{"id":246451,"date":"2021-04-03T11:30:24","date_gmt":"2021-04-03T06:00:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=246451"},"modified":"2021-04-08T18:46:52","modified_gmt":"2021-04-08T13:16:52","slug":"sales-tax","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/03\/sales-tax\/","title":{"rendered":"[Sales Tax] Ori HC | Once the material is offered for inspection, the delivery shall be \u201cdeemed to have been completed\u201d on that very date, Freight charges were rightly raised separately\u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"

Orissa High Court: <\/strong>A Division Bench of S. Muralidhar CJ and B.P. Routray, J. allowed the petition and held that the Tribunal was incorrect in holding that the freight shown in the sale bill separately is part of the sale price. It is held that the Petitioner is entitled to claim a deduction of the freight charges from the taxable sales turnover.<\/p>\n

The facts of the case are such that the petitioner is engaged in manufacturing and trading of cast iron goods and is a registered dealer under the Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947 (OST Act) and the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The Department of Telecommunications i.e. DoT floated a tender requiring the bidder to quote a basic unit price and excise duty, sales tax, insurance, freight and other taxes payable item wise which would remain fixed during the entire period of contract. The bid by the petitioner was accepted. The DoT inspected and earmarked the goods at the factory of the petitioners. The petitioner raised invoices separately showing freight, excise duty as per Section (iii) Part-3 of the tender conditions.<\/p>\n

On 24th<\/sup> April 1999, an inspection report was submitted and assessment proceedings initiated under Rule 12 (5) of the CST (Orissa) Rules. The explanation given was rejected by the STO and an additional demand was raised. Assailing this, an appeal was filed which came to be dismissed by the Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes. This order was put under challenge before Orissa Sales Tax Tribunal which was dismissed yet again. This order is under challenge in the present petition.<\/p>\n

Counsel for the petitioners submitted that the definition of sale price under Section 2 (h) of the CST Act made it clear that the sale price excluded the cost of freight of delivery where such cost was separately charged. He further referred to the clauses in the contract which made it clear that the sale was completed inside the Petitioner\u2019s factory, once it was inspected by the DoT and the goods to be sold were earmarked for purchase. He pointed out that the Petitioner had transported the goods to the site of the DoT at the latter\u2019s behest, after the sale was complete. Accordingly, the freight was charged separately and could not be included in the sale price.<\/p>\n

Counsel for the respondents submitted that the sale was complete when the delivery took place at the site of the DoT. He further observed that it was a contract of sale where the cost of freight was a part of the sale prices and the purchaser i.e. the DoT had not undertaken any obligation to pay freight incurred by the selling dealer. Therefore, the selling dealer i.e. the Petitioner would not be entitled to any deduction towards freight despite showing it separately in the sale invoice.<\/p>\n

The court observed that from Clauses 9.1 to 9.5 of the bid document, it is plain that the bidder was required to separately indicate the components of excise duty, sales tax, insurance and freight. The rate was to be quoted on FOR Destination in the States of Maharashtra and Goa. It was further observed that as per Clause 21.2 that the \u2018unit price\u2019 was the determining factor. It was further observed that Clause 6.1 Section VI of the General (Commercial) conditions of contract read with Clause 4 (a) of the PO indicates the intention of the parties was when they entered into the contract of sale and purchase as to the exact place of delivery of the goods in question. The definition of sale in Section 2(h) of the CST Act had to be understood in the context of the clauses of the contract. Here, once the sale was complete at the site of the inspection of the goods, which is the factory of the Petitioner, then the freight charge for further transportation of the goods to the purchaser\u2019s site would obviously not form part of the sale price. Therefore, it was being separately shown in the invoice.<\/p>\n

The court relied on the judgment State of Karnataka v. Bangalore Soft Drinks Pvt. Ltd. <\/em>(2000) 117 STC 413 (SC) and held \u201cthe freight charges are not includable in the sale price, which is amenable and therefore, has to be excluded while calculating the taxable turn over for the purposes of the OST Act\u201d<\/em>[Utkal Moulders v. State of Orissa, 2021 SCC OnLine Ori 199<\/b><\/a>, decided on 30-03-2021]<\/p>\n

\n

Arunima Bose, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Orissa High Court: A Division Bench of S. Muralidhar CJ and B.P. Routray, J. allowed the petition and held that the Tribunal <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[45589,29785,37146,2758],"class_list":["post-246451","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-freight","tag-law","tag-orissa-high-court","tag-sales_tax"],"yoast_head":"\n[Sales Tax] Ori HC | Once the material is offered for inspection, the delivery shall be \u201cdeemed to have been completed\u201d on that very date, Freight charges were rightly raised separately\u00a0 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Sales Tax\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/03\/sales-tax\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"[Sales Tax] Ori HC | Once the material is offered for inspection, the delivery shall be \u201cdeemed to have been completed\u201d on that very date, Freight charges were rightly raised separately\u00a0\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Sales Tax\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/03\/sales-tax\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-04-03T06:00:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-04-08T13:16:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/orissa-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/03\/sales-tax\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/03\/sales-tax\/\",\"name\":\"[Sales Tax] Ori HC | Once the material is offered for inspection, the delivery shall be \u201cdeemed to have been completed\u201d on that very date, Freight charges were rightly raised separately\u00a0 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-04-03T06:00:24+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-04-08T13:16:52+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Sales Tax\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/03\/sales-tax\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/03\/sales-tax\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/03\/sales-tax\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"[Sales Tax] Ori HC | Once the material is offered for inspection, the delivery shall be \u201cdeemed to have been completed\u201d on that very date, Freight charges were rightly raised separately\u00a0\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"[Sales Tax] Ori HC | Once the material is offered for inspection, the delivery shall be \u201cdeemed to have been completed\u201d on that very date, Freight charges were rightly raised separately\u00a0 | SCC Times","description":"Sales Tax","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/03\/sales-tax\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"[Sales Tax] Ori HC | Once the material is offered for inspection, the delivery shall be \u201cdeemed to have been completed\u201d on that very date, Freight charges were rightly raised separately\u00a0","og_description":"Sales Tax","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/03\/sales-tax\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-04-03T06:00:24+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-04-08T13:16:52+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/orissa-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/03\/sales-tax\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/03\/sales-tax\/","name":"[Sales Tax] Ori HC | Once the material is offered for inspection, the delivery shall be \u201cdeemed to have been completed\u201d on that very date, Freight charges were rightly raised separately\u00a0 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-04-03T06:00:24+00:00","dateModified":"2021-04-08T13:16:52+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Sales Tax","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/03\/sales-tax\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/03\/sales-tax\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/03\/sales-tax\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"[Sales Tax] Ori HC | Once the material is offered for inspection, the delivery shall be \u201cdeemed to have been completed\u201d on that very date, Freight charges were rightly raised separately\u00a0"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":192934,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/02\/28\/order-passed-commissioner-sales-tax-set-aside-grounds-limitation\/","url_meta":{"origin":246451,"position":0},"title":"Order passed by Commissioner of Sales Tax set aside on grounds of limitation","author":"Saba","date":"February 28, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Orissa High Court: An order of revision of assessment passed against the petitioner by the Commissioner of Sales Tax was set aside by a Division Bench comprising of Vineet Saran, CJ and B.R. Sarangi, J., holding that under Rule 80 of the Orissa Sales Tax Rules, the revision proceedings has\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":329688,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/30\/absence-of-payment-of-freight-charges-acknowledgement-taking-delivery-goods-toll-receipts-fail-establish-physical-movement-goods-allahabad-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":246451,"position":1},"title":"Absence of payment of freight charges, acknowledgement of taking delivery of goods, toll receipts fails to establish physical movement of goods; Allahabad HC upholds proceedings under S.74 of UPGST","author":"Apoorva","date":"August 30, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIn the event of wrong availment of input tax credit, the proceedings can be initiated against the registered person or registered dealer but at the same time, restrictions has been imposed upon the authorities that without putting notice to the dealer, no adjudication proceeding can be initiated.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":246352,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/01\/duty\/","url_meta":{"origin":246451,"position":2},"title":"CESTAT | No intention to evade duty, penalty set aside; Tribunal partly allows appeal","author":"Editor","date":"April 1, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): Ramesh Nair (Judicial Member) partly allowed an appeal where the issue was whether the appellant was entitled to Cenvat credit of Service Tax paid on Outward Transportation Service for clearance of Excisable Goods by the appellant. The appellant raised the sale invoice\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":224561,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/26\/guj-hc-court-strikes-down-the-levy-and-collection-of-tax-on-ocean-freight-for-transport-of-goods-in-a-vessel-from-a-place-outside-india-up-to-the-customs-station-by-a-person-located-in-non-taxable-t\/","url_meta":{"origin":246451,"position":3},"title":"Guj HC | Court strikes down levy and collection of tax on Ocean Freight for transport of goods in a vessel from a place outside India up to the customs station by a person located in non-taxable territory","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 26, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Gujarat High Court: \u00a0A Division Bench comprising of J.B. Pardiwala and A.C. Rao, JJ., declared the tax on Ocean Freight levied for transportation of goods in a vessel by a foreign seller, as ultra vires the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (IGST). The writ-applicant moved to the court\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":331199,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/20\/tractor-trailer-sans-motor-not-amenable-entry-tax-orissa-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":246451,"position":4},"title":"Whether \u2018tractor-trailer\u2019 sans \u2018motor\u2019 falls under \u2018motor vehicle\u2019 and is amenable to entry tax under Odisha Entry tax Act? Orissa HC answers","author":"Editor","date":"September 20, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Section 2(h)-\"Motor Vehicle\" means a Motor Vehicle as defined in Clause 28 of Section 2 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988; [excluding any tractor, earth mover, excavator, bulldozer or road-roller].","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Orissa High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":270071,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/14\/whether-ocean-freight-charges-can-be-collected-subject-to-levy-of-service-tax-cestat-answers\/","url_meta":{"origin":246451,"position":5},"title":"Whether ocean freight charges can be collected, subject to levy of Service Tax? CESTAT answers","author":"Editor","date":"July 14, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): The Division Coram of Sulekha Beevi C.S. (Judicial Member) and P. Anjani Kumar (Technical Member) allowed two appeals (with same issue involved) which were filed aggrieved by the order of original authority. The Tribunal answered that ocean freight charges are not subject\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/CESTATNew-Logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/CESTATNew-Logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/CESTATNew-Logo.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/CESTATNew-Logo.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/CESTATNew-Logo.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/246451","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=246451"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/246451\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=246451"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=246451"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=246451"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}