{"id":246480,"date":"2021-04-04T22:18:41","date_gmt":"2021-04-04T16:48:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=246480"},"modified":"2021-04-08T18:38:14","modified_gmt":"2021-04-08T13:08:14","slug":"whether-pre-fir-enquiry-is-permissible-against-public-servant-in-corruption-matters-what-is-the-scope-and-ambit-of-such-an-enquiry-supreme-court-explains","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/04\/whether-pre-fir-enquiry-is-permissible-against-public-servant-in-corruption-matters-what-is-the-scope-and-ambit-of-such-an-enquiry-supreme-court-explains\/","title":{"rendered":"Whether pre-FIR enquiry is permissible against public servant in corruption matters? What is the scope and ambit of such an enquiry? Supreme Court explains"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Supreme Court of India: <\/strong>The Division Bench comprising of Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud and <strong>M.R. Shah*<\/strong>, JJ., addressed the instant appeal challenging the validity of notice send to the appellant by Anti-corruption Bureau regarding pre-FIR open enquiry against him. The Bench stated,<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #666699;\"><strong>\u201c\u2026(If) an enquiry is held and\/or conducted after following the procedure as per Maharashtra State Anti-corruption &amp; Prohibition Intelligence Bureau Manual, it cannot be said that the same is illegal and\/or the police officer, Anti-corruption Bureau has no jurisdiction and\/or authority and\/or power at all to conduct such an enquiry at pre-registration of FIR stage.\u201d<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\"><strong>Background<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The background of the instant case relates to various allegations made against the appellant and his brothers with regard to accumulating the assets disproportionate to his known sources of income. Noticeably, the appellant was a Member and President of Municipal Council, Katol, Nagpur. In connection with the said complaint, the Police Inspector, Anti-corruption Bureau, had issued a notice, calling upon the appellant to personally remain present before the investigating officer of the Anti-corruption Bureau to give his statement in an \u2018open enquiry\u2019 in respect of the property owned by him along with the information on the points stated in the said notice and further, asking him to provide documents relating to his property, assets, bank statements, income tax returns.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The grievance of the petitioner was that the Police Inspector, Anti-Corruption Bureau, had no power to issue the said notice. It was also submitted that there is no statutory provision which would compel any body to give statement to the police. It was also submitted that there was no FIR against the appellant. Per contra, the respondent authority submitted that the said \u2018open enquiry\u2019 was ordered to find out if an offence under Section 13(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act was disclosed.<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\"><strong><u>Whether such an enquiry at pre-FIR stage would be legal and to what extent such an enquiry is permissible?<\/u><\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In <strong><em>Lalita Kumari v. Government of Uttar Pradesh<\/em>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/L23cg0P8\">(2014) 2 SCC 1<\/a><\/strong>, this Court had observed that it is mandatory to register an FIR on receipt of information disclosing a cognizable offence. However, this Court had also considered the situations\/cases in which preliminary enquiry is permissible\/desirable and certain illustrations were also \u00a0carved out in which the preliminary enquiry was held to be permissible\/desirable before registering\/lodging of an FIR. <strong><em>It was further observed that if the information received did not disclose a cognizable offence but indicates the necessity for an inquiry, a preliminary enquiry may be conducted to ascertain whether cognizable offence is disclosed or not.<\/em> <\/strong>It had been clarified that the scope of preliminary inquiry is not to verify the veracity or otherwise of the information received but only to ascertain whether the information reveals any cognizable offence. Similarly, in<strong> <em>P. Sirajuddin v. State of Madras,<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Khs81W79\">(1970) 1 SCC 595<\/a><\/strong>, this Court expressed the need for a preliminary enquiry before proceeding against public servants.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">When a public servant, whatever be his status, is publicly charged with acts of dishonesty which amount to serious misdemeanour or misconduct of indulging into corrupt practice, it does incalculable harm not only to the officer in particular but to the department he belonged to in general. Thus, before lodging FIR against him, there must be some suitable preliminary enquiry into the allegations by a responsible officer to ascertain whether cognizable offence is disclosed or not.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Observing that a fool proof safeguard and procedure is provided under the Maharashtra State Anti-corruption &amp; Prohibition Intelligence Bureau Manual of Instructions 1968, before lodging an FIR\/complaint before the Court against the public servant, the Bench disregarded any doubt of irregularity regarding the issuance of impugned notice. Further, the Bench observed that the information sought on the aforesaid points was having a direct connection with the allegations made against the appellant, namely, accumulating assets disproportionate to his known sources of income. Clarifying that such an \u2018open enquiry\u2019, should be restricted to facilitate the appellant to clarify regarding his assets and known sources of income, the Bench said the same could not be said to be a fishing or roving enquiry.<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\"><strong>Conclusion <\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Clarifying that the statement of the appellant and the information so received during the course of discrete enquiry should be only for the purpose to satisfy and find out whether an offence under Section 13(1)(e) of the PC Act, 1988 was disclosed. Such a statement cannot be said to be confessional in character, and would be restricted only to ascertain whether a cognizable offence is disclosed or not. The Bench held that such an enquiry would be to safeguard the interest of appellant which may avoid further harassment to him. Hence, the Bench refused to interfere with the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court of Bombay and dismissed the appeal with the above observations.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">[Charansingh v. State of Maharashtra, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/u67l2622\"><b>2021 SCC OnLine SC 251<\/b><\/a>, decided on 24-03-2021]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>Kamini Sharma, Editorial Assistant has put this report together\u00a0<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>*Judgment by: Justice M.R. Shah<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Appearance before the Court by:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>For the Appellant:<\/strong> Sr. Adv. Subodh Dharmadhikari,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>For the Respondent\/s<\/strong>: Sr. Adv. Raja Thakare<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Supreme Court of India: The Division Bench comprising of Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud and M.R. Shah*, JJ., addressed the instant appeal challenging the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":243203,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[2673,30150,3067,2675],"class_list":["post-246480","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-corruption","tag-enquiry","tag-FIR","tag-public_servant"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Whether pre-FIR enquiry is permissible against public servant in corruption matters? What is the scope and ambit of such an enquiry? Supreme Court explains | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/04\/whether-pre-fir-enquiry-is-permissible-against-public-servant-in-corruption-matters-what-is-the-scope-and-ambit-of-such-an-enquiry-supreme-court-explains\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Whether pre-FIR enquiry is permissible against public servant in corruption matters? What is the scope and ambit of such an enquiry? Supreme Court explains\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court of India: The Division Bench comprising of Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud and M.R. Shah*, JJ., addressed the instant appeal challenging the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/04\/whether-pre-fir-enquiry-is-permissible-against-public-servant-in-corruption-matters-what-is-the-scope-and-ambit-of-such-an-enquiry-supreme-court-explains\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-04-04T16:48:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-04-08T13:08:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/04\/whether-pre-fir-enquiry-is-permissible-against-public-servant-in-corruption-matters-what-is-the-scope-and-ambit-of-such-an-enquiry-supreme-court-explains\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/04\/whether-pre-fir-enquiry-is-permissible-against-public-servant-in-corruption-matters-what-is-the-scope-and-ambit-of-such-an-enquiry-supreme-court-explains\/\",\"name\":\"Whether pre-FIR enquiry is permissible against public servant in corruption matters? What is the scope and ambit of such an enquiry? Supreme Court explains | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/04\/whether-pre-fir-enquiry-is-permissible-against-public-servant-in-corruption-matters-what-is-the-scope-and-ambit-of-such-an-enquiry-supreme-court-explains\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/04\/whether-pre-fir-enquiry-is-permissible-against-public-servant-in-corruption-matters-what-is-the-scope-and-ambit-of-such-an-enquiry-supreme-court-explains\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-04-04T16:48:41+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-04-08T13:08:14+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/04\/whether-pre-fir-enquiry-is-permissible-against-public-servant-in-corruption-matters-what-is-the-scope-and-ambit-of-such-an-enquiry-supreme-court-explains\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/04\/whether-pre-fir-enquiry-is-permissible-against-public-servant-in-corruption-matters-what-is-the-scope-and-ambit-of-such-an-enquiry-supreme-court-explains\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/04\/whether-pre-fir-enquiry-is-permissible-against-public-servant-in-corruption-matters-what-is-the-scope-and-ambit-of-such-an-enquiry-supreme-court-explains\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":888},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/04\/whether-pre-fir-enquiry-is-permissible-against-public-servant-in-corruption-matters-what-is-the-scope-and-ambit-of-such-an-enquiry-supreme-court-explains\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Whether pre-FIR enquiry is permissible against public servant in corruption matters? What is the scope and ambit of such an enquiry? Supreme Court explains\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Whether pre-FIR enquiry is permissible against public servant in corruption matters? What is the scope and ambit of such an enquiry? Supreme Court explains | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/04\/whether-pre-fir-enquiry-is-permissible-against-public-servant-in-corruption-matters-what-is-the-scope-and-ambit-of-such-an-enquiry-supreme-court-explains\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Whether pre-FIR enquiry is permissible against public servant in corruption matters? What is the scope and ambit of such an enquiry? Supreme Court explains","og_description":"Supreme Court of India: The Division Bench comprising of Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud and M.R. Shah*, JJ., addressed the instant appeal challenging the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/04\/whether-pre-fir-enquiry-is-permissible-against-public-servant-in-corruption-matters-what-is-the-scope-and-ambit-of-such-an-enquiry-supreme-court-explains\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-04-04T16:48:41+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-04-08T13:08:14+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/04\/whether-pre-fir-enquiry-is-permissible-against-public-servant-in-corruption-matters-what-is-the-scope-and-ambit-of-such-an-enquiry-supreme-court-explains\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/04\/whether-pre-fir-enquiry-is-permissible-against-public-servant-in-corruption-matters-what-is-the-scope-and-ambit-of-such-an-enquiry-supreme-court-explains\/","name":"Whether pre-FIR enquiry is permissible against public servant in corruption matters? What is the scope and ambit of such an enquiry? Supreme Court explains | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/04\/whether-pre-fir-enquiry-is-permissible-against-public-servant-in-corruption-matters-what-is-the-scope-and-ambit-of-such-an-enquiry-supreme-court-explains\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/04\/whether-pre-fir-enquiry-is-permissible-against-public-servant-in-corruption-matters-what-is-the-scope-and-ambit-of-such-an-enquiry-supreme-court-explains\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg","datePublished":"2021-04-04T16:48:41+00:00","dateModified":"2021-04-08T13:08:14+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/04\/whether-pre-fir-enquiry-is-permissible-against-public-servant-in-corruption-matters-what-is-the-scope-and-ambit-of-such-an-enquiry-supreme-court-explains\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/04\/whether-pre-fir-enquiry-is-permissible-against-public-servant-in-corruption-matters-what-is-the-scope-and-ambit-of-such-an-enquiry-supreme-court-explains\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/04\/whether-pre-fir-enquiry-is-permissible-against-public-servant-in-corruption-matters-what-is-the-scope-and-ambit-of-such-an-enquiry-supreme-court-explains\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg","width":1331,"height":888},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/04\/whether-pre-fir-enquiry-is-permissible-against-public-servant-in-corruption-matters-what-is-the-scope-and-ambit-of-such-an-enquiry-supreme-court-explains\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Whether pre-FIR enquiry is permissible against public servant in corruption matters? What is the scope and ambit of such an enquiry? Supreme Court explains"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":216452,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/04\/jk-hc-power-of-employer-to-hold-departmental-enquiry-against-a-delinquent-government-servant-is-independent-of-the-power-of-the-police-and-anti-corruption-bureau-to-register-fir\/","url_meta":{"origin":246480,"position":0},"title":"J&#038;K HC | Power of employer to hold departmental enquiry against a delinquent government servant, is independent of power of police and Anti-Corruption Bureau to register FIR","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 4, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: Sanjeev Kumar, J. dismissed a writ petition which claimed promotion and challenged the government order which was made on the basis of serious allegations regarding the disproportionate acquisition of property. Respondent 2 herein, on a complaint, conducted a secret verification and found that the petitioner\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":255403,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/09\/explained-is-preliminary-enquiry-mandatory-in-all-corruption-cases\/","url_meta":{"origin":246480,"position":1},"title":"Explained| Is Preliminary Enquiry mandatory in all corruption cases?","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"October 9, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of Dr. DY Chandrachud*, Vikram Nath and BV Nagarathna, JJ has held that a Preliminary Enquiry is not mandatory in all cases which involve allegations of corruption. The Court said that in case the information received by the CBI, through a complaint or a \u201csource\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":286591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/09\/desirable-if-high-courts-maintain-a-hands-off-approach-and-not-quash-a-fir-pertaining-to-corruption-cases-at-the-stage-of-investigation-supreme-court-legal-re\/","url_meta":{"origin":246480,"position":2},"title":"Desirable if High Courts maintain a hands-off approach and not quash FIRs in corruption cases at the stage of investigation: Supreme Court","author":"Apoorva","date":"March 9, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme court said that if criminal prosecution is based upon adequate evidence and the same is otherwise justifiable, it does not become vitiated on account of significant political overtones and mala fide motives","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/tmp_fbe9a0cf-f0c3-494a-948b-0b9673893672.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/tmp_fbe9a0cf-f0c3-494a-948b-0b9673893672.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/tmp_fbe9a0cf-f0c3-494a-948b-0b9673893672.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/tmp_fbe9a0cf-f0c3-494a-948b-0b9673893672.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":270861,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/29\/s-i-r-cannot-be-generated-at-the-drop-of-a-hat-karnataka-high-court-quashes-corruption-proceedings-initiated-by-acb-under-prevention-of-corruption-act-1988\/","url_meta":{"origin":246480,"position":3},"title":"&#8216;S.I.R cannot be generated at the drop of a hat&#8217;; Karnataka High Court quashes corruption proceedings initiated by ACB under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988","author":"Editor","date":"July 29, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Karnataka High Court: M Nagaprasanna, J. quashed the proceedings initiated against a public servant working as an Executive Engineer in the Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited, (\u2018the petitioner') as the entire process initiated by the Anti-Corruption Bureau (\u2018ACB') is contrary to the law. This is due to no\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Karnataka High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/karnataka_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/karnataka_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/karnataka_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/karnataka_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/karnataka_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":268122,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/08\/sealed-cover-jurisprudence-state-privilege-disclosure-information-madras-high-court-natural-justice-velumani-supreme-court-india-legal-updates-research-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":246480,"position":4},"title":"Madras High Court&#8217;s decision to keep enquiry report in a sealed cover in SP Velumani graft case doesn&#8217;t sit well with Supreme Court","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"June 8, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In the case where the Madras High Court had ordered an enquiry and obtained a report without\u00a0\u00a0 furnishing a copy thereof to Tamil Nadu Minister SP Velumani in a corruption case and unceremoniously closed the writ petition, the 3-judge bench of NV Ramana, CJ* and Krishna Murari and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-196.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-196.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-196.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-196.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-196.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":269322,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/30\/bombay-high-court-criminal-proceedings-cannot-be-proceeded-with-if-accused-was-exonerated-in-departmental-proceedings-based-on-identical-similar-charges\/","url_meta":{"origin":246480,"position":5},"title":"Bombay High Court | Criminal proceedings cannot be proceeded with if accused was exonerated in departmental proceedings based on identical\/similar charges","author":"Editor","date":"June 30, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: The Division Bench of S.B. Shukre and G. A. Sanap, JJ. allowed an application setting aside an FIR for the offences punishable under Sections 13(1)(c)(d) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 in the matter of departmental proceedings being based on identical\/similar charges. The complaint\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/246480","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=246480"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/246480\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/243203"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=246480"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=246480"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=246480"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}