{"id":246302,"date":"2021-03-31T15:33:34","date_gmt":"2021-03-31T10:03:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=246302"},"modified":"2021-06-03T14:13:53","modified_gmt":"2021-06-03T08:43:53","slug":"high-courts-monthly-roundup","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/31\/high-courts-monthly-roundup\/","title":{"rendered":"High Courts Monthly Round-up: March 2021"},"content":{"rendered":"<blockquote><p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>Here\u2019s a short recap of what we covered under the High Court\u2019s section for the month of March 2021.<\/strong><\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<hr \/>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><u>Allahabad High Court<\/u><\/span><\/h2>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-54691 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/Allahabad-High-Court-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" \/><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Rule Making Power under the Motor Vehicles Act<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">All HC | Rule making power of Central and State Government under Motor Vehicles Act \u2013 Are the subject matters falling under Ss. 110 and 111 delineated and demarcated or do they overlap? HC explains<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3m5cMwI\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3m5cMwI<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Maintenance<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">All HC | Rent Allowance vis-a-vis Maintenance Allowance: Whether under S. 125 CrPC, rent allowance is included under maintenance allowance? Read to know<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3fpMKTL\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3fpMKTL<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Maintainability of Habeas Corpus Writ<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">All HC | Full Bench decides whether writ of Habeas Corpus will be maintainable against Judicial order or Child Welfare Committee&#8217;s order under J.J. Act? Decoded<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/31xr9QW\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/31xr9QW<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Marriage of a Minor| Void or Voidable?<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">All HC | If a minor girl marries a major of her freewill, will such marriage be void or voidable? Court explains while discussing validity of child marriage<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3m3tfSg\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3m3tfSg<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Contract<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">All HC | During his lifetime, tenant enters into compromise with landlord and enjoys benefits thereof. After such tenant&#8217;s demise, can his legal heirs challenge the compromise? HC uncovers legal position<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3dlLBtF\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3dlLBtF<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Land Title Dispute<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">All HC | Order reserved in Kashi Vishwanath Temple-Gyanvapi Masjid Land Title Dispute; Court to decide maintainability [Religious Character]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3rCXbWu\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3rCXbWu<\/a><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><u>Bombay High Court<\/u><\/span><\/h2>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><u><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-74381 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC-886x590.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC-60x40.jpg 60w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg 1331w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/u><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Maintenance to Widowed Daughter-in-Law<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bom HC | Father-in-law denies maintenance to widowed daughter-in-law and her children. Will he be obligated to maintain them if late son had a share in ancestral property? HC Decodes<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/39w2RLF\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/39w2RLF<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Fraud by Wife?<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bom HC | Husband alleged that wife hid her actual date of birth &amp; since he intended to marry a \u2018Mangalik Yog\u2019 girl, fraud was played upon him. Here\u2019s how HC solved the matter<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/31BByv0\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/31BByv0<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Section 417 of Penal Code, 1860<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bom HC | Whether absence of &#8216;dishonest concealment of fact&#8217; exempt a person from being punished under S. 417 IPC? Read on<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3weIFHV\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3weIFHV<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Legal Heirs | Property<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bom HC | Relinquishment of self-acquired properties of a deceased by legal heirs. Will such release enure to benefit of all other legal heirs? Court explains<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3ftQQdG\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3ftQQdG<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Defamation<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bom HC | Can a person\u2019s image be used for a commercial purpose, without his\/her express written consent? Justice G.S. Patel elaborates directing Amazon Prime to take down the telecast of a movie using a person\u2019s private image<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3u9WTYU\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3u9WTYU<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Suicide<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bom HC | Woman commits suicide along with her infant daughter within 7 years of marriage. Can husband of deceased be held guilty for offences under Ss. 498-A, 304-B read with 34 IPC? Mere suspicion of Cruelty &amp; Harassment is enough?<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3m5Qknj\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3m5Qknj<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Agreement<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bom HC | Can a development agreement signed between Chairman of Society and one of the Managing Committee members be binding upon non-signatory? Court discusses while ordering redevelopment of building<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3sH9HFJ\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3sH9HFJ<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Copyright Registration<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bom HC | Does Copyright Act requires mandatory registration to seek protection under the Act? Justice G.S. Patel explains<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3ue4FRz\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3ue4FRz<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Daughter approaches Family Court on behalf of father\u2019s Marriage<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bom HC | Can a daughter approach Family Court on behalf of her father to challenge validity of his marriage? OR only parties to marriage can challenge validity? Read in light of S. 7 of Family Courts Act<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/wp.me\/pcenps-11Vt\">https:\/\/wp.me\/pcenps-11Vt<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Others<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bom HC | Board of Directors of Co-operative Bank: Power of Registrar of Co-operative Societies under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act &amp; RBI\u2019s role || Detailed Report<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/2PN0htB\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/2PN0htB<\/a><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><u>Calcutta High Court<\/u><\/span><\/h2>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><u><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-52131 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court-886x590.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court-60x40.jpg 60w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg 1330w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/u><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Registered Society<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Cal HC | Can a registered society file a writ petition on behalf of a group of people including those who are not members of the society? HC discusses while upholding shifting of market site in view of COVID-19<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3sFJTtz\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3sFJTtz<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Marriage Conversion<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Cal HC | Judiciary \u2013 The policy-making instrument on issues relating to marriage conversion and acceptability in terms of personal laws? Read on<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3m6vqEw\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3m6vqEw<\/a><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><u>Chhattisgarh High Court<\/u><\/span><\/h2>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-38251 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/chattisgarh_high_court-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" \/><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Opportunity of Hearing<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Chh HC | Does forfeiture of earned remission of a convict without giving reasonable opportunity of hearing would amount to violation of fundamental right under Art. 21 Constitution of India? HC observes<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3sDdy6T\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3sDdy6T<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Benami Transaction<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Chh HC | Principles governing determination whether a transfer is a Benami transaction has been reiterated; Petition allowed<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3fuYFzM\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3fuYFzM<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Cooling Period<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Chh HC | Guidelines regarding the waiver of cooling period as provided under S. 13B (2) of Hindu Marriage Act reiterated; Petition allowed<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3dlQCm3\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3dlQCm3<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Contract<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Chh HC | When terms of a contract have been reduced to the form of a document, no evidence shall be given or permitted to be adduced in proof of terms of such contract under Ss. 91 &amp; 92 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3dlOtGX\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3dlOtGX<\/a><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><u>Delhi High Court<\/u><\/span><\/h2>\n<figure id=\"attachment_76391\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-76391\" style=\"width: 300px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-76391\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-76391\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Delhi High Court<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Revisional Court Decision v. Lower Court Decision<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Del HC | Can the revisional court\u2019s conclusion substitute the lower court\u2019s decision? Read HC\u2019s analysis<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/31AUw4U\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/31AUw4U<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Defamation<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Del HC | Complaint against Business Standard for defaming &#8216;member of RSS&#8217; quashed: Who qualifies as an aggrieved person to file defamation complaint? HC explains<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3fx3lVE\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3fx3lVE<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Payment of Rent<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Delhi HC issues notice in a plea raising important issues concerning payment of rent by Cinema Halls during lockdown, doctrine of incorporation of arbitration clause, recourse in absence of force majeure clause<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/2PcCROF\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/2PcCROF<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Jurisdiction<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Del HC | What is the scope of Court&#8217;s jurisdiction while examining application under S. 8, Arbitration and Conciliation Act. What is effect of &#8216;Chalk &amp; Cheese&#8217; case of non-arbitrability? HC examines in &#8220;Hero&#8221; electric bikes dispute<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3fuRRBV\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3fuRRBV<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Virtual Hearing<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Del HC | NCLT and NCLAT directed to regulate their own procedure for virtual hearing platforms so long as it is ensured that if any particular party requests for a link, same would be considered in a fair, transparent and non-arbitrary manner<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3m7Ph6m\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3m7Ph6m<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Sensitization of Citizenry<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Del HC | Sensitization of citizenry has to precede, not succeed, galvanization of governmental machinery: Directions issued to Airlines and DGCA on noting an \u2018alarming\u2019 situation in Air India flight<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3rF3Cbz\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3rF3Cbz<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Vicarious Liability<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Del HC | Vicarious liability under S. 138 NI Act. What is proper stage of raising defence of absence of knowledge\u00a0 by the accused being held vicariously liable for offence committed by company? Explained<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3ucGHG3\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3ucGHG3<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Arbitrator<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Del HC | Whether disability of an appointing authority to appoint an arbitrator frustrate the arbitration agreement. HC unravels in light of Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/2PKAna8\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/2PKAna8<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Unsoundness of Mind<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Del HC | How to prove unsoundness of mind in absence of medical records? When does presumption of being under influence arise? On whom lies burden of proof? Court answers while rejecting challenge to a Will<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3sHokZQ\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3sHokZQ<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Culpable Homicide<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Del HC | What is the most crucial element to be determined while finding a person guilty under attempted culpable homicide \u2013 S. 308 IPC? Vegetable seller beaten up on failing to provide money for conducting business outside Okhla Sabzi Mandi<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/2PK242A\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/2PK242A<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Emergency Arbitrator<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">[Amazon v. Future Retail] From Emergency Arbitrator to Group of Companies Doctrine \u2013 Delhi HC covers all while restraining Future Group from proceeding further with Disputed transaction<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3sCdMes\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3sCdMes<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Eviction Order<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Del HC | Which is the proper forum for filing appeals from the eviction order passed by DM under Delhi Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act? Court answers<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3cEwYmh\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3cEwYmh<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Interim Maintenance<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Del HC | It is for the wife to establish alleged source of husband&#8217;s income; Husband would have paid maintenance rather than going jail: HC reduces interim maintenance to wife and son<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3frG0or\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3frG0or<\/a><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><u>Gauhati High Court<\/u><\/span><\/h2>\n<p><u><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-214877 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Gauhati-HC-300x200.jpeg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" \/><\/u><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Gau HC | [Artificial Ripening of Fruits] HC considers health hazards; lays down detailed guidelines to ensure chemical-free ripening of fruits<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/39x1pbQ\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/39x1pbQ<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Culpable Homicide<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Gau HC | \u201cNature of injury does not suggest that the appellant acted in cruelty\u201d; HC converts conviction for murder into culpable homicide<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3fuDP3A\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3fuDP3A<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Motor Accident Case<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Gau HC | Deceased being below 40 years of age the future prospects shall be held at 40%; HC allows appeal against enhanced compensation in motor accident case<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3rAFl6A\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3rAFl6A<\/a><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><u>Gujarat High Court<\/u><\/span><\/h2>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-206146 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1-886x590.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1-60x40.jpg 60w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg 1330w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Policy Decision<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Guj HC | Court cannot undertake the activity of banking regulations upon itself and pass omnibus orders to come up with policy decision; Court dismisses appeal<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/2PGMcy6\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/2PGMcy6<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Termination of Pregnancy<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Guj HC | Termination of pregnancy application rejected keeping in mind health of the minor; Court issues directions<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3m5kAPf\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3m5kAPf<\/a><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><u>Himachal Pradesh High Court<\/u><\/span><\/h2>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-222108 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_2-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" \/><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Maternity Leave<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">HP HC | Whether a contractual woman employee is entitled to avail maternity leave in case of a surrogate child? HC analyses<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3rA2vd7\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3rA2vd7<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Judicial Bias<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">HP HC | Merely because persons are related do not establish that the relationships were working or cordial; Crucial aspect is time period of knowledge<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/2PJQLHE\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/2PJQLHE<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Eminent Domain<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">HP HC | Can a writ in the instant nature be allowed to direct Temple authorities to spend the amount collected through donations for construction of parking sites<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3rDg5MP\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3rDg5MP<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Education Department<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">HP HC \u2502 Lamentable state of affairs; Education Department is one of the biggest litigants before this Court and majority of writ petitions relate to transfer and adjustment of the teachers<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/31wtmML\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/31wtmML<\/a><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><u>Jammu and Kashmir High Court<\/u><\/span><\/h2>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><u><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-28081 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/JK-High-Court-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" \/><\/u><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">J&amp;K HC | \u201cGovernment bungalows are Public property, it belongs to Public\u201d HC directs State to ensure eviction of unauthorised occupants from Government accommodation<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3m5lo6w\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3m5lo6w<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Magistrate\u2019s Jurisdiction<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">J&amp;K HC | When a CJM transfers a petition to a Magistrate subordinate to him, the Magistrate is conferred with jurisdiction to entertain the same even if the matter would otherwise fall outside his jurisdiction<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3rLGloB\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3rLGloB<\/a><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><u>Jharkhand High Court<\/u><\/span><\/h2>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-37672 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/Jharkhand-High-Court-1-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" \/><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Arbitral Award<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Jhar HC | [Galudih Barrage Irrigation Project] HC upholds arbitral award after certain modifications; explains principles of adjustment, counterclaim and set off<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3rE9stC\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3rE9stC<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Victim Compensation<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Jhar HC | \u201cAccused cannot be saddled with payment of victim compensation\u201d; HC says such order is contradictory to S. 357A of CrPC<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/2Pen9mc\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/2Pen9mc<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Jhar HC | Will a person claiming to be 41 years 11 months and 30 days of age be qualified for a post which prescribes\u00a0upper age limit of 42 years? HC explains<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3cAee79\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3cAee79<\/a><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><u>Karnataka High Court<\/u><\/span><\/h2>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-109081\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3499-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" \/><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Contract<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kar HC | Whether the termination\/cancellation of contract of the petitioner on the ground of the petitioner seeking maternity leave is justified? HC analyses<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3fo4yi6\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3fo4yi6<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">LIC Pension Rules<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kar HC | Benefit under Rule 27 LIC Pension Rules was rejected to a LIC Agent working as a field officer as no special qualification was required; Appeal dismissed<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3ua0ru5\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3ua0ru5<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Immovable Property Registration<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kar HC | Immovable property which is compulsorily registrable under S. 49 of Indian Registration Act, 1908 may be taken as evidence for the purpose of collateral transaction<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3cDxReJ\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3cDxReJ<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Abuse of Office<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kar HC | Assistant Commissioner and Tahsildar made a consorted effort to abuse their office to take possession of the properties, demolish them and dispossess the rightful owners<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3fxT0ZB\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3fxT0ZB<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Trademark Dispute<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kar HC | A case of deceptively similar trademarks; Quintessential \u2018Common man\u2019 is neither blessed with the wisdom of Solomon nor the trained eyes of Sherlock Holmes<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3ftZrNu\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3ftZrNu<\/a><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><u>Kerala High Court<\/u><\/span><\/h2>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-39882\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/KeralaHC-e1521442636157-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" \/><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Maintenance<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ker HC | If a neglected wife is being maintained by her eldest son, would that exempt the husband from his liability to maintain the wife under S. 125 CrPC? HC explains<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/2PjOLpK\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/2PjOLpK<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Right to Protest<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ker HC | \u201cStriking workers cannot resort to strong-arm tactics and violence\u201d; HC explains the ambit of Right to Protest<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3sEGhrU\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3sEGhrU<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Statutory Proceedings<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ker HC | Inappropriate for Court to interfere with\u00a0statutory proceedings at show-cause stage; HC dismisses petition against SEBI<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3dqoTAR\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3dqoTAR<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Dishonour of Cheque<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ker HC | Dishonour of cheque shall be proved to the hilt; Adverse inference cannot be drawn under S. 138 of NI Act merely because evidence is not adduced to prove a negative fact<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/31BLGE2\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/31BLGE2<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Divorce<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ker HC | In divorce petition under S. 13(1)(iii) of HMA, can Court order a party to appear before medical board for assessment of mental condition? Court discusses<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3dkDHRd\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3dkDHRd<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">OTT Rules<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ker HC | Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021 challenged; HC restrains State from taking any coercive action for non-compliance of Part III of the impugned Rules<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3m5f6UJ\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3m5f6UJ<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Manual Scavenging<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ker HC | HC directs State to pay Rs 10 lakh compensation to the family of a deceased manhole worker<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3rBi04z\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3rBi04z<\/a><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><u>Madras High Court<\/u><\/span><\/h2>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-27451 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/madras-high-court1-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" \/><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Forgery<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Madras HC | Does buyer&#8217;s knowledge about dispute in title of subject property, will make him liable for offence of cheating, forgery and making false document? HC answers<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3wdFKPQ\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3wdFKPQ<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Ancestral Property<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Madras HC | Under Hindu Succession Act, can an \u2018ancestral property\u2019 blend in with the \u2018individual property\u2019? Read to know<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3ryfHPT\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3ryfHPT<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Sexual Harassment<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Madras HC | Media and Political Parties restrained from indulging in any discussions on alleged sexual harassment of Lady IPS Officer \u2013 NO parallel \u2018Media Trial\u2019 || Restraint to continue<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3fu9BNO\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3fu9BNO<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Madras HC | Why Special DGP who has been alleged to have sexually harassed the Lady IPS Officer been placed under \u2018Compulsory Wait\u2019 instead of being suspended? Does compulsory wait attach any stigma to it?<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3fv8hdQ\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3fv8hdQ<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Madras HC | Lady IPS Officer harassed by Special DGP. &#8220;Court is not going to be a mute spectator&#8221;: HC takes suo motu cognizance; decides to monitor investigation; issues directions<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3cyCPt7\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3cyCPt7<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Right to use Postal Ballot<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Madras HC | Political Party DMK challenged Constitutional Validity of S. 60(c) of Representation of the People Act 1951. Why HC held that EC provided right to use postal ballot to certain persons who otherwise would have been excluded? Know more<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/31yTRkx\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/31yTRkx<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Same-Sex Couple<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Madras HC | Society still grappling to come to terms with same sex orientation: HC orders protection and in-chamber hearing<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3diM0Nz\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3diM0Nz<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Madras HC | &#8220;Trying to develop the case brick by brick and construct something purposeful&#8221;: HC while arranging counselling for same-sex couple and parents<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/2PKahnq\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/2PKahnq<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">COVID-19<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Madras HC | Wear masks; maintain social distancing norms at all political gatherings: HC to candidates and political parties in election-bound State of Tamil Nadu<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3wdGpAO\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3wdGpAO<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Law Colleges<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Madras HC | Quality of education being compromised in course of more law colleges being born in guise of creating opportunities. Read what HC says<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3uefCTb\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3uefCTb<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Elections<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Madras HC | Official Funds for Campaigning: One has to wear allegiance to a political leader, if not on the sleeve at least visibly crying out of pocket | Why? Read on<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/2QXbaKh\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/2QXbaKh<\/a><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><u>Madhya Pradesh High Court<\/u><\/span><\/h2>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-77481 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/MP-high-court1-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" \/><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Litigation<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">MP HC | Litigation in the Court is not a \u201cgame of chess\u201d; Court dismisses appeal stating serious suppression of facts<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/2PKt42d\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/2PKt42d<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Preventive Detention<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">MP HC | Law of preventive detention is an exception to fundamental right to personal liberty under Art. 21 of Constitution and therefore has to be strictly construed; Court allows petition challenging preventive detention<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3dm1foX\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3dm1foX<\/a><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><u>Meghalaya High Court<\/u><\/span><\/h2>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-36201 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/Meghalaya-High-court-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" \/><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Injunction<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Megh HC | Grant of injunction cannot be claimed by a party as a matter of right nor can it be denied by the Court arbitrarily; Court dismisses petition on the question of effective possession<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/31z16sO\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/31z16sO<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><u>Orissa High Court<\/u><\/span><\/h2>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-44841 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/orissa-high-court-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" \/><\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Judicial Review<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Ori HC | Power of judicial review will not be permitted to be invoked to protect private interest at the cost of public interest or to decide contractual disputes<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/31w4vbO\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/31w4vbO<\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Quasi-Judicial Authority<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Ori HC | A quasi-judicial authority vested with the power for cancellation of a license, could not have acted under the \u2018dictation\u2019 of another authority<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3rEdPow\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3rEdPow<\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Strict Liability<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Ori HC | Onus of proof, which lies on a party alleging negligence should be established on the touchstone of preponderance of probabilities<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3dprCuf\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3dprCuf<\/a><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><u>Patna High Court<\/u><\/span><\/h2>\n<p><u><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-34451 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/patna-high-court-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" \/><\/u><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Toilet for Girls<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Pat HC points out apathy on the part of State regarding the non-existence of ladies toilet in Colleges; Constitutes a Committee to examine existing conditions<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3m6HS7e\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3m6HS7e<\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Unlawful Association<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Pat HC | To attract penalty for being a member of an unlawful association, the association must be one declared unlawful by a notification under UAP Act, 1967; HC declares seizure exercise illegal and arbitrary<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/39wQMWJ\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/39wQMWJ<\/a><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><u>Punjab and Haryana High Court<\/u><\/span><\/h2>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><u><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-31071 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/panjab_and_hariyana_high_court-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" \/><\/u><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Panchayati Divorce<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">P&amp;H HC | \u201cPanchayati divorce has no recognition in law\u201d; HC grants protection to the couple in spite of holding their marriage illegal<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/2PeswBS\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/2PeswBS<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Partnership Firm<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">P&amp;H HC | Experience gained by erstwhile partnership firm could not be construed as experience of partners in an individual capacity; HC dismisses the petition<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3m7Zn7g\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3m7Zn7g<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Marriage<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">P&amp;H HC | Muslim woman and Hindu man marries as per Hindu rites; HC holds the marriage is invalid<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3m6DpS4\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3m6DpS4<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Contractual Live-in Relationship<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">P&amp;H HC | Contractual live-in relationship has no recognition in law; HC terms it \u201cmisuse of process\u201d and against morality<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3rywBxz\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3rywBxz<\/a><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><u>Rajasthan High Court<\/u><\/span><\/h2>\n<p><u><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-109501 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3584-e1487939870879-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" \/><\/u><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Judgment<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Raj HC | Judgment can be a binding precedent only for what has been considered and held in it; No Court can travel beyond facts mentioned and considered therein to cull out &#8220;ratio decidendi&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3cCamCL\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3cCamCL<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><u>Telangana High Court<\/u><\/span><\/h2>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-138911 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/AP-TELANGANA-HC-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" \/><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Sale Notice<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Telangana HC | If the bank sends sale notice following due procedure on the addresses mentioned in loan agreement, will the same amount to &#8216;service&#8217; under Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules? Read on<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3m801lc\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3m801lc<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Principles of Res Judicata<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Telangana HC | Are principles of res judicata applicable to bail applications? Can repeated filing of bail applications without change in circumstances be accepted? Read on<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3wgBUFu\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3wgBUFu<\/a><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><u>Tripura High Court<\/u><\/span><\/h2>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-44191 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/Tripura-High-Court-1-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" \/><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Economic Abuse and Domestic Abuse<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tri HC | How are \u2018economic abuse\u2019 and \u2018domestic abuse\u2019 synonymous? HC explains in light of S. 3 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3ftbfQ3\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3ftbfQ3<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Bail Application<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tri HC | Strong prima facie case leaves no ground for custodial immunity; Court rejects bail application in matter of Ss. 377 and 506 of IPC and S. 6 of POCSO<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3sQjWrz\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3sQjWrz<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Public Interest Litigation<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tri HC | Every State and local authority to provide adequate facilities for instruction in mother tongue at the primary stage of education to children belonging to linguistic minority groups? Court decides on PIL<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3rDFsyj\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3rDFsyj<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Writ Petition<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tri HC | High Court would not entertain a writ petition which is hopelessly delayed without proper explanation; dismisses petition with costs<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><u>Uttaranchal High Court<\/u><\/span><\/h2>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-40921 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/uttrakhandHC-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" \/><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>RTI Act<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Utt HC | Delay in providing information under RTI Act does not amount to penalty, if valid reasons for the delay are proved; Court sets aside the penalty<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/3m5xGfn\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/3m5xGfn<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Enquiry<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Utt HC | Before proceeding in the matter, Court has to form an opinion that an enquiry is needed; Court dismisses application moved under S. 340 CrPC<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/31BktBn\">https:\/\/bit.ly\/31BktBn<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here\u2019s a short recap of what we covered under the High Court\u2019s section for the month of March 2021. Allahabad High Court <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":246305,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[46069,10,45673],"tags":[11801,33557],"class_list":["post-246302","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-high-court-round-up","category-highcourts","category-columns-for-roundup","tag-high-court","tag-monthly-roundup"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>High Courts Monthly Round-up: March 2021 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"High Courts Monthly Roundup\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/31\/high-courts-monthly-roundup\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"High Courts Monthly Round-up: March 2021\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"High Courts Monthly Roundup\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/31\/high-courts-monthly-roundup\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-03-31T10:03:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-06-03T08:43:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/HC-Roundup.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"18 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/31\/high-courts-monthly-roundup\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/31\/high-courts-monthly-roundup\/\",\"name\":\"High Courts Monthly Round-up: March 2021 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/31\/high-courts-monthly-roundup\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/31\/high-courts-monthly-roundup\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/HC-Roundup.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-03-31T10:03:34+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-06-03T08:43:53+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"description\":\"High Courts Monthly Roundup\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/31\/high-courts-monthly-roundup\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/31\/high-courts-monthly-roundup\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/31\/high-courts-monthly-roundup\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/HC-Roundup.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/HC-Roundup.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":888},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/31\/high-courts-monthly-roundup\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"High Courts Monthly Round-up: March 2021\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"High Courts Monthly Round-up: March 2021 | SCC Times","description":"High Courts Monthly Roundup","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/31\/high-courts-monthly-roundup\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"High Courts Monthly Round-up: March 2021","og_description":"High Courts Monthly Roundup","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/31\/high-courts-monthly-roundup\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-03-31T10:03:34+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-06-03T08:43:53+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/HC-Roundup.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"18 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/31\/high-courts-monthly-roundup\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/31\/high-courts-monthly-roundup\/","name":"High Courts Monthly Round-up: March 2021 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/31\/high-courts-monthly-roundup\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/31\/high-courts-monthly-roundup\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/HC-Roundup.jpg","datePublished":"2021-03-31T10:03:34+00:00","dateModified":"2021-06-03T08:43:53+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"description":"High Courts Monthly Roundup","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/31\/high-courts-monthly-roundup\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/31\/high-courts-monthly-roundup\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/31\/high-courts-monthly-roundup\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/HC-Roundup.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/HC-Roundup.jpg","width":1331,"height":888},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/31\/high-courts-monthly-roundup\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"High Courts Monthly Round-up: March 2021"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/HC-Roundup.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":205098,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/14\/motor-vehicles-act-a-code-in-itself-section-24-cpc-not-applicable-for-transfer-of-matter-thereunder-all-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":246302,"position":0},"title":"Motor Vehicles Act a code in itself; Section 24 CPC not applicable for transfer of matter thereunder: All HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 14, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: A transfer application was filed under Section 24 of Code of Civil Procedure before a Single Judge Bench of Anjani Kumar Mishra, J. for transfer of Motor Vehicles Claim petition pending before the Motor Vehicles Claim Tribunal. A motor vehicle claim was filed before motor vehicle tribunal\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":244910,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/03\/motor-vehicles-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":246302,"position":1},"title":"All HC | Rule making power of Central and State Government under Motor Vehicles Act \u2013 Are the subject matters falling under Ss. 110 and 111 delineated and demarcated or do they overlap? HC explains","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 3, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: The Division bench of Surya Parkash Kesarwani and Dr Yogendra Kumar Srivastava, JJ., expressed that: The legislative intendment with regard to the mutual exclusion of the rule making powers of the Central and the State Government being clear, the matters falling under Sections 110 and 111 must\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":263580,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/13\/9-legal-stories-of-the-week\/","url_meta":{"origin":246302,"position":2},"title":"9 Legal Stories of the Week | Unlicensed transport aggregators to Spanking back of a woman without her consent, read more such stories in this weekly roundup","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 13, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Here are our interesting picks from the stories reported this week: To operate in State of Maharashtra, Uber and other unlicensed aggregators to apply for license before 16th March 2022: Bom HC The Division Bench of Dipankar Datta, CJ and Vinay Joshi, J., directed UBER and other transport aggregators who\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;High Court Round Up&quot;","block_context":{"text":"High Court Round Up","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/high-court-round-up\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-44-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-44-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-44-2.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-44-2.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-44-2.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":241629,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/05\/supreme-court-yearly-roundup-2020-in-review\/","url_meta":{"origin":246302,"position":3},"title":"Supreme Court Yearly Roundup &#8211; 2020 in review","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"January 5, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"JANUARY 2020 Story of the month 5-judge bench holds no time limit could be fixed while granting anticipatory bail https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-january-2020\/ FEBRUARY 2020 Story of the month Grant permanent commission to all women officers in Army who opt for it within 3 months: SC to Centre https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/06\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-february-2020\/ MARCH 2020 Story of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/2020-wrap-up.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/2020-wrap-up.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/2020-wrap-up.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/2020-wrap-up.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/2020-wrap-up.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":259084,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/27\/supreme-court-2021-12-months-12-stories\/","url_meta":{"origin":246302,"position":4},"title":"Supreme Court 2021: 12 Months, 12 Stories","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"December 27, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"JANUARY Manish Kumar v. Union of India, (2021) 5 SCC 1 The 3-Judge Bench of Rohinton Fali Nariman, Navin Sinha and K.M. Joseph, JJ., in a 465-pages long judgment, upheld the validity of several provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Act, 2020, albeit with directions given in exercise\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legal RoundUp&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-11-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-11-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-11-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-11-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-11-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":213030,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-march-2019\/","url_meta":{"origin":246302,"position":5},"title":"Supreme Court Monthly Roundup \u2013 March 2019","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"April 1, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"TOP STORIES Ayodhya Dispute to be settled by a \u2018confidential\u2019 Court monitored mediation; No Gag order passed A 5-judge bench referred the\u00a0Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid land dispute case, famously known as the Ayodhya Dispute, to a Court-monitored Mediation Panel of Justice Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla, Former Judge, Supreme Court of India\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/Supreme-Court_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/Supreme-Court_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/Supreme-Court_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/Supreme-Court_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/Supreme-Court_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/246302","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=246302"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/246302\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/246305"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=246302"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=246302"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=246302"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}