{"id":242220,"date":"2021-01-13T17:30:55","date_gmt":"2021-01-13T12:00:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=242220"},"modified":"2021-04-02T15:31:47","modified_gmt":"2021-04-02T10:01:47","slug":"all-hc-if-a-husband-denies-being-married-in-a-proceeding-under-s-125-crpc-what-should-the-magistrate-determine-explainer","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/13\/all-hc-if-a-husband-denies-being-married-in-a-proceeding-under-s-125-crpc-what-should-the-magistrate-determine-explainer\/","title":{"rendered":"All HC | If a husband denies being married in a proceeding under S. 125 CrPC, what should the Magistrate determine? Explainer"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Allahabad High Court: <\/strong>Raj Beer Singh, J., observed that:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008080;\">\u201cThe object of the Section 125 CrPC being to afford a swift remedy, and the determination by the Magistrate as to the status of the parties being subject to a final determination by the Civil Court, when the husband denies that the applicant is not his wife, all that the Magistrate has to find, in a proceeding under Section 125 CrPC, is whether there was some marriage ceremony between the parties, whether they have lived as husband and wife in the eyes of their neighbours, whether children were born from the union.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The instant revision was preferred against the order passed under Section 125 of Criminal Procedure Code.<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #993300;\"><strong><u>Contention that falls for consideration:<\/u><\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Whether respondent 2 has been able to show herself as married wife of revisionist in order to claim maintenance from revisionist under Section 125 CrPC?<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Proceedings under Section 125 CrPC. are summary proceeding. In Supreme Court\u2019s decision of <em>Dwarika Prasad Satpathy v. Bidyut Prava Dixit<\/em>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/F54TKzQr\">(1999) 7 SCC 675<\/a>, it was observed that the standard of proof of marriage in a Section 125 proceeding is not as strict as is required in a trial for an offence under Section 494 IPC.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bench expressed that it is a well-settled law that for the purposes of a proceeding under Section 125 CrPC, the factum of marriage has to be prima facie considered.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>\u201cIf there is prima facie material on record to suggest that the parties have married or are having relationship in the nature of marriage, the court can presume in favour of the woman claiming maintenance.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong>Court also stated that an order passed in an application under Section 125 CrPC does not finally determine the rights and obligations of the parties and the said section is enacted with a view to provide a summary remedy for providing maintenance to a wife, children and parents.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In the decision of <em>S. Sethurathiuam Pillai v. Barbara <\/em>it was observed that maintenance under Section 488 CrPC, 1898 (similar to Section 125 Cr.P.C.) cannot be denied where there was some evidence on which conclusion for grant of maintenance could be reached. It was held that order passed under Section 488 is a summary order which does not finally determine the rights and obligations of the parties; the decision of the criminal court that there was a valid marriage between the parties will not operate as decisive in any civil proceeding between the parties.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Court observed that in a proceeding for maintenance under Section 125 CrPC, a Magistrate or Judge of the Family Court has to be prima facie satisfied about the marital status of the parties, as a decision under Section 125 CrPC is tentative in nature, subject to the decision in any civil proceeding, as has been held in <em>Santosh v. Naresh Pal<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/a3EvvBvo\">(1998) 8 SCC 447<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In light of the above discussions, High Court states that if from the evidence which is led, the Magistrate\/Court is prima facie satisfied with regard to the performance of marriage in proceedings under Section 125 CrPC which are of summary nature, strict proof of performance of essential rites is not required.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In the instant matter, respondent 2 had submitted that her nikah was solemnized with the revisionist and out of that marriage, she gave birth to a daughter, but she was killed by the revisionist, whereas the case of the revisionist was that his nikah was never solemnized and they never lived as husband and wife together.<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #993300;\"><strong><u>Limited Scope of Revisional Court<\/u><\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Question whether the respondent 2 was a married wife of revisionist, is a question of fact and thus, this court cannot upset the finding of the trial court by entering into re-appreciation of evidence, unless it is shown such a finding is not based on evidence or some patent error of jurisdiction is shown. In the instant case, no such eventuality could be shown. In fact, if the wife had been neglected and the wife was entitled to maintenance, the scope of interference by the Revisional Court is very limited.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Further, the Court added that in view of evidence on record, the grant of maintenance from the date of application cannot be said arbitrary or against law. The quantum of maintenance also appeared reasonable and appropriate.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>\u201cIf a party deliberately delays the proceedings for long period, such party must not be allowed to take advantage of such tactics.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong>High Court found no illegality, perversity or error of jurisdiction in the impugned order.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">While parting with the decision, Court added that the Court has to keep in mind that the exercise of revisional jurisdiction itself should not lead to injustice ex facie. [Irshad Ali v. State of U.P.,\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/ggy532ZP\">2021 SCC OnLine All 92<\/a>, decided on 08-01-2021]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Advocates who appeared on behalf of the parties:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00a0Counsel for Revisionist: Krishna Mishra<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Counsel for Opposite Party: G.A.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Allahabad High Court: Raj Beer Singh, J., observed that: \u201cThe object of the Section 125 CrPC being to afford a swift remedy, <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[11721,2864,2641,29785,2538,4021,36002,12531,44809],"class_list":["post-242220","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-divorced-wife","tag-family_court","tag-husband","tag-law","tag-Magistrate","tag-marriage","tag-revisional-court","tag-section-125-crpc","tag-summary-remedy"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>All HC | If a husband denies being married in a proceeding under S. 125 CrPC, what should the Magistrate determine? Explainer | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/13\/all-hc-if-a-husband-denies-being-married-in-a-proceeding-under-s-125-crpc-what-should-the-magistrate-determine-explainer\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"All HC | If a husband denies being married in a proceeding under S. 125 CrPC, what should the Magistrate determine? Explainer\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Allahabad High Court: Raj Beer Singh, J., observed that: \u201cThe object of the Section 125 CrPC being to afford a swift remedy,\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/13\/all-hc-if-a-husband-denies-being-married-in-a-proceeding-under-s-125-crpc-what-should-the-magistrate-determine-explainer\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-01-13T12:00:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-04-02T10:01:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/Allahabad-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/13\/all-hc-if-a-husband-denies-being-married-in-a-proceeding-under-s-125-crpc-what-should-the-magistrate-determine-explainer\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/13\/all-hc-if-a-husband-denies-being-married-in-a-proceeding-under-s-125-crpc-what-should-the-magistrate-determine-explainer\/\",\"name\":\"All HC | If a husband denies being married in a proceeding under S. 125 CrPC, what should the Magistrate determine? Explainer | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-01-13T12:00:55+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-04-02T10:01:47+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/13\/all-hc-if-a-husband-denies-being-married-in-a-proceeding-under-s-125-crpc-what-should-the-magistrate-determine-explainer\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/13\/all-hc-if-a-husband-denies-being-married-in-a-proceeding-under-s-125-crpc-what-should-the-magistrate-determine-explainer\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/13\/all-hc-if-a-husband-denies-being-married-in-a-proceeding-under-s-125-crpc-what-should-the-magistrate-determine-explainer\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"All HC | If a husband denies being married in a proceeding under S. 125 CrPC, what should the Magistrate determine? Explainer\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"All HC | If a husband denies being married in a proceeding under S. 125 CrPC, what should the Magistrate determine? Explainer | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/13\/all-hc-if-a-husband-denies-being-married-in-a-proceeding-under-s-125-crpc-what-should-the-magistrate-determine-explainer\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"All HC | If a husband denies being married in a proceeding under S. 125 CrPC, what should the Magistrate determine? Explainer","og_description":"Allahabad High Court: Raj Beer Singh, J., observed that: \u201cThe object of the Section 125 CrPC being to afford a swift remedy,","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/13\/all-hc-if-a-husband-denies-being-married-in-a-proceeding-under-s-125-crpc-what-should-the-magistrate-determine-explainer\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-01-13T12:00:55+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-04-02T10:01:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/Allahabad-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/13\/all-hc-if-a-husband-denies-being-married-in-a-proceeding-under-s-125-crpc-what-should-the-magistrate-determine-explainer\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/13\/all-hc-if-a-husband-denies-being-married-in-a-proceeding-under-s-125-crpc-what-should-the-magistrate-determine-explainer\/","name":"All HC | If a husband denies being married in a proceeding under S. 125 CrPC, what should the Magistrate determine? Explainer | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-01-13T12:00:55+00:00","dateModified":"2021-04-02T10:01:47+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/13\/all-hc-if-a-husband-denies-being-married-in-a-proceeding-under-s-125-crpc-what-should-the-magistrate-determine-explainer\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/13\/all-hc-if-a-husband-denies-being-married-in-a-proceeding-under-s-125-crpc-what-should-the-magistrate-determine-explainer\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/13\/all-hc-if-a-husband-denies-being-married-in-a-proceeding-under-s-125-crpc-what-should-the-magistrate-determine-explainer\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"All HC | If a husband denies being married in a proceeding under S. 125 CrPC, what should the Magistrate determine? Explainer"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":363296,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/10\/bom-hc-no-proof-of-first-marriage-wife-gets-maintenance\/","url_meta":{"origin":242220,"position":0},"title":"No proof of subsisting first marriage; Bombay HC upholds maintenance for wife under S. 125 CrPC","author":"Editor","date":"October 10, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cHowever, even presuming that for the sake of discussion the marriage between the husband and wife is void, still the wife is entitled to claim maintenance under Section 125 of the CrPC.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"subsisting first marriage maintenance claim","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/subsisting-first-marriage-maintenance-claim.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/subsisting-first-marriage-maintenance-claim.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/subsisting-first-marriage-maintenance-claim.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/subsisting-first-marriage-maintenance-claim.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":319716,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/08\/woman-living-with-man-for-considerably-long-period-of-time-as-husband-and-wife-is-entitled-to-maintenance-mp-hc-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":242220,"position":1},"title":"Woman living with man for considerably long period of time entitled to maintenance under Section 125 CrPC: Madhya Pradesh High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"April 8, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court noted that Supreme Court has emphasised on the broad interpretation of the term \u201cwife\u201d under Section 125 of CrPC and the presumption of marriage in cases of long cohabitation.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":350314,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/11\/isolated-acts-of-immorality-not-living-in-adultery-patna-hc-legal-news-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":242220,"position":2},"title":"Isolated acts of immorality not \u2018living in adultery\u2019; Patna HC dismisses plea filed by husband against maintenance order","author":"Editor","date":"June 11, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA few moral lapses and a return back to a normal life cannot be said to be living in adultery. If the lapse is continued and followed up by a further adulterous life, the woman can be said to be \u2018living in adultery.\u2019\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Patna High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Patna-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Patna-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Patna-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Patna-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":316817,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/12\/can-daughter-in-law-claim-maintenance-parents-in-law-s125-crpc-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":242220,"position":3},"title":"Does Section 125, CrPC envisage any claim of maintenance for daughter-in-law against her parents-in-law? Karnataka HC answers","author":"Sucheta","date":"March 12, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The High Court answered the question in negative pointing out that Section 125, CrPC envisages that wives, parents and minor children can claim for maintenance.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Karnataka High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":332997,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/14\/calcutta-high-court-upholds-spouse-maintenance-principle-equistatus-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":242220,"position":4},"title":"A spouse unable to maintain himself\/herself is entitled to maintenance on the principle of equistatus; Calcutta High Court upholds maintenance to wife","author":"Arunima","date":"October 14, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The purpose of paying maintenance is mainly two folds, first to prevent vagrancy because of strained husband and wife relationships and to guarantee that the poor litigating spouse is not crippled as a result of a lack of funds to live a dignified life.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Calcutta High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":326367,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/11\/divorced-muslim-woman-can-seek-maintenance-under-section-125-crpc-supreme-court-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":242220,"position":5},"title":"Comprehensive breakdown of the Supreme Court Verdict on Divorced Muslim women\u2019s right to seek maintenance under Section 125 CrPC","author":"Editor","date":"July 11, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"In the case at hand, the husband had argued that in view of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986, a divorced Muslim woman is not entitled to maintain a petition under Section 125 of the CrPC and has to proceed under the provisions of the 1986\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Divorced Muslim woman","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/DIVORCE-5.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/DIVORCE-5.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/DIVORCE-5.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/DIVORCE-5.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/242220","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=242220"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/242220\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=242220"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=242220"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=242220"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}