{"id":247665,"date":"2021-04-26T21:57:12","date_gmt":"2021-04-26T16:27:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=247665"},"modified":"2021-04-30T13:41:45","modified_gmt":"2021-04-30T08:11:45","slug":"mini-trial-not-permissible-at-the-stage-of-framing-of-charge-supreme-court-explains-the-yardsticks-of-revisional-jurisdiction-of-high-courts","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/26\/mini-trial-not-permissible-at-the-stage-of-framing-of-charge-supreme-court-explains-the-yardsticks-of-revisional-jurisdiction-of-high-courts\/","title":{"rendered":"\u201cMini Trial not permissible at the stage of framing of charge\u201d; Supreme Court explains the yardsticks of revisional jurisdiction of High Courts"},"content":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court: The Division Bench comprising of <\/strong>Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud and M.R. Shah*, JJ., recently held in an interesting case that evaluation of evidence on merits is not permissible at the stage of considering the application for discharge and the same is beyond the scope of revisional jurisdiction of the High Courts. The Bench explained,<\/p>\n

\n

\u201cAt the stage of framing of the charge and\/or considering the discharge application, the mini trial is not permissible.\u201d <\/strong><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

The High Court of Rajsthan, in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction had quashed the order passed by the Special Judge, Prevention of Corruption Act. The High Court had set aside the charges framed by the Special Judge against the respondent-accused for the offence under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act\u00a0 and consequently had discharged the accused of the alleged offence.<\/p>\n

Factual Matrix of the Case <\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n

The respondent-accused was serving as a Patwari, when it was alleged by the complainant that \u00a0that for the purpose of issuing Domicile Certificate and OBC Certificate of his son, but the Patwari in lieu of endorsing his report demanded a bribe of Rs.2,800. Prsuant to the said complaint an investigation was conducted and the accused was chargesheeted on reaching to the findings that there was a prima facie case made out under Section 7 of the PC Act.<\/p>\n

Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied the accused preferred revision application before the High Court whereby the High Court had discharged the accused.<\/p>\n

It was submitted by the state that the High Court had committed a grave error in evaluating the transcript\/evidence on merits which at the stage of considering the application for discharge is not permissible and is beyond the scope of the exercise of the revisional jurisdiction. It was further submitted that the accused had been charged for the offence under Section 7 of the PC Act and even an attempt is sufficient to attract the offence under Section 7 of the PC Act.<\/p>\n

Stand taken by the Respondent<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n

The defense raised by the respondent-accused was that, he had refused to issue residence certificate for Rajsthan and caste certificate in favor of complainant having come to know about the complaint being the permanent resident of Agra and that the complainant wanted a false residence certificate and caste certificate illegally. It was submitted that in fact the respondent-accused gave a report rejecting the request of the complainant and there was nothing pending before the accused and the decision regarding his application was already taken.<\/p>\n

The respondent submitted that at the time of conversation two persons were present, (1) the complainant \u2013 Jai Kishore; and (2) Devi Singh. And the so far as the complainant was concerned, the accused categorically refused to accept any bribe. However, it was alleged that\u00a0 the appellant had tried to confuse and mislead the Court by mixing the conversation of Devi Singh regarding his dues of Rs.4,850-\/ to the bank against which he had paid Rs.2,000\/- and the remaining amount of Rs.2,850\/- was due to the bank. Thus, neither there was any acceptance nor there was any demand of bribe and the High Court has rightly discharged the accused. The reliance was placed on Dilawar Balu Kurane v. State of Maharashtra, (2002) 2 SCC 135, <\/em>it had been held that, by and large if two views are equally possible and the Judge is satisfied that the evidence produced before him will give rise to some suspicion but not grave suspicion against the accused, he will be fully justified to discharge the accused.<\/em><\/p>\n

Findings of the Court<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n

At the stage of Section 227, the Judge has merely to sift the evidence in order to find out whether or not there is sufficient ground for proceeding against the accused. The Bench opined that the High Court had exceeded in its jurisdiction and had acted beyond the scope of Section 227\/239 Cr.P.C. While discharging the accused, the High Court had gone into the merits of the case and had considered whether on the basis of the material on record, the accused was likely to be convicted or not. For the aforesaid,<\/p>\n

\n

\u201cThe High Court has considered in detail the transcript of the conversation between the complainant and the accused which exercise at this stage to consider the discharge application and\/or framing of the charge is not permissible at all.\u201d<\/strong><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

At the stage of framing of the charge and\/or considering the discharge application, the mini trial is not permissible. At this stage, it is to be noted that even as per Section 7 of the PC Act, even an attempt constitutes an offence. Therefore, the High Court has erred and\/or exceeded in virtually holding a mini trial at the stage of discharge application.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

Lastly, the Bench stated, defence on merits is not to be considered at the stage of framing of the charge and\/or at the stage of discharge application. In view of the above, the impugned judgment and order was held unsustainable in law and the same was quashed and set aside. The order passed by the Special Judge of framing charge against the accused under Section 7 of the PC Act was restored.<\/p>\n

[State of Rajsthan v. Ashok Kumar Kashyap, 2021 SCC OnLine SC 314<\/b><\/a>, decided on 13-04-2021]<\/p>\n

\n

Kamini Sharma, Editorial Assistant has put this report together\u00a0<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

*Judgment by: Justice M. R. Shah<\/strong><\/p>\n

Appearance before the Court by:<\/p>\n

For the State: Adv. Vishal Meghwal<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court: The Division Bench comprising of Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud and M.R. Shah*, JJ., recently held in an interesting case that evaluation <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":243203,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[2557,2809,4351,4571],"class_list":["post-247665","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-Criminal_Trial","tag-revision","tag-revisional-jurisdiction","tag-trial"],"yoast_head":"\n\u201cMini Trial not permissible at the stage of framing of charge\u201d; Supreme Court explains the yardsticks of revisional jurisdiction of High Courts | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/26\/mini-trial-not-permissible-at-the-stage-of-framing-of-charge-supreme-court-explains-the-yardsticks-of-revisional-jurisdiction-of-high-courts\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u201cMini Trial not permissible at the stage of framing of charge\u201d; Supreme Court explains the yardsticks of revisional jurisdiction of High Courts\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court: The Division Bench comprising of Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud and M.R. Shah*, JJ., recently held in an interesting case that evaluation\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/26\/mini-trial-not-permissible-at-the-stage-of-framing-of-charge-supreme-court-explains-the-yardsticks-of-revisional-jurisdiction-of-high-courts\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-04-26T16:27:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-04-30T08:11:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/26\/mini-trial-not-permissible-at-the-stage-of-framing-of-charge-supreme-court-explains-the-yardsticks-of-revisional-jurisdiction-of-high-courts\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/26\/mini-trial-not-permissible-at-the-stage-of-framing-of-charge-supreme-court-explains-the-yardsticks-of-revisional-jurisdiction-of-high-courts\/\",\"name\":\"\u201cMini Trial not permissible at the stage of framing of charge\u201d; Supreme Court explains the yardsticks of revisional jurisdiction of High Courts | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/26\/mini-trial-not-permissible-at-the-stage-of-framing-of-charge-supreme-court-explains-the-yardsticks-of-revisional-jurisdiction-of-high-courts\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/26\/mini-trial-not-permissible-at-the-stage-of-framing-of-charge-supreme-court-explains-the-yardsticks-of-revisional-jurisdiction-of-high-courts\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-04-26T16:27:12+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-04-30T08:11:45+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/26\/mini-trial-not-permissible-at-the-stage-of-framing-of-charge-supreme-court-explains-the-yardsticks-of-revisional-jurisdiction-of-high-courts\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/26\/mini-trial-not-permissible-at-the-stage-of-framing-of-charge-supreme-court-explains-the-yardsticks-of-revisional-jurisdiction-of-high-courts\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/26\/mini-trial-not-permissible-at-the-stage-of-framing-of-charge-supreme-court-explains-the-yardsticks-of-revisional-jurisdiction-of-high-courts\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":888},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/26\/mini-trial-not-permissible-at-the-stage-of-framing-of-charge-supreme-court-explains-the-yardsticks-of-revisional-jurisdiction-of-high-courts\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u201cMini Trial not permissible at the stage of framing of charge\u201d; Supreme Court explains the yardsticks of revisional jurisdiction of High Courts\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"\u201cMini Trial not permissible at the stage of framing of charge\u201d; Supreme Court explains the yardsticks of revisional jurisdiction of High Courts | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/26\/mini-trial-not-permissible-at-the-stage-of-framing-of-charge-supreme-court-explains-the-yardsticks-of-revisional-jurisdiction-of-high-courts\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u201cMini Trial not permissible at the stage of framing of charge\u201d; Supreme Court explains the yardsticks of revisional jurisdiction of High Courts","og_description":"Supreme Court: The Division Bench comprising of Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud and M.R. Shah*, JJ., recently held in an interesting case that evaluation","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/26\/mini-trial-not-permissible-at-the-stage-of-framing-of-charge-supreme-court-explains-the-yardsticks-of-revisional-jurisdiction-of-high-courts\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-04-26T16:27:12+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-04-30T08:11:45+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/26\/mini-trial-not-permissible-at-the-stage-of-framing-of-charge-supreme-court-explains-the-yardsticks-of-revisional-jurisdiction-of-high-courts\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/26\/mini-trial-not-permissible-at-the-stage-of-framing-of-charge-supreme-court-explains-the-yardsticks-of-revisional-jurisdiction-of-high-courts\/","name":"\u201cMini Trial not permissible at the stage of framing of charge\u201d; Supreme Court explains the yardsticks of revisional jurisdiction of High Courts | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/26\/mini-trial-not-permissible-at-the-stage-of-framing-of-charge-supreme-court-explains-the-yardsticks-of-revisional-jurisdiction-of-high-courts\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/26\/mini-trial-not-permissible-at-the-stage-of-framing-of-charge-supreme-court-explains-the-yardsticks-of-revisional-jurisdiction-of-high-courts\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg","datePublished":"2021-04-26T16:27:12+00:00","dateModified":"2021-04-30T08:11:45+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/26\/mini-trial-not-permissible-at-the-stage-of-framing-of-charge-supreme-court-explains-the-yardsticks-of-revisional-jurisdiction-of-high-courts\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/26\/mini-trial-not-permissible-at-the-stage-of-framing-of-charge-supreme-court-explains-the-yardsticks-of-revisional-jurisdiction-of-high-courts\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/26\/mini-trial-not-permissible-at-the-stage-of-framing-of-charge-supreme-court-explains-the-yardsticks-of-revisional-jurisdiction-of-high-courts\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg","width":1331,"height":888},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/26\/mini-trial-not-permissible-at-the-stage-of-framing-of-charge-supreme-court-explains-the-yardsticks-of-revisional-jurisdiction-of-high-courts\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u201cMini Trial not permissible at the stage of framing of charge\u201d; Supreme Court explains the yardsticks of revisional jurisdiction of High Courts"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":266258,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/30\/trial-framing-of-charge-delhi-high-court-accused\/","url_meta":{"origin":247665,"position":0},"title":"Does framing of charge means that accused is guilty or does it imply that accused may be guilty? Del HC elaborates","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 30, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Expressing that, the revisional jurisdiction is not meant to test the waters of what might happen in the trial, Chandra Dhari Singh, J., held that at the stage of framing of charge, the judge is merely required to overview the evidence in order to find out whether\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/DelCharge.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/DelCharge.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/DelCharge.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/DelCharge.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/DelCharge.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":247815,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/02\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-april-2021\/","url_meta":{"origin":247665,"position":1},"title":"Supreme Court Monthly Roundup – April 2021","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"May 2, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"TOP STORIES Constitution Bench No more \u201cmechanical\u201d conversion of complaints under Section 138 NI Act from summary to summons trial; Magistrates \u201cmust\u201d record reasons: Supreme Court \u201cSuch conversion of complaints under Section 138 from summary trial to summons trial has been contributing to the delay in disposal of the cases.\u201d\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Supreme Court Roundups"","block_context":{"text":"Supreme Court Roundups","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/scmonthly\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-31.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-31.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-31.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-31.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-31.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":46191,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/13\/court-of-sessions-has-revisional-power-if-the-magistrate-refuses-to-take-cognizance-of-a-matter\/","url_meta":{"origin":247665,"position":2},"title":"Court of Sessions has revisional power if the Magistrate refuses to take cognizance of a matter","author":"Sucheta","date":"May 13, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The case before the bench comprising of A.K. Sikri & R.K Agarwal,JJ was whether the Court of Sessions is empowered to take the cognizance of offence when a similar application to this effect was rejected by the Judicial Magistrate while committing the case to Sessions Court, taking cognizance\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":214645,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/14\/jhar-hc-revisional-jurisdiction-of-high-court-to-be-exercised-sparingly-only-in-cases-of-glaring-injustice-by-trial-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":247665,"position":3},"title":"Jhar HC | Revisional jurisdiction of High Court to be exercised sparingly, only in cases of glaring injustice by trial court","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 14, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: The Bench of Deepak Roshan, J. dismissed a revision application seeking to set aside the lower courts\u2019 order acquitting the respondents in a case filed under Sections 448, 323, 427, 506 of Penal Code, 1860. A complaint was filed by the applicant herein, against the respondents alleging\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":260653,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/27\/high-courts-revisional-jurisdiction-under-section-401-cr-p-c-re-power-to-reverse-acquittal-sc-answers-important-questions\/","url_meta":{"origin":247665,"position":4},"title":"High Court’s Revisional jurisdiction under Section 401 Cr.P.C re power to reverse acquittal. SC answers important questions","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"January 27, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The bench of MR Shah* and Sanjiv Khanna, JJ has answered the following three important questions on the revisional jurisdiction of the High Court: Whether the High Court in exercise of the revisional jurisdiction under Section 401 Cr.P.C. can set aside the order of acquittal and convicting the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Add-a-subheading-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Add-a-subheading-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Add-a-subheading-1.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Add-a-subheading-1.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Add-a-subheading-1.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":260877,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/31\/section-125-crpc-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":247665,"position":5},"title":"Court under maintenance proceedings under S. 125 of CrPC, can usurp jurisdiction of Civil Courts? Del HC decides","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 31, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Chandra Dhari Singh, J., decided a maintenance case wherein the marital status of the parties was the crux of the matter and expressed that, \u201c\u2026there is no straight jacket formula for judging the validity of the marriage between the parties.\u201d A petition was filed under Section 397\/401\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/247665","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=247665"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/247665\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/243203"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=247665"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=247665"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=247665"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}