{"id":244861,"date":"2021-03-02T09:17:24","date_gmt":"2021-03-02T03:47:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=244861"},"modified":"2021-03-12T11:37:41","modified_gmt":"2021-03-12T06:07:41","slug":"business-standard","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/02\/business-standard\/","title":{"rendered":"Del HC | Complaint against Business Standard for defaming &#8216;member of RSS&#8217; quashed: Who qualifies as an aggrieved person to file defamation complaint? HC explains"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Delhi High Court: <\/strong>Suresh Kumar Kait, J., quashed a complaint about defamation filed by a lawyer against Business Standard. It was held that the complainant had no locus to file the complainant.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>What do the petitioners want?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Petitioner sought the quashing of Order as well as Complaint Case titled: <em>Lohitaksha Shukla v. Business Standard (P) Ltd. <\/em>pending before the Metropolitan Magistrate.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>What was the basis of complaint?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Complaint was based on an article titled: <em>\u201cThe Long and Short of it\u201d <\/em>which was published in the petitioner\u2019s newspaper \u2013 <em>Business Standard <\/em>under the authorship of <em>Mitali Saran.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><u>Averments of the Complainant<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>Lohitaksha Shukla, <\/em>Complainant who was an advocate by profession averred that he was informed about the factum of publication of the article by his friends. In the complaint he alleged that the article was not based on facts and contained some defamatory insinuations against RSS and it\u2019s members, as it accused members of RSS being oppressive to Indians, mentally disturbed and disrespectful to Indian National Symbols ridden with psycho sexual complexes, practitioners of discrimination based on caste and physically unfit.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Further, he added that being a member of RSS, his reputation had been adversely affected.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Metropolitan Magistrate found that there was sufficient material for summoning the accused 1, 2 and 3 under Section 500 IPC.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><u>Petitioner\u2019s Stand<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Petitioners submitted that if a Magistrate were to take cognizance of the offence of defamation on a complaint filed by one who was not an \u201caggrieved person\u201d, the trial and conviction of an accused in such a case by Magistrate would be void and illegal.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Petitioner 2 has averred that the allegation of complainant that he was \u2018Editor in Chief\u2019 of petitioner 1 at the time of publication of the article was baseless, as he had never been \u2018Editor in Chief\u2019 of petitioner 1.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Adding to the above, it was submitted that the complainant was not \u201cperson aggrieved\u201d within the meaning of Section 199(1) CrPC and hence, was not competent to institute a private complaint and even if the complaint was taken on the face value, the same did not disclose any offence whatsoever which falls within the ambit of Sections 499 and 500 IPC.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Complainant could not establish how his reputation was harmed or his moral or intellectual character was lowered as a result of the said article. Though he claimed that he had been asked by his friends to leave RSS as a result of that article, but he could not bring anyone to the witness box in support of the said assertion, hence failed to prove that article brought any kind of defamation to him.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bench noted that Section 199(1) CrPC mandated that the magistrate could take cognizance of the offence only upon receiving a complaint by a person who was aggrieved.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>Purpose and intent of this provision is to limit the power of Magistrate to take cognizance of offences pertaining to defamation in order to prevent and discourage the filing of frivolous complaints.<\/em><em>\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Court observed that, in the present case, the complainant had not been able to show as to how he was the \u201cperson aggrieved\u201d within the definition of Section 199(1) CrPC and thus, the contents of complaint suffered from vices of illegality or infirmity. Even complainant was not a part of \u201cidentifiable class\u201d or definite \u201cassociation or collection of persons\u201d as enumerated in Explanation (2) to Section 499 of IPC.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Trial Court did not take into consideration the above-stated provision.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">High Court referred to the Supreme Court decision in <em>Mehmood Ul Rehman v. Khazir Mohammad Tunda, <\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/kWU0uPLe\">(2015) 12 SCC 420<\/a> with regard to the scope of \u201copinion of Magistrate\u201d.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hence, in view of the above discussions, Court held that the complaint in question was not maintainable and was liable to be dismissed.\u00a0 [Business Standard (P) Ltd. v. Lohitaksha Shukla,\u00a0 <b><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/51M3U7VN\">2021 SCC OnLine Del 988<\/a>,<\/b> decided on 01-03-2021]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Delhi High Court: Suresh Kumar Kait, J., quashed a complaint about defamation filed by a lawyer against Business Standard. It was held <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2812,29785,2538,33123],"class_list":["post-244861","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-defamation","tag-law","tag-Magistrate","tag-section-500-ipc"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Del HC | Complaint against Business Standard for defaming &#039;member of RSS&#039; quashed: Who qualifies as an aggrieved person to file defamation complaint? HC explains | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Business Standard\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/02\/business-standard\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Del HC | Complaint against Business Standard for defaming &#039;member of RSS&#039; quashed: Who qualifies as an aggrieved person to file defamation complaint? HC explains\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Business Standard\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/02\/business-standard\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-03-02T03:47:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-03-12T06:07:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/02\/business-standard\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/02\/business-standard\/\",\"name\":\"Del HC | Complaint against Business Standard for defaming 'member of RSS' quashed: Who qualifies as an aggrieved person to file defamation complaint? HC explains | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-03-02T03:47:24+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-03-12T06:07:41+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"description\":\"Business Standard\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/02\/business-standard\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/02\/business-standard\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/02\/business-standard\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Del HC | Complaint against Business Standard for defaming &#8216;member of RSS&#8217; quashed: Who qualifies as an aggrieved person to file defamation complaint? HC explains\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Del HC | Complaint against Business Standard for defaming 'member of RSS' quashed: Who qualifies as an aggrieved person to file defamation complaint? HC explains | SCC Times","description":"Business Standard","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/02\/business-standard\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Del HC | Complaint against Business Standard for defaming 'member of RSS' quashed: Who qualifies as an aggrieved person to file defamation complaint? HC explains","og_description":"Business Standard","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/02\/business-standard\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-03-02T03:47:24+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-03-12T06:07:41+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/02\/business-standard\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/02\/business-standard\/","name":"Del HC | Complaint against Business Standard for defaming 'member of RSS' quashed: Who qualifies as an aggrieved person to file defamation complaint? HC explains | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-03-02T03:47:24+00:00","dateModified":"2021-03-12T06:07:41+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"description":"Business Standard","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/02\/business-standard\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/02\/business-standard\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/02\/business-standard\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Del HC | Complaint against Business Standard for defaming &#8216;member of RSS&#8217; quashed: Who qualifies as an aggrieved person to file defamation complaint? HC explains"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":240278,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/07\/ph-hc-under-s-499-ipc-is-it-only-the-family-members-or-near-relatives-of-deceased-person-against-whom-imputations-have-been-made-can-claim-to-be-persons-aggrieved-court-explains\/","url_meta":{"origin":244861,"position":0},"title":"P&#038;H HC | Under S. 499 IPC, is it only the &#8216;family members&#8217; or &#8216;near relatives&#8217; of deceased person, against whom imputations have been made, can claim to be &#8216;persons aggrieved&#8217;? Court explains","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 7, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court:\u00a0Sanjay Kumar, J., quashed the proceedings under Section 499 IPC against the petitioner holding that the complainant was neither a family member nor a near relative of the deceased whose defamation was alleged to have been caused by the petitioner, and hence the complaint itself was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":201302,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/04\/godman-to-tycoon-the-untold-story-of-baba-ramdev-defamation-complaint-against-juggernaut-books-p-ltd-stayed\/","url_meta":{"origin":244861,"position":1},"title":"Godman to Tycoon: The Untold Story of Baba Ramdev| Defamation complaint against Juggernaut Books (P) Ltd. stayed","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 4, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: The Bench comprising of Ashwani Kumar Singh, J, in an order stayed the proceedings against Juggernaut Books (P) Ltd. in regard to the defamation complaint by a complainant on behalf of Swami Ramdev. The petitioner's counsel in his submissions placed that Section 199 (1) CrPC makes it\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":255698,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/16\/anyone-possessing-knowledge-of-who-is-who-can-name-the-minister-holding-portfolio-of-works\/","url_meta":{"origin":244861,"position":2},"title":"J&#038;K and Ladakh HC | \u201cAnyone possessing knowledge of who is who can name the Minister holding portfolio of works\u201d; HC quashes defamation complaint against Arnab Goswami and Aditya Raj Kaul","author":"Editor","date":"October 16, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court: Sanjay Dhar, J., quashed a defamation complaint filed against the Editor-in-Chief of Republic TV, Arnab Goswami, and journalist Aditya Raj Kaul. The Bench observed, \u201cThe accused\/anchors have only stated the obvious. Anyone who possesses even elementary knowledge of who is who of Jammu\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":245665,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/16\/audi-alteram-partem\/","url_meta":{"origin":244861,"position":3},"title":"[Audi Alteram Partem] Raj HC | Whether complainant\u2019s revision against dismissal of his complaint, can be decided without giving an opportunity of hearing to the accused petitioner? Court explains\u00a0","author":"Editor","date":"March 16, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J., disposed of a petition which was filed against the order passed by the Additional Session Judge, Women Atrocity Cases No.1, Kota. The counsel for the petitioner, Mr Sudhir Jain submitted that the complainant had challenged the order passed by the Learned ACJM, Kota\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":357161,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/20\/bom-hc-quashes-notice-in-hdfc-ceo-defamation-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":244861,"position":4},"title":"Bombay High Court quashes notice issued by Magistrate to HDFC Bank\u2019s MD-CEO in defamation case","author":"Editor","date":"August 20, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"There is a purpose of recording the verification of the complaint, as it gives an opportunity to the Magistrate to ascertain whether to proceed further. When the accused is recognised with a right of audience, they have got every right to insist on the compliance of the procedure regarding verification.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"HDFC CEO defamation case","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/HDFC-CEO-defamation-case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/HDFC-CEO-defamation-case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/HDFC-CEO-defamation-case.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/HDFC-CEO-defamation-case.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":288266,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/31\/delhi-high-court-quashes-summons-issued-to-the-wire-editors-in-a-criminal-defamation-case-filed-by-a-former-jnu-professor-legal-research-updates-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":244861,"position":5},"title":"Delhi High Court quashes summons issued to \u201cThe Wire\u201d editors in a criminal defamation case filed by a former JNU Professor","author":"Simranjeet","date":"March 31, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court quashes and sets aside summons issued to the editor and deputy editor of \u201cThe Wire\u201d in a criminal defamation case filed by the former Professor of Jawaharlal Nehru University.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/244861","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=244861"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/244861\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=244861"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=244861"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=244861"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}