doesn&#8217;t exhibit evidence despite reference; claimants awarded compensation under MV Act: SC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 17, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cMotor Vehicles Act is a beneficial piece of legislation enacted to give solace to the victims of the motor accident who suffer bodily injury or die untimely.\u201d Supreme Court: The Bench comprising of A.M. Sapre and Indu Malhotra, JJ. allowed the present appeal filed against the decision of Rajasthan High\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":244363,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/25\/accident\/","url_meta":{"origin":248254,"position":3},"title":"[MV Act] Kar HC | Evidence is examined on the touchstone of \u2018preponderance of probabilities\u2019, Standard of proof of accident beyond reasonable doubt to not apply","author":"Editor","date":"February 25, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: A Division Bench of Alok Aradhe and Nataraj Rangaswamy, JJ., disposed of the appeal after modifying the compensation. The facts of the case are such that the deceased Sanjeev M Patil was crossing the road as a pedestrian at 6:00 am in morning when a bus being\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":274784,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/30\/supreme-court-of-appeal-of-south-africa-minute-scrutiny-of-evidence-given-by-prosecution-is-not-necessary-if-the-theory-of-prosecution-is-supported-by-evidence-in-broad-strokes\/","url_meta":{"origin":248254,"position":4},"title":"Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa | Minute Scrutiny of Evidence given by Prosecution is not Necessary if the theory of Prosecution is supported by evidence in broad strokes","author":"Editor","date":"September 30, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa | While deciding an appeal filed with view to challenge the order of Free State Division of the High Court, Bloemfontein, challenging the way in which the evidence was collected by the authorities and the role played by those evidence collected\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-96-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-96-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-96-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-96-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-96-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":143961,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/21\/objection-to-mode-or-method-of-electronic-proof-cannot-be-entertained-at-appellate-stage\/","url_meta":{"origin":248254,"position":5},"title":"Objection to mode or method of electronic proof cannot be entertained at appellate stage","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"July 21, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In the case where the reliability of the Call Detail Records (CDRs) produced as proof was questioned for not complying with the requirements under Section 65B of the Evidence Act, 1872, the bench of S. A. Bobde and L. Nageswara Rao, JJ said that the mode or method\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/248254","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=248254"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/248254\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/222107"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=248254"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=248254"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=248254"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}