{"id":247082,"date":"2021-04-15T12:45:39","date_gmt":"2021-04-15T07:15:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=247082"},"modified":"2021-04-23T12:51:47","modified_gmt":"2021-04-23T07:21:47","slug":"dentist-act","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/15\/dentist-act\/","title":{"rendered":"Chh HC | Aggrieved by an order passed under S. 41(1) Dentists Act, 1948 appeal can be filed before State Government in accordance with S. 41(4) of Dentists Act, 1948"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Chhattisgarh High Court:<\/strong> Goutam Bhaduri, J. dismissed the petition as being devoid of merit.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The facts are such that the petitioner was accused of treating 1400 children of 6 villages by placing wire on teeth in order to get the advantage of the government scheme. The petitioner used the scheme of fixed orthodontic appliances over 281 children of different villages by providing treatment by wrongly applying fixed orthodontic appliances over 280 children of different villages. Consequent to this respondent no.4 i.e. Chhattisgarh State Dental Council in exercise of power under Section 41(1) of the Dentists Act, 1948 suspended the registration of the petitioner from 18.03.2021 to 18.03.2022. The instant petition was filed challenging the suspension order on grounds of stating that such order is without jurisdiction.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Counsel for the petitioners <strong>Mr Prafull Bharat<\/strong> submitted that order suspending the petitioner&#8217;s practice is not embodied in Section 41 of The Dentists Act, 1948 which speaks only about removal from register and such removal will not include the suspension. It was further submitted that the facts of the accusation was not ascertained and the treatment was done by following the due procedure as to be implemented by the State Government.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Counsel for the respondents <strong>Mr Gagan Tiwari<\/strong> submitted that Section 41 of The Dentist Act, 1948 states regarding the removal from register and the removal of registration in the instant case was made for a specific period. It was further submitted that the nature of allegations leveled against the petitioner was enquired and the petitioner was given an opportunity of hearing and thereafter the orders were passed. It was further submitted that the petitioner has a statutory remedy to file an appeal before the State Government.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court observed that a reading of sub-section (4) of Section 41 of Dentists Act, 1948 purports that if a person feels aggrieved by an order passed under sub section (1), he may file an appeal to the State Government.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court held <em>\u201cthe petitioner if is aggrieved by the order can avail statutory remedy of filing an appeal before the State Government under sub-section (4) of Section 41 of the Act.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In view of the above, petition was dismissed.[Manish Kumar Pandit v. State of Chhattisgarh, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Omw3v227\"><b>2021 SCC OnLine Chh 908<\/b><\/a>, decided on 07-04-2021]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\">Arunima Bose, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Chhattisgarh High Court: Goutam Bhaduri, J. dismissed the petition as being devoid of merit. The facts are such that the petitioner was <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[8991,45688,29785,7431],"class_list":["post-247082","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-appeal","tag-dentist-act","tag-law","tag-state-government"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Chh HC | Aggrieved by an order passed under S. 41(1) Dentists Act, 1948 appeal can be filed before State Government in accordance with S. 41(4) of Dentists Act, 1948 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Dentist Act\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/15\/dentist-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Chh HC | Aggrieved by an order passed under S. 41(1) Dentists Act, 1948 appeal can be filed before State Government in accordance with S. 41(4) of Dentists Act, 1948\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Dentist Act\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/15\/dentist-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-04-15T07:15:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-04-23T07:21:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/chattisgarh_high_court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/15\/dentist-act\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/15\/dentist-act\/\",\"name\":\"Chh HC | Aggrieved by an order passed under S. 41(1) Dentists Act, 1948 appeal can be filed before State Government in accordance with S. 41(4) of Dentists Act, 1948 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-04-15T07:15:39+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-04-23T07:21:47+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Dentist Act\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/15\/dentist-act\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/15\/dentist-act\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/15\/dentist-act\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Chh HC | Aggrieved by an order passed under S. 41(1) Dentists Act, 1948 appeal can be filed before State Government in accordance with S. 41(4) of Dentists Act, 1948\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Chh HC | Aggrieved by an order passed under S. 41(1) Dentists Act, 1948 appeal can be filed before State Government in accordance with S. 41(4) of Dentists Act, 1948 | SCC Times","description":"Dentist Act","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/15\/dentist-act\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Chh HC | Aggrieved by an order passed under S. 41(1) Dentists Act, 1948 appeal can be filed before State Government in accordance with S. 41(4) of Dentists Act, 1948","og_description":"Dentist Act","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/15\/dentist-act\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-04-15T07:15:39+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-04-23T07:21:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/chattisgarh_high_court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/15\/dentist-act\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/15\/dentist-act\/","name":"Chh HC | Aggrieved by an order passed under S. 41(1) Dentists Act, 1948 appeal can be filed before State Government in accordance with S. 41(4) of Dentists Act, 1948 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-04-15T07:15:39+00:00","dateModified":"2021-04-23T07:21:47+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Dentist Act","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/15\/dentist-act\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/15\/dentist-act\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/15\/dentist-act\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Chh HC | Aggrieved by an order passed under S. 41(1) Dentists Act, 1948 appeal can be filed before State Government in accordance with S. 41(4) of Dentists Act, 1948"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":158444,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/21\/cabinet-approves-introduction-of-the-dentists-amendment-bill-2017\/","url_meta":{"origin":247082,"position":0},"title":"Cabinet approves introduction of the Dentists (Amendment) Bill, 2017","author":"Saba","date":"September 21, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"The Union Cabinet chaired by the Prime Minister has given its approval for introduction of the Dentists (Amendment) Bill, 2017 in Parliament subject to modifications of drafting or consequential nature, if any, as may be considered necessary by the Legislative Department by amending the Dentists Act, 1948 (16 of 1948).\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cabinet Decisions&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cabinet Decisions","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/cabinet_decisions\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/DSC_4762-e1474523869607.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/DSC_4762-e1474523869607.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/DSC_4762-e1474523869607.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/DSC_4762-e1474523869607.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/DSC_4762-e1474523869607.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":276421,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/19\/whether-head-cooks-and-cooks-employed-under-mid-day-meal-scheme-covered-under-minimum-wages-act-1948-karnataka-high-court-analyses\/","url_meta":{"origin":247082,"position":1},"title":"Whether Head cooks and cooks employed under Mid-Day Meal Scheme covered under Minimum Wages Act, 1948? Karnataka High Court analyses","author":"Editor","date":"August 19, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: In a case filed by a social activist seeking direction to State to provide minimum wages to the women workers employed under mid-day meal scheme and to provide other benefits like Maternity Leave and other Leaves including medical benefits and insurance benefits, a Division Bench of Alok\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Karnataka High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/karnataka_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/karnataka_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/karnataka_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/karnataka_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/karnataka_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":315244,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/24\/calcutta-high-court-directs-the-returning-officer-to-reschedule-west-bengal-dental-councils-election-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":247082,"position":2},"title":"\u2018Returning Officer has power to alter election schedule\u2019; Calcutta High Court directs to reschedule West Bengal Dental Council\u2019s Election","author":"Ritu","date":"February 24, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court emphasised on the importance of conducting the elections to avoid a \u201cheadless state of affairs\u201d in the Council and to uphold the democratic process.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Calcutta High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":155694,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/11\/no-consideration-can-be-shown-to-state-transport-corporation-unless-scheme-as-per-ch-vi-of-mv-act-is-finalised-by-government\/","url_meta":{"origin":247082,"position":3},"title":"No consideration can be shown to State Transport Corporation unless scheme as per Ch. VI of MV Act is finalised by Government","author":"Saba","date":"September 11, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"High Court of Himachal Pradesh: While deciding a Civil Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution praying to quash the order of the RTO, Dharamshala wherein he revised the departure time of the bus of the petitioner, a two-Judge Bench of Sanjay Karol, Acting CJ and Sandeep Sharma,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":276354,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/31\/meritorious-students-dont-need-backdoor-entry-supreme-court-quashes-illegal-admissions-to-chhattisgarh-pg-dental-colleges\/","url_meta":{"origin":247082,"position":4},"title":"\u201cMeritorious students don\u2019t need backdoor entry\u201d; Supreme Court quashes illegal admissions to Chhattisgarh PG Dental Colleges","author":"Editor","date":"October 31, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In an appeal filed by the Dental Council of India (\u2018DCI\u2019) against the order of Chhattisgarh High Court, wherein the Court has quashed and set aside the communication of the State of Chhattisgarh cancelling the admissions of the respondents, the division bench of *M.R Shah and M.M Sundresh,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Meritorious-students-dont-need-backdoor-entry-Supreme-Court-quashes-illegal-admissions-to-Chhattisgarh-PG-Dental-Colleges-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Meritorious-students-dont-need-backdoor-entry-Supreme-Court-quashes-illegal-admissions-to-Chhattisgarh-PG-Dental-Colleges-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Meritorious-students-dont-need-backdoor-entry-Supreme-Court-quashes-illegal-admissions-to-Chhattisgarh-PG-Dental-Colleges-1.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Meritorious-students-dont-need-backdoor-entry-Supreme-Court-quashes-illegal-admissions-to-Chhattisgarh-PG-Dental-Colleges-1.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Meritorious-students-dont-need-backdoor-entry-Supreme-Court-quashes-illegal-admissions-to-Chhattisgarh-PG-Dental-Colleges-1.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":48961,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/24\/govt-amends-indian-medical-council-act-and-dentists-act-to-institutionalise-neet\/","url_meta":{"origin":247082,"position":5},"title":"Govt amends Indian Medical Council Act and Dentists Act to institutionalise NEET","author":"Sucheta","date":"May 24, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"The President of India promulgated two ordinances to amend the Indian Medical Council Act and the Dentist Act to conduct a uniform entrance exam to all medical educational institutions at the undergraduate level and post graduate level in English, Hindi and such other languages as may be prescribed for the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Foreign Legislation&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Foreign Legislation","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/foreign\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/admision-and-examination.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/admision-and-examination.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/admision-and-examination.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/admision-and-examination.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/admision-and-examination.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/247082","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=247082"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/247082\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=247082"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=247082"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=247082"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}