{"id":244363,"date":"2021-02-25T10:00:26","date_gmt":"2021-02-25T04:30:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=244363"},"modified":"2021-03-05T11:47:02","modified_gmt":"2021-03-05T06:17:02","slug":"accident","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/25\/accident\/","title":{"rendered":"[MV Act] Kar HC | Evidence is examined on the touchstone of \u2018preponderance of probabilities\u2019, Standard of proof of accident beyond reasonable doubt to not apply"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Karnataka High Court:<\/strong> A Division Bench of Alok Aradhe and Nataraj Rangaswamy, JJ., disposed of the appeal after modifying the compensation.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The facts of the case are such that the deceased Sanjeev M Patil was crossing the road as a pedestrian at 6:00 am in morning when a bus being driven in a rash and negligent manner by its driver dashed against the deceased as a result the deceased received grievous injuries and succumbed to the same. The claimants filed a petition seeking compensation which was thereby granted keeping in mind his young age and monthly income. Aggrieved by the same, the present appeal was filed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Counsel for appellants submitted that the Tribunal has erred in its judgment and the accident took place 75 meters from the toll booth and that the deceased suddenly tried to cross the road without observing the vehicles approaching the toll counter. It was also submitted that there is a gross error in assessing the monthly income and compensation is excessive.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Counsel for the respondents submitted that as per an independent eye witness it is clear that the accident happened due to the rash and negligent driving of the bus by the driver and the monthly income calculated is correct as the deceased was a permanent employee and infact sums awarded under the heads \u201closs of consortium\u201d and \u201closs of love and affection\u201d are on the lower side and deserves to be enhanced suitably.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court relied on judgment <em>Mangala Ram v. Oriental Insurance Co.,<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Tu7bN1A9\">(2018) 5 SCC 656<\/a> and observed that the proceeding under the Act has to be decided on the basis of preponderance of probabilities and the claimant is not required to prove the accident beyond reasonable doubt.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court thus held that \u201che Tribunal on meticulous appreciation of the evidence on record as well as on the basis of preponderance of probabilities has rightly held that the accident occurred on account of the negligence of the driver of the KSRTC bus.\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">On the question of amount of compensation the Court held that after perusing the salary slip and income tax return statements and keeping in mind the future aspects the compensation was modified.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In view of the above, appeal was disposed off.[Gowri S. Patil v. Divisional Controller, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/QDq75i6r\"><b>2021 SCC OnLine Kar 447<\/b><\/a>, decided on 04-02-2021]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\">Arunima Bose, Editorial Assistant has put this story together.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court: A Division Bench of Alok Aradhe and Nataraj Rangaswamy, JJ., disposed of the appeal after modifying the compensation. The <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2735,2728,2521,29785,3065,34365],"class_list":["post-244363","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Accident","tag-compensation","tag-Evidence","tag-law","tag-negligence","tag-standard-of-proof"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>[MV Act] Kar HC | Evidence is examined on the touchstone of \u2018preponderance of probabilities\u2019, Standard of proof of accident beyond reasonable doubt to not apply | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Accident\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/25\/accident\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"[MV Act] Kar HC | Evidence is examined on the touchstone of \u2018preponderance of probabilities\u2019, Standard of proof of accident beyond reasonable doubt to not apply\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Accident\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/25\/accident\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-02-25T04:30:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-03-05T06:17:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3499-e1487871967209.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/25\/accident\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/25\/accident\/\",\"name\":\"[MV Act] Kar HC | Evidence is examined on the touchstone of \u2018preponderance of probabilities\u2019, Standard of proof of accident beyond reasonable doubt to not apply | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-02-25T04:30:26+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-03-05T06:17:02+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Accident\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/25\/accident\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/25\/accident\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/25\/accident\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"[MV Act] Kar HC | Evidence is examined on the touchstone of \u2018preponderance of probabilities\u2019, Standard of proof of accident beyond reasonable doubt to not apply\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"[MV Act] Kar HC | Evidence is examined on the touchstone of \u2018preponderance of probabilities\u2019, Standard of proof of accident beyond reasonable doubt to not apply | SCC Times","description":"Accident","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/25\/accident\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"[MV Act] Kar HC | Evidence is examined on the touchstone of \u2018preponderance of probabilities\u2019, Standard of proof of accident beyond reasonable doubt to not apply","og_description":"Accident","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/25\/accident\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-02-25T04:30:26+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-03-05T06:17:02+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3499-e1487871967209.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/25\/accident\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/25\/accident\/","name":"[MV Act] Kar HC | Evidence is examined on the touchstone of \u2018preponderance of probabilities\u2019, Standard of proof of accident beyond reasonable doubt to not apply | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-02-25T04:30:26+00:00","dateModified":"2021-03-05T06:17:02+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Accident","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/25\/accident\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/25\/accident\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/25\/accident\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"[MV Act] Kar HC | Evidence is examined on the touchstone of \u2018preponderance of probabilities\u2019, Standard of proof of accident beyond reasonable doubt to not apply"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":261457,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/10\/raj-hc-money-cannot-substitute-a-life-lost-but-an-effort-has-to-be-made-for-grant-of-just-compensation-having-uniformity-in-approach-court-observes-in-a-mv-accident-case-demanding-higher-compensati\/","url_meta":{"origin":244363,"position":0},"title":"Raj HC | Money cannot substitute a life lost but an effort has to be made for grant of just compensation having uniformity in approach; Court observes in a MV accident case demanding higher compensation","author":"Editor","date":"February 10, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: Birendra Kumar J. allowed the appeal and enhanced the award considering the settled guidelines in the subsequent judgments to reach at \u201cjust compensation\u201d. The instant appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, was filed by the wife, minor daughter and parents of Late Ramavatar\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":256895,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/10\/in-absence-of-documentary-evidence-can-monthly-income-of-deceased-be-determined-as-notional-income-for-purpose-of-determining-compensation-under-mv-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":244363,"position":1},"title":"Bom HC | In absence of documentary evidence, can monthly income of deceased be determined as notional income for purpose of determining compensation under MV Act? Explained","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 10, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: Noting that the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Member did not properly determine just and proper compensation, V.M. Deshpande, J., while partly allowing the appeal enhanced compensation. Instant appeal was filed by the claimants for enhancement of compensation. Factual Matrix Appellants were the widow, sons and daughters of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":221363,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/22\/ph-hc-merely-not-finding-a-ticket-from-the-body-of-a-person-who-died-in-railway-accident-does-not-prove-that-deceased-was-a-ticket-less-passenger\/","url_meta":{"origin":244363,"position":2},"title":"P&#038;H HC | Merely not finding a ticket from the body of a person who died in railway accident does not prove that deceased was a ticket less passenger","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 22, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: Dr Ravi Ranjan, J. allowed the appeal filed by legal heirs of a person who died in a \u2018railway untoward accident\u2019, under Section 16 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987. The claimants herein were the sons of the deceased person who died in an\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":220904,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/16\/ph-hc-%e2%94%82claimants-in-proceedings-under-mv-act-have-to-prove-their-case-on-the-touchstone-of-preponderance-of-probabilities-and-not-beyond-reasonable-doubt\/","url_meta":{"origin":244363,"position":3},"title":"P&#038;H HC | Claimants in proceedings under MV Act have to prove their case on the touchstone of preponderance of probabilities and not beyond reasonable doubt","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 16, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: Lisa Gill, J. dismissed the appeal filed by insurance company challenging the amount of compensation granted by the Motor Accidents Claim Tribunal (\u2018MACT\u2019). In the present case, one Dalip Singh and Aslam (deceased), met with a motor vehicle accident which led to their fatal death.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":353399,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/15\/sik-hc-deceased-workeman-compensation-for-son-motor-accident-death\/","url_meta":{"origin":244363,"position":4},"title":"\u2018Deceased a workman, not gratuitous passenger\u2019; Sikkim HC awards Rs 21.89 lakh compensation to parents for son\u2019s accidental death","author":"Editor","date":"July 15, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe deceased was a gratuitous passenger based on hearsay knowledge from persons who did not enter the witness box, but, on a preponderance of probabilities, the evidence on record clearly suggest that the deceased was a workman working with the owner.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"compensation for son\u2019s motor accident death","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/compensation-for-sons-motor-accident-death.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/compensation-for-sons-motor-accident-death.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/compensation-for-sons-motor-accident-death.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/compensation-for-sons-motor-accident-death.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":325128,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/26\/ph-hc-enhances-compensation-for-accidental-death-of-nine-year-old-child\/","url_meta":{"origin":244363,"position":5},"title":"\u2018Deceased was a brilliant student\u2019; Punjab and Haryana HC enhances compensation granted by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal for accidental death of nine-year-old child","author":"Arushi","date":"June 26, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court stated that the appellants were entitled to the compensation on the count of \u2018loss of consortium\u2019, \u2018loss of dependency\u2019, \u2018loss of estate\u2019 and \u2018funeral expenses\u2019.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Punjab and Haryana High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/244363","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=244363"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/244363\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=244363"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=244363"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=244363"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}