{"id":243598,"date":"2021-02-09T09:30:51","date_gmt":"2021-02-09T04:00:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=243598"},"modified":"2021-02-12T10:46:21","modified_gmt":"2021-02-12T05:16:21","slug":"ker-hc-right-to-be-heard-cannot-be-claimed-in-cases-of-re-incarceration-where-initial-order-of-release-was-without-application-of-mind","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/09\/ker-hc-right-to-be-heard-cannot-be-claimed-in-cases-of-re-incarceration-where-initial-order-of-release-was-without-application-of-mind\/","title":{"rendered":"Ker HC | Right to be heard cannot be claimed in cases of re-incarceration where initial order of release was without application of mind"},"content":{"rendered":"

Kerala High Court: <\/strong>V.G. Arun, J.,\u00a0 dismissed the instant petition whereby the petitioner had challenged his re-incarceration contending violation of natural justice by authorities.<\/p>\n

On 18-02-2011, the government ordered premature release of 209 prisoners who had completed imprisonment of 10 years (with remission) and above and in whose cases, favourable reports, either from the police or probation officer, had been received. The said order was challenged in Suo Motu v. State of Kerala,<\/em> 2019 SCC OnLine Ker 335<\/a>, before full Bench on the ground that the order was result of arbitrary exercise of power under Article 161 of the Constitution. The Court found out that power under Article 161 had been exercised without government applying its mind to the individual cases. Consequently, the impugned order was quashed and government was directed to examine the proposal for premature release of the 209 prisoners, afresh. Further, the Court directed government to consider the release of prisoners on two grounds namely, non-involvement in crime after release and favourable reports by police or probation officers.<\/p>\n

Accordingly, a State Level Committee was constituted, which, after analysing each case, observed that among the 209 prisoners, 22 had expired, 27 had involved in criminal cases after release and the remaining 160 were not involved in any criminal activity and had lived with good conduct. Hence, the government issued an order directing 30 persons from among the 209 to be re-incarcerated, for completing the remaining period of their sentence.<\/p>\n

The petitioner being one among the 30 ordered to be re-incarcerated was issued with summons from the trial court. Aggrieved by the order for his re-incarceration, the petitioner contended that government could not have ordered his re-incarceration without even affording an opportunity of hearing and the reason for re-incarceration being not discernible from the summon order, was indicative of absolute non-application of mind. It was further contended that,<\/p>\n

Quashing of order for release by the Court did not absolve the government from complying with the fundamental principles of natural justice and fair play.<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00a0The Bench observed the order of full Bench that in case of the Government failing to take a decision within six months, it would be deemed that there was no exercise of power under Article 161 in favour of the prisoners concerned and steps should be taken to re-incarcerate such prisoners for serving out the remainder of their sentence. The Bench stated,<\/p>\n

All 209 prisoners were liable to be re-incarcerated, but, on humanitarian consideration, the Full Bench allowed the Government to consider the cases of prisoners who could be granted exemption from re-incarceration based on their exceptional conduct and favourable reports from all authorities. <\/strong><\/p>\n

Therefore, the consideration was to be made with respect to the prisoners who could be exempted and not about those who were to be re-incarcerated. Being so, the principle of audi alteram partem<\/em> had no application in the case of petitioner. The petitioner got involved in two crimes after his release and did not satisfy the strict conditions imposed for being exempted from re-incarceration. Referring to the order of Full Bench, the Court emphasised it needs no reiteration that interim orders, unlike judgments, do not have any persuasive effect.<\/em> [Ramesh K.S v. State of Kerala,\u00a0 2021 SCC OnLine Ker 600<\/b><\/a>, decided on 05-02-2021]<\/p>\n

\n

Kamini Sharma, Editorial Assistant has put this story together<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Kerala High Court: V.G. Arun, J.,\u00a0 dismissed the instant petition whereby the petitioner had challenged his re-incarceration contending violation of natural justice <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[29785,45107,43815,27494],"class_list":["post-243598","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-law","tag-re-incarceration","tag-right-to-be-heard","tag-summons"],"yoast_head":"\nKer HC | Right to be heard cannot be claimed in cases of re-incarceration where initial order of release was without application of mind | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/09\/ker-hc-right-to-be-heard-cannot-be-claimed-in-cases-of-re-incarceration-where-initial-order-of-release-was-without-application-of-mind\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ker HC | Right to be heard cannot be claimed in cases of re-incarceration where initial order of release was without application of mind\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Kerala High Court: V.G. Arun, J.,\u00a0 dismissed the instant petition whereby the petitioner had challenged his re-incarceration contending violation of natural justice\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/09\/ker-hc-right-to-be-heard-cannot-be-claimed-in-cases-of-re-incarceration-where-initial-order-of-release-was-without-application-of-mind\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-02-09T04:00:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-02-12T05:16:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/KeralaHC-e1521442636157.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/09\/ker-hc-right-to-be-heard-cannot-be-claimed-in-cases-of-re-incarceration-where-initial-order-of-release-was-without-application-of-mind\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/09\/ker-hc-right-to-be-heard-cannot-be-claimed-in-cases-of-re-incarceration-where-initial-order-of-release-was-without-application-of-mind\/\",\"name\":\"Ker HC | Right to be heard cannot be claimed in cases of re-incarceration where initial order of release was without application of mind | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-02-09T04:00:51+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-02-12T05:16:21+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/09\/ker-hc-right-to-be-heard-cannot-be-claimed-in-cases-of-re-incarceration-where-initial-order-of-release-was-without-application-of-mind\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/09\/ker-hc-right-to-be-heard-cannot-be-claimed-in-cases-of-re-incarceration-where-initial-order-of-release-was-without-application-of-mind\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/09\/ker-hc-right-to-be-heard-cannot-be-claimed-in-cases-of-re-incarceration-where-initial-order-of-release-was-without-application-of-mind\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ker HC | Right to be heard cannot be claimed in cases of re-incarceration where initial order of release was without application of mind\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ker HC | Right to be heard cannot be claimed in cases of re-incarceration where initial order of release was without application of mind | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/09\/ker-hc-right-to-be-heard-cannot-be-claimed-in-cases-of-re-incarceration-where-initial-order-of-release-was-without-application-of-mind\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ker HC | Right to be heard cannot be claimed in cases of re-incarceration where initial order of release was without application of mind","og_description":"Kerala High Court: V.G. Arun, J.,\u00a0 dismissed the instant petition whereby the petitioner had challenged his re-incarceration contending violation of natural justice","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/09\/ker-hc-right-to-be-heard-cannot-be-claimed-in-cases-of-re-incarceration-where-initial-order-of-release-was-without-application-of-mind\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-02-09T04:00:51+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-02-12T05:16:21+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/KeralaHC-e1521442636157.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/09\/ker-hc-right-to-be-heard-cannot-be-claimed-in-cases-of-re-incarceration-where-initial-order-of-release-was-without-application-of-mind\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/09\/ker-hc-right-to-be-heard-cannot-be-claimed-in-cases-of-re-incarceration-where-initial-order-of-release-was-without-application-of-mind\/","name":"Ker HC | Right to be heard cannot be claimed in cases of re-incarceration where initial order of release was without application of mind | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-02-09T04:00:51+00:00","dateModified":"2021-02-12T05:16:21+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/09\/ker-hc-right-to-be-heard-cannot-be-claimed-in-cases-of-re-incarceration-where-initial-order-of-release-was-without-application-of-mind\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/09\/ker-hc-right-to-be-heard-cannot-be-claimed-in-cases-of-re-incarceration-where-initial-order-of-release-was-without-application-of-mind\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/09\/ker-hc-right-to-be-heard-cannot-be-claimed-in-cases-of-re-incarceration-where-initial-order-of-release-was-without-application-of-mind\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ker HC | Right to be heard cannot be claimed in cases of re-incarceration where initial order of release was without application of mind"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":176134,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/20\/kerala-hc-allows-application-re-enrolment-advocate-post-retirement-government-service\/","url_meta":{"origin":243598,"position":0},"title":"Kerala HC allows application for re-enrolment of Advocate post retirement from government service","author":"Saba","date":"December 20, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Dama Seshadri Naidu, J. heard a petition dealing with the issue of re-enrolment of a lawyer in the State Bar Council after retirement from government service. The petitioner, after joining government service as a Sales Tax Officer requested the Kerala Bar\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":371613,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/04\/conditional-bail-film-director-accused-of-casting-couch-ker-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":243598,"position":1},"title":"Kerala HC grants conditional bail to Film Director in casting couch allegations as investigation already crossed crucial stage","author":"Sunaina","date":"January 4, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cPrima facie case of \u2018casting couch\u2019 practices, which must be dealt with a heavy hand. Such offences, which exploited professional aspirations for sexual gratification, constituted a serious affront to the dignity of women.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"film director accused of casting couch","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/film-director-accused-of-casting-couch.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/film-director-accused-of-casting-couch.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/film-director-accused-of-casting-couch.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/film-director-accused-of-casting-couch.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":207407,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/30\/delay-in-disposal-of-cases-and-protraction-of-incarceration-of-prisoners-is-violation-of-article-21\/","url_meta":{"origin":243598,"position":2},"title":"Delay in disposal of cases and protraction of incarceration of prisoners is violation of Article 21","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 30, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Gita Mittal, CJ and Tashi Rabstan, J. allowed an application whereby a suspension of sentence was prayed. The facts of the case are that the appellant was arrested in early 2005 and by the time the custody certificate was issued;\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":6325,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/15\/life-convicts-cannot-claim-remission-as-a-right\/","url_meta":{"origin":243598,"position":3},"title":"Life convicts cannot claim remission as a right","author":"Sucheta","date":"November 15, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: In a recent case a PIL was filed seeking directions for the release of all life convicts who have completed 14 years incarceration in Tihar jail. Dismissing the petition and referring to the Supreme Court decisions in Arjun Jadav v. State of West Bengal 2014 SCC OnLine\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "High Courts"","block_context":{"text":"High Courts","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/highcourts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":326241,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/10\/bombay-hc-grants-bail-fraudster-incarcertation-exceeds-maximum-sentence-period\/","url_meta":{"origin":243598,"position":4},"title":"Bombay HC grants bail to man arrested for fraud for having suffered incarceration beyond the maximum sentence period","author":"Editor","date":"July 10, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court referred to Niranjan Singh v. Prabhakar Rajaram Kharote (1980) 2 SCC 559, wherein it was explained that no lexical dexterity nor precedential profusion is needed to come to the realistic conclusion that he who is under the control of the court or is in the physical hold of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6666,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/06\/08\/president-s-clemency-power-is-not-immune-from-judicial-review\/","url_meta":{"origin":243598,"position":5},"title":"President\u2019s clemency power is not immune from Judicial Review","author":"Sucheta","date":"June 8, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: Dealing as to whether the power of the President\/ Governor as provided in the Constitution is subjected to Judicial Review, a division bench of Ashok Bhushan CJ. and A.M. Shaffique J, reiterated that the decision of the President of India and the Governor under Article 72 and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "High Courts"","block_context":{"text":"High Courts","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/highcourts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/243598","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=243598"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/243598\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=243598"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=243598"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=243598"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}