{"id":245975,"date":"2021-03-23T10:30:40","date_gmt":"2021-03-23T05:00:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=245975"},"modified":"2021-03-23T10:13:46","modified_gmt":"2021-03-23T04:43:46","slug":"live-in-relationship","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/23\/live-in-relationship\/","title":{"rendered":"P&#038;H HC | Contractual live-in relationship has no recognition in law; HC terms it \u201cmisuse of process\u201d and against morality"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Punjab and Haryana High Court: <\/strong>Arvind Singh Sangwan, J., addressed the instant petition regarding a new concept of contractual Live-In-Relation wherein the petitioners had sought issuance of direction for the protection of their life and liberty.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Petitioner 1, namely Moyana Khatun was aged about 18 years, whereas, petitioner 2, namely Labh Singh was aged about 19 years and in pursuance to a deed of Live-In-Relationship dated 04-03-2021, which had been executed between the petitioners, wherein, petitioner 1 was referred to as the \u2018Female Partner\u2019 and petitioner 2 was referred to as the \u2018Male Partner\u2019. Certain terms and conditions had been settled in the said deed of live-in-relationship by way of mutual consent.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>The contents of the deed were such that:<\/em><\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li><em>both the parties had agreed that their live-in-relationship was not \u2018Marital Relationship\u2019;<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>that the parties will fully cooperate with each other without any dispute and issue and will not claim anything against each other;<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>if any of the parties backs out from the aforesaid deed, the other party will have a right to approach a competent Court of law for implementation of the same.<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>that the parties are entitled and will be at liberty to terminate this deed any time after giving one month\u2019s notice to other party. <\/em><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">However, it was also stated that on attaining marriageable age the parties were agree to solemnize the marriage. The petitioners contended that the live-in-relationship deed was executed between the parties at Patiala in presence of witnesses though neither the original deed was attached nor names of the witnesses were described; only a typed copy signed as a true copy by the counsel was attached.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Reliance was placed on <em>Simran Kaur v. State of Punjab<\/em>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/yY812WWG\">2018 SCC OnLine P&amp;H 6710<\/a>, wherein, the petition relating to live-in-relationship couples was disposed of with a direction to the Senior Superintendent of Police to provide protection to the couple.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Counsel for state, DAG Joginder Pal Ratra argued that such deed of live-in-relationship is impermissible in law when the parties had not attained marriageable age under Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006. It also submitted that Section 5 (iii) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 prohibits marriage of a girl below 18 years and boy below 21 years of age and prescribes punishment for two years for contravention of Section 5 (iii) of the Act.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">It was also submitted by the state that Section 26 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, also provides that an agreement in restraint of marriage is a void agreement and therefore, it cannot be enforced as per Section 14 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. Thus, the Live-In-Relationship agreement set up by petitioners being void agreement could not be accepted.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Bench opined that the deed being impermissible in law, no benefit could be claimed by the petitioners. Petitioner 2 was held to be incompetent to have a live-in-relationship since he had not attained marriageable age. The Bench held that the petition was without any merit as the terms and conditions of live-in-relationship relied upon, especially stating that it was not a \u2018Marital Relationship\u2019 was nothing but the misuse of the process of law as it could not be morally accepted in society. [Moyna Khatun v. State of Punjab, CRWP-2421-2021, decided on 10-03-2021]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><span style=\"color: #008000;\">Kamini Sharma, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.<\/span><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Appearance before the Court by:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For the Petitioner: Adv. Sushil K. Sharma,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For The Respondent: DAG Joginder Pal Ratra<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Punjab and Haryana High Court: Arvind Singh Sangwan, J., addressed the instant petition regarding a new concept of contractual Live-In-Relation wherein the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[9292,29785,27214,31855],"class_list":["post-245975","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-contract-act","tag-law","tag-live-in-relationship","tag-specific-relief-act"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>P&amp;H HC | Contractual live-in relationship has no recognition in law; HC terms it \u201cmisuse of process\u201d and against morality | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Live in Relationship\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/23\/live-in-relationship\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"P&amp;H HC | Contractual live-in relationship has no recognition in law; HC terms it \u201cmisuse of process\u201d and against morality\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Live in Relationship\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/23\/live-in-relationship\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-03-23T05:00:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/panjab_and_hariyana_high_court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/23\/live-in-relationship\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/23\/live-in-relationship\/\",\"name\":\"P&H HC | Contractual live-in relationship has no recognition in law; HC terms it \u201cmisuse of process\u201d and against morality | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-03-23T05:00:40+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Live in Relationship\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/23\/live-in-relationship\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/23\/live-in-relationship\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/23\/live-in-relationship\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"P&#038;H HC | Contractual live-in relationship has no recognition in law; HC terms it \u201cmisuse of process\u201d and against morality\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"P&H HC | Contractual live-in relationship has no recognition in law; HC terms it \u201cmisuse of process\u201d and against morality | SCC Times","description":"Live in Relationship","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/23\/live-in-relationship\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"P&H HC | Contractual live-in relationship has no recognition in law; HC terms it \u201cmisuse of process\u201d and against morality","og_description":"Live in Relationship","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/23\/live-in-relationship\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-03-23T05:00:40+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/panjab_and_hariyana_high_court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/23\/live-in-relationship\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/23\/live-in-relationship\/","name":"P&H HC | Contractual live-in relationship has no recognition in law; HC terms it \u201cmisuse of process\u201d and against morality | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-03-23T05:00:40+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Live in Relationship","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/23\/live-in-relationship\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/23\/live-in-relationship\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/23\/live-in-relationship\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"P&#038;H HC | Contractual live-in relationship has no recognition in law; HC terms it \u201cmisuse of process\u201d and against morality"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":338421,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/04\/punjab-haryana-hc-refuses-police-protection-plea-live-in-couple-since-one-of-them-married-with-kids\/","url_meta":{"origin":245975,"position":0},"title":"\u2018Allowing such petitions would promote bigamy\u2019; Punjab and Haryana HC refuses to grant police protection to live-in couple where one of them was married &#038; had kids","author":"Editor","date":"January 4, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe concept of right to life and personal liberty guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India includes the right to live with dignity and the petitioners by running away from their parental home is not only bringing bad name to the family but also is violating the right\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Punjab and Haryana High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":301249,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/12\/parents-inter-religion-couple-cannot-interfere-right-to-freedom-choosing-partner-live-in-relationship-allahabad-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":245975,"position":1},"title":"[Inter-religion Live-in relationship] Parents cannot interfere in right to freedom of choosing a partner: Allahabad High Court","author":"Apoorva","date":"September 12, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court said that in case any disturbance is caused in the peaceful living of the petitioners, the petitioners shall approach the Superintendent of Police with a copy of this order, who shall provide immediate protection to the petitioners.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"allahabad high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":316926,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/14\/person-having-a-spouse-alive-cannot-live-in-illicit-live-in-relationship-in-contravention-of-law-allahabad-hc-refuses-to-grant-police-protection\/","url_meta":{"origin":245975,"position":2},"title":"\u2018Person having a spouse alive cannot live in illicit and live-in-relationship in contravention of law\u2019: Allahabad HC refuses to grant police protection","author":"Apoorva","date":"March 14, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court clarified that it is not against live-in relationships, but against illegal relations","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":240095,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/04\/all-hc-is-any-offence-committed-if-two-adults-wish-to-be-in-a-live-in-relationship-read-what-hc-ruled\/","url_meta":{"origin":245975,"position":3},"title":"All HC | Is any offence committed if two adults wish to be in a live-in relationship? Read what HC ruled","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 4, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"\"...where a boy and a girl are major and they are living with their free will, then, nobody including their parents has the authority to interfere with their living together.\"","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":250112,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/22\/live-in-relationship-4\/","url_meta":{"origin":245975,"position":4},"title":"P&#038;H HC | Inaction to legitimately end matrimonial alliance from wife before entering into live-in-relationship is incongruous","author":"Editor","date":"June 22, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: Arun Monga, J., held that inaction to legitimately end matrimonial alliance from wife while seeking protection for live-in-relationship, suggest lack of bonafide on the part of the husband. The petitioners, claiming to be in live-in-relationship had approached the Court for seeking to protect their lives\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":242890,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/28\/ker-hc-question-of-sale-deed-being-null-and-void-emerging-out-of-matrimonial-relationship-can-be-decided-only-by-family-court-hc-states\/","url_meta":{"origin":245975,"position":5},"title":"Ker HC | Question of sale deed being null and void, emerging out of matrimonial relationship can be decided only by Family Court;\u00a0 HC states","author":"Editor","date":"January 28, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: T.V. Anilkumar, J., allowed the petition against the impugned order of Munsiff Court, thereby upholding the order of returning plaint to the Family Court. The petitioners filed a suit (O.S.No.310\/2014) for declaring them as wife and son of the deceased, P.J.Suresh and also for declaring sale deed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/245975","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=245975"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/245975\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=245975"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=245975"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=245975"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}