{"id":244146,"date":"2021-02-19T16:45:37","date_gmt":"2021-02-19T11:15:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=244146"},"modified":"2021-02-26T12:27:12","modified_gmt":"2021-02-26T06:57:12","slug":"protest","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/19\/protest\/","title":{"rendered":"Madras HC | Can Court take cognizance of an offence registered under S. 309 IPC after 3 years? Court discusses while expressing \u201cHunger strike during a protest is not an offence under S. 309 IPC\u201d"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Madras High Court: <\/strong>N. Anand Venkatesh, J., addressed a matter wherein it was alleged that hunger strike during protest will be an offence under Section 309 of Penal Code, 1860.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Petitioner was detained at a Special Camp, Poonamallee, while a protest was being made by the petitioner and others by way of a hunger strike.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">FIR came to be registered on the above occurrence under Section 309 of Penal Code, 1860 on the ground that there was an attempt to commit suicide.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Lower Court has taken cognizance of the final report in regard to the investigation conducted. The present petition was filed challenging the proceedings.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><u>Analysis<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bench noted that two grounds were raised in the present petition. First being, if the allegations were taken as it is, no offence has been made out under Section 309 IPC. The second ground that was raised was that the offence under Section 309 IPC was punishable with a maximum imprisonment of one year.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Fir was registered in the year 2013 and the lower court took cognizance in the year 2016 and the same is barred under Section 468 CrPC.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Court observed that:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008080;\"><strong>Mere fact that the petitioner has protested by sitting on hunger strike will not attract the offence under Section 309 IPC.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Adding to the above observation, Bench also stated that the lower court ought to have taken cognizance within a period of one year since the offence is punishable for a maximum period of one year. However, cognizance has been taken after nearly 3 years.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hence, taking cognizance of the final report is barred by law.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Court allowed the criminal original petition in view of the above discussion.[P. Chandrakumar v. State, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/KN4deM61\"><b>2021 SCC OnLine Mad 710<\/b><\/a>, decided on 15-02-2021]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Advocates who appeared before the Court:<\/strong><\/p>\n<div class=\"page\" title=\"Page 1\">\n<div class=\"layoutArea\">\n<div class=\"column\">\n<p><span style=\"color: #008000;\">For Petitioner : P. Pugalenthi <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #008000;\">For Respondents: C.Raghavan, Government Advocate<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Madras High Court: N. Anand Venkatesh, J., addressed a matter wherein it was alleged that hunger strike during protest will be an <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[45240,29785,23864,45239],"class_list":["post-244146","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-hunger-strike","tag-law","tag-protest","tag-section-309-ipc"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Madras HC | Can Court take cognizance of an offence registered under S. 309 IPC after 3 years? Court discusses while expressing \u201cHunger strike during a protest is not an offence under S. 309 IPC\u201d | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Protest\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/19\/protest\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Madras HC | Can Court take cognizance of an offence registered under S. 309 IPC after 3 years? Court discusses while expressing \u201cHunger strike during a protest is not an offence under S. 309 IPC\u201d\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Protest\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/19\/protest\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-02-19T11:15:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-02-26T06:57:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/madras-high-court1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/19\/protest\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/19\/protest\/\",\"name\":\"Madras HC | Can Court take cognizance of an offence registered under S. 309 IPC after 3 years? Court discusses while expressing \u201cHunger strike during a protest is not an offence under S. 309 IPC\u201d | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-02-19T11:15:37+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-02-26T06:57:12+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"description\":\"Protest\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/19\/protest\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/19\/protest\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/19\/protest\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Madras HC | Can Court take cognizance of an offence registered under S. 309 IPC after 3 years? Court discusses while expressing \u201cHunger strike during a protest is not an offence under S. 309 IPC\u201d\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Madras HC | Can Court take cognizance of an offence registered under S. 309 IPC after 3 years? Court discusses while expressing \u201cHunger strike during a protest is not an offence under S. 309 IPC\u201d | SCC Times","description":"Protest","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/19\/protest\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Madras HC | Can Court take cognizance of an offence registered under S. 309 IPC after 3 years? Court discusses while expressing \u201cHunger strike during a protest is not an offence under S. 309 IPC\u201d","og_description":"Protest","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/19\/protest\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-02-19T11:15:37+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-02-26T06:57:12+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/madras-high-court1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/19\/protest\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/19\/protest\/","name":"Madras HC | Can Court take cognizance of an offence registered under S. 309 IPC after 3 years? Court discusses while expressing \u201cHunger strike during a protest is not an offence under S. 309 IPC\u201d | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-02-19T11:15:37+00:00","dateModified":"2021-02-26T06:57:12+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"description":"Protest","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/19\/protest\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/19\/protest\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/19\/protest\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Madras HC | Can Court take cognizance of an offence registered under S. 309 IPC after 3 years? Court discusses while expressing \u201cHunger strike during a protest is not an offence under S. 309 IPC\u201d"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":329367,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/26\/person-attempting-commit-suicide-in-stress-cannot-be-penalised-u-s-309-ipc-in-view-of-s-115-mental-healthcare-act-bomhc\/","url_meta":{"origin":244146,"position":0},"title":"\u2018S.115(1) of Mental Healthcare Act overrides S.309 IPC\u2019; Bombay HC quashes FIR u\/s 309 IPC against woman who attempted to commit suicide under stress","author":"Simranjeet","date":"August 26, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Section 115 of the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017 stated that a person who tried to commit suicide, enjoyed a statutory presumption about mental stress and having regard to such presumption, is excluded from being put on trial.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":231829,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/06\/madras-hc-police-failed-to-state-how-anti-caa-protest-by-accused-was-unlawful-court-quashes-criminal-case-against-accused-booked-for-anti-caa-protest\/","url_meta":{"origin":244146,"position":1},"title":"Madras HC | Police failed to state how anti-CAA protest by accused was unlawful: Court quashes criminal case against accused booked for anti-CAA protest","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 6, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court:\u00a0G.K. Ilanthiraiyan, J., allowed a criminal petition and quashed proceedings in the criminal case filed against the petitioner protesting against Citizenship Amendment Act. Case of the prosecution Petitioner along with other accused persons protested in the public road against the implementation of the Citizenship Amendment Act and further\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":335060,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/13\/madras-hc-quashes-case-354a-teenage-love-affair\/","url_meta":{"origin":244146,"position":2},"title":"\u2018Hugging or kissing between teenagers in love is natural\u2019, Madras HC quashes case against 21-year-old boy accused of sexual harassment","author":"Apoorva","date":"November 13, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court clarified that to constitute an offence under Section 354-A(1)(i) of IPC, the accused must make unwelcome physical contact and advances, specifically involving explicit sexual overtures.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":253812,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/07\/frustrated-litigants\/","url_meta":{"origin":244146,"position":3},"title":"Kar HC | \u201cChagrined and frustrated litigants should not be permitted to give vent to their frustration by cheaply invoking jurisdiction of the criminal court\u201d Application of judicious mind sine qua non for setting criminal trial in motion","author":"Editor","date":"September 7, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: M. Nagaprasanna J. allowed the criminal petition and quashed the impugned order dated 30-07-2016 passed by Additional Civil Judge, Udupi. The facts of the case are such the wife of respondent 2\/complainant borrowed finance from the Karnataka State Finance Corporation (\u2018the Corporation\u2019) for establishing Sri Durga Printers\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":325601,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/03\/orissa-hc-quashes-trial-courts-cognizance-order-for-offence-306-against-doctor-accused-abetting-suicide\/","url_meta":{"origin":244146,"position":4},"title":"\u2018Reluctance to marry after engagement cannot be made penal offence\u2019; Orissa HC quashes Trial Court\u2019s cognizance order for offence u\/s. 306","author":"Editor","date":"July 3, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe case unveils the kind of damage caused in the minds of young people due to societal pressure, particularly in this age where psyche of the society as a whole is dominated by internet and social media platforms. It is unfathomable that a highly educated young girl, who was pursuing\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Orissa High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":272652,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/30\/madras-high-court-granted-bail-non-bailable-offence-national-investigation-agency-unlawful-activities-prevention-act-1967-indian-penal-code-1860-prisoner-on-transit-warrant-non-bailable-warrant\/","url_meta":{"origin":244146,"position":5},"title":"Madras High Court| PT warrant can never be converted into regular warrant in a case where the accused person is already on bail; opportunity should be given to the accused to explain his non-appearance","author":"Editor","date":"August 30, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court: In a case related to an appeal filed for the cancellation of an order of dismissing the bail application by the Special Court under the National Investigation Agency Act (Sessions Court for Exclusive Trial of Bomb Blast Cases) (Special Court), S.Vaidyanathan and A.D. Jagadish Chandira, JJ. released\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/244146","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=244146"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/244146\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=244146"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=244146"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=244146"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}