{"id":242382,"date":"2021-01-18T11:06:04","date_gmt":"2021-01-18T05:36:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=242382"},"modified":"2021-01-31T16:10:59","modified_gmt":"2021-01-31T10:40:59","slug":"tri-hc-default-on-the-part-of-a-government-department-cannot-be-a-reason-to-prevent-an-entity-from-seeking-its-entitlement-petition-allowed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/18\/tri-hc-default-on-the-part-of-a-government-department-cannot-be-a-reason-to-prevent-an-entity-from-seeking-its-entitlement-petition-allowed\/","title":{"rendered":"Tri HC | Default on the part of a Government department cannot be a reason to prevent an entity from seeking its entitlement; Petition allowed"},"content":{"rendered":"

Tripura High Court: <\/strong>A Division Bench of Akil Kureshi, CJ and S.G. Chattopadhyay J., while allowing the present petition, held, \u201cOne department of the Government cannot cite the reason of another department not acting promptly enough to deny the benefit declared by the Government under any scheme.\u201d<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

The petitioner herein challenged a communication dated 25-06-2020 and further prayed for grant of subsidy in terms of Tripura Industrial Investment Promotion Incentive Scheme, 2012 (hereinafter to be<\/em> referred to as the Incentive Scheme<\/em>). Petitioner is a private limited company and is engaged in manufacturing different types of UPVC pipe and fittings, HDE coil pipes, etc. for which the petitioner had established a manufacturing unit at Agartala in the year 2013. The State of Tripura had framed the said scheme which envisaged grant of certain incentives in the form of subsidy to the specified industries set up on or after 01-04-2012. Such rebate would be equal to the net amount of Tripura Value Added Tax and Central Sales Tax and other taxes paid by the industry to the State Government on sale of finished goods subject to certain conditions. The petitioner was one of the eligible units and in the past had also claimed and was granted subsidy as per the terms of the said scheme. The issue for determination in the instant case is, a refund of the VAT etc. under the said scheme for the period between 01-01-2016 to 31-12-2016 and thereafter from 01-01-2017 to 30-06-2017. The petitioner first applied under two separate applications for such refund to the District Industries Centre on 23-06-2020 along with all necessary documents. These applications of the petitioner were rejected by the District Industries Centre by two separate orders both dated 25-06-2020. The sole ground cited for rejection of the petitioner\u2019s applications was that the claim was submitted after expiry of two years from the period to which the claim related.<\/p>\n

Court observed,<\/p>\n

\u201cIt is not in dispute that a petitioner is otherwise an eligible unit entitled to the refund of the value-added tax under the said scheme, of course subject to fulfillment of the conditions contained therein. The scheme also envisages time limit for making application for refund. However, if the VAT department of the Government had delayed issuing necessary certificates of payment of tax to the petitioner, the application of the petitioner for refund cannot be rejected only on the ground of delay in making the same.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

While issuing necessary directions, Court held,<\/p>\n

\u201cThe District Industrial Centre shall consider the petitioner\u2019s further representations both dated 13-07-2020 and the contents thereof. If it is found that the petitioner is correct in contending that the refund applications were delayed on account of non-issuance of certificate of payment of tax by the VAT authorities, its applications for refund shall be entertained and examined on merits and refund to the extent payable be released. If, on the other hand, the authority comes to the conclusion that delay in making the applications could not be attributed to the delay in issuance of the VAT payment certificates by the concerned authority, a speaking order shall be passed and communicated to the petitioner. Entire exercise shall be completed within four months from today.\u201d<\/em>\u00a0 [Agartala Plastic Private Ltd. v. State of Tripura, 2021 SCC OnLine Tri 27<\/b><\/a>, decided on 12-01-2021]<\/p>\n

\n

Sakshi Shukla, Editorial Assistant has put this story together<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Tripura High Court: A Division Bench of Akil Kureshi, CJ and S.G. Chattopadhyay J., while allowing the present petition, held, \u201cOne department <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[44854,44855,29785,5961,2532,7431,44856,29991,2621,44857,12951],"class_list":["post-242382","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-government-department","tag-incentive-scheme","tag-law","tag-rebate","tag-Refund","tag-state-government","tag-state-of-tripura","tag-subsidy","tag-Tax","tag-tripura-industrial-investment-promotion-incentive-scheme","tag-vat"],"yoast_head":"\nTri HC | Default on the part of a Government department cannot be a reason to prevent an entity from seeking its entitlement; Petition allowed | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/18\/tri-hc-default-on-the-part-of-a-government-department-cannot-be-a-reason-to-prevent-an-entity-from-seeking-its-entitlement-petition-allowed\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tri HC | Default on the part of a Government department cannot be a reason to prevent an entity from seeking its entitlement; Petition allowed\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Tripura High Court: A Division Bench of Akil Kureshi, CJ and S.G. Chattopadhyay J., while allowing the present petition, held, \u201cOne department\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/18\/tri-hc-default-on-the-part-of-a-government-department-cannot-be-a-reason-to-prevent-an-entity-from-seeking-its-entitlement-petition-allowed\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-01-18T05:36:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-01-31T10:40:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/Tripura-High-Court-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/18\/tri-hc-default-on-the-part-of-a-government-department-cannot-be-a-reason-to-prevent-an-entity-from-seeking-its-entitlement-petition-allowed\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/18\/tri-hc-default-on-the-part-of-a-government-department-cannot-be-a-reason-to-prevent-an-entity-from-seeking-its-entitlement-petition-allowed\/\",\"name\":\"Tri HC | Default on the part of a Government department cannot be a reason to prevent an entity from seeking its entitlement; Petition allowed | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-01-18T05:36:04+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-01-31T10:40:59+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/18\/tri-hc-default-on-the-part-of-a-government-department-cannot-be-a-reason-to-prevent-an-entity-from-seeking-its-entitlement-petition-allowed\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/18\/tri-hc-default-on-the-part-of-a-government-department-cannot-be-a-reason-to-prevent-an-entity-from-seeking-its-entitlement-petition-allowed\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/18\/tri-hc-default-on-the-part-of-a-government-department-cannot-be-a-reason-to-prevent-an-entity-from-seeking-its-entitlement-petition-allowed\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tri HC | Default on the part of a Government department cannot be a reason to prevent an entity from seeking its entitlement; Petition allowed\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tri HC | Default on the part of a Government department cannot be a reason to prevent an entity from seeking its entitlement; Petition allowed | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/18\/tri-hc-default-on-the-part-of-a-government-department-cannot-be-a-reason-to-prevent-an-entity-from-seeking-its-entitlement-petition-allowed\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tri HC | Default on the part of a Government department cannot be a reason to prevent an entity from seeking its entitlement; Petition allowed","og_description":"Tripura High Court: A Division Bench of Akil Kureshi, CJ and S.G. Chattopadhyay J., while allowing the present petition, held, \u201cOne department","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/18\/tri-hc-default-on-the-part-of-a-government-department-cannot-be-a-reason-to-prevent-an-entity-from-seeking-its-entitlement-petition-allowed\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-01-18T05:36:04+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-01-31T10:40:59+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/Tripura-High-Court-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/18\/tri-hc-default-on-the-part-of-a-government-department-cannot-be-a-reason-to-prevent-an-entity-from-seeking-its-entitlement-petition-allowed\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/18\/tri-hc-default-on-the-part-of-a-government-department-cannot-be-a-reason-to-prevent-an-entity-from-seeking-its-entitlement-petition-allowed\/","name":"Tri HC | Default on the part of a Government department cannot be a reason to prevent an entity from seeking its entitlement; Petition allowed | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-01-18T05:36:04+00:00","dateModified":"2021-01-31T10:40:59+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/18\/tri-hc-default-on-the-part-of-a-government-department-cannot-be-a-reason-to-prevent-an-entity-from-seeking-its-entitlement-petition-allowed\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/18\/tri-hc-default-on-the-part-of-a-government-department-cannot-be-a-reason-to-prevent-an-entity-from-seeking-its-entitlement-petition-allowed\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/18\/tri-hc-default-on-the-part-of-a-government-department-cannot-be-a-reason-to-prevent-an-entity-from-seeking-its-entitlement-petition-allowed\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tri HC | Default on the part of a Government department cannot be a reason to prevent an entity from seeking its entitlement; Petition allowed"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":309559,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/18\/calcutta-high-court-directs-issuance-of-eligibility-cum-registration-certificate-under-wb-incentive-scheme-2013-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":242382,"position":0},"title":"\u2018Howrah unit qualifies as small enterprise under MSMED Act\u2019; Calcutta High Court directs issuance of Eligibility-cum-Registration Certificate under W.B. Incentive Scheme, 2013","author":"Ritu","date":"December 18, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The definition of a \u201cnew industrial unit\u201d does not require manufacturing new items; it applies when an existing unit sets up a branch in a different location.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":322850,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/24\/payment-of-gratuity-act-applicable-to-anganwadi-workers-helpers-tripurahc-reiterates-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":242382,"position":1},"title":"Payment of Gratuity Act 1972 is applicable to anganwadi workers and helpers working in the State: Tripura HC reiterates","author":"Simranjeet","date":"May 24, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The anganwadi centres are the creation of the Intensive Child Development Services Scheme, launched in 1975 to address the issues of health, nutrition, and education needs of children and each anganwadi centre is managed by one anganwadi worker and one anganwadi helper to implement the Scheme.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Tripura High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Tripura-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Tripura-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Tripura-High-Court-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Tripura-High-Court-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":248268,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/16\/tri-hc-claim-of-regularization-can-be-made-only-within-the-four-corners-of-a-scheme-framed-by-the-government\/","url_meta":{"origin":242382,"position":2},"title":"Tri HC| Claim of regularization can be made only within the four corners of a scheme framed by the government","author":"Editor","date":"May 16, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Tripura High Court: Akil Kureshi, CJ., dismissed a writ petition which was filed by the petitioner praying for regularizing her in service w.e.f. 14-02-2002, i.e. on completion of 10 years of service with all consequential benefits. Counsel for the petitioner, Mr Arijit Bhowmik however submitted that the expectation of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":314084,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/14\/when-payment-of-gratuity-act-is-applicable-in-establishment-calculation-to-be-made-as-per-limits-prescribed-by-central-govt-tripura-hc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":242382,"position":3},"title":"Calculation must be made as per limits prescribed by Central Govt from time to time in case Payment of Gratuity is applicable on any establishment: Tripura HC","author":"Simranjeet","date":"February 14, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cSection 4(5) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 is indicative of fact that the Act being a beneficial legislation, entitlement of employee cannot be reduced below the prescribed ceiling limit under Section 4(3) of Act, rather this provision approves receiving of a better gratuity than what is notified by Central\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"tripura high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/tripura-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/tripura-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/tripura-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/tripura-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":274007,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/19\/tripura-high-court-writ-petition-tripura-government-undertakings-expert-committee-policy-pension-civil-services-pension-rules-1972-life-insurance-corporation-of-india-article-14-employees-provident\/","url_meta":{"origin":242382,"position":4},"title":"Tripura High Court | Employees of statutory organizations cannot claim pensionary benefits as a matter of right","author":"Editor","date":"September 19, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Tripura High Court: In a batch of writ petitions filed for directing the State Government to provide similar Pension benefit as granted to the other similarly situated Tripura Government Undertakings, Arindam Lodh, J. has held that the writ court while exercising the power of judicial review under Article 226 of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Tripura High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/tripura-high-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/tripura-high-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/tripura-high-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/tripura-high-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/tripura-high-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":176384,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/16\/cabinet-approves-capital-investment-subsidy-industrial-units-located-north-eastern-region\/","url_meta":{"origin":242382,"position":5},"title":"Cabinet approves capital investment subsidy to industrial units located in North Eastern Region","author":"Saba","date":"December 16, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"The Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs has approved Capital Investment Subsidy amounting to Rs. 264.67 crore to four industrial units located in North Eastern Region (NER) including Sikkim under Central Capital Investment Subsidy Scheme (CCISS), 2007 of North East Industrial Investment and Promotion Policy (NEIIPP), 2007. The CCEA has also\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Hot Off The Press"","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/DSC_4762-e1474523869607.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/DSC_4762-e1474523869607.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/DSC_4762-e1474523869607.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/DSC_4762-e1474523869607.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/DSC_4762-e1474523869607.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/242382","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=242382"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/242382\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=242382"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=242382"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=242382"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}