{"id":242890,"date":"2021-01-28T09:30:51","date_gmt":"2021-01-28T04:00:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=242890"},"modified":"2021-01-29T09:58:53","modified_gmt":"2021-01-29T04:28:53","slug":"ker-hc-question-of-sale-deed-being-null-and-void-emerging-out-of-matrimonial-relationship-can-be-decided-only-by-family-court-hc-states","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/28\/ker-hc-question-of-sale-deed-being-null-and-void-emerging-out-of-matrimonial-relationship-can-be-decided-only-by-family-court-hc-states\/","title":{"rendered":"Ker HC | Question of sale deed being null and void, emerging out of matrimonial relationship can be decided only by Family Court;\u00a0 HC states"},"content":{"rendered":"

Kerala High Court: <\/strong>T.V. Anilkumar, J., allowed the petition against the impugned order of Munsiff Court, thereby upholding the order of returning plaint to the Family Court.<\/p>\n

The petitioners filed a suit (O.S.No.310\/2014) for declaring them as wife and son of the deceased, P.J.Suresh and also for declaring sale deed dated 28-03-2014 in respect of the suit property executed by defendant 2 to 4 in favour of defendant 6 at the instance of defendant-bank 1 was void and not binding on the plaintiffs. The plaint schedule property was mortgaged by the deceased in favour of defendant-bank at the time of availment of loan. Later on, when the deceased committed default in repayment of loan, the defendant-bank proceeded under the provisions of SARFAESI Act, 2002 and brought the property to sale. During the course of the auction proceeding, with the permission of defendant-bank, the property was sold to defendant 6 by defendants 2 to 5 who claimed to be the children, wife and mother of the deceased.<\/p>\n

The grievances of the petitioners were that, petitioner 1 was the legally wedded wife of the deceased and petitioner 2 was the son and they alone being the sole legal heirs were the property owners, therefore, the impugned sale deed was null and void. The main relief that was sought, \u00a0was for declaring petitioner 1 as the legally wedded wife of the deceased. The defendant-bank raised the question of maintainability of suit and contended that it was not liable to be tried before the Munsiff Court as the issue involved was liable to be dealt with under the provisions of the Family Courts Act,1984.<\/p>\n

The Bench expressed that the view taken by the court below were correct and were in accordance with law. The Court, while explaining S. 7 of Family Courts Act,1984 stated, as per Explanation to Section 7(1) (b) of the Act, a suit or proceeding for a declaration as to the validity of marriage or as to the matrimonial status of any person could be brought only before a Family Court and there was exclusion of jurisdiction of Civil Court in this respect.<\/em> The question as to whether sale deed in favour of defendant 6 was null and void was consequential upon the decision on the alleged status claimed by petitioner 1.<\/strong> The Bench observed that without deciding the question as to the status of petitioner 1, the validity as to the sale deed could not be decided.<\/p>\n

Considering the above, the Bench dismissed the instant petition, holding that the impugned order of the court below of returning plaint to be presented before Family Court was perfectly legal and was not liable to be interfered with. [Jaminimol v. Federal Bank Ltd.,\u00a0 2021 SCC OnLine Ker 381<\/b><\/a>, decided on 22-01-2021]<\/p>\n

\n

Kamini Sharma, Editorial Assistant has put this story together<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Kerala High Court: T.V. Anilkumar, J., allowed the petition against the impugned order of Munsiff Court, thereby upholding the order of returning <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[29785,44960,41914,30459],"class_list":["post-242890","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-law","tag-marriage-validity","tag-matrimonial-relationship","tag-sale-deed"],"yoast_head":"\nKer HC | Question of sale deed being null and void, emerging out of matrimonial relationship can be decided only by Family Court;\u00a0 HC states | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/28\/ker-hc-question-of-sale-deed-being-null-and-void-emerging-out-of-matrimonial-relationship-can-be-decided-only-by-family-court-hc-states\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ker HC | Question of sale deed being null and void, emerging out of matrimonial relationship can be decided only by Family Court;\u00a0 HC states\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Kerala High Court: T.V. Anilkumar, J., allowed the petition against the impugned order of Munsiff Court, thereby upholding the order of returning\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/28\/ker-hc-question-of-sale-deed-being-null-and-void-emerging-out-of-matrimonial-relationship-can-be-decided-only-by-family-court-hc-states\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-01-28T04:00:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-01-29T04:28:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/KeralaHC-e1521442636157.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/28\/ker-hc-question-of-sale-deed-being-null-and-void-emerging-out-of-matrimonial-relationship-can-be-decided-only-by-family-court-hc-states\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/28\/ker-hc-question-of-sale-deed-being-null-and-void-emerging-out-of-matrimonial-relationship-can-be-decided-only-by-family-court-hc-states\/\",\"name\":\"Ker HC | Question of sale deed being null and void, emerging out of matrimonial relationship can be decided only by Family Court;\u00a0 HC states | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-01-28T04:00:51+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-01-29T04:28:53+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/28\/ker-hc-question-of-sale-deed-being-null-and-void-emerging-out-of-matrimonial-relationship-can-be-decided-only-by-family-court-hc-states\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/28\/ker-hc-question-of-sale-deed-being-null-and-void-emerging-out-of-matrimonial-relationship-can-be-decided-only-by-family-court-hc-states\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/28\/ker-hc-question-of-sale-deed-being-null-and-void-emerging-out-of-matrimonial-relationship-can-be-decided-only-by-family-court-hc-states\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ker HC | Question of sale deed being null and void, emerging out of matrimonial relationship can be decided only by Family Court;\u00a0 HC states\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ker HC | Question of sale deed being null and void, emerging out of matrimonial relationship can be decided only by Family Court;\u00a0 HC states | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/28\/ker-hc-question-of-sale-deed-being-null-and-void-emerging-out-of-matrimonial-relationship-can-be-decided-only-by-family-court-hc-states\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ker HC | Question of sale deed being null and void, emerging out of matrimonial relationship can be decided only by Family Court;\u00a0 HC states","og_description":"Kerala High Court: T.V. Anilkumar, J., allowed the petition against the impugned order of Munsiff Court, thereby upholding the order of returning","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/28\/ker-hc-question-of-sale-deed-being-null-and-void-emerging-out-of-matrimonial-relationship-can-be-decided-only-by-family-court-hc-states\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-01-28T04:00:51+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-01-29T04:28:53+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/KeralaHC-e1521442636157.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/28\/ker-hc-question-of-sale-deed-being-null-and-void-emerging-out-of-matrimonial-relationship-can-be-decided-only-by-family-court-hc-states\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/28\/ker-hc-question-of-sale-deed-being-null-and-void-emerging-out-of-matrimonial-relationship-can-be-decided-only-by-family-court-hc-states\/","name":"Ker HC | Question of sale deed being null and void, emerging out of matrimonial relationship can be decided only by Family Court;\u00a0 HC states | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-01-28T04:00:51+00:00","dateModified":"2021-01-29T04:28:53+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/28\/ker-hc-question-of-sale-deed-being-null-and-void-emerging-out-of-matrimonial-relationship-can-be-decided-only-by-family-court-hc-states\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/28\/ker-hc-question-of-sale-deed-being-null-and-void-emerging-out-of-matrimonial-relationship-can-be-decided-only-by-family-court-hc-states\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/28\/ker-hc-question-of-sale-deed-being-null-and-void-emerging-out-of-matrimonial-relationship-can-be-decided-only-by-family-court-hc-states\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ker HC | Question of sale deed being null and void, emerging out of matrimonial relationship can be decided only by Family Court;\u00a0 HC states"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":262546,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/26\/merely-writing-cancelled-on-registered-power-of-attorney-wouldnt-make-it-null-and-void-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":242890,"position":0},"title":"Merely writing “cancelled” on registered power of attorney wouldn’t make it null and void: Supreme Court","author":"Editor","date":"February 26, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The Division Bench of K.M. Joseph* and Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, JJ., held that mere writing the word \"cancelled\" or drawing a line would not render Power of Attorney null and void as there must be cancellation and it must further be brought to the notice of the third\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-91.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-91.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-91.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-91.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-91.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":242518,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/21\/sale-agreement-does-not-remain-a-stand-alone-document-if-it-is-mentioned-in-the-disputed-will-and-obligations-thereunder-are-purportedly-passed-on-to-the-legatee-sc-restores-findin\/","url_meta":{"origin":242890,"position":1},"title":"\u201cSale agreement does not remain a stand-alone document if it is mentioned in the disputed Will, and obligations thereunder are purportedly passed on to the legatee\u201d; SC restores findings of Trial Court","author":"Editor","date":"January 21, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Dinesh Maheshwari and Hrishikesh Roy, JJ., has set aside the order of High Court of Judicature for Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad and, thereby restored the findings of Trial Court. Background \u00a0In the instant case, a claim for partition and division was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":258672,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/17\/shared-household-3\/","url_meta":{"origin":242890,"position":2},"title":"Daughter-in-law claims right of residence in late husband\u2019s mothers\u2019 property under the head \u2018Shared Household\u2019: Mother-in-law approaches Del HC seeking eviction of daughter-in-law | Read what HC says","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 17, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Explaining the significance of \u2018shared household\u2019 Asha Menon, J., explained that where a residence is clearly a shared household, it would not bar the owner from claiming eviction against her daughter-in-law, if circumstances call for it. An instant suit was filed for possession, damages and permanent injunction\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":255469,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/12\/decree-of-specific-performance\/","url_meta":{"origin":242890,"position":3},"title":"Law on Specific Performance | For purpose of passing a decree of specific performance, what is essential? SC explains","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 12, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Stating that readiness and willingness are necessary for the purpose of passing a decree of specific performance, Division Bench of M.R. Shah and A.S. Bopanna, JJ., expressed that, Straightaway to rely upon the affidavit without amending the plaint and the pleadings is wholly impermissible under the law. Factual\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":265328,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/12\/coparcenary-rights-are-not-taken-away-by-hindu-succession-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":242890,"position":4},"title":"Are Coparcenary rights taken away by Hindu Succession Act? Madras HC throws light","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 12, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court: N. Anand Venkatesh, J., addressed a matter with regard to coparcenary rights of sons and daughters. Plaintiff had sought for relief of partition and for allotment of 1\/5th share in the suit property and also sought for declaration of the sale deed executed by the 1st defendant\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":217735,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/06\/del-hc-partition-suit-rejected-under-or-7-r-11-cpc-for-want-of-cause-of-action-in-light-of-general-power-of-attorney-and-requisition-deed\/","url_meta":{"origin":242890,"position":5},"title":"Del HC | Partition suit rejected under Or. 7 R. 11 CPC for want of cause of action in light of General Power of Attorney and Requisition Deed","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 6, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Pratibha M. Singh, J. allowed an application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC filed by the defendant in the subject partition suit. The said application sought rejection of plaint (partition suit) on two grounds -- that the suit lacked cause of action and the suit was time-barred. The\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/242890","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=242890"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/242890\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=242890"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=242890"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=242890"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}