{"id":247940,"date":"2021-05-08T09:00:29","date_gmt":"2021-05-08T03:30:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=247940"},"modified":"2021-05-08T21:23:02","modified_gmt":"2021-05-08T15:53:02","slug":"jk-hc-non-application-of-mind-by-detaining-authority-is-fatal-hc-sets-aside-order-of-preventive-detention-for-alleged-involvement-in-militant-activities","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/08\/jk-hc-non-application-of-mind-by-detaining-authority-is-fatal-hc-sets-aside-order-of-preventive-detention-for-alleged-involvement-in-militant-activities\/","title":{"rendered":"J&K HC| \u201cNon-application of mind by detaining authority is fatal\u201d HC sets aside order of preventive detention for alleged involvement in militant activities"},"content":{"rendered":"

Jammu and Kashmir High Court<\/strong>: Sanjeev Kumar, J. heard the instant petition against the impugned order passed by District Magistrate (the detaining authority), by which the petitioner had been detained in preventive detention to preventing him from indulging in the activities which were prejudicial to the security of Union Territory. The Bench expressed,<\/p>\n

\n

\u201cEither there was lapse on the part of police to provide all relevant material to the detaining authority or there was lack of application of mind on the part of detaining authority.\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

The impugned order had been passed by the detaining authority on the basis of material supplied by the SSP. As per the dossier supplied by the police, the petitioner had connections with one foreign militant namely Maz Bahi and was providing assistance to the militants of banned outfit Hizbul Mujahideen. It had been alleged that the petitioner was instrumental in strengthening militancy network in the area of Rafiabad. For which he had been apprehended in connection with case FIR No.161 of 2019 under Sections 18, 39 of ULA(P) Act and 7\/25 Arms Act which is still under investigation.<\/p>\n

The detaining authority, on the basis of dossier of activities arrived at satisfaction that the petitioner though under judicial remand, was every likely to indulge in subversive activities if he is admitted to bail, therefore, it was imperative to put him under preventive detention.<\/p>\n

The petitioner has assailed the impugned order of detention, inter alia, on the following grounds:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. The grounds of detention were vague and indefinite and no prudent man can make an effective representation against these allegations;<\/li>\n
  2. At the time of passing of the detention order, the detenue was already in custody in and he had neither applied for bail nor was bail otherwise due to him. The detaining authority despite having knowledge of the custody of the detenue has not spelled out any justified and compelling reasons to detain the petitioner under preventive detention;<\/li>\n
  3. That the relevant material, like copy of dossier, FIR, statements under Section 161 and 164-A Cr. P. C, seizure memos etc. which had been relied upon in the grounds of detention, were never supplied to him to enable him to make an effective representation nor he was made aware of his right to make representation against his detention to the detaining authority or the government.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    The Bench observed that the petitioner had been detained under preventive detention for his alleged involvement in subversive activities which led to the registration of FIR No.161 of 2019 under Sections 18, 39 of ULA(P) Act and 7\/25 Arms Act. In the aforesaid FIR, the petitioner was released on bail by on 06-02-2020, whereas Superintendent of Police, who forwarded the relevant record including dossier and other connected documents to the detaining authority, did not bring the factum of petitioner having been released on bail to the notice of detaining authority. It was because of this omission on the part of Senior Superintendent of Police, the detaining authority had categorically stated in the grounds of the detention that the detenue was under judicial remand and that there was every likelihood of his being admitted to bail. The detaining authority had also noted that there was well-founded apprehension based on report received from field information that the petitioner, if released on bail, would again indulge in subversive activities.<\/p>\n

    The Bench opined that either there was lapse on the part of police to provide all relevant material to the detaining authority or there was lack of application of mind on the part of detaining authority. The Bench expressed,<\/p>\n

    \n

    \u201cAt the time of passing of the detention order, the detaining authority was not aware whether the detenue was in police\/judicial custody or he stood released on bail. It cannot be denied that it was a relevant information that was required to be produced before the detaining authority to enable it to derive subjective satisfaction with regard to necessity of placing the petitioner under preventive detention.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

    Hence, the non-application of mind by the detaining authority was fatal and affected the root of the detention and, therefore, the Bench held that the impugned order of detention was worthy of being quashed. Accordingly, direction were issued to the respondents to release the detenue from the preventive custody.<\/p>\n

    [Riyaz Khaliq Parray v. UT of J&K, 2021 SCC OnLine J&K 311<\/b><\/a>, decided on 27-04-2021]<\/p>\n

    \n

    Kamini Sharma, Editorial Assistant has put this report together\u00a0<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

    Appearance before the Court by:<\/p>\n

    For the Petitioner: Adv. Wajid Haseeb<\/p>\n

    For UT of J&K: AAG Asifa Padroo<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Jammu and Kashmir High Court: Sanjeev Kumar, J. heard the instant petition against the impugned order passed by District Magistrate (the detaining <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2664,3365,12931,27054,3475],"class_list":["post-247940","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Bail","tag-detention","tag-detention-order","tag-judicial-custody","tag-Terrorism"],"yoast_head":"\nJ&K HC| \u201cNon-application of mind by detaining authority is fatal\u201d HC sets aside order of preventive detention for alleged involvement in militant activities | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/08\/jk-hc-non-application-of-mind-by-detaining-authority-is-fatal-hc-sets-aside-order-of-preventive-detention-for-alleged-involvement-in-militant-activities\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"J&K HC| \u201cNon-application of mind by detaining authority is fatal\u201d HC sets aside order of preventive detention for alleged involvement in militant activities\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: Sanjeev Kumar, J. heard the instant petition against the impugned order passed by District Magistrate (the detaining\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/08\/jk-hc-non-application-of-mind-by-detaining-authority-is-fatal-hc-sets-aside-order-of-preventive-detention-for-alleged-involvement-in-militant-activities\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-05-08T03:30:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-05-08T15:53:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/JK-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/08\/jk-hc-non-application-of-mind-by-detaining-authority-is-fatal-hc-sets-aside-order-of-preventive-detention-for-alleged-involvement-in-militant-activities\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/08\/jk-hc-non-application-of-mind-by-detaining-authority-is-fatal-hc-sets-aside-order-of-preventive-detention-for-alleged-involvement-in-militant-activities\/\",\"name\":\"J&K HC| \u201cNon-application of mind by detaining authority is fatal\u201d HC sets aside order of preventive detention for alleged involvement in militant activities | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-05-08T03:30:29+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-05-08T15:53:02+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/08\/jk-hc-non-application-of-mind-by-detaining-authority-is-fatal-hc-sets-aside-order-of-preventive-detention-for-alleged-involvement-in-militant-activities\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/08\/jk-hc-non-application-of-mind-by-detaining-authority-is-fatal-hc-sets-aside-order-of-preventive-detention-for-alleged-involvement-in-militant-activities\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/08\/jk-hc-non-application-of-mind-by-detaining-authority-is-fatal-hc-sets-aside-order-of-preventive-detention-for-alleged-involvement-in-militant-activities\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"J&K HC| \u201cNon-application of mind by detaining authority is fatal\u201d HC sets aside order of preventive detention for alleged involvement in militant activities\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"J&K HC| \u201cNon-application of mind by detaining authority is fatal\u201d HC sets aside order of preventive detention for alleged involvement in militant activities | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/08\/jk-hc-non-application-of-mind-by-detaining-authority-is-fatal-hc-sets-aside-order-of-preventive-detention-for-alleged-involvement-in-militant-activities\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"J&K HC| \u201cNon-application of mind by detaining authority is fatal\u201d HC sets aside order of preventive detention for alleged involvement in militant activities","og_description":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: Sanjeev Kumar, J. heard the instant petition against the impugned order passed by District Magistrate (the detaining","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/08\/jk-hc-non-application-of-mind-by-detaining-authority-is-fatal-hc-sets-aside-order-of-preventive-detention-for-alleged-involvement-in-militant-activities\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-05-08T03:30:29+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-05-08T15:53:02+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/JK-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/08\/jk-hc-non-application-of-mind-by-detaining-authority-is-fatal-hc-sets-aside-order-of-preventive-detention-for-alleged-involvement-in-militant-activities\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/08\/jk-hc-non-application-of-mind-by-detaining-authority-is-fatal-hc-sets-aside-order-of-preventive-detention-for-alleged-involvement-in-militant-activities\/","name":"J&K HC| \u201cNon-application of mind by detaining authority is fatal\u201d HC sets aside order of preventive detention for alleged involvement in militant activities | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-05-08T03:30:29+00:00","dateModified":"2021-05-08T15:53:02+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/08\/jk-hc-non-application-of-mind-by-detaining-authority-is-fatal-hc-sets-aside-order-of-preventive-detention-for-alleged-involvement-in-militant-activities\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/08\/jk-hc-non-application-of-mind-by-detaining-authority-is-fatal-hc-sets-aside-order-of-preventive-detention-for-alleged-involvement-in-militant-activities\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/08\/jk-hc-non-application-of-mind-by-detaining-authority-is-fatal-hc-sets-aside-order-of-preventive-detention-for-alleged-involvement-in-militant-activities\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"J&K HC| \u201cNon-application of mind by detaining authority is fatal\u201d HC sets aside order of preventive detention for alleged involvement in militant activities"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":225446,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/11\/jk-hc-high-court-does-not-sit-in-appeal-over-decision-of-detaining-authority-and-cannot-substitute-its-own-opinion-over-that-of-detaining-authority-when-grounds-of-detention-are-precise-and-releva\/","url_meta":{"origin":247940,"position":0},"title":"J&K HC | HC does not sit in appeal over decision of detaining authority and cannot substitute its own opinion, when grounds of detention are precise & relevant","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 11, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: Tashi Rabstan J., in a matter relating to preventive detention declined to provide opinion over that of detaining authority and reiterated that the object of preventive detention is not to punish a man but to prevent from any further acts. The present case relates to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":247740,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/30\/jamat-i-islami\/","url_meta":{"origin":247940,"position":1},"title":"J&K HC | [Jamat-i-Islami] HC quashes preventive detention order holding opportunity to effective representation an essential pre-requisite","author":"Editor","date":"April 30, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: Sanjeev Kumar, J., heard the instant petition presented by the wife of the Petitioner to assail his detention ordered by District Magistrate, Pulwama under Preventive Detention law. The Bench opined, \u201cTwo FIRs, pertain to the offences under NDPS Act and, therefore, if the petitioner was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":235999,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/19\/telangana-hc-when-can-detaining-authority-pass-a-detention-order-court-explains-the-importance-of-preventive-detention-laws\/","url_meta":{"origin":247940,"position":2},"title":"Telangana HC | When can detaining authority pass a detention order? Court explains the importance of preventive detention laws","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 19, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Telangana High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench of Raghvendra Singh Chauhan, CJ and B. Vijaysen Reddy, J., while addressing the present petition observed the following: \"The preventive detention laws cannot be invoked as an easy way method bypassing the ordinary law and if a detention order is passed, it is very much\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":220155,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/27\/jk-hc-preventive-detention-quashed-for-non-supplying-of-the-material-relied-upon-by-detaining-authority\/","url_meta":{"origin":247940,"position":3},"title":"J&K HC | Preventive detention quashed for non-supplying of the material relied upon by detaining authority","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 27, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: Ali Mohammad Magrey, J. quashed the detention order of Masood Ahmad Bhat while directing for his release from the preventive custody. Denetu, Masood Ahmad Bhat, sought quashing of detention order dated 22-01-2019. The grounds of which the detention order was challenged were as follows: No\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":253902,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/08\/detention-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":247940,"position":4},"title":"Guj HC | Detaining authority fell in error in interpreting \u201cdangerous person\u201d; Court allows petition against detention","author":"Editor","date":"September 8, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Gujarat High Court: Paresh Upadhyay, J., allowed a petition which was filed against the order passed by the Commissioner of Police, Surat whereby the petitioner is detained under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985. Advocate for the petitioner had submitted that, mere filing of five FIRs against\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":321515,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/06\/grounds-of-detention-vague-incapable-of-being-understood-jk-ladakh-hc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":247940,"position":5},"title":"Grounds of detention incapable of being intelligently understood, can be termed as vague: J&K and Ladakh HC reiterates","author":"Sucheta","date":"May 6, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIn other words, a detenue may be able to make an effective representation if the details of the facts, on the basis of which conclusion is drawn by the detaining authority, are furnished to him\u201d.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jammu-and-Kashmir-and-Ladakh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jammu-and-Kashmir-and-Ladakh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jammu-and-Kashmir-and-Ladakh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jammu-and-Kashmir-and-Ladakh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/247940","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=247940"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/247940\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=247940"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=247940"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=247940"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}