{"id":246218,"date":"2021-03-27T14:25:24","date_gmt":"2021-03-27T08:55:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=246218"},"modified":"2021-03-27T14:38:41","modified_gmt":"2021-03-27T09:08:41","slug":"msps-against-corporates","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/27\/msps-against-corporates\/","title":{"rendered":"MSPs against Corporates: A Legal Right under the Contract Act and a Constitutional Right under Article 21"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

\u201cLaw is the protector of the weak.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u2013Frederick Schiller[1]<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

The ongoing months long farmers\u2019 protests in several parts of Northern India have raised a demand of enacting a stringent special law mandating the Minimum Support Prices (MSP) for every crop in addition to the repeal of three farms Acts, namely, the Farmers\u2019 Produce Trade and Commerce (Promotion and Facilitation) Act, 2020[2]<\/a>, the Farmers (Empowerment and Protection) Agreement on Price Assurance and Farm Services Act, 2020[3]<\/a> and the Essential Commodities (Amendment) Act, 2020[4]<\/a>. The farmers have alleged that these farm laws would act as the death knell for the small and marginal farmers.\u00a0 The issue that arises now is whether, if the Government maintains the status quo, the farmers would be protected under the ambit of the existing Indian laws against the abuse and unfair practices of the big corporates. The article analyses that how even if no law mandating the MSPs is enacted, the courts would not be deprived of the power to protect the farmers against the unfair trade practices by the corporates. The article analyses the provisions of existing Indian laws which can be used by the courts to impose the minimum prices to be paid by the corporates to the farmers for purchasing their crops.<\/p>\n

The Contract Act, 1872[5]<\/a> gives liberty to every person to come into a contract with the free consent of both the parties. However, the drafters of the Act had very aptly anticipated that there might be numerous situations where the big corporates having disproportionate and unequal bargaining power would endeavour to come into unfair bargains with the weaker section of the public. The Contract Act takes care of these situations by virtue of Section 19-A[6]<\/a> read with the Section 16[7]<\/a> of the Act.\u00a0 Section 19-A of the Act gives the option to the weaker party in the contract to set aside the contract at his will if his consent was induced by \u201cundue influence\u201d. A consent is considered to be induced by \u201cundue influence\u201d if one of the parties to the contract is \u201cin a position to dominate the will of the other and uses that position to obtain an unfair advantage over the other\u201d[8]<\/a>. The Supreme Court of India has observed in DTC <\/em>v. DTC Mazdoor Congress<\/em><\/a>[9]<\/a> that the disparity in the economic strength of the contracting parties results in the unequal bargaining power and thus, leads to the abuse of weaker party by the stronger party. Sometimes, the weaker party is in a position in which it could obtain the means of livelihood only upon the terms imposed by the stronger party. It is obvious that the position of corporates, headed by billionaires and position of farmers, facing suicide crisis in India, cannot be compared. The corporates are per se the stronger parties and the farmers are per se the weaker parties. Thus, this clause perfectly applies to the situations where a stronger party buys a crop from a weaker party at a price below the Minimum Support Price (MSP).\u00a0 Here the MSP should be considered as that threshold rate above which farmer would reap the profits. So, if the Court faces any dispute involving a transaction between a farmer and a buyer which per se indicates the unfair terms between the parties, such as buying a crop below its MSP rate, the consent of the farmer should be considered as consent induced under \u201cundue influence\u201d. The farmer should be then given the option to rescind the contract and simultaneously take compensation due to the loss incurred by that contract. However, here, the MSP would not be a price fixed by the Government on that particular crop. Rather, it would be that rate independently determined by the Court above which the farmer would reap the profits.<\/p>\n

The question now arises is whether it is a matter of public policy and thus, a matter not to be decided by the courts. The public policy, as held by the Supreme Court of India[10]<\/a>, is not a policy of any particular Government. It is simply a matter which concerns the public good and the public interest. The principles governing public policy must be and are capable on proper occasion, of expansion or modification. If the conduct is against the public conscience, public good and public interest, then such conduct must be regulated by the courts. The Supreme Court of India has expressly held that \u201cIn any case which is not covered by authority, courts should be guided by Preamble to the Constitution[11]<\/a> and the principles underlying the Fundamental Rights and the Directive Principles.\u201d Thus, the courts as parens patriae cannot leave this matter as a matter to be decided only by Government even when there is no specific law on MSP. Thus, the courts are duty-bound to decide upon the transactions between corporates and farmers that are against the public policy.<\/p>\n

Now, which constitutional principles compel the Court to secure the MSPs? It has been held several times that the \u201cright to life\u201d guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution[12]<\/a> includes the \u201cright to livelihood\u201d[13]<\/a>.\u00a0 It needs no proof that it has become extremely difficult for the farmers to earn their livelihood. Right to life means more than just physical existence. It takes within itself the bare necessities of life such as clothing, shelter, adequate nutrition, etc. Thus, forcing the farmer to sell below the MSPs leads to denial of their \u201cright to livelihood\u201d guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. Further, Article 23 of the Constitution[14]<\/a> protects the citizens against the exploitation from both State and private citizens.<\/p>\n

In People\u2019s Union for Democratic Rights <\/em>v. Union of India<\/em>[15]<\/a>, the Court held that the \u201cforce\u201d means \u201cnot only the physical or legal force but also force arising from the compulsion of economic circumstances which leaves no choice of alternatives to a person in want and compels him to provide labour or service even though the remuneration received for it is less than the minimum wage\u201d. Then Articles 38[16]<\/a> and 39(c<\/em>)[17]<\/a>, collectively known as principles of social security and social justice, direct the State to minimise the inequalities of justice, social and economic amongst its citizens. Article 43 of the Constitution[18]<\/a> directs the State to secure the \u201cliving wage\u201d to the farmers. These provisions when read collectively compel the Court to protect the right of the farmers to sell at a favourable price.<\/p>\n

It is believed that it would be a perfect opportunity for the courts to determine the threshold rate and other guidelines after in-depth analysis and study of the risks and losses involved in the agriculture sector. If decided by constitutional courts, they would act as the binding guidelines on the future transactions between corporates and farmers. It is pertinent to note here that it would not be the first time when the constitutional courts would intervene to issue guidelines to protect the weaker section of the society.<\/p>\n

The Supreme Court has held in Vishaka <\/em>v. State of Rajasthan<\/em>[19]<\/a> that when conduct of one section of society results in the violation of fundamental rights of other section of the society and there is a legislative vacuum against that conduct then \u201can effective redressal requires that some guidelines should be laid down for the protection of these rights to fill the legislative vacuum\u201d. It was held that the obligation of the courts for the enforcement of the fundamental rights in the absence of legislation must be viewed along with the role of judiciary envisaged in the Beijing Statement of Principles of the Independence of the Judiciary. It was held that it is the function of judiciary to ensure the observance and attainment of human rights. Further, it was held that the guidelines would be treated as the law declared by this Court under Article 141 of the Constitution[20]<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Thus, the absence of a law mandating the MSPs for contracts between farmers and corporates does not mean that the corporates would be able to take advantage of distressed farmers. The courts are still not deprived of the powers granted to them under the Contract Act, 1872 and the Constitution to protect the farmers of their right to sell crops at their favourable prices.<\/p>\n

\n

*<\/a>Advocate, \u00a0Delhi High Court.<\/span><\/p>\n

**<\/a>Final year law student (LLB), Campus Law Centre, Faculty of Law, University of Delhi.<\/span><\/p>\n

[1]<\/a> Gene Ligotti, Accomplice: … a Novel<\/em> (2013), p. 202.<\/p>\n

[2]<\/a>\u00a0 http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/wdP4LxVM<\/a>.<\/p>\n

[3]<\/a> http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/s4WyG5Ra<\/a>.<\/p>\n

[4]<\/a> http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/8F35O644<\/a>.<\/p>\n

[5]<\/a> http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/xAi185p6<\/a>.<\/p>\n

[6]<\/a> http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/K5XuGL0N<\/a>.<\/p>\n

[7]<\/a> http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/37B4H2v8<\/a>.<\/p>\n

[8]<\/a> See<\/em> S. 16 of the Contract Act, 1872.<\/p>\n

[9]<\/a>1991 Supp (1) SCC 600<\/a>.<\/p>\n

[10]<\/a> Ibid.<\/em><\/p>\n

[11]<\/a> http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/8bvjrn3W<\/a>.<\/p>\n

[12]<\/a> http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/VN1u87S9<\/a>.<\/p>\n

[13]<\/a> Olga Tellis <\/em>v. Bombay Municipal Corpn<\/em>.,(1985) 3 SCC 545<\/a>.<\/p>\n

[14]<\/a> http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/1RoWjnWY<\/a>.<\/p>\n

[15]<\/a> (1982) 3 SCC 235<\/a> .<\/p>\n

[16]<\/a> http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/pd9EUWHe<\/a>.<\/p>\n

[17]<\/a> http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/HgecD61Z<\/a>.<\/p>\n

[18]<\/a> http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/C86Lq30R<\/a>.<\/p>\n

[19]<\/a> (1997) 6 SCC 241<\/a> .<\/p>\n

[20]<\/a> http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/42L90IU1<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

by Mohit Rana* and Ravi Singh Chhikara**<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":246227,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[42503,1191],"tags":[30129,9292,45555,29785,32000,43594],"class_list":["post-246218","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-legal-analysis","category-op-ed","tag-constitutional-right","tag-contract-act","tag-corporates","tag-law","tag-legal-right","tag-msp"],"yoast_head":"\nMSPs against Corporates: A Legal Right under the Contract Act and a Constitutional Right under Article 21 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"MSP's against Corporates\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/27\/msps-against-corporates\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"MSPs against Corporates: A Legal Right under the Contract Act and a Constitutional Right under Article 21\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"MSP's against Corporates\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/27\/msps-against-corporates\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-03-27T08:55:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-03-27T09:08:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-3-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/27\/msps-against-corporates\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/27\/msps-against-corporates\/\",\"name\":\"MSPs against Corporates: A Legal Right under the Contract Act and a Constitutional Right under Article 21 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/27\/msps-against-corporates\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/27\/msps-against-corporates\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-3-1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-03-27T08:55:24+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-03-27T09:08:41+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"MSP's against Corporates\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/27\/msps-against-corporates\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/27\/msps-against-corporates\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/27\/msps-against-corporates\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-3-1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-3-1.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/27\/msps-against-corporates\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"MSPs against Corporates: A Legal Right under the Contract Act and a Constitutional Right under Article 21\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"MSPs against Corporates: A Legal Right under the Contract Act and a Constitutional Right under Article 21 | SCC Times","description":"MSP's against Corporates","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/27\/msps-against-corporates\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"MSPs against Corporates: A Legal Right under the Contract Act and a Constitutional Right under Article 21","og_description":"MSP's against Corporates","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/27\/msps-against-corporates\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-03-27T08:55:24+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-03-27T09:08:41+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-3-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/27\/msps-against-corporates\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/27\/msps-against-corporates\/","name":"MSPs against Corporates: A Legal Right under the Contract Act and a Constitutional Right under Article 21 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/27\/msps-against-corporates\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/27\/msps-against-corporates\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-3-1.jpg","datePublished":"2021-03-27T08:55:24+00:00","dateModified":"2021-03-27T09:08:41+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"MSP's against Corporates","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/27\/msps-against-corporates\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/27\/msps-against-corporates\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/27\/msps-against-corporates\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-3-1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-3-1.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/27\/msps-against-corporates\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"MSPs against Corporates: A Legal Right under the Contract Act and a Constitutional Right under Article 21"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-3-1.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":244161,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/20\/farmers-laws\/","url_meta":{"origin":246218,"position":0},"title":"Critical Examination of the Implications of the Farm Acts, 2020 on Farmers and Agricultural Commerce","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 20, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"by Dr Muddu Vijai*","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/farmewr.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/farmewr.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/farmewr.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/farmewr.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/farmewr.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":236373,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/28\/spotlight-farmers-produce-trade-and-commerce-promotion-and-facilitation-act-2020-is-this-a-step-towards-direct-marketing-of-farmers-produce\/","url_meta":{"origin":246218,"position":1},"title":"[SPOTLIGHT] Farmers\u2019 Produce Trade and Commerce (Promotion and Facilitation) Act, 2020 | Is this a step towards direct marketing of farmers’ produce?","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 28, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"The Farmers\u2019 Produce Trade and Commerce (Promotion and Facilitation) Bill, 2020 received the President's assent on 24-09-2020. Farmers\u2019 Produce Trade and Commerce (Promotion and Facilitation) Act, 2020 Purpose of the Act: The following are the objectives of the Act: Creation of an ecosystem where the farmers and traders enjoy the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Legislation Updates"","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":242179,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/12\/court-cannot-be-said-to-be-completely-powerless-to-grant-stay-of-any-executive-action-under-a-statutory-enactment-supreme-court-stays-implementation-of-farm-laws\/","url_meta":{"origin":246218,"position":2},"title":"Farm Laws | “Court cannot be said to be completely powerless to grant stay of any executive action under a statutory enactment”; Supreme Court stays implementation of Farm Laws","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 12, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The 3-Judge Bench of S.A. Bobde, CJ and A.S. Bopanna and V. Ramasubramanian, JJ., stays the implementation of farms laws until further orders. Three categories of petitions have been filed before the Court, all revolving around the validity or otherwise of three Farm Laws namely: Farmers\u2019 Produce Trade\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":236029,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/21\/parliament-passes-the-farmers-produce-trade-and-commerce-promotion-and-facilitation-bill-2020-and-the-farmers-empowerment-and-protection-agreement-of-price-assurance-and-farm-services-bill-202\/","url_meta":{"origin":246218,"position":3},"title":"Parliament passes Farmers’ Produce Trade and Commerce (Promotion and Facilitation) Bill, 2020 & Farmers (Empowerment and Protection) Agreement of Price Assurance and Farm Services Bill, 2020","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 21, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Parliament passed two bills aimed at transforming agriculture in the country and raising farmers\u2019 incomes. The Farmers' Produce Trade and Commerce (Promotion and Facilitation) Bill, 2020 and The Farmers (Empowerment and Protection) Agreement of Price Assurance and Farm Services Bill, 2020 which were passed by Lok Sabha on 17th\u00a0September 2020,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Legislation Updates"","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Parliament_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Parliament_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Parliament_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Parliament_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Parliament_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":374160,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/30\/calcutta-high-court-no-deficiency-of-service-free-of-charge-consumer-protection-act-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":246218,"position":4},"title":"Calcutta High Court rules no deficiency of service where service rendered free of charge; Sets aside consumer fora orders","author":"Arunima","date":"January 30, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"The principal grievance of the farmers was that both the bank and the Jute Corporation of India were deficient in service, inasmuch as the bank did not sell the pledged jute goods in time to recover its dues and JCI did not purchase the goods under the Minimum Support Price\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"No deficiency of service free of charge","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/No-deficiency-of-service-free-of-charge.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/No-deficiency-of-service-free-of-charge.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/No-deficiency-of-service-free-of-charge.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/No-deficiency-of-service-free-of-charge.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":257878,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/29\/lok-sabha-passes-farm-laws-repeal-bill-2021\/","url_meta":{"origin":246218,"position":5},"title":"Lok Sabha passes Farm Laws Repeal Bill, 2021","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 29, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"On November 29, 2021, the Lok Sabha has passed Farm Law Repeal Bill, 2021. \u00a0 The Bill will repeal the following Acts: Farmers (Empowerment and Protection) Agreement on Price Assurance and Farm Services Act, 2020, Farmers' Produce Trade and Commerce (Promotion and Facilitation) Act, 2020, Essential Commodities (Amendment) Act, 2020.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Legislation Updates"","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-153.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-153.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-153.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-153.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-153.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/246218","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=246218"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/246218\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/246227"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=246218"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=246218"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=246218"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}