{"id":245920,"date":"2021-03-22T13:00:40","date_gmt":"2021-03-22T07:30:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=245920"},"modified":"2021-03-22T11:23:36","modified_gmt":"2021-03-22T05:53:36","slug":"possession-of-properties","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/22\/possession-of-properties\/","title":{"rendered":"Kar HC | Assistant Commissioner and Tahsildar made a consorted effort to abuse their office to take possession of the properties, demolish them and dispossess the rightful owners"},"content":{"rendered":"

Karnataka High Court:<\/strong> R. Devdas, J. allowed the petitions and quashed the impugned orders and directed not to act upon the recommendation of the National Commission of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes.<\/p>\n

Background<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n

The facts of the case are such that one Sri Kaveriga was granted the land in question subsequent to whose death; the legal heirs inherited the property and got the khata transferred in their names. They sold the property to one Sri Karar Ahmed vide registered sale deed dated 09-04-2001, who got the land converted from agricultural to the non-agricultural purpose and sold a parcel of the converted land to one Sri. K. Boopathy and the remaining part to M\/s Pathy Housing Pvt. Ltd. Mr K. Boopathy got a plan sanctioned for the land and thereby formed residential sites and sold them to K.C. Varghese. Mr K.C. Varghese sold these sites in favour of M\/s Unidesign Builders and Developers Pvt. Ltd. who is the petitioner in the instant writ petitions. \u00a0Some persons moved the Tahsildar Bangalore South Taluk seeking change of revenue entries which was granted. Assailing which Mr K. Boopathy preferred an appeal before the Assistant Commissioner which was allowed setting aside the order passed by the Special Tahsildar and directed restoration of the khata as it stood earlier. Assailing which Sri. Muniraju M filed revision petition before the Deputy Commissioner stating that he has not sold the property in favour of Sri. Karar Ahmed and the documents are fabricated. The revision petition was allowed and order passed by the Assistant Commissioner was set aside. Assailing which M\/s Unidesign filed a petition for restoration of the order passed by Assistant Commissioner with a specific direction to remove the name of Sri Muniraju from the revenue records. A writ appeal was preferred by Muniraju M. which was dismissed consequent to which he approached the National Commission of Scheduled Castes praying for restoration. Hence the Commission recommended to the Government to ensure resumption and restoration of the granted land in accordance with Section 5 of the Karnataka Scheduled Castes and Tribes (Prohibition of Transfer of Certain Lands) Act, 1978. Three writ petitions was filed in the instant case praying to quash order passed by the Assistant Commissioner and Vice Chairman of National Commission as well as to declare that the action of demolishing the property and dispossessing the tenants of the petitioners is arbitrary and illegal.<\/p>\n

Submissions<\/strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n

Counsel for the petitioner submitted that in the impugned order the Assistant Commissioner says the proceedings were initiated pursuant to the directions issued by the National Commission but, it is obvious that a conspiracy has been hatched by Sri. Muniraju, the Assistant Commissioner, the Tahsildar, Sri. K Bhoopathy and Karar Ahmad to knock off the landed properties, illegally and without authority of law.<\/p>\n

Counsel for the respondents submitted that an alternative statutory remedy is available and therefore the petition deserves to be dismissed. It was further submitted that even if the order passed by the Assistant Commissioner under the provisions of the PTCL Act, is rank bad and deserves to be set aside, the petitioners should not be permitted to deviate from the set procedure of availing the appeal remedy before the Deputy Commissioner.<\/p>\n

Observations<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n

The Court relied on judgment Rajasthan State Industrial Development and Investment Corporation v. Subhash Sindhi Cooperative Housing Society,<\/em> (2013) 5 SCC 427<\/a> and observed that the primary purpose of the writ is to protect and to establish rights, and to impose a corresponding imperative duty existing in law. It is designed to promote justice and its grant or refusal is at the discretion of the Court.<\/p>\n

The Court observed that the National Commission recommended the case of Muniraju to the Government of Karnataka for restoration of the land in his favour. In the impugned order passed by the Assistant Commissioner, no reference is made to any communication either by the Commission or the Deputy Commissioner or the State Government, therefore it is clear that the Assistant Commissioner has initiated the proceedings at the behest of Muniraju. It was also observed that the Assistant Commissioner had initiated the proceedings on going through the recommendation; notice to Unidesign should have been issued as the entire allegation was against Unidesign whereas the notices were issued only to Sri. Bhoopathy and Sri. Karar Ahmed had nothing to lose. This establishes the consorted effort of Muniraju and other official respondents to defraud the petitioners.<\/p>\n

The Court further observed that it is clear from the documents available on record that the procedure prescribed under Section 39 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, has not been followed before evicting the persons in possession of the commercial\/ residential buildings. Therefore, there is a violation of the principles of natural justice and violation of the fundamental rights of the petitioners. Therefore, inspite of the alternative remedy being available to the petitioners, the Court found it fit to entertain the petition.<\/p>\n

The Court relied on a judgment Sri Ganganna v. State of Karnataka<\/em> in W.P. No. 46279 of 2013 decided on 09-10-2020 and observed that the functions entrusted to the National Commission for Scheduled Castes and Schedules Tribes is investigative in nature regarding various safeguards provided to the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes and they do not clothe with powers to entertain the petition which is filed by a grantee seeking restoration of land.<\/p>\n

The Court observed that in light of instant facts it is clear that the National Commission has issued a recommendation to the State Government without even issuing notice to persons against whom the complaint was made by Sri. M. Muniraju or Unidesign. It is clear that the Assistant Commissioner was well aware of the fact that Sri K Bhoopathy had disposed of the properties in favour of Sri. K. C. Varghese, who had in turn sold it to M\/s. Unidesign. Therefore, it is obvious that the Assistant Commissioner has abused his office to pass an order in favour of Sri. M Muniraju, knowing fully well that the properties were no more in the hands of Sri. K. Bhoopathy.<\/p>\n

Decision<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n

The Court thus held that the Assistant Commissioner and the Tahsildar have made a consorted effort, abusing their office and violating the procedures, to take possession of the properties in question, proceeding to demolish the structures and buildings which were in possession of the rightful owners or tenants, with utter disregard to the provisions of law and human rights. Hence the impugned order passed by the Assistant Commissioner is arbitrary, illegal and tainted with malice.<\/p>\n

In view of the above, petitions was disposed off.[Jayamma v. State of Karnataka, Writ Petition No. 9723 of 2020, decided on 15-03-2021]<\/p>\n

\n

Arunima Bose, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Karnataka High Court: R. Devdas, J. allowed the petitions and quashed the impugned orders and directed not to act upon the recommendation <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[45510,45511,45512,33427],"class_list":["post-245920","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-assistant-commissioner","tag-possession-of-properties","tag-rightful-owners","tag-tahsildar"],"yoast_head":"\nKar HC | Assistant Commissioner and Tahsildar made a consorted effort to abuse their office to take possession of the properties, demolish them and dispossess the rightful owners | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Possession of Properties\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/22\/possession-of-properties\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Kar HC | Assistant Commissioner and Tahsildar made a consorted effort to abuse their office to take possession of the properties, demolish them and dispossess the rightful owners\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Possession of Properties\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/22\/possession-of-properties\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-03-22T07:30:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3499-e1487871967209.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/22\/possession-of-properties\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/22\/possession-of-properties\/\",\"name\":\"Kar HC | Assistant Commissioner and Tahsildar made a consorted effort to abuse their office to take possession of the properties, demolish them and dispossess the rightful owners | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-03-22T07:30:40+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Possession of Properties\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/22\/possession-of-properties\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/22\/possession-of-properties\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/22\/possession-of-properties\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Kar HC | Assistant Commissioner and Tahsildar made a consorted effort to abuse their office to take possession of the properties, demolish them and dispossess the rightful owners\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Kar HC | Assistant Commissioner and Tahsildar made a consorted effort to abuse their office to take possession of the properties, demolish them and dispossess the rightful owners | SCC Times","description":"Possession of Properties","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/22\/possession-of-properties\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Kar HC | Assistant Commissioner and Tahsildar made a consorted effort to abuse their office to take possession of the properties, demolish them and dispossess the rightful owners","og_description":"Possession of Properties","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/22\/possession-of-properties\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-03-22T07:30:40+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3499-e1487871967209.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/22\/possession-of-properties\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/22\/possession-of-properties\/","name":"Kar HC | Assistant Commissioner and Tahsildar made a consorted effort to abuse their office to take possession of the properties, demolish them and dispossess the rightful owners | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-03-22T07:30:40+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Possession of Properties","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/22\/possession-of-properties\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/22\/possession-of-properties\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/22\/possession-of-properties\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Kar HC | Assistant Commissioner and Tahsildar made a consorted effort to abuse their office to take possession of the properties, demolish them and dispossess the rightful owners"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":209007,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/30\/sl-coa-person-claiming-prescriptive-title-against-rightful-owner-has-a-heavy-burden-to-prove-all-requirements-prescribed-in-section-3-of-prescription-ordinance\/","url_meta":{"origin":245920,"position":0},"title":"SL CoA | Person claiming prescriptive title against rightful owner has a heavy burden to prove all requirements prescribed in S. 3 of Prescription Ordinance","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 30, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Court of Appeal of Sri Lanka: The Bench of Mahinda Samayawardhena, J. dismissed the appeal of the plaintiff seeking a declaration of title to the land in question for the lack of proof given by the plaintiff to show that the property belonged to him and not the rightful owners.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":216896,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/16\/ori-hc-lower-court-orders-quashed-due-to-production-of-forged-evidence-and-fraudulent-practices\/","url_meta":{"origin":245920,"position":1},"title":"Ori HC | Lower Court orders quashed due to production of forged evidence and fraudulent practices","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 16, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Orissa High Court: Dr A.K. Rath J., quashed the order passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division) and order by Tahsildar due to fraudulent practices of the parties in a consolidation matter. In the present case, a plot of land came into the purview of consolidation operation, wherein the Opposite Party\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":214767,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/17\/ker-hc-minority-commission-doesnt-have-jurisdiction-to-pass-order-directing-issuance-of-revenue-documents-to-individual-member-of-community\/","url_meta":{"origin":245920,"position":2},"title":"Ker HC | Minority Commission doesn’t have jurisdiction to pass order directing issuance of revenue documents to individual member of community","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 17, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: A. Muhamed Mustaque, J. set aside an order given by the Minority Commission whereby Tahsildar and Village Officer were directed to issue the revenue documents to the Respondent 2. In the present case, Jenny John (Respondent 2) a member of minority community approached the Minority Commission with\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":238360,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/02\/doctrine-of-delay-and-laches-kar-hc-limitation-act-1963-does-not-apply-to-writ-jurisdiction-court-discusses-well-settled-law-regarding-delayed-filing-of-writ-petitions\/","url_meta":{"origin":245920,"position":3},"title":"Kar HC | Whether delay and latches be put against a person who approaches the Writ Court under Article 226 of the Constitution? HC determines","author":"Editor","date":"November 2, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: S. G. Pandit J., rejected the petition on the ground of delay and latches. The facts of the case are such that the father of the petitioners are the owners\/ landlords of the property situated at Unachageri of Ron Taluk, Gadag district. The lands were inam land\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":279107,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/05\/can-caste-based-reservation-be-given-to-an-individual-if-one-converts-to-another-religion-madras-high-court-explains-considering-instant-facts\/","url_meta":{"origin":245920,"position":4},"title":"Can caste-based reservation be given to an individual if one converts to another religion; Madras High Court explains considering instant facts","author":"Editor","date":"December 5, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Madras High Court: In a case filed by the petitioner- candidate seeking the reason for his non-selection as well as an explanation as to why after him being converted to Islam, TNPSC did not treat him under the \u201cBC (Muslim)\u201d category but considered him under the \u201cGeneral\u201d category,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Madras-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":287571,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/23\/madhya-pradesh-high-court-writ-petition-will-mutation-proceeding-authority-tahsildar-legal-research-news-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":245920,"position":5},"title":"\u201cEvery \u2018FILE\u2019 carries a \u2018LIFE\u2019\u201d; Tahsildar cannot decide question of Will in mutation proceeding: Madhya Pradesh High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"March 23, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court held that all authorities while discharging public duties or performing judicial\/quasi-judicial functions must be think about Justice and that every \u201cFILE\u201d carries a \u201cLIFE\u201d.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-681.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-681.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-681.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-681.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/245920","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=245920"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/245920\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=245920"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=245920"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=245920"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}