{"id":243593,"date":"2021-02-08T22:54:34","date_gmt":"2021-02-08T17:24:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=243593"},"modified":"2021-02-12T10:47:28","modified_gmt":"2021-02-12T05:17:28","slug":"illegally-occupying-government-panchayat-land-supreme-court-says-you-cannot-claim-regularization-as-a-matter-of-right","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/08\/illegally-occupying-government-panchayat-land-supreme-court-says-you-cannot-claim-regularization-as-a-matter-of-right\/","title":{"rendered":"Illegally occupying Government\/Panchayat Land? Supreme Court says you cannot claim regularization as a matter of right"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Supreme Court<\/strong>: In the case where two petitioners had encroached upon the Panchayat land and had constructed houses on it, the bench of Dr. DY Chandrachud and <strong>MR Shah*,<\/strong> JJ has held,<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800080;\">\u201cThe persons in illegal occupation of the Government Land\/Panchayat Land cannot, as a matter of right, claim regularization. Regularization of the illegal occupation of the Government Land\/Panchayat Land can only be as per the policy of the State Government and the conditions stipulated in the Rules. If it is found that the conditions stipulated for regularisation have not been fulfilled, such persons in illegal occupation of the Government Land\/Panchayat Land are not entitled to regularization.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<hr \/>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\"><strong>Background<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In the present case, the lands on which the petitioners had constructed the houses vested in the Gram Panchayat. In the year 2000, the Government of Haryana framed a policy regarding sale of panchayat land in unauthorised possession inside outside the Abadi Deh and also amended the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Rules, 1964 and issued a notification dated 1.8.2001 in this regard. Thereafter, in 2008, Rule 12(4) was incorporated in the 1964 Rules in terms of the notification dated 03.01.2008, <strong><em>which authorises Gram Panchayat to sell its non-cultivable land in Shamlat Deh to the inhabitants of the village who have constructed their houses on or before 31.03.2000, subject to fulfilment of the conditions mentioned in Rule 12(4) of the 1964 Rules<\/em><\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The competent authority after giving an opportunity of personal hearing to the writ petitioners and on perusal of the record and the site report which was verified by visiting the relevant place found that petitioner no.1 \u2013 Joginder was in illegal occupation of the area admeasuring 757.37 square yards and petitioner no.2 -Karamveer was found to be in illegal occupation of the area admeasuring\u00a0\u00a0 239.48 square yards, rejected the prayer of the petitioners to sell the land in exercise of powers under Rule 12(4) of the 1964 Rules.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\"><strong>Analysis<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">As per Rule 12(4) of the 1964 Rules,<\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li>the construction of the house on the panchayat land must have been put on or before 31.03.2000.<\/li>\n<li>it must be a non-cultivable land;<\/li>\n<li>does not result in any obstruction to the traffic and passer\u00acby and<\/li>\n<li>the illegal occupation\/constructed area shall be up to a maximum of 200 square yards and then only the same can be regularised\/sold.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The illegal occupation of the panchayat land can be regularised provided the area of the illegal occupation is up to a maximum of 200 square yards. It includes the constructed area, open space up to 25% of the constructed area or appurtenant area.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Therefore, on a fair reading of Rule 12(4), in case of an illegal occupation of the area up to a maximum of 200 square yards including the constructed area, appurtenant area and open space area can be regularised and sold at not less than collector rate (floor rate or market rate, whichever is higher).<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800080;\">\u201cThe idea behind keeping the cap of 200 square yards may be that the small area of the lands occupied illegally can be regularised\/sold.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">If it is held otherwise, in that case, <strong><em>it may happen that somebody has put up a construction on 195 square yards and is in illegal occupation of 500 square yards area, in that case, though he has encroached upon the total area of about 700 square yards, he shall be entitled to purchase the land under Rule 12(4) of the 1964 Rules, which is not the intention of Rule 12(4).<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In the present case, the policy which was formulated by the State Government which culminated in Rule 12(4) of the 1964 Rules specifically contained a stipulation to the effect that the illegal\/unauthorised occupation up to a maximum of 200 square yards only can be sold on regularisation and on fulfilment of other conditions mentioned in Rule 12(4) of the 1964 Rules. \u00a0The petitioners were found to be in illegal occupation of the area of more than 200 square yards.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Therefore, one of the conditions mentioned in Rule 12(4) is not satisfied and therefore both, the competent authority as well as the High Court have rightly held that the petitioners are not entitled to the benefit of the provisions of Rule 12(4) of the 1964 Rules.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">[Joginder v. State of Haryana, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/eC02qg34\"><b>2021 SCC OnLine SC 59<\/b><\/a>, decided on 05.02.2021]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>*Judgment by: Justice MR Shah<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Supreme Court: In the case where two petitioners had encroached upon the Panchayat land and had constructed houses on it, the bench <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121,"featured_media":243205,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[3457,43345,45106,45104,45105,15601],"class_list":["post-243593","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-encroachment","tag-government-land","tag-government-property","tag-land-grabbing","tag-land-ownership","tag-property-law"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Illegally occupying Government\/Panchayat Land? Supreme Court says you cannot claim regularization as a matter of right | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/08\/illegally-occupying-government-panchayat-land-supreme-court-says-you-cannot-claim-regularization-as-a-matter-of-right\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Illegally occupying Government\/Panchayat Land? Supreme Court says you cannot claim regularization as a matter of right\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court: In the case where two petitioners had encroached upon the Panchayat land and had constructed houses on it, the bench\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/08\/illegally-occupying-government-panchayat-land-supreme-court-says-you-cannot-claim-regularization-as-a-matter-of-right\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-02-08T17:24:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-02-12T05:17:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/08\/illegally-occupying-government-panchayat-land-supreme-court-says-you-cannot-claim-regularization-as-a-matter-of-right\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/08\/illegally-occupying-government-panchayat-land-supreme-court-says-you-cannot-claim-regularization-as-a-matter-of-right\/\",\"name\":\"Illegally occupying Government\/Panchayat Land? Supreme Court says you cannot claim regularization as a matter of right | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/08\/illegally-occupying-government-panchayat-land-supreme-court-says-you-cannot-claim-regularization-as-a-matter-of-right\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/08\/illegally-occupying-government-panchayat-land-supreme-court-says-you-cannot-claim-regularization-as-a-matter-of-right\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-02-08T17:24:34+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-02-12T05:17:28+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/08\/illegally-occupying-government-panchayat-land-supreme-court-says-you-cannot-claim-regularization-as-a-matter-of-right\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/08\/illegally-occupying-government-panchayat-land-supreme-court-says-you-cannot-claim-regularization-as-a-matter-of-right\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/08\/illegally-occupying-government-panchayat-land-supreme-court-says-you-cannot-claim-regularization-as-a-matter-of-right\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":888},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/08\/illegally-occupying-government-panchayat-land-supreme-court-says-you-cannot-claim-regularization-as-a-matter-of-right\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Illegally occupying Government\/Panchayat Land? Supreme Court says you cannot claim regularization as a matter of right\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\",\"name\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"caption\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\"},\"description\":\"Senior Associate Editor\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Illegally occupying Government\/Panchayat Land? Supreme Court says you cannot claim regularization as a matter of right | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/08\/illegally-occupying-government-panchayat-land-supreme-court-says-you-cannot-claim-regularization-as-a-matter-of-right\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Illegally occupying Government\/Panchayat Land? Supreme Court says you cannot claim regularization as a matter of right","og_description":"Supreme Court: In the case where two petitioners had encroached upon the Panchayat land and had constructed houses on it, the bench","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/08\/illegally-occupying-government-panchayat-land-supreme-court-says-you-cannot-claim-regularization-as-a-matter-of-right\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-02-08T17:24:34+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-02-12T05:17:28+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Prachi Bhardwaj","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/08\/illegally-occupying-government-panchayat-land-supreme-court-says-you-cannot-claim-regularization-as-a-matter-of-right\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/08\/illegally-occupying-government-panchayat-land-supreme-court-says-you-cannot-claim-regularization-as-a-matter-of-right\/","name":"Illegally occupying Government\/Panchayat Land? Supreme Court says you cannot claim regularization as a matter of right | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/08\/illegally-occupying-government-panchayat-land-supreme-court-says-you-cannot-claim-regularization-as-a-matter-of-right\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/08\/illegally-occupying-government-panchayat-land-supreme-court-says-you-cannot-claim-regularization-as-a-matter-of-right\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg","datePublished":"2021-02-08T17:24:34+00:00","dateModified":"2021-02-12T05:17:28+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/08\/illegally-occupying-government-panchayat-land-supreme-court-says-you-cannot-claim-regularization-as-a-matter-of-right\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/08\/illegally-occupying-government-panchayat-land-supreme-court-says-you-cannot-claim-regularization-as-a-matter-of-right\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/08\/illegally-occupying-government-panchayat-land-supreme-court-says-you-cannot-claim-regularization-as-a-matter-of-right\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg","width":1331,"height":888},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/08\/illegally-occupying-government-panchayat-land-supreme-court-says-you-cannot-claim-regularization-as-a-matter-of-right\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Illegally occupying Government\/Panchayat Land? Supreme Court says you cannot claim regularization as a matter of right"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942","name":"Prachi Bhardwaj","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","caption":"Prachi Bhardwaj"},"description":"Senior Associate Editor","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":197372,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/22\/state-directed-to-prevent-encroachment-upon-water-bodies-and-gram-panchayat-land\/","url_meta":{"origin":243593,"position":0},"title":"State directed to prevent \u2018encroachment\u2019 upon water bodies and Gram Panchayat land","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 22, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: The Division Bench comprising of Rajiv Sharma and Lok Pal Singh, JJ., addressed a petition raising the concern of encroachment over the Gram Panchayat land by unscrupulous people, for which the bench issued directives in order to prevent the said act. The petition brought a very peculiar\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":179764,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/03\/continued-encroachment-government-land-disqualification-re-election-member-panchayat\/","url_meta":{"origin":243593,"position":1},"title":"A continued encroachment on government land is disqualification for re-election as member of Panchayat","author":"Saba","date":"January 3, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: A single judge bench comprising of MS Sonak, J. reversed an order of the Additional Commissioner, thereby restoring the order of the Additional Collector which had disqualified the respondent from continuing as a member of the village panchayat of Karkamb by relying on Section 14 (1) (j-3)\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":256832,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/08\/raj-hc-issued-directions-to-provide-a-pan-rajasthan-solution-for-persisting-problem-of-encroachment-on-the-land-of-public-way\/","url_meta":{"origin":243593,"position":2},"title":"Raj HC issued directions to provide a pan-Rajasthan solution for persisting problem of encroachment on the land of public way, johar paitan, river bed etc.","author":"Editor","date":"November 8, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: A Division Bench of Vinit Kumar Mathur and Sangeet Lodha, JJ., disposed of the petition and issued directions to the respondents to remove encroachments made over the land in question.\u00a0 The instant petition was filed by the petitioners seeking directions to the respondents to remove encroachments made\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":248947,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/31\/2021-scc-vol-3-part-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":243593,"position":3},"title":"2021 SCC Vol. 3 Part 2","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 31, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"SCC Issue dated April 7th, 2021 (Vol. 3 Part 2) In this part read a very important decision delivered by the Supreme Court with respect to Consumer Protection Act which was expertly analysed by our editors in over 7 short notes. Supreme Court observed that \u201cDeveloper cannot compel the apartment\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cases Reported&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/scc-14-7-2017.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/scc-14-7-2017.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/scc-14-7-2017.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/scc-14-7-2017.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/scc-14-7-2017.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":341179,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/13\/litigant-and-his-lawyer-have-a-basic-obligation-not-to-deceive-mislead-the-court-raj-hc-imposes-rs-50000-cost-on-counsel-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":243593,"position":4},"title":"\u201cLitigant and his lawyer have a basic obligation not to deceive\/mislead the Court\u201d; Rajasthan High Court imposes \u20b9 50,000\/- cost on counsel","author":"Ritu","date":"February 13, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe distorted facts as stated before this Court not only prove to be an attempt to mislead the Court but also an attempt to waste precious time of the Court.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":355864,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/06\/s-163a-hp-land-revenue-act-declared-unconstitutional-hp-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":243593,"position":5},"title":"\u2018The provision is a legislation for class of dishonest persons\u2019: Himachal Pradesh HC declares S. 163-A H.P. Land Revenue Act unconstitutional","author":"Editor","date":"August 6, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cBy condoning the illegal acts of the violators who carry out encroachments, the State intends to treat such law breakers equal to those persons who abide by the law. This is arbitrariness, because by treating un-equals alike, the State is violating Article 14 of the Constitution.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"S. 163-A HP Land Revenue Act unconstitutional","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/S.-163-A-HP-Land-Revenue-Act-unconstitutional.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/S.-163-A-HP-Land-Revenue-Act-unconstitutional.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/S.-163-A-HP-Land-Revenue-Act-unconstitutional.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/S.-163-A-HP-Land-Revenue-Act-unconstitutional.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/243593","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/121"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=243593"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/243593\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/243205"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=243593"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=243593"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=243593"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}