{"id":245477,"date":"2021-03-13T09:30:34","date_gmt":"2021-03-13T04:00:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=245477"},"modified":"2021-03-19T11:01:38","modified_gmt":"2021-03-19T05:31:38","slug":"jharkhand-high-court","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/13\/jharkhand-high-court\/","title":{"rendered":"Jhar HC | Will a person claiming to be 41 years 11 months and 30 days of age be qualified for a post which prescribes\u00a0upper age limit of 42 years? HC explains"},"content":{"rendered":"

Jharkhand High Court:<\/strong> Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J., heard the instant petition whereby the petitioner had requested for quashing the order dated 05-12-2018 by which the candidature of the petitioner had been rejected.<\/p>\n

Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission (JSSC) had published an advertisement inviting applications for appointment on the post of Graduate Trained Teacher under Combined Graduate Trained Teacher Competitive Exam, 2016. As per the advertisement, the cut-off date of age was 01-01-2016 on which the minimum age required was 21 years and maximum age for Extremely Backward Class (List-I) and Backward Class (List-2) was set at 42 years. The petitioner appeared and was declared successful in the counselling. The documents of the petitioner was examined and while calculating the age of the petitioner, it was found that the petitioner had already crossed 42 years of age. Consequently, the candidature of the petitioner had been rejected. Aggrieved by the impugned order, the petitioner had approached the Court by way of a writ petition.<\/p>\n

Grievance of the petitioner was that he had completed 41 years 11 months and 30 days of age on 31-12-2015 and on 01-01-2016; the petitioner was 42nd years of age. The petitioner submitted that his date of birth was 01-01-1974 and in the light of age calculator on the website of JSSC, the petitioner was found 42 years on 01-01-2016. thus, his candidature was arbitrarily rejected.<\/p>\n

Whereas, the respondent argued that petitioner\u2019s age had been rightly calculated. It was submitted that so far the age calculator on the website of JSSC was concerned that was erroneous and was not required to be relied as the same was not a part of the advertisement and the said calculator had been removed from the website of JSSC. The Respondent relied on the case of Pradeep Kumar Sonthalia v. Dhiraj Prasad Sahu <\/em>reported in 2020 (1) JBCJ (HC), wherein it had been held that,<\/p>\n

\u201cAs already stated, a legal day commences at 12 o\u2019clock midnight and continues until the same hour the following night. It would therefore appear that the appellant having been born on January 2, 1956, he had not only attained the age of 28 years but also completed the same at 12 o\u2019clock on the midnight of January 1, 1984.On the next day i.e. on January 2, 1984, the appellant would be one day more than 28 years.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

The Bench, after going through the materials available on record observed that, in the advertisement, it had been clearly stated that maximum age for Extremely Backward Class (List-I) and Backward Class (List-2) was 42 years. The petitioner belonged to this Class. The cut-off date was fixed for calculating the age as on 01-01-2016. The date of birth of the petitioner was 01-01-1974. Hence, the Bench opined,<\/p>\n

\u201cOn calculation of date of birth of petitioner, it transpires that the petitioner has completed 42 years of age on 31-12-2015. It is well-settled precedent that if a person born on 1stof a month is said to complete on entire year in terms of age on the last date of the previous month of next year.\u201d<\/strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Hence, it was held that, in the advertisement, it had been substantiated in the cleat terms that maximum age was 42 years and that the petitioner had already completed 42 years on 31-12-2015. He had entered in 43rd<\/sup> years on 01-01-2016. Therefore, the Bench refused to deviate from the advertisement. The instant petition was dismissed holding that the age of petitioner had been rightly calculated and as such no relief could be extended to the petitioner.[Ajay Kumar Mandal v. State of Jharkhand,\u00a0 2021 SCC OnLine Jhar 280<\/b><\/a>, decided on 08-03-2021]<\/p>\n

\n

Kamini Sharma, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

Appearance before the Court by:<\/strong><\/p>\n

For the Petitioner: Adv. Deepak Kumar Bharati,<\/p>\n

For the Respondents-State: G.A. I Ashok Kumar Yadav,<\/p>\n

For the Respondent-JSSC: Adv. Sanjay Piprawall<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Jharkhand High Court: Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J., heard the instant petition whereby the petitioner had requested for quashing the order dated 05-12-2018 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[5791,29785],"class_list":["post-245477","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-jharkhand-high-court","tag-law"],"yoast_head":"\nJhar HC | Will a person claiming to be 41 years 11 months and 30 days of age be qualified for a post which prescribes\u00a0upper age limit of 42 years? HC explains | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Jharkhand High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/13\/jharkhand-high-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Jhar HC | Will a person claiming to be 41 years 11 months and 30 days of age be qualified for a post which prescribes\u00a0upper age limit of 42 years? HC explains\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Jharkhand High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/13\/jharkhand-high-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-03-13T04:00:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-03-19T05:31:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/Jharkhand-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/13\/jharkhand-high-court\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/13\/jharkhand-high-court\/\",\"name\":\"Jhar HC | Will a person claiming to be 41 years 11 months and 30 days of age be qualified for a post which prescribes\u00a0upper age limit of 42 years? HC explains | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-03-13T04:00:34+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-03-19T05:31:38+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Jharkhand High Court\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/13\/jharkhand-high-court\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/13\/jharkhand-high-court\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/13\/jharkhand-high-court\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jhar HC | Will a person claiming to be 41 years 11 months and 30 days of age be qualified for a post which prescribes\u00a0upper age limit of 42 years? HC explains\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Jhar HC | Will a person claiming to be 41 years 11 months and 30 days of age be qualified for a post which prescribes\u00a0upper age limit of 42 years? HC explains | SCC Times","description":"Jharkhand High Court","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/13\/jharkhand-high-court\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Jhar HC | Will a person claiming to be 41 years 11 months and 30 days of age be qualified for a post which prescribes\u00a0upper age limit of 42 years? HC explains","og_description":"Jharkhand High Court","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/13\/jharkhand-high-court\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-03-13T04:00:34+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-03-19T05:31:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/Jharkhand-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/13\/jharkhand-high-court\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/13\/jharkhand-high-court\/","name":"Jhar HC | Will a person claiming to be 41 years 11 months and 30 days of age be qualified for a post which prescribes\u00a0upper age limit of 42 years? HC explains | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-03-13T04:00:34+00:00","dateModified":"2021-03-19T05:31:38+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Jharkhand High Court","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/13\/jharkhand-high-court\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/13\/jharkhand-high-court\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/13\/jharkhand-high-court\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jhar HC | Will a person claiming to be 41 years 11 months and 30 days of age be qualified for a post which prescribes\u00a0upper age limit of 42 years? HC explains"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":311654,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/18\/delay-in-issuance-of-advertisement-will-not-create-any-right-to-seek-age-relaxation-for-a-examination-phc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":245477,"position":0},"title":"Delay in issuance of advertisement will not create any right\/legitimate expectation to seek relaxation in upper age limit for an examination: Patna HC reiterates","author":"Simranjeet","date":"January 18, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIt is a policy decision and the criteria prescribed by the advertisement, whether it is relating to age and\/or the essential qualification, cannot be interfered with.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"patna high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/patna-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/patna-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/patna-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/patna-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":219453,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/12\/utt-hc-courts-not-to-do-task-of-prescribing-a-cut-off-date-other-than-that-stipulated-in-the-rules-made-under-the-proviso-to-art-309-of-the-constitution-of-india\/","url_meta":{"origin":245477,"position":1},"title":"Utt HC | Courts not to do task of prescribing a cut-off date other than that stipulated in the Rules made under the proviso to Art. 309 of the Constitution of India","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 12, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: A Division Bench of Ramesh Ranganathan, CJ and Alok Kumar Verma, JJ., entertained a writ petition where the issue was related to a prescription of the maximum age advertised by the Public Service Commission inviting application to fill up 46 posts of Assistant Conservator of Forest. In\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":323780,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/06\/raj-hc-rejects-petition-challenging-rajasthan-civil-judge-recruitments-age-eligibility-criteria-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":245477,"position":2},"title":"Rajasthan High Court rejects petition challenging Civil Judge Recruitment\u2019s age eligibility criteria","author":"Ritu","date":"June 6, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court upheld the validity of Clause 20, concluding it was consistent with Rule 17 of the Rajasthan Judicial Service Rules, 2010.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":322274,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/16\/jhc-directs-central-coalfields-ltd-constitute-medical-board-to-determine-age-of-man-seeking-compassionate-appointment-scctimes\/","url_meta":{"origin":245477,"position":3},"title":"Jharkhand HC directs Central Coalfields Limited to constitute Medical Board to determine age of man seeking compassionate appointment on his father\u2019s death","author":"Arushi","date":"May 16, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The exclusion of one class of legitimate children from seeking compassionate appointment merely on the ground that the mother of the applicant was a plural wife of the deceased employee would fail to meet the test of a reasonable nexus with the objective sought to be achieved.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Jharkhand High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":265559,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/18\/history-subject-educational-qualification-post-graduate-teacher-training-jharkhand-expert-opinion-supreme-court-legal-research-updates-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":245477,"position":4},"title":"Appointment of Teachers| Can obtaining a degree in one branch of a subject be considered equivalent to obtaining degree in the subject as a whole? SC answers\u00a0","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"April 18, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In the case where the Court was posed with the question as to whether the degrees obtained by the respective petitioners in one branch of History can be said to be obtaining a degree in History, the bench of MR Shah* and BV Nagarathna, JJ has held that\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-131-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-131-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-131-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-131-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-131-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":343035,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/06\/gujarat-hc-rejects-judiciary-aspirant-plea-seeking-age-relaxation-civil-judge-exam\/","url_meta":{"origin":245477,"position":5},"title":"Gujarat HC rejects judiciary aspirant\u2019s plea seeking age relaxation to attempt Civil Judge Exam","author":"Editor","date":"March 6, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The aspirant, who crossed the age limit of 35 years contended that there was no recruitment undertaken during the year 2023-2024, though, the vacancies were available and therefore, she did not get a chance to participate.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Gujarat High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Gujarat-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Gujarat-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Gujarat-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Gujarat-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/245477","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=245477"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/245477\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=245477"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=245477"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=245477"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}