{"id":247048,"date":"2021-04-13T16:16:59","date_gmt":"2021-04-13T10:46:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=247048"},"modified":"2021-04-16T12:18:35","modified_gmt":"2021-04-16T06:48:35","slug":"no-blood-or-breath-analyser-test-proving-drunk-driving-insurer-may-still-establish-a-case-for-exclusion-from-liability-supreme-court","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/13\/no-blood-or-breath-analyser-test-proving-drunk-driving-insurer-may-still-establish-a-case-for-exclusion-from-liability-supreme-court\/","title":{"rendered":"No blood or breath analyser test proving drunk driving? Insurer may still establish a case for exclusion from liability: Supreme Court"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Supreme Court<\/strong>: In an interesting case, the 3-judge bench of UU Lalit, Indira Banerjee and <strong>KM Joseph*<\/strong>, JJ has held that while in case where there is a blood test or breath test, which indicates that there is no consumption at all, undoubtedly, it would not be open to the insurer to set up the case of exclusion, however, the absence of test may not disable the insurer from establishing a case for exclusion from liability on ground of drunk driving.<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\"><strong>How to decide if the driver was \u201cunder the influence of intoxicating liquor\u201d? <\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">If in a case, without there being any blood test, circumstances, associated with effects of consumption of alcohol, are proved, it may certainly go to show that the person who drove the vehicle, had come under the influence of alcohol. The manner, in which the vehicle was driven, may again, if it unerringly points to the person having been under the influence of alcohol, be reckoned.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800080;\">\u201cEvidence, if forthcoming, of an unsteady gait, smell of alcohol, the eyes being congested, apart from, of course, actual consumption of alcohol, either before the commencement of the driving or even during the process of driving, along with the manner in which the accident took place, may point to the driver being under the influence of alcohol. It would be a finding based on the effect of the pleadings and the evidence.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\"><strong>What does Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act state? <\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/zvyJGj4M\">Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act<\/a> creates a criminal offence dealing with driving by a drunken person or by a person under the influence of drugs. <strong>The Section mandates the proving of the objective criteria of presence of alcohol exceeding 30 mg per 100 ml. of blood in a test by a breath analyser<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Being a criminal offence, it is indisputable that the ingredients of the offence must be established as contemplated by law which means that the case must be proved beyond reasonable doubt and evidence must clearly indicate the level of alcohol in excess of 30 mg in 100 ml blood and what is more such presence must be borne out by a test by a breath analyser. With effect from 01.09.2019, the following words have been added to Section 185, that is \u201cor in any other test including laboratory test\u201d.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800080;\">\u201cThe law does not prohibit driving after consuming liquor and all that is prohibited is, that the percentage of liquor should not exceed 30 mg. per 100 ml. of blood. Therefore, the understanding appears to be that only in circumstances, where the act of driving, having consumed liquor, attracts the wrath of Section 185 and an offence is committed thereunder, that the opprobrium of the Exclusion Clause in the Contract of Insurance, for own damage, is attracted.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Read the full text of the provision <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/zvyJGj4M\">here<\/a>.\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\"><strong>Why will lack of scientific material not disable the insurer from establishing a case for exclusion?<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">If prosecution has not filed a case under Section 185, that would not mean that a competent Forum in an action alleging deficiency of service, under the Consumer Protection Act, is disabled from finding that the vehicle was being driven by the person under the influence of the alcohol.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800080;\">\u201cThe presence of alcohol in excess of 30 mg per 100 ml. of blood is not an indispensable requirement to enable an Insurer to successfully invoke the clause. What is required to be proved is driving by a person under the influence of the alcohol. Drunken driving, a criminal offence, under Section 185 along with its objective criteria of the alcohol-blood level, is not the only way to prove that the person was under the influence of alcohol. If the Breath Analyser or any other test is not performed for any reason, the Insurer cannot be barred from proving his case otherwise.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Further, should the Insurer fail to establish a case in terms of Section 185 BAL (Blood Analyser Test), it would fail, may not be the proper approach to the issue.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800080;\">\u201cIt is not difficult to contemplate that the accident may take place with the driver being under the influence of alcohol and neither the Breath Test nor the laboratory test is done. A driver after the accident, may run away. A test may never be performed. However, there may be evidence available which may indicate that the vehicle in question was being driven at the time of the accident by a person under the influence of alcohol.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hence, in such circumstances, it cannot then be said that merely because there is no test performed, the Insurer would be deprived of its right to establish a case which is well within its rights under the contract.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">[IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. v. Pearl Beverages, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/86AFEzbu\"><b>2021 SCC OnLine SC 309<\/b><\/a>, decided on 12.04.2021]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>*Judgment by Justice KM Joseph<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>For appellant:<\/strong> Advocate Shivam Singh<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>For respondent<\/strong>: Senior Advocate Gopal Sankarnarayanan<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8220;Merely because there is no test performed, the Insurer would not be deprived of its right to establish a case which is well within its rights under the contract.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121,"featured_media":243205,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[31970,36370,45678,2707,34735,45679],"class_list":["post-247048","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-blood-test","tag-breath-analyser-test","tag-drunk-driving","tag-Insurance","tag-intoxication","tag-section-185"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>No blood or breath analyser test proving drunk driving? Insurer may still establish a case for exclusion from liability: Supreme Court | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/13\/no-blood-or-breath-analyser-test-proving-drunk-driving-insurer-may-still-establish-a-case-for-exclusion-from-liability-supreme-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"No blood or breath analyser test proving drunk driving? Insurer may still establish a case for exclusion from liability: Supreme Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"&quot;Merely because there is no test performed, the Insurer would not be deprived of its right to establish a case which is well within its rights under the contract.&quot;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/13\/no-blood-or-breath-analyser-test-proving-drunk-driving-insurer-may-still-establish-a-case-for-exclusion-from-liability-supreme-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-04-13T10:46:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-04-16T06:48:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/13\/no-blood-or-breath-analyser-test-proving-drunk-driving-insurer-may-still-establish-a-case-for-exclusion-from-liability-supreme-court\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/13\/no-blood-or-breath-analyser-test-proving-drunk-driving-insurer-may-still-establish-a-case-for-exclusion-from-liability-supreme-court\/\",\"name\":\"No blood or breath analyser test proving drunk driving? Insurer may still establish a case for exclusion from liability: Supreme Court | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/13\/no-blood-or-breath-analyser-test-proving-drunk-driving-insurer-may-still-establish-a-case-for-exclusion-from-liability-supreme-court\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/13\/no-blood-or-breath-analyser-test-proving-drunk-driving-insurer-may-still-establish-a-case-for-exclusion-from-liability-supreme-court\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-04-13T10:46:59+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-04-16T06:48:35+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/13\/no-blood-or-breath-analyser-test-proving-drunk-driving-insurer-may-still-establish-a-case-for-exclusion-from-liability-supreme-court\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/13\/no-blood-or-breath-analyser-test-proving-drunk-driving-insurer-may-still-establish-a-case-for-exclusion-from-liability-supreme-court\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/13\/no-blood-or-breath-analyser-test-proving-drunk-driving-insurer-may-still-establish-a-case-for-exclusion-from-liability-supreme-court\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":888},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/13\/no-blood-or-breath-analyser-test-proving-drunk-driving-insurer-may-still-establish-a-case-for-exclusion-from-liability-supreme-court\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"No blood or breath analyser test proving drunk driving? Insurer may still establish a case for exclusion from liability: Supreme Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\",\"name\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"caption\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\"},\"description\":\"Senior Associate Editor\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"No blood or breath analyser test proving drunk driving? Insurer may still establish a case for exclusion from liability: Supreme Court | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/13\/no-blood-or-breath-analyser-test-proving-drunk-driving-insurer-may-still-establish-a-case-for-exclusion-from-liability-supreme-court\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"No blood or breath analyser test proving drunk driving? Insurer may still establish a case for exclusion from liability: Supreme Court","og_description":"\"Merely because there is no test performed, the Insurer would not be deprived of its right to establish a case which is well within its rights under the contract.\"","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/13\/no-blood-or-breath-analyser-test-proving-drunk-driving-insurer-may-still-establish-a-case-for-exclusion-from-liability-supreme-court\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-04-13T10:46:59+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-04-16T06:48:35+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Prachi Bhardwaj","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/13\/no-blood-or-breath-analyser-test-proving-drunk-driving-insurer-may-still-establish-a-case-for-exclusion-from-liability-supreme-court\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/13\/no-blood-or-breath-analyser-test-proving-drunk-driving-insurer-may-still-establish-a-case-for-exclusion-from-liability-supreme-court\/","name":"No blood or breath analyser test proving drunk driving? Insurer may still establish a case for exclusion from liability: Supreme Court | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/13\/no-blood-or-breath-analyser-test-proving-drunk-driving-insurer-may-still-establish-a-case-for-exclusion-from-liability-supreme-court\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/13\/no-blood-or-breath-analyser-test-proving-drunk-driving-insurer-may-still-establish-a-case-for-exclusion-from-liability-supreme-court\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg","datePublished":"2021-04-13T10:46:59+00:00","dateModified":"2021-04-16T06:48:35+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/13\/no-blood-or-breath-analyser-test-proving-drunk-driving-insurer-may-still-establish-a-case-for-exclusion-from-liability-supreme-court\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/13\/no-blood-or-breath-analyser-test-proving-drunk-driving-insurer-may-still-establish-a-case-for-exclusion-from-liability-supreme-court\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/13\/no-blood-or-breath-analyser-test-proving-drunk-driving-insurer-may-still-establish-a-case-for-exclusion-from-liability-supreme-court\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg","width":1331,"height":888},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/13\/no-blood-or-breath-analyser-test-proving-drunk-driving-insurer-may-still-establish-a-case-for-exclusion-from-liability-supreme-court\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"No blood or breath analyser test proving drunk driving? Insurer may still establish a case for exclusion from liability: Supreme Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942","name":"Prachi Bhardwaj","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","caption":"Prachi Bhardwaj"},"description":"Senior Associate Editor","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":247350,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/19\/scc-online-weekly-rewind-5\/","url_meta":{"origin":247048,"position":0},"title":"SCC Online Weekly Rewind Episode 6","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 19, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"6th Episode of SCC Online Weekly Rewind featuring Prachi Bhardwaj, Associate Editor bringing you the most important and interesting stories from the field of law is out now! Check out the link below. Supreme\u00a0Court\u00a0 \u2666 Enquiry by retired Supreme Court judge into Justice V. Eswaraiah\u00a0Phone Call controversy uncalled for\u00a0 In\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;SCC Times Newsflash&quot;","block_context":{"text":"SCC Times Newsflash","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/watch-now-2\/scc-times-newsflash\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Weekly-Rewind-Episode-6.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Weekly-Rewind-Episode-6.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Weekly-Rewind-Episode-6.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Weekly-Rewind-Episode-6.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Weekly-Rewind-Episode-6.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":242509,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/21\/ker-hc-there-can-be-no-prosecution-under-s-185-of-mv-act-in-the-absence-of-alcohol-detection-test-through-breath-analyser\/","url_meta":{"origin":247048,"position":1},"title":"Ker HC | There can be no prosecution under S. 185 of MV Act in the absence of alcohol detection test through breath analyser","author":"Editor","date":"January 21, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: V.G. Arun, J., while partly allowing the instant petition held that offence under Section 185 of Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 would be attracted only when alcohol content is detected through breath analyser test or in any other test including a laboratory test. The petitioner was an accused\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":200168,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/16\/fake-driving-licence-per-se-does-not-absolve-insurer-of-liability-to-pay-compensation-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":247048,"position":2},"title":"Fake driving licence, per se, does not absolve insurer of liability to pay compensation: SC  \u00a0","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 16, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: A.M. Khanwilkar, J. delivered the judgment for CJ Dipak Misra and himself whereby the matter concerning the liability of the insurer to pay compensation in a motor accident claim was remanded back to the Allahabad High Court. Respondents 1-5 filed a claim before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":324882,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/21\/breath-analyzer-report-not-conclusive-proof-of-consumption-of-alcohol-pathc\/","url_meta":{"origin":247048,"position":3},"title":"Breath analyzer report not conclusive proof of consumption of alcohol: Patna High Court","author":"Simranjeet","date":"June 21, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Consumption of alcohol can only be ascertained by way of blood and urine test by a person suspected to have consumed alcohol.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Patna High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Patna-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Patna-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Patna-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Patna-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":278665,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/19\/supreme-court-exclusion-clause-destroying-the-contract-entered-with-knowledge-cannot-be-permitted-to-be-used-by-a-party-who-introduced-it-to-avoid-its-liability-legal-research-le\/","url_meta":{"origin":247048,"position":4},"title":"Supreme Court| &#8216;Exclusion clause&#8217; destroying the contract entered with knowledge, cannot be permitted to be used by a party who introduced it, to avoid liability","author":"Editor","date":"November 19, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Supreme Court: In an appeal against the decision of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (\u2018NCDRC\u2019), wherein the commission having found a deficiency in service; placed reliance upon the exclusion clause in setting aside the decision of the State Commission while granting a sum of Rs. 7.5 lakhs\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image1-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image1-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image1-1.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image1-1.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image1-1.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":247815,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/02\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-april-2021\/","url_meta":{"origin":247048,"position":5},"title":"Supreme Court Monthly Roundup &#8211; April 2021","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"May 2, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"TOP STORIES Constitution Bench No more \u201cmechanical\u201d conversion of complaints under Section 138 NI Act from summary to summons trial; Magistrates \u201cmust\u201d record reasons: Supreme Court \u201cSuch conversion of complaints under Section 138 from summary trial to summons trial has been contributing to the delay in disposal of the cases.\u201d\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Supreme Court Roundups&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Supreme Court Roundups","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/scmonthly\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-31.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-31.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-31.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-31.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-31.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/247048","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/121"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=247048"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/247048\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/243205"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=247048"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=247048"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=247048"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}