{"id":242247,"date":"2021-01-15T09:00:56","date_gmt":"2021-01-15T03:30:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=242247"},"modified":"2021-01-15T01:20:50","modified_gmt":"2021-01-14T19:50:50","slug":"madras-hc-authorities-need-to-be-told-that-right-to-property-has-close-nexus-with-right-to-life-under-art-21-hc-while-issuing-notice-in-acquisition-matter-pending-from-16-yrs","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/15\/madras-hc-authorities-need-to-be-told-that-right-to-property-has-close-nexus-with-right-to-life-under-art-21-hc-while-issuing-notice-in-acquisition-matter-pending-from-16-yrs\/","title":{"rendered":"Madras HC | &#8220;Authorities need to be told that right to property has close nexus with right to life under Art. 21&#8221;: HC while issuing notice in acquisition matter pending from 16 yrs"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Madras High Court:\u00a0<\/strong>N. Seshasayee, J., said that if the allegations made in the present petition were true then it exposes the callousness with which District Authorities deal with citizens&#8217; right to property.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In the instant matter, it has been stated that some 16 years back, on 30-12-2004, a 4(1) notification was issued under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Harijan Welfare Schemes Act, 1978 for acquiring the lands of the petitioners.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The above was challenged by the petitioners. Court had provided legal advice to the State Government\/authorities concerned to go for fresh acquisition following the due process of law.\u00a0 Till date, nothing has been done.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Further, it was added that the petitioner has been running from pillar to post to have their properties re-mutated in their names.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">After no relief, petitioners approached the Court with the instant petition.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bench expressed that, if the allegations were true then it only displays the apathy with which the Authorities deal with the right to property of the citizens of this country. They need to be told that right to property has a close nexus to right to life within the meaning of Article 21 of the Constitution of India.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">By the inaction, the authorities had denied the right to these citizens at least for 10 years, and to that extent, they have transgressed the quality of life of the citizens of this country within the meaning of Article 21 of the Constitution of India.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">D. Raja, Additional Government Pleader took notice for the respondent. He was directed to make a statement as to the correctness of the allegations made. The matter was posted for 11 -1-2021.<\/p>\n<p>[Report will be updated when further order is available.]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">[Jayalakshmi v. State of T.N., WP No. 181 of 2021, decided on 08-01-2021]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Madras High Court:\u00a0N. Seshasayee, J., said that if the allegations made in the present petition were true then it exposes the callousness <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[32220,3425,44827,29785,9731,24654],"class_list":["post-242247","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-article-21-of-constitution-of-india","tag-citizen","tag-district-authorities","tag-law","tag-right-to-life","tag-right-to-property"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Madras HC | &quot;Authorities need to be told that right to property has close nexus with right to life under Art. 21&quot;: HC while issuing notice in acquisition matter pending from 16 yrs | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/15\/madras-hc-authorities-need-to-be-told-that-right-to-property-has-close-nexus-with-right-to-life-under-art-21-hc-while-issuing-notice-in-acquisition-matter-pending-from-16-yrs\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Madras HC | &quot;Authorities need to be told that right to property has close nexus with right to life under Art. 21&quot;: HC while issuing notice in acquisition matter pending from 16 yrs\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Madras High Court:\u00a0N. Seshasayee, J., said that if the allegations made in the present petition were true then it exposes the callousness\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/15\/madras-hc-authorities-need-to-be-told-that-right-to-property-has-close-nexus-with-right-to-life-under-art-21-hc-while-issuing-notice-in-acquisition-matter-pending-from-16-yrs\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-01-15T03:30:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/madras-high-court1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/15\/madras-hc-authorities-need-to-be-told-that-right-to-property-has-close-nexus-with-right-to-life-under-art-21-hc-while-issuing-notice-in-acquisition-matter-pending-from-16-yrs\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/15\/madras-hc-authorities-need-to-be-told-that-right-to-property-has-close-nexus-with-right-to-life-under-art-21-hc-while-issuing-notice-in-acquisition-matter-pending-from-16-yrs\/\",\"name\":\"Madras HC | \\\"Authorities need to be told that right to property has close nexus with right to life under Art. 21\\\": HC while issuing notice in acquisition matter pending from 16 yrs | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-01-15T03:30:56+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/15\/madras-hc-authorities-need-to-be-told-that-right-to-property-has-close-nexus-with-right-to-life-under-art-21-hc-while-issuing-notice-in-acquisition-matter-pending-from-16-yrs\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/15\/madras-hc-authorities-need-to-be-told-that-right-to-property-has-close-nexus-with-right-to-life-under-art-21-hc-while-issuing-notice-in-acquisition-matter-pending-from-16-yrs\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/15\/madras-hc-authorities-need-to-be-told-that-right-to-property-has-close-nexus-with-right-to-life-under-art-21-hc-while-issuing-notice-in-acquisition-matter-pending-from-16-yrs\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Madras HC | &#8220;Authorities need to be told that right to property has close nexus with right to life under Art. 21&#8221;: HC while issuing notice in acquisition matter pending from 16 yrs\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Madras HC | \"Authorities need to be told that right to property has close nexus with right to life under Art. 21\": HC while issuing notice in acquisition matter pending from 16 yrs | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/15\/madras-hc-authorities-need-to-be-told-that-right-to-property-has-close-nexus-with-right-to-life-under-art-21-hc-while-issuing-notice-in-acquisition-matter-pending-from-16-yrs\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Madras HC | \"Authorities need to be told that right to property has close nexus with right to life under Art. 21\": HC while issuing notice in acquisition matter pending from 16 yrs","og_description":"Madras High Court:\u00a0N. Seshasayee, J., said that if the allegations made in the present petition were true then it exposes the callousness","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/15\/madras-hc-authorities-need-to-be-told-that-right-to-property-has-close-nexus-with-right-to-life-under-art-21-hc-while-issuing-notice-in-acquisition-matter-pending-from-16-yrs\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-01-15T03:30:56+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/madras-high-court1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/15\/madras-hc-authorities-need-to-be-told-that-right-to-property-has-close-nexus-with-right-to-life-under-art-21-hc-while-issuing-notice-in-acquisition-matter-pending-from-16-yrs\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/15\/madras-hc-authorities-need-to-be-told-that-right-to-property-has-close-nexus-with-right-to-life-under-art-21-hc-while-issuing-notice-in-acquisition-matter-pending-from-16-yrs\/","name":"Madras HC | \"Authorities need to be told that right to property has close nexus with right to life under Art. 21\": HC while issuing notice in acquisition matter pending from 16 yrs | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-01-15T03:30:56+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/15\/madras-hc-authorities-need-to-be-told-that-right-to-property-has-close-nexus-with-right-to-life-under-art-21-hc-while-issuing-notice-in-acquisition-matter-pending-from-16-yrs\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/15\/madras-hc-authorities-need-to-be-told-that-right-to-property-has-close-nexus-with-right-to-life-under-art-21-hc-while-issuing-notice-in-acquisition-matter-pending-from-16-yrs\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/15\/madras-hc-authorities-need-to-be-told-that-right-to-property-has-close-nexus-with-right-to-life-under-art-21-hc-while-issuing-notice-in-acquisition-matter-pending-from-16-yrs\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Madras HC | &#8220;Authorities need to be told that right to property has close nexus with right to life under Art. 21&#8221;: HC while issuing notice in acquisition matter pending from 16 yrs"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":343614,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/13\/allahabad-hc-penalty-land-utilization-compensation-landowner\/","url_meta":{"origin":242247,"position":0},"title":"Allahabad HC warns of &#8216;heavy penalty&#8217; on State for unauthorised land utilisation without due acquisition process; Orders compensation for landowner","author":"Apoorva","date":"March 13, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cRight to Property is protected under Article 300A of the Constitution of India, which ensures that no person can be deprived of their property without due process of law. It emphasized that land cannot be acquired without payment of due compensation, as mandated by law.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":237845,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/22\/ker-hc-interest-on-solatium-provided-under-land-acquisition-act-applies-unequivocally-to-acquisition-made-under-nhai-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":242247,"position":1},"title":"Ker HC | Interest on solatium provided under Land Acquisition Act applies unequivocally to acquisition made under NHAI Act","author":"Editor","date":"October 22, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: Raja Vijayaraghavan V J., allowing the present writ petition, held that the provisions for compensation and payment of interest under the Land Acquisition Act shall also be attracted in the cases of acquisition by the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI). \u00a0Brief Facts The property owned by\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":313704,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/10\/provisional-attachment-not-accordance-law-all-consequential-actions-cannot-sustained-madras-hc-sets-aside-order-ed\/","url_meta":{"origin":242247,"position":2},"title":"Madras HC sets aside ED\u2019s attachment order for not being in accordance with law, making consequential actions unsustainable","author":"Apoorva","date":"February 10, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court noted that even in the counter, ED have not explained how the provisional attachment can be sustained on merits, in view of the sale in favour of the petitioners","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"madras high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":250799,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/05\/right-to-property\/","url_meta":{"origin":242247,"position":3},"title":"Bom HC | Right to Property under Art. 300 A \u2013 A Human and Constitutional Right? Court decides in a dispute of construction of National Highway [Land Owners v. State]","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 5, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: The Division Bench of S.V. Gangapurwala and Shrikant D. Kulkarni, JJ., expressed that, In a welfare State, statutory authorities are bound, not only to pay adequate compensation, but there is also a legal obligation upon them to rehabilitate such persons. The non-fulfilment of their obligations would tantamount\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":326188,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/10\/raj-hc-stays-acquisition-of-land-for-railway-line-in-rajsamand-district-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":242247,"position":4},"title":"Rajasthan High Court stays acquisition of land for new railway line in Rajsamand District","author":"Ritu","date":"July 10, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The petitioners alleged that the objections were decided without affording them a proper opportunity of hearing, relying solely on a newspaper notice.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":302481,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/27\/high-tension-line-not-constitute-property-acquisition-under-article-301a-of-constitution-of-india-cal-hc-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":242247,"position":5},"title":"High Tension line installation not a property \u201cacquisition\u201d to attract rigours of Article 30(1A) of Constitution of India: Calcutta High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"September 27, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court emphasized on the need to strike a balance between Article 30 of the Constitution of India and public interest.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/242247","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=242247"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/242247\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=242247"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=242247"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=242247"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}