{"id":243560,"date":"2021-02-08T15:30:55","date_gmt":"2021-02-08T10:00:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=243560"},"modified":"2021-02-12T10:50:30","modified_gmt":"2021-02-12T05:20:30","slug":"del-hc-if-on-the-basis-of-materials-on-record-a-court-could-come-to-the-conclusion-that-commission-of-the-offence-is-a-probable-consequence-a-case-of-framing-of-charge-exists","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/08\/del-hc-if-on-the-basis-of-materials-on-record-a-court-could-come-to-the-conclusion-that-commission-of-the-offence-is-a-probable-consequence-a-case-of-framing-of-charge-exists\/","title":{"rendered":"Del HC | If on the basis of materials on record a court could come to the conclusion that commission of the offence is a probable consequence, a case of framing of charge exists"},"content":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court:<\/strong> Rajnish Bhatnagar, J., upheld the trial court decision in view of no evidence placed on record.<\/p>\n

Petitioner is a registered valuer, running his sole proprietorship firm. Raj Kumar Karanwal, Lance Healthcare (P) Ltd., who met Y.P. Singh, Chartered Accountant wherein they discussed the matter of loan to Raj Kumar Karanwal from some banks. In the month of March, 2013 Raj Kumar Karanwal, Y.P. Singh and S.K. Verma discussed the matter of loan in the office of Raj Kumar Karanwal who informed them about his various CC Limits and deposits of his various properties title deeds with the banks.<\/p>\n

Allegations against the petitioner were that the property of Karanwal\u2019s were assessed by Ashugosh Nirmal, Satguru Valuers even before the actual application by Karanwal\u2019s was moved to Corporation Bank. Petitioner claimed that he had prepared the valuation report on the asking of Corporation Bank, but according to the record, the said report was never deposited.<\/p>\n

Further, it was stated that the petitioner, who is stated to be one of the empanelled valuer of the Corporation Bank is that he prepared inflated valuation reports in regard to the properties offered for mortgage by the borrowers. When the respondent got the same properties valued from the independent valuers, there was a huge difference between the valuation given by the petitioner and those independent valuers.<\/p>\n

CBI investigation revealed that the petitioner was one of the bank empanelled valuer and he alongwith other co-accused persons was a part of a conspiracy to get sanctioned and disbursed CorpVyapar OD Limit Loan amounting to Rs 27 Crores to Lancer Healthcare (P) Ltd. and the petitioner alongwith other co-accused was a member of a larger conspiracy where the forged and fabricated documents were prepared of the firms\/companies by inflating\/exaggerating the financial records, tailor made to ensure sanction of desired loan of Rs 27 Crores. He further argued that the petitioner who was the empanelled valuer submitted false, inflated\/exaggerated valuation reports to facilitate loan to the borrower co-accused.<\/p>\n

Analysis, Law and Decision<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n

It is a well-settled law that at the stage of framing of charge, the court has power to shift and weigh the evidence for the limited purpose of finding out whether or not a prima-facie case against accused has been made out.<\/p>\n

Further, the Bench added that when the material placed before the court discloses great suspicion against the accused which has not been properly explained, the court will be justified in framing charge.<\/p>\n

It is not obligatory for the judge at that stage of the trial to consider in any detail and weigh in a sensitive balance whether the facts, if proved, would be incompatible with the innocence of the accused or not.<\/strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Standard Test before recording a finding regarding the guilt<\/u><\/p>\n

Standard of test and judgment which is to be finally applied before recording a finding regarding the guilt or otherwise of the accused is not exactly to be applied at this stage of deciding the matter under Section 227 or under Section 228 of the Code. But at the initial stage, if there is a strong suspicion which leads the court to think that there is ground for presuming that the accused has committed an offence, then it is not open to the court to say that there is no sufficient ground for proceeding against the accused.<\/p>\n

Whether there is a strong suspicion which may lead to the court to think that there is ground for presuming that the accused committed an offence.<\/p>\n

Bench stated that the observations made by the trial court against the petitioner in the impugned order were all a matter of evidence which cannot be decided unless and until the evidence is led in the present case.<\/p>\n

Therefore, in Court\u2019s opinion the trial court\u2019s decision is upheld. [Ashughosh Kumar Nirmal v. CBI, 2021 SCC OnLine Del 410<\/b><\/a>, decided on 05-02-2021]<\/p>\n

\n

Advocates for the parties:<\/strong><\/p>\n

For the Petitioner: Geeta Luthra, Senior Advocate with Amit Singh Rathore, Varun Deewan, Reena Rathore, Advocates.<\/span><\/p>\n

For the Respondent: Anupam S Sharma, SPP for CBI with Prakarsh Airan and Harpreet Kalsi, Advocates.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court: Rajnish Bhatnagar, J., upheld the trial court decision in view of no evidence placed on record. Petitioner is a <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[29785,11641,9471,7181,45094],"class_list":["post-243560","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-law","tag-mortgage","tag-offence","tag-trial-court","tag-valuer"],"yoast_head":"\nDel HC | If on the basis of materials on record a court could come to the conclusion that commission of the offence is a probable consequence, a case of framing of charge exists | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/08\/del-hc-if-on-the-basis-of-materials-on-record-a-court-could-come-to-the-conclusion-that-commission-of-the-offence-is-a-probable-consequence-a-case-of-framing-of-charge-exists\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Del HC | If on the basis of materials on record a court could come to the conclusion that commission of the offence is a probable consequence, a case of framing of charge exists\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court: Rajnish Bhatnagar, J., upheld the trial court decision in view of no evidence placed on record. Petitioner is a\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/08\/del-hc-if-on-the-basis-of-materials-on-record-a-court-could-come-to-the-conclusion-that-commission-of-the-offence-is-a-probable-consequence-a-case-of-framing-of-charge-exists\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-02-08T10:00:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-02-12T05:20:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/08\/del-hc-if-on-the-basis-of-materials-on-record-a-court-could-come-to-the-conclusion-that-commission-of-the-offence-is-a-probable-consequence-a-case-of-framing-of-charge-exists\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/08\/del-hc-if-on-the-basis-of-materials-on-record-a-court-could-come-to-the-conclusion-that-commission-of-the-offence-is-a-probable-consequence-a-case-of-framing-of-charge-exists\/\",\"name\":\"Del HC | If on the basis of materials on record a court could come to the conclusion that commission of the offence is a probable consequence, a case of framing of charge exists | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-02-08T10:00:55+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-02-12T05:20:30+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/08\/del-hc-if-on-the-basis-of-materials-on-record-a-court-could-come-to-the-conclusion-that-commission-of-the-offence-is-a-probable-consequence-a-case-of-framing-of-charge-exists\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/08\/del-hc-if-on-the-basis-of-materials-on-record-a-court-could-come-to-the-conclusion-that-commission-of-the-offence-is-a-probable-consequence-a-case-of-framing-of-charge-exists\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/08\/del-hc-if-on-the-basis-of-materials-on-record-a-court-could-come-to-the-conclusion-that-commission-of-the-offence-is-a-probable-consequence-a-case-of-framing-of-charge-exists\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Del HC | If on the basis of materials on record a court could come to the conclusion that commission of the offence is a probable consequence, a case of framing of charge exists\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Del HC | If on the basis of materials on record a court could come to the conclusion that commission of the offence is a probable consequence, a case of framing of charge exists | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/08\/del-hc-if-on-the-basis-of-materials-on-record-a-court-could-come-to-the-conclusion-that-commission-of-the-offence-is-a-probable-consequence-a-case-of-framing-of-charge-exists\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Del HC | If on the basis of materials on record a court could come to the conclusion that commission of the offence is a probable consequence, a case of framing of charge exists","og_description":"Delhi High Court: Rajnish Bhatnagar, J., upheld the trial court decision in view of no evidence placed on record. Petitioner is a","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/08\/del-hc-if-on-the-basis-of-materials-on-record-a-court-could-come-to-the-conclusion-that-commission-of-the-offence-is-a-probable-consequence-a-case-of-framing-of-charge-exists\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-02-08T10:00:55+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-02-12T05:20:30+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/08\/del-hc-if-on-the-basis-of-materials-on-record-a-court-could-come-to-the-conclusion-that-commission-of-the-offence-is-a-probable-consequence-a-case-of-framing-of-charge-exists\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/08\/del-hc-if-on-the-basis-of-materials-on-record-a-court-could-come-to-the-conclusion-that-commission-of-the-offence-is-a-probable-consequence-a-case-of-framing-of-charge-exists\/","name":"Del HC | If on the basis of materials on record a court could come to the conclusion that commission of the offence is a probable consequence, a case of framing of charge exists | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-02-08T10:00:55+00:00","dateModified":"2021-02-12T05:20:30+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/08\/del-hc-if-on-the-basis-of-materials-on-record-a-court-could-come-to-the-conclusion-that-commission-of-the-offence-is-a-probable-consequence-a-case-of-framing-of-charge-exists\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/08\/del-hc-if-on-the-basis-of-materials-on-record-a-court-could-come-to-the-conclusion-that-commission-of-the-offence-is-a-probable-consequence-a-case-of-framing-of-charge-exists\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/08\/del-hc-if-on-the-basis-of-materials-on-record-a-court-could-come-to-the-conclusion-that-commission-of-the-offence-is-a-probable-consequence-a-case-of-framing-of-charge-exists\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Del HC | If on the basis of materials on record a court could come to the conclusion that commission of the offence is a probable consequence, a case of framing of charge exists"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":222618,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/28\/raj-hc-writ-petition-not-maintainable-against-s-14-of-sarfaesi-act-as-alternative-remedies-for-the-same-can-be-availed\/","url_meta":{"origin":243560,"position":0},"title":"Raj HC | Writ Petition not maintainable against S. 14 of SARFAESI Act as alternative remedies for the same can be availed","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 28, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: Ashok Kumar Gaur, J. was hearing a petition on the issue pertaining to taking possession of the mortgaged property by the respondent bank. \u00a0 The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging an order passed under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":225854,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/18\/raj-hc-online-fantasy-game-dream-11-does-not-involve-offences-of-betting-and-gambling-court-dismisses-pil\/","url_meta":{"origin":243560,"position":1},"title":"Raj HC | Online fantasy game -\u201cDream 11\u201d does not involve offences of betting and gambling; Court dismisses PIL","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 18, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: A Division Bench of Indrajit Mahanty CJ, and Ashok Kumar Gaur J., dismissed a Public Interest Litigation alleging the online game \u201cDream 11\u201d of committing offence of betting and gambling. In the present case, the petitioner filed a PIL with a grievance that the online game \u201cDream\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":264448,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/25\/transfer-petition-for-trial-of-salman-khans-deer-hunting-case-allowed\/","url_meta":{"origin":243560,"position":2},"title":"Raj HC | Transfer petition for trial of Salman Khan’s deer hunting case allowed; High Court to take charge","author":"Editor","date":"March 25, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J., allowed a transfer petition in the infamous deer hunting case of actor Salman Khan. An FIR was lodged with the Forest Department against Salman Khan alongwith Saif Ali Khan, Neelam, Tabbsum @ Tabu, Sonali and Dushyant Singh, who, in pursuance of a complaint,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":226561,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/05\/raj-hc-court-allows-compromise-entered-into-by-parties-since-offences-under-ni-act-are-compoundable-offences\/","url_meta":{"origin":243560,"position":3},"title":"Raj HC | Court allows compromise entered into by parties since offences under NI Act are compoundable offences","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 5, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: Vijay Bishnoi, J., allowed a criminal revision petition seeking to set aside judgments convicting the petitioner with regard to offences under the Negotiable Instruments Act.\u00a0 In the present case, the petitioner being aggrieved by the orders of the trial court and the appellate court wherein he was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":264151,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/23\/minor-girl-students-raped-and-subjected-to-penetrative-sexual-assault-by-their-teacher\/","url_meta":{"origin":243560,"position":4},"title":"HP HC | Minor girl students raped and subjected to penetrative sexual assault by their teacher: Sanctity of Teacher-Student relationship polluted","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 23, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: Polluting the sanctity of the relationship of the teacher and students, a teacher committed rape and penetrative sexual assault with minor students, the Division Bench of Sabina and Satyen Vaidya, JJ., noting the harrowing incidents expressed that the said is a sad reflection of the present-day\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":222225,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/18\/raj-hc-gravity-of-offence-cannot-be-a-reasonable-ground-for-denying-bail-to-juvenile-delinquents-except-under-extraordinary-situations\/","url_meta":{"origin":243560,"position":5},"title":"Raj HC | Gravity of offence cannot be a reasonable ground for denying bail to Juvenile delinquents, except under extraordinary situations","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 18, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: Manoj Kumar Garg, J. allowed bail to a juvenile who was accused of criminal offences on finding his situation to be inconsistent with any of the exceptional circumstances given in Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015. The petitioner(s) Ridmal Ram, on behalf of juvenile son\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/243560","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=243560"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/243560\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=243560"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=243560"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=243560"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}