{"id":242187,"date":"2021-01-13T11:30:57","date_gmt":"2021-01-13T06:00:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=242187"},"modified":"2021-04-02T16:13:24","modified_gmt":"2021-04-02T10:43:24","slug":"ph-hc-there-is-no-requirement-in-law-that-a-person-applying-for-sanction-of-the-building-plan-has-to-prove-his-ownership-before-the-building-plan-can-be-sanctioned","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/13\/ph-hc-there-is-no-requirement-in-law-that-a-person-applying-for-sanction-of-the-building-plan-has-to-prove-his-ownership-before-the-building-plan-can-be-sanctioned\/","title":{"rendered":"P&H HC | There is no requirement in law that a person applying for sanction of the building plan, has to prove his ownership before the building plan can be sanctioned"},"content":{"rendered":"

Punjab and Haryana High Court: <\/strong>Anil Kshetarpal, J., while addressing the instant petition against the impugned order of Deputy Commissioner expressed that, \u201cCompassionate empathy should be one of the trait\/quality of everyone manning a public office. The persons holding such offices are required to be more sympathetic and compassionate while dealing with downtrodden and uneducated persons.\u201d<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/strong>Facts of the case are such that, the petitioner was in possession of a small building and Haryana Wakf Board was owner of the land underneath that building. The grievance of the petitioner was that since level of the road, passing in front of the building, had been increased, therefore, rainy\/dirty water started getting accumulated in the premises and the building had also developed certain cracks. In spite of several applications for permission to reconstruct the said building, no response had been received from the officials of Municipal Committee. Therefore, construction work was carried out by the petitioner, to which the Municipal Committee had sent a notice under Section 208 of the Haryana Municipal Act, 1973 (\u201cthe Act\u201d) directing the petitioner to stop the construction and demolish whatever construction had already been carried out. The Petitioner again requested for approval and submitted a building plan, which was rejected on the grounds that the building plan had been filed without deposit of the required fee and the petitioner had failed to provide evidence of ownership. Consequently, the premise was sealed by the authorities. The petitioner filed an appeal before the Deputy Commissioner, which was dismissed with the finding that there was no error in the order of Municipal Committee.<\/p>\n

The Court observed that, \u201cthe entire emphasise of the legislature while enacting the Haryana Municipal Act, 1973 was to encourage the residents to erect the buildings after getting the building plan sanctioned and if some buildings have been erected or re-erected in violation thereof and such construction is found within the permissible limits, then the construction should be regularised or the violation should be compounded and the officials are expected to deal with such violation with compassion in such matters.\u201d <\/em>The Court said, Municipal Committee had failed to draw attention of the Court to any requirement of law requiring a person who had applied for sanction of the building plan, to prove his ownership before the building plan could be sanctioned. Further, it was held that, till the time the petitioner continues to be in possession of the said land he is entitled to repair\/ renovate\/reconstruct the building existing therein. Setting aside the order passed by the Municipal Committee and affirmed by the Deputy Commissioner, the Court stated that sealing of the property was an undoubtedly arbitrary exercise of power. Hence, the petition was disposed of with further directions that the petitioner should submit a fresh application for post facto approval of the building plan within one month from the date of the judgment and the officials of Municipal Committee were directed to process the same in accordance with law within 6 months. [Devender Kumar v. State of Haryana, 2020 SCC OnLine P&H 2360<\/b><\/a>, decided on 16-12-2020]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Punjab and Haryana High Court: Anil Kshetarpal, J., while addressing the instant petition against the impugned order of Deputy Commissioner expressed that, <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[44801,44802,32260],"class_list":["post-242187","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-building-plan","tag-haryana-municipal-act","tag-ownership"],"yoast_head":"\nP&H HC | There is no requirement in law that a person applying for sanction of the building plan, has to prove his ownership before the building plan can be sanctioned | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/13\/ph-hc-there-is-no-requirement-in-law-that-a-person-applying-for-sanction-of-the-building-plan-has-to-prove-his-ownership-before-the-building-plan-can-be-sanctioned\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"P&H HC | There is no requirement in law that a person applying for sanction of the building plan, has to prove his ownership before the building plan can be sanctioned\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Punjab and Haryana High Court: Anil Kshetarpal, J., while addressing the instant petition against the impugned order of Deputy Commissioner expressed that,\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/13\/ph-hc-there-is-no-requirement-in-law-that-a-person-applying-for-sanction-of-the-building-plan-has-to-prove-his-ownership-before-the-building-plan-can-be-sanctioned\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-01-13T06:00:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-04-02T10:43:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/panjab_and_hariyana_high_court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/13\/ph-hc-there-is-no-requirement-in-law-that-a-person-applying-for-sanction-of-the-building-plan-has-to-prove-his-ownership-before-the-building-plan-can-be-sanctioned\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/13\/ph-hc-there-is-no-requirement-in-law-that-a-person-applying-for-sanction-of-the-building-plan-has-to-prove-his-ownership-before-the-building-plan-can-be-sanctioned\/\",\"name\":\"P&H HC | There is no requirement in law that a person applying for sanction of the building plan, has to prove his ownership before the building plan can be sanctioned | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-01-13T06:00:57+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-04-02T10:43:24+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/13\/ph-hc-there-is-no-requirement-in-law-that-a-person-applying-for-sanction-of-the-building-plan-has-to-prove-his-ownership-before-the-building-plan-can-be-sanctioned\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/13\/ph-hc-there-is-no-requirement-in-law-that-a-person-applying-for-sanction-of-the-building-plan-has-to-prove-his-ownership-before-the-building-plan-can-be-sanctioned\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/13\/ph-hc-there-is-no-requirement-in-law-that-a-person-applying-for-sanction-of-the-building-plan-has-to-prove-his-ownership-before-the-building-plan-can-be-sanctioned\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"P&H HC | There is no requirement in law that a person applying for sanction of the building plan, has to prove his ownership before the building plan can be sanctioned\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"P&H HC | There is no requirement in law that a person applying for sanction of the building plan, has to prove his ownership before the building plan can be sanctioned | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/13\/ph-hc-there-is-no-requirement-in-law-that-a-person-applying-for-sanction-of-the-building-plan-has-to-prove-his-ownership-before-the-building-plan-can-be-sanctioned\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"P&H HC | There is no requirement in law that a person applying for sanction of the building plan, has to prove his ownership before the building plan can be sanctioned","og_description":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: Anil Kshetarpal, J., while addressing the instant petition against the impugned order of Deputy Commissioner expressed that,","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/13\/ph-hc-there-is-no-requirement-in-law-that-a-person-applying-for-sanction-of-the-building-plan-has-to-prove-his-ownership-before-the-building-plan-can-be-sanctioned\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-01-13T06:00:57+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-04-02T10:43:24+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/panjab_and_hariyana_high_court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/13\/ph-hc-there-is-no-requirement-in-law-that-a-person-applying-for-sanction-of-the-building-plan-has-to-prove-his-ownership-before-the-building-plan-can-be-sanctioned\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/13\/ph-hc-there-is-no-requirement-in-law-that-a-person-applying-for-sanction-of-the-building-plan-has-to-prove-his-ownership-before-the-building-plan-can-be-sanctioned\/","name":"P&H HC | There is no requirement in law that a person applying for sanction of the building plan, has to prove his ownership before the building plan can be sanctioned | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-01-13T06:00:57+00:00","dateModified":"2021-04-02T10:43:24+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/13\/ph-hc-there-is-no-requirement-in-law-that-a-person-applying-for-sanction-of-the-building-plan-has-to-prove-his-ownership-before-the-building-plan-can-be-sanctioned\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/13\/ph-hc-there-is-no-requirement-in-law-that-a-person-applying-for-sanction-of-the-building-plan-has-to-prove-his-ownership-before-the-building-plan-can-be-sanctioned\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/13\/ph-hc-there-is-no-requirement-in-law-that-a-person-applying-for-sanction-of-the-building-plan-has-to-prove-his-ownership-before-the-building-plan-can-be-sanctioned\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"P&H HC | There is no requirement in law that a person applying for sanction of the building plan, has to prove his ownership before the building plan can be sanctioned"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":223410,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/23\/ph-hc-compassionate-appointment-not-to-be-provided-to-the-dependents-when-a-claim-was-made-after-attaining-the-age-of-majority-but-the-application-had-become-time-barred\/","url_meta":{"origin":242187,"position":0},"title":"P&H HC | Compassionate appointment not to be provided to the dependents when a claim was made after attaining age of majority but application had become time barred","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 23, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: Ritu Bahri, J. partly allowed the petition with the directions that the petitioner was entitled to compensation when their plea for the compassionate appointment was rejected by the respondents. \u00a0 The husband of the petitioner was working with Haryana Police as Head Constable. He expired\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":211310,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/04\/ph-hc-compassionate-financial-assistance-to-dependents-of-deceased-for-a-period-of-15-years-not-violative-of-article-14-of-constitution\/","url_meta":{"origin":242187,"position":1},"title":"P&H HC | Compassionate financial assistance to dependents of deceased for a period of 15 years not violative of Article 14 of Constitution\u00a0","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 4, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: A Division Bench of A.B. Chaudhari and Harnaresh Singh Gill, JJ., addressed a petition where petitioner challenged Part 5(1) Clause (b) of a notification issued by the State of Haryana along with the order. Petitioner contended that the impugned notification provided financial assistance equal to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":205186,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/17\/disallowing-to-finish-the-construction-of-a-portion-of-a-complete-building-serves-no-purpose-punjab-and-haryana-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":242187,"position":2},"title":"Disallowing to finish the construction of a portion of a complete building serves no purpose: Punjab and Haryana HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 17, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Anil Kshetarpal, J. disposed of a revision petition by allowing construction of a portion of the subject building. Plaintiffs had filed a suit for possession of a land claiming themselves to be the owner of the said property. They\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":304208,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/10\/no-violation-of-kolkata-municipal-corporation-building-rules-2009-in-sanctioned-building-plan-cal-hc-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":242187,"position":3},"title":"\u201cNo violation of Kolkata Municipal Corporation Building Rules, 2009\u201d; Calcutta High Court refuses to quash sanctioned building plan","author":"Ritu","date":"October 10, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court examined the Building Rules and found that the construction was within the permissible limits of FAR and height after the land was gifted to Kolkata Municipal Corporation.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":271363,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/08\/possession-of-joint-land-by-one-co-owner-valid-in-absence-of-proof-showing-disagreement-between-other-co-owners-punjab-haryana-high-court-reiterates\/","url_meta":{"origin":242187,"position":4},"title":"Possession of joint land by one co-owner valid in absence of proof showing disagreement between other co-owners; Punjab & Haryana High Court reiterates","author":"Editor","date":"August 8, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: Manjari Nehru Kaul, J., while dealing with a revision petition for setting aside the order passed by the Civil Judge in Execution Petition held that the petitioner was unable to bring any material that showed that other co-owners were not agreeable to take possession. The\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Punjab and Haryana High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":356166,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/11\/dhc-upholds-charges-against-building-owner-in-anaj-mandi-fire-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":242187,"position":5},"title":"\u2018Glaring lapses indicate negligence\u2019; Delhi HC upholds charges against building owner in Anaj Mandi Fire case","author":"Editor","date":"August 11, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The central test to be applied while framing a charge is whether there exists sufficient material on record which, if unrebutted and accepted at face value, gives rise to a strong suspicion that the petitioner-accused has committed the offence in question.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Anaj Mandi fire case","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Anaj-Mandi-fire-case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Anaj-Mandi-fire-case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Anaj-Mandi-fire-case.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Anaj-Mandi-fire-case.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/242187","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=242187"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/242187\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=242187"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=242187"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=242187"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}