{"id":242852,"date":"2021-01-27T10:30:23","date_gmt":"2021-01-27T05:00:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=242852"},"modified":"2021-01-29T09:51:28","modified_gmt":"2021-01-29T04:21:28","slug":"jk-hc-what-is-the-extent-of-interference-that-the-court-can-exercise-under-art-226-while-adjudicating-a-contractual-matter-hc-answers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/27\/jk-hc-what-is-the-extent-of-interference-that-the-court-can-exercise-under-art-226-while-adjudicating-a-contractual-matter-hc-answers\/","title":{"rendered":"J&#038;K HC | What is the extent of interference that the Court can exercise under Art. 226 while adjudicating a contractual matter? HC answers"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Jammu and Kashmir High Court: <\/strong>Sanjay Dhar J., while dismissing the present petition, discussed the scope of interference under Article 226 in Contractual matters and further called the present case a classic example of filing successive petitions for the same relief after failing to get the interim relief in the earlier writ petitions. Taking a lenient view of the matter, and considering that the petitioner is a student, Court did not impose any costs but only left with a severe warning against the same.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Through the medium of the instant writ petition, the petitioner has sought a direction against the respondents for release of all the instalments of fee in her favour and transfer of the same to a medical college in Bangladesh, so that she is able to pursue her MBBS course from the institution therein. Further, a writ of certiorari for quashing of communication dated 31-01-2020 has also been sought. Issue to be determined by the Court precisely was, whether the petitioner is entitled to seek a direction upon the respondent corporation to release the loan amount sanctioned in her favour to college different from the one mentioned in the sanctioned letter. It is to be noted that such borrowings\/loan from a Financial Institution is purely contractual in nature governed by the terms and conditions of the loan agreement indicating a very restricted approach of the Court exercising writ jurisdiction.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Court referred to the following cases pursuant to its decision;<\/p>\n<ol style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li><em>Noble Resources Ltd. v. State of Orissa,<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Bvbu6SvJ\">(2006) 10 SCC 236<\/a>; While answering whether a writ petition was maintainable in contractual matters and if so, what is the scope of jurisdiction of the Court in such matters, Supreme Court said, <em>\u201cIt is trite that if an action on the part of the State is violative of the equality clause contained in Article 14 of the Constitution of India, a writ petition would be maintainable even in the contractual field. A distinction indisputably must be made between a matter which is at the threshold of a contract and a breach of contract; whereas in the former the court&#8217;s scrutiny would be more intrusive, in the latter the court may not ordinarily exercise its discretionary jurisdiction of judicial review, unless it is found to be violative of Article 14 of the Constitution<strong>.\u201d <\/strong><\/em><strong>[Law laid down in <em>Radhakrishna Agarwal v. State of Bihar,<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/v4hV81X3\">(1977) 3 SCC 457<\/a>]<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><em>Kisan Sehkari Chini Mills v. Vardan Linkers, <\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/55DEUg0E\">(2008) 12 SCC 500<\/a>; With respect to an administrative action involved in conclusion of the Contract, Court said, <em>\u201c\u2026when there is a contractual dispute with a public law element, and a party chooses the public law remedy by way of a writ petition instead of a private law remedy of a suit, he will not get a full fledged adjudication of his contractual rights, but only a judicial review of the administrative action.\u201d<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>Rishi Kiran Logistics v. Board of Trustees of Kandla Port Trust, <\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/9Y8kdsD0\">(2015) 13 SCC 233<\/a>; Distinguishing between a remedy sought under the Contract Act, by means of damages, Specific Performance under the specified Act and invoking Writ Jurisdiction, Court observed in the words, \u201c<em>Ordinarily, the remedy available for a party complaining of breach of contract lies for seeking damages. He would be entitled to the relief of specific performance, if the contract was capable of being specifically enforced in law. The remedies for a breach of contract being purely in the realm of contract are dealt with by civil courts. The public law remedy, by way of a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, is not available to seek damages for breach of contract or specific performance of contract. However, where the contractual dispute has a public law element, the power of judicial review under Article 226 may be invoked.<\/em>\u201d<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Narrowing down to the facts and circumstances of the present case, Court said that the terms and conditions of the loan agreement suggest that the institution in whose favour the loan was being sanctioned was an essential ingredient to the contract and the college in which the petitioner now seeks to take admission in, was not at all in picture during the grant of the first installment.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Therefore, <em>\u201c\u2026the action of the respondent-Corporation in not releasing the second installment of loan in favour of the petitioner appears to be justified and the same cannot be termed either arbitrary or malafide\u201d. <\/em>Court further said, <em>\u201cSo far as the action of the respondent Corporation directing the petitioner to refund the first installment of loan amount is concerned, the same also appears to be justified because the petitioner admittedly had, on her own, transferred the first installment of loan from the Community Based Medical College, Bangladesh to Khwaja Younis Ali Medical College, Bangladesh without informing the respondent Corporation which is a breach of terms and conditions of the sanction letter.\u201d <\/em>[Mubashir Ashraf Bhat v. Union Territory of J&amp;K, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/t7A0X44s\"><b>2021 SCC OnLine J&amp;K 8<\/b><\/a>, decided on 19-01-2021]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><span style=\"color: #008000;\">Sakshi Shukla, Editorial Assistant has put this story together<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jammu and Kashmir High Court: Sanjay Dhar J., while dismissing the present petition, discussed the scope of interference under Article 226 in <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[31647,12141,44950,37965,29785],"class_list":["post-242852","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-adjudication","tag-article-226","tag-extent-of-interference","tag-jammu-and-kashmir-high-court","tag-law"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>J&amp;K HC | What is the extent of interference that the Court can exercise under Art. 226 while adjudicating a contractual matter? HC answers | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/27\/jk-hc-what-is-the-extent-of-interference-that-the-court-can-exercise-under-art-226-while-adjudicating-a-contractual-matter-hc-answers\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"J&amp;K HC | What is the extent of interference that the Court can exercise under Art. 226 while adjudicating a contractual matter? HC answers\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: Sanjay Dhar J., while dismissing the present petition, discussed the scope of interference under Article 226 in\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/27\/jk-hc-what-is-the-extent-of-interference-that-the-court-can-exercise-under-art-226-while-adjudicating-a-contractual-matter-hc-answers\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-01-27T05:00:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-01-29T04:21:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/JK-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/27\/jk-hc-what-is-the-extent-of-interference-that-the-court-can-exercise-under-art-226-while-adjudicating-a-contractual-matter-hc-answers\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/27\/jk-hc-what-is-the-extent-of-interference-that-the-court-can-exercise-under-art-226-while-adjudicating-a-contractual-matter-hc-answers\/\",\"name\":\"J&K HC | What is the extent of interference that the Court can exercise under Art. 226 while adjudicating a contractual matter? HC answers | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-01-27T05:00:23+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-01-29T04:21:28+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/27\/jk-hc-what-is-the-extent-of-interference-that-the-court-can-exercise-under-art-226-while-adjudicating-a-contractual-matter-hc-answers\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/27\/jk-hc-what-is-the-extent-of-interference-that-the-court-can-exercise-under-art-226-while-adjudicating-a-contractual-matter-hc-answers\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/27\/jk-hc-what-is-the-extent-of-interference-that-the-court-can-exercise-under-art-226-while-adjudicating-a-contractual-matter-hc-answers\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"J&#038;K HC | What is the extent of interference that the Court can exercise under Art. 226 while adjudicating a contractual matter? HC answers\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"J&K HC | What is the extent of interference that the Court can exercise under Art. 226 while adjudicating a contractual matter? HC answers | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/27\/jk-hc-what-is-the-extent-of-interference-that-the-court-can-exercise-under-art-226-while-adjudicating-a-contractual-matter-hc-answers\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"J&K HC | What is the extent of interference that the Court can exercise under Art. 226 while adjudicating a contractual matter? HC answers","og_description":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: Sanjay Dhar J., while dismissing the present petition, discussed the scope of interference under Article 226 in","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/27\/jk-hc-what-is-the-extent-of-interference-that-the-court-can-exercise-under-art-226-while-adjudicating-a-contractual-matter-hc-answers\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-01-27T05:00:23+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-01-29T04:21:28+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/JK-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/27\/jk-hc-what-is-the-extent-of-interference-that-the-court-can-exercise-under-art-226-while-adjudicating-a-contractual-matter-hc-answers\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/27\/jk-hc-what-is-the-extent-of-interference-that-the-court-can-exercise-under-art-226-while-adjudicating-a-contractual-matter-hc-answers\/","name":"J&K HC | What is the extent of interference that the Court can exercise under Art. 226 while adjudicating a contractual matter? HC answers | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-01-27T05:00:23+00:00","dateModified":"2021-01-29T04:21:28+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/27\/jk-hc-what-is-the-extent-of-interference-that-the-court-can-exercise-under-art-226-while-adjudicating-a-contractual-matter-hc-answers\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/27\/jk-hc-what-is-the-extent-of-interference-that-the-court-can-exercise-under-art-226-while-adjudicating-a-contractual-matter-hc-answers\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/27\/jk-hc-what-is-the-extent-of-interference-that-the-court-can-exercise-under-art-226-while-adjudicating-a-contractual-matter-hc-answers\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"J&#038;K HC | What is the extent of interference that the Court can exercise under Art. 226 while adjudicating a contractual matter? HC answers"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":217026,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/18\/jk-hc-writ-under-art-226-admissible-only-if-there-is-allegation-of-violation-of-a-statutory-duty-on-the-part-of-statutory-authority\/","url_meta":{"origin":242852,"position":0},"title":"J&#038;K HC | Writ under Art. 226 admissible only if there is allegation of violation of a statutory duty on the part of statutory authority","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 18, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu & Kashmir High Court: Sanjay Kumar Gupta, J. dismissed a writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus against official respondents for restraining private persons from encroaching of the suit property of the petitioner. The petitioner herein had filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":206140,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/03\/scope-of-interference-by-a-writ-court-in-decision-of-a-lower-forum-limited-to-the-extent-of-assessing-if-due-process-was-followed-in-arriving-at-impugned-decision\/","url_meta":{"origin":242852,"position":1},"title":"Scope of interference by a writ court in decision of a lower forum &#8212; limited to the extent of assessing","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 3, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu & Kashmir High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Dhiraj Singh Thakur and Sindhu Sharma, JJ. ruled that a joint reading of Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Section 103 of the Constitution of State of Jammu & Kashmir leads to the conclusion that a writ court\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":374846,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/06\/writ-maintainability-private-unaided-school-teacher-selection-jk-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":242852,"position":2},"title":"Teacher&#8217;s selection in private unaided school purely contractual matter; Not amenable to writ jurisdiction: J&#038;K and Ladakh HC","author":"Sunaina","date":"February 6, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe rights arising in favour of candidates participating in the selection process are private rights, which cannot be enforced against an institution that is neither a State nor an instrumentality of the State by way of a writ petition.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"writ maintainability against private unaided school","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/writ-maintainability-against-private-unaided-school.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/writ-maintainability-against-private-unaided-school.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/writ-maintainability-against-private-unaided-school.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/writ-maintainability-against-private-unaided-school.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":276150,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/26\/jammu-kashmir-hc-reservation-pahari-speaking-people-petition-challenging-dismissed-writs-legal-news-and-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":242852,"position":3},"title":"J&#038;K and Ladakh HC | Petition challenging 4% reservation for Pahari Speaking People in State\/UT Services dismissed as petitioners failed to qualify as \u2018aggrieved persons\u2019 for the purposes of Art 226","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"October 26, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court: While deliberating over the instant writ petition concerning reservation provided to Pahari Speaking People, the Sanjay Dhar, J., had to look into the question as to who can invoke the jurisdiction of the High Court under Art. 226 of the Constitution seeking a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":204918,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/07\/property-disputes-between-private-parties-not-a-fit-case-for-high-courts-to-interfere-under-article-226-of-the-constitution\/","url_meta":{"origin":242852,"position":4},"title":"Property disputes between private parties: Not a fit case for High Courts to interfere under Article 226 of the Constitution","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 7, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu & Kashmir High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Dhiraj Singh Thakur, J., dismissed a writ petition filed against the actions of private respondents 6 to 13, whereby respondents were interfering with the property owned by the petitioner. The main issue that arose before the Court was whether the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":242471,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/20\/telangana-hc-interference-under-art-226-writ-jurisdiction-of-the-high-court-cannot-be-invoked-for-registration-of-fir-in-cases-where-an-effective-remedy-lies-under-the-code-of-criminal-procedure\/","url_meta":{"origin":242852,"position":5},"title":"Telangana HC | [Interference under Art. 226] Writ Jurisdiction of the High Court cannot be invoked for registration of FIR in cases where an effective remedy lies under the Code of Criminal Procedure","author":"Editor","date":"January 20, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Telangana High Court: P. Naveen Rao J., while dismissing the present petition, reiterated that the scope of interference under Article 226 is restricted and cannot be put to action where an alternate remedy is available under the concerned statute. The present writ petition was filed alleging that even though a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/242852","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=242852"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/242852\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=242852"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=242852"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=242852"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}