{"id":24431,"date":"2015-11-02T21:21:07","date_gmt":"2015-11-02T15:51:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=24431"},"modified":"2015-11-23T18:04:48","modified_gmt":"2015-11-23T12:34:48","slug":"owner-under-section-230-of-the-motor-vehicle-act-1988-interpreted","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/02\/owner-under-section-230-of-the-motor-vehicle-act-1988-interpreted\/","title":{"rendered":"\u201cOwner\u201d under Section 2(30) of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 interpreted"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Supreme Court<\/strong>: The questions that came before the bench of H.L. Dattu, CJ and Arun Mishra, J were whether in the wake of lease agreement entered into by registered owner with Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC), the registered owner and insurer along with KSRTC can be fastened with the liability to make payment to the claimants and that whether KSRTC can recover the amount from registered owner and its entitlement to seek indemnification from insurer.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Taking note of the definition of the term \u2018owner\u2019 as defined under Section 2(30) of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988, the Court said that under the MV Act, the owner means a registered owner and where the agreement on hire-purchase or an agreement of hypothecation has been entered into or lease agreement, the person in possession of the vehicle is treated as an owner. It was held that the KSRTC being in actual control of the vehicle would also be liable to make the compensation, however, it can recover the amount from the registered owner or insurer, as the case may be. Regarding the liability of the insurer, it was held that the insurer cannot escape the liability, when ownership changes due to the hypothecation agreement It was further held that In the case of hire also, it cannot escape the liability, even if the ownership changes. Even though, KSRTC is treated as owner under Section 2(30) of the MV Act, the registered owner continues to remain liable as per terms and conditions of lease agreement lawfully entered into with KSRTC.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court, after referring to many decisions of this court, held that registered owner, insurer as well as KSRTC would be liable to make the payment of compensation jointly and severally to the claimants and the KSRTC in terms of the lease agreement entered into with the registered owner would be entitled to recover the amount paid to the claimants from the owner as stipulated in the agreement or from the insurer.[ Managing Director, K.S.R.T.C. v. New India Assurance Co.Ltd.,<b><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2015_SCC_OnLine_SC_1044\" target=\"_blank\">2015 SCC OnLine SC 1044<\/a><\/b>, decided on 27.10.2015]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Supreme Court: The questions that came before the bench of H.L. Dattu, CJ and Arun Mishra, J were whether in the wake <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":154914,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[2728,2707,3301],"class_list":["post-24431","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-compensation","tag-Insurance","tag-liability"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>\u201cOwner\u201d under Section 2(30) of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 interpreted | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/02\/owner-under-section-230-of-the-motor-vehicle-act-1988-interpreted\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u201cOwner\u201d under Section 2(30) of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 interpreted\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court: The questions that came before the bench of H.L. Dattu, CJ and Arun Mishra, J were whether in the wake\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/02\/owner-under-section-230-of-the-motor-vehicle-act-1988-interpreted\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-11-02T15:51:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-11-23T12:34:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/02\/owner-under-section-230-of-the-motor-vehicle-act-1988-interpreted\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/02\/owner-under-section-230-of-the-motor-vehicle-act-1988-interpreted\/\",\"name\":\"\u201cOwner\u201d under Section 2(30) of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 interpreted | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/02\/owner-under-section-230-of-the-motor-vehicle-act-1988-interpreted\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/02\/owner-under-section-230-of-the-motor-vehicle-act-1988-interpreted\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2015-11-02T15:51:07+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-11-23T12:34:48+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/02\/owner-under-section-230-of-the-motor-vehicle-act-1988-interpreted\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/02\/owner-under-section-230-of-the-motor-vehicle-act-1988-interpreted\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/02\/owner-under-section-230-of-the-motor-vehicle-act-1988-interpreted\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/02\/owner-under-section-230-of-the-motor-vehicle-act-1988-interpreted\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u201cOwner\u201d under Section 2(30) of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 interpreted\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"\u201cOwner\u201d under Section 2(30) of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 interpreted | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/02\/owner-under-section-230-of-the-motor-vehicle-act-1988-interpreted\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u201cOwner\u201d under Section 2(30) of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 interpreted","og_description":"Supreme Court: The questions that came before the bench of H.L. Dattu, CJ and Arun Mishra, J were whether in the wake","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/02\/owner-under-section-230-of-the-motor-vehicle-act-1988-interpreted\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2015-11-02T15:51:07+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-11-23T12:34:48+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/02\/owner-under-section-230-of-the-motor-vehicle-act-1988-interpreted\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/02\/owner-under-section-230-of-the-motor-vehicle-act-1988-interpreted\/","name":"\u201cOwner\u201d under Section 2(30) of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 interpreted | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/02\/owner-under-section-230-of-the-motor-vehicle-act-1988-interpreted\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/02\/owner-under-section-230-of-the-motor-vehicle-act-1988-interpreted\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","datePublished":"2015-11-02T15:51:07+00:00","dateModified":"2015-11-23T12:34:48+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/02\/owner-under-section-230-of-the-motor-vehicle-act-1988-interpreted\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/02\/owner-under-section-230-of-the-motor-vehicle-act-1988-interpreted\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/02\/owner-under-section-230-of-the-motor-vehicle-act-1988-interpreted\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/11\/02\/owner-under-section-230-of-the-motor-vehicle-act-1988-interpreted\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u201cOwner\u201d under Section 2(30) of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 interpreted"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":330221,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/06\/motor-accident-compensation-ownership-definition-not-limited-context-control-of-vehicle-important-supreme-court-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":24431,"position":0},"title":"\u2018Ownership\u2019 not limited to categories specified in Section 2(30) of MV Act; Context around control of vehicle important to fix liability: SC","author":"Sucheta","date":"September 6, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The issue in the instant case revolved around whether a dealer or the manufacturer can be construed as an \u2018owner\u2019 vis-a-vis fixation of tortious liability for payment of compensation, especially when the driver and deceased both were employees of the manufacturer.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"vehicle owner motor accident compensation liability","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/vehicle-owner-motor-accident-compensation-liability.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/vehicle-owner-motor-accident-compensation-liability.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/vehicle-owner-motor-accident-compensation-liability.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/vehicle-owner-motor-accident-compensation-liability.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":352144,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/02\/hcc-high-court-cases-on-motor-vehicles-act-1988-compensation\/","url_meta":{"origin":24431,"position":1},"title":"Cases Reported in HCC | Latest High Court Cases on Third Party Claims under MV Act","author":"Niyati","date":"July 2, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Explore the latest cases reported in SCC OnLine, High Court Cases (HCC) on the Motor Vehicles Act, focusing on ownership liability, just compensation, evidentiary standards, and tribunal powers. Key cases reflect a progressive judicial approach to fair and victim-centric motor accident claims.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cases Reported&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Cases on Motor Vehicles","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Cases-on-Motor-Vehicles.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Cases-on-Motor-Vehicles.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Cases-on-Motor-Vehicles.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Cases-on-Motor-Vehicles.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":218512,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/22\/ker-hc-liability-of-insurer-to-indemnify-third-parties-subsists-unless-insurance-coverage-is-cancelled-and-an-intimation-thereof-has-reached-the-insured\/","url_meta":{"origin":24431,"position":2},"title":"Ker HC | Liability of insurer to indemnify third parties subsists unless insurance coverage is cancelled and an intimation thereof has reached the insured","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 22, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: P.B. Suresh Kumar, J. allowed an appeal filed by the claimant against the insurer in which an award was passed exonerating the liability of the insurer to indemnify the owner. \u00a0In the instant case, the claimant sustained injuries in a motor vehicle accident and claimed for indemnity\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":379773,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/31\/sc-state-not-insurer-liable-for-accident-involving-requisitioned-vehicle\/","url_meta":{"origin":24431,"position":3},"title":"SC: State Liable for Accidents Involving Requisitioned Vehicles, Not Insurer","author":"Malika Bhola","date":"March 31, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u2018A requisition is not a voluntary arrangement; it is a command issued under statutory authority.\u2019","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"liability for requisitioned vehicle accident","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/liability-for-requisitioned-vehicle-accident.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/liability-for-requisitioned-vehicle-accident.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/liability-for-requisitioned-vehicle-accident.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/liability-for-requisitioned-vehicle-accident.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":306159,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/02\/insurer-has-no-right-to-recover-motor-accident-compensation-from-insured-for-driver-fake-licence-sc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":24431,"position":4},"title":"Insurer has no right to recover motor accident claim compensation from insured vehicle owner for driver\u2019s fake licence: SC","author":"Editor","date":"November 2, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The burden of proving that there was a failure on the part of the vehicle owner in carrying out due diligence apropos driving licence before employing a person to drive the vehicle is upon the insurance company.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"recover motor accident compensation","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/recover-motor-accident-compensation.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/recover-motor-accident-compensation.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/recover-motor-accident-compensation.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/recover-motor-accident-compensation.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":222249,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/18\/kar-hc-insurer-directed-to-pay-compensation-awarded-to-claimants-and-thereafter-recover-it-from-owner-of-the-vehicle\/","url_meta":{"origin":24431,"position":5},"title":"Kar HC | Insurer directed to pay compensation awarded to claimants and thereafter recover it from owner of the vehicle","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 18, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: H.T. Narendra Prasad, J. while allowing the appeal in part and condoning the delay ordered that the claimant was not entitled to the interest for the delayed period of 358 days. This Miscellaneous First Appeal was filed under Section 173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 seeking enhancement\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24431","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=24431"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24431\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/154914"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24431"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=24431"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=24431"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}