{"id":242426,"date":"2021-01-19T16:00:45","date_gmt":"2021-01-19T10:30:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=242426"},"modified":"2021-01-29T18:27:13","modified_gmt":"2021-01-29T12:57:13","slug":"sikk-hc-o-vi-r-17-cpc-amendment-can-be-allowed-provided-it-does-not-prejudice-the-rights-of-the-respondents-to-take-up-the-grounds-on-waiver-and-acquiescence-at-the-time-of-final-hearing-hc-reite","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/19\/sikk-hc-o-vi-r-17-cpc-amendment-can-be-allowed-provided-it-does-not-prejudice-the-rights-of-the-respondents-to-take-up-the-grounds-on-waiver-and-acquiescence-at-the-time-of-final-hearing-hc-reite\/","title":{"rendered":"Sikk HC | [O. VI R. 17 CPC] Amendment can be allowed provided it does not prejudice the rights of the respondents to take up the grounds on waiver and acquiescence at the time of final hearing; HC reiterates"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Sikkim High Court: <\/strong>Meenakshi Madan Rai, J., while allowing the application made for the amendment of pleadings, held <em>\u201cThe proposed amendment, in my considered opinion, in no manner causes any prejudice to the answering Respondent neither does it change the nature and character of the Petition or the reliefs sought.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the amendment sought in the present application is necessary for the purpose of determining the real question in controversy and further placed reliance on the case of <em>Estralla Rubber v. Dass Estate (P) Ltd,<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/4MXgHAbE\">(2001) 8 SCC 97<\/a>. Objecting the same, Advocate General submitted that after the repatriation order was issued by the Government the Petitioner has joined his original Department, that is, Education Department, and consequently nothing further remains for adjudication in the matter. However, if this Court be inclined to allow the amendment it should not prejudice the rights of the Respondent to take up the grounds of waiver and acquiescence at the hearing. To substantiate his submission, Advocate General relied on <em>P.S. Gopinathan v. State of Kerala,<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/qpHQVqRn\">(2008) 7 SCC 70<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Taking into consideration the due submissions, the Court allowed the application seeking amendment, reiterating that unless the amendment sought affects the right vested with the opposite party, the same shall be allowed provided there was no opportunity of raising it at an earlier stage.[Santosh Dong v. State of Sikkim, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/IIHJQVjK\"><b>2020 SCC OnLine Sikk 205<\/b><\/a>, decided on 10-12-2020]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\">Sakshi Shukla, Editorial Assistant has put this story together<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sikkim High Court: Meenakshi Madan Rai, J., while allowing the application made for the amendment of pleadings, held \u201cThe proposed amendment, in <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[25634,29785],"class_list":["post-242426","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-amendment-of-pleadings","tag-law"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Sikk HC | [O. VI R. 17 CPC] Amendment can be allowed provided it does not prejudice the rights of the respondents to take up the grounds on waiver and acquiescence at the time of final hearing; HC reiterates | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/19\/sikk-hc-o-vi-r-17-cpc-amendment-can-be-allowed-provided-it-does-not-prejudice-the-rights-of-the-respondents-to-take-up-the-grounds-on-waiver-and-acquiescence-at-the-time-of-final-hearing-hc-reite\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sikk HC | [O. VI R. 17 CPC] Amendment can be allowed provided it does not prejudice the rights of the respondents to take up the grounds on waiver and acquiescence at the time of final hearing; HC reiterates\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Sikkim High Court: Meenakshi Madan Rai, J., while allowing the application made for the amendment of pleadings, held \u201cThe proposed amendment, in\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/19\/sikk-hc-o-vi-r-17-cpc-amendment-can-be-allowed-provided-it-does-not-prejudice-the-rights-of-the-respondents-to-take-up-the-grounds-on-waiver-and-acquiescence-at-the-time-of-final-hearing-hc-reite\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-01-19T10:30:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-01-29T12:57:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/05\/High-Court-of-Sikkim.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/19\/sikk-hc-o-vi-r-17-cpc-amendment-can-be-allowed-provided-it-does-not-prejudice-the-rights-of-the-respondents-to-take-up-the-grounds-on-waiver-and-acquiescence-at-the-time-of-final-hearing-hc-reite\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/19\/sikk-hc-o-vi-r-17-cpc-amendment-can-be-allowed-provided-it-does-not-prejudice-the-rights-of-the-respondents-to-take-up-the-grounds-on-waiver-and-acquiescence-at-the-time-of-final-hearing-hc-reite\/\",\"name\":\"Sikk HC | [O. VI R. 17 CPC] Amendment can be allowed provided it does not prejudice the rights of the respondents to take up the grounds on waiver and acquiescence at the time of final hearing; HC reiterates | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-01-19T10:30:45+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-01-29T12:57:13+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/19\/sikk-hc-o-vi-r-17-cpc-amendment-can-be-allowed-provided-it-does-not-prejudice-the-rights-of-the-respondents-to-take-up-the-grounds-on-waiver-and-acquiescence-at-the-time-of-final-hearing-hc-reite\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/19\/sikk-hc-o-vi-r-17-cpc-amendment-can-be-allowed-provided-it-does-not-prejudice-the-rights-of-the-respondents-to-take-up-the-grounds-on-waiver-and-acquiescence-at-the-time-of-final-hearing-hc-reite\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/19\/sikk-hc-o-vi-r-17-cpc-amendment-can-be-allowed-provided-it-does-not-prejudice-the-rights-of-the-respondents-to-take-up-the-grounds-on-waiver-and-acquiescence-at-the-time-of-final-hearing-hc-reite\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sikk HC | [O. VI R. 17 CPC] Amendment can be allowed provided it does not prejudice the rights of the respondents to take up the grounds on waiver and acquiescence at the time of final hearing; HC reiterates\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sikk HC | [O. VI R. 17 CPC] Amendment can be allowed provided it does not prejudice the rights of the respondents to take up the grounds on waiver and acquiescence at the time of final hearing; HC reiterates | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/19\/sikk-hc-o-vi-r-17-cpc-amendment-can-be-allowed-provided-it-does-not-prejudice-the-rights-of-the-respondents-to-take-up-the-grounds-on-waiver-and-acquiescence-at-the-time-of-final-hearing-hc-reite\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sikk HC | [O. VI R. 17 CPC] Amendment can be allowed provided it does not prejudice the rights of the respondents to take up the grounds on waiver and acquiescence at the time of final hearing; HC reiterates","og_description":"Sikkim High Court: Meenakshi Madan Rai, J., while allowing the application made for the amendment of pleadings, held \u201cThe proposed amendment, in","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/19\/sikk-hc-o-vi-r-17-cpc-amendment-can-be-allowed-provided-it-does-not-prejudice-the-rights-of-the-respondents-to-take-up-the-grounds-on-waiver-and-acquiescence-at-the-time-of-final-hearing-hc-reite\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-01-19T10:30:45+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-01-29T12:57:13+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/05\/High-Court-of-Sikkim.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/19\/sikk-hc-o-vi-r-17-cpc-amendment-can-be-allowed-provided-it-does-not-prejudice-the-rights-of-the-respondents-to-take-up-the-grounds-on-waiver-and-acquiescence-at-the-time-of-final-hearing-hc-reite\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/19\/sikk-hc-o-vi-r-17-cpc-amendment-can-be-allowed-provided-it-does-not-prejudice-the-rights-of-the-respondents-to-take-up-the-grounds-on-waiver-and-acquiescence-at-the-time-of-final-hearing-hc-reite\/","name":"Sikk HC | [O. VI R. 17 CPC] Amendment can be allowed provided it does not prejudice the rights of the respondents to take up the grounds on waiver and acquiescence at the time of final hearing; HC reiterates | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-01-19T10:30:45+00:00","dateModified":"2021-01-29T12:57:13+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/19\/sikk-hc-o-vi-r-17-cpc-amendment-can-be-allowed-provided-it-does-not-prejudice-the-rights-of-the-respondents-to-take-up-the-grounds-on-waiver-and-acquiescence-at-the-time-of-final-hearing-hc-reite\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/19\/sikk-hc-o-vi-r-17-cpc-amendment-can-be-allowed-provided-it-does-not-prejudice-the-rights-of-the-respondents-to-take-up-the-grounds-on-waiver-and-acquiescence-at-the-time-of-final-hearing-hc-reite\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/19\/sikk-hc-o-vi-r-17-cpc-amendment-can-be-allowed-provided-it-does-not-prejudice-the-rights-of-the-respondents-to-take-up-the-grounds-on-waiver-and-acquiescence-at-the-time-of-final-hearing-hc-reite\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sikk HC | [O. VI R. 17 CPC] Amendment can be allowed provided it does not prejudice the rights of the respondents to take up the grounds on waiver and acquiescence at the time of final hearing; HC reiterates"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":219212,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/07\/hp-hc-amendments-denied-after-5-years-of-institution-of-suit-as-serious-prejudice-would-have-been-caused-held-that-the-plaintiff-was-sleeping-over-his-rights\/","url_meta":{"origin":242426,"position":0},"title":"HP HC | Amendments denied after 5 years of institution of suit as serious prejudice would have been caused; Held that the plaintiff was sleeping over his rights","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 7, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: Chander Bhusan Barowalia, J. contemplated a petition filed under Article 227 of\u00a0 Constitution of India for quashing and setting aside the order passed by Civil Judge of dismissing the application under Order 6 Rule 7 i.e. for \u2018Amendment of Pleadings\u2019 read with Section 151 of CPC.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":272953,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/03\/bar-under-order-2-rule-2-cpc-amendment-of-pleading-existing-plaint-inapplicable-applicable-to-subsequent-plainst-principles-stated-supreme-court-legal-research-updates-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":242426,"position":1},"title":"Bar under Order II Rule 2 CPC cannot apply to an amendment sought on an existing suit; Supreme Court lays down Principles for Amendment of Pleadings","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"September 3, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: On the question as to whether Order II Rule 2 CPC can be made applicable to an application for amendment of plaint, the bench of Aniruddha Bose and JB Pardiwala*, JJ has held that Order II Rule 2 of the CPC operates as a bar against a subsequent\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-65-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-65-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-65-3.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-65-3.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-65-3.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":329489,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/28\/o-vi-r-17-does-not-limit-application-for-amendment-pleadings-at-any-stage-of-proceedings-sikkim-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":242426,"position":2},"title":"\u2018O. VI R. 17 does not limit amendment of pleadings at any stage of proceedings, if it is necessary for determining the real questions in controversy\u2019: Sikkim HC","author":"Editor","date":"August 28, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The amendments were imperative for the proper and effective adjudication of the dispute; refusal to allow the amendment application would have caused injustice or resulted in multiple litigations; and the amendments did not constitutionally or fundamentally change the nature of the case.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Sikkim High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Sikkim-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Sikkim-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Sikkim-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Sikkim-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":296159,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/06\/objective-section-125-crpc-ameliorate-sufferings-destitute-wives-children-kerala-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":242426,"position":3},"title":"Objective of Section 125 CrPC to ameliorate sufferings of destitute wives, children; technicalities have no place in maintenance cases: Kerala High Court","author":"Ridhi","date":"July 6, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe attempt should be to assimilate the required details and reach the correct conclusion at the earliest, rather than mulling over mundane objections.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"kerala high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":249187,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/03\/amendment-of-pleadings\/","url_meta":{"origin":242426,"position":4},"title":"Bom HC | In case of an application for amendment of pleadings, what would be the principal condition that Courts need to consider? Read on","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 3, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: Milind N. Jadhav, J., addressed a matter with regard to the amendment of pleadings. Petitioners have submitted that they are aggrieved with the Orders passed by Civil Judge, Junior Division on 17-11-2016. Factual Matrix Petitioners were the original defendants and respondents the legal heirs of the original\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":254627,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/23\/a-case-of-wanton-negligence-and-callousness-of-petitioner\/","url_meta":{"origin":242426,"position":5},"title":"Ker HC | A case of wanton negligence and callousness of petitioner; HC rejects application for amendment making inconsistent and alternative pleadings in written statement","author":"Editor","date":"September 23, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: V.G.Arun, J., held that no amendment can be allowed in written statement where it seeks to change former admissions.\u00a0 The Bench stated, \u00a0\u201cEven the most liberal approach towards amendment of written statements will not justify the approval of such an application.\u201d Background The petitioner was the defendant\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/242426","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=242426"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/242426\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=242426"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=242426"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=242426"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}