{"id":241779,"date":"2021-01-05T14:20:11","date_gmt":"2021-01-05T08:50:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=241779"},"modified":"2021-01-08T12:03:00","modified_gmt":"2021-01-08T06:33:00","slug":"jhar-hc-interference-under-arti-226-a-writ-of-certiorari-can-be-issued-only-in-exercise-of-supervisory-jurisdiction-which-is-different-from-appellate-jurisdiction-hc-reiterates","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/05\/jhar-hc-interference-under-arti-226-a-writ-of-certiorari-can-be-issued-only-in-exercise-of-supervisory-jurisdiction-which-is-different-from-appellate-jurisdiction-hc-reiterates\/","title":{"rendered":"Jhar HC | [Interference under Art. 226] A writ of certiorari can be issued only in exercise of supervisory jurisdiction which is different from appellate jurisdiction; HC reiterates"},"content":{"rendered":"

Jharkhand High Court: <\/strong>A Division Bench of Dr Ravi Ranjan, CJ. and Sujit Narayan Prasad, J. while dismissing the present appeal, relied on settled precedents upon power of judicial review against an Award passed by Tribunal or Lower Court.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/strong>Background<\/strong><\/p>\n

Respondent had raised a demand for regularization in service but after a failed attempt at conciliation, reference was made through a notification dated 18-09-1997 to the Central Government Industrial Tribunal. The Tribunal, after considering the rival contention raised before it, passed an Award of regularization which was assailed before this Court by the writ petitioner-appellant by filing WP (L) No 4466 of 2016. However, the writ petition was dismissed. Assailing the order of such dismissal, the present intra-court appeal has been preferred.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/strong>Observations<\/strong><\/p>\n

On power of judicial review\/issuance of writ of Certiorari against an Award passed by the Tribunal or Lower Court<\/u><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

Court placed reliance on the case of;<\/p>\n

Hari Vishnu v. Ahmad Ishaque, <\/em>(1955) 1 SCR 1104<\/a>, at paragraph 21, it was noted, \u201cWith regard to the character and scope of the writ of certiorari and the conditions under which it can be issued, the following propositions may be taken as established: (1) Certiorari will be issued for correcting errors of jurisdiction, as when an inferior Court or Tribunal acts without jurisdiction or in excess of it, or fails to exercise it<\/strong>. (2) Writ of certiorari will also be issued when the Court or Tribunal acts illegally in the exercise of its undoubted jurisdiction, as when it decides without giving an opportunity to the parties to be heard, or violates the principles of natural justice<\/strong>. (3) The Court issuing a writ of certiorari acts in exercise of a supervisory and not appellate jurisdiction<\/strong>. One consequence of this is that the Court will not review findings of fact reached by the inferior Court or Tribunal even if they be erroneous. This is on the principle that a Court which has jurisdiction over a subject-matter has jurisdiction to decide wrong as well as right, and when the Legislature does not choose to confer a right of appeal against that decision, it would be defeating its purpose and policy, if a superior Court were to rehear the case on the evidence and substitute its own findings in certiorari.\u201d <\/em><\/p>\n

Syed Yakoob v. Radhakrishnan,<\/em> (1964) 5 SCR 64<\/a>, wherein the Supreme Court said, \u201cIn regard to a finding of fact recorded by the Tribunal, a writ of certiorari can be issued if it is shown that in recording the said finding, the tribunal had erroneously refused to admit admissible and material evidence, or had erroneously admitted inadmissible evidence which has influenced the impugned finding<\/strong>. Similarly, if a finding of fact is based on no evidence, that would be regarded as an error of law which can be corrected by a writ of certiorari. In dealing with this category of cases, however, we must always bear in mind that a finding of fact recorded by the Tribunal cannot be challenged in proceedings for a writ of certiorari on the ground that the relevant and material evidence adduced before the Tribunal was insufficient or inadequate to sustain the impugned finding. <\/strong>The adequacy or sufficiency of evidence led on a point and the <\/em><\/p>\n

inference of fact to be drawn from the said finding are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Tribunal, and the said points cannot be agitated before a writ Court.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

General Manager, Electrical Rengali Hydro Electric Project, Orissa v. Giridhari Sahu, <\/em>(2019) 10 SCC 695<\/a>, the Supreme Court considered the issue about scope of issuance of writ of certiorari by the High Court and has laid down the proposition of law that if the finding recorded by the court is erroneous and based upon perversity, the order is fit to be quashed\/set aside.<\/p>\n

Court also acknowledged the findings in Sawarn Singh v. State of Punjab,<\/em> (1976) 2 SCC 868<\/a>, Heinz India Pvt. Ltd. v. State of UP,<\/em> (2012) 5 SCC 443<\/a>, Pepsico India Holding (P) Ltd. v. Krishna Kant Pandey, <\/em>(2015) 4 SCC 270<\/a>, Chandavarkar Sita Ratna Rao v. Ashalata S. Guram, <\/em>(1986) 4 SCC 447<\/a>. \u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n

With respect to the reliance placed on Uma Devi Case<\/u><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

It was argued by the counsel for the appellant that there cannot be any regularisation in the service after the judgment rendered by the Constitution Bench in the case of Secretary, State of Karnataka v. Uma Devi, <\/em>(2006) 4 SCC 1<\/a>, but the present Court does not concur with the same, as, \u201cBefore the Constitution Bench of the Hon\u2019ble Apex Court, the applicability of Industrial Dispute Act 1947 was not an issue. Further, the workman has claimed regularisation, in view of the policy decision of the Management FCI dated 06-05-1987 and if the Tribunal has passed an Award after taking into consideration the policy decision of the Management FCI, the same cannot be said to be illegal.\u201d <\/em><\/p>\n

Decision<\/strong><\/p>\n

Refusing to interfere with the Award, Court conclusively said, \u201cIt is settled that in the matter of issuance of writ of certiorari, the perversity of finding is to be looked into by the High Court in exercise of power under Article 226 and if the issue has not been raised before the Tribunal, the same cannot be proper to be looked by the High Court at the time of looking into the legality and propriety of the Award.\u201d<\/em>[Food Corporation of India v. Ganesh Jha, 2020 SCC OnLine Jhar 1078<\/b><\/a>, decided on 17-12-2020]<\/p>\n

\n

Sakshi Shukla, Editorial Assistant has put this story together<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Jharkhand High Court: A Division Bench of Dr Ravi Ranjan, CJ. and Sujit Narayan Prasad, J. while dismissing the present appeal, relied <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[33429,3042,29785,32664,35403],"class_list":["post-241779","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-exclusive-jurisdiction","tag-Judicial_Review","tag-law","tag-writ","tag-writ-of-certiorari"],"yoast_head":"\nJhar HC | [Interference under Art. 226] A writ of certiorari can be issued only in exercise of supervisory jurisdiction which is different from appellate jurisdiction; HC reiterates | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/05\/jhar-hc-interference-under-arti-226-a-writ-of-certiorari-can-be-issued-only-in-exercise-of-supervisory-jurisdiction-which-is-different-from-appellate-jurisdiction-hc-reiterates\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Jhar HC | [Interference under Art. 226] A writ of certiorari can be issued only in exercise of supervisory jurisdiction which is different from appellate jurisdiction; HC reiterates\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Jharkhand High Court: A Division Bench of Dr Ravi Ranjan, CJ. and Sujit Narayan Prasad, J. while dismissing the present appeal, relied\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/05\/jhar-hc-interference-under-arti-226-a-writ-of-certiorari-can-be-issued-only-in-exercise-of-supervisory-jurisdiction-which-is-different-from-appellate-jurisdiction-hc-reiterates\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-01-05T08:50:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-01-08T06:33:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/Jharkhand-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/05\/jhar-hc-interference-under-arti-226-a-writ-of-certiorari-can-be-issued-only-in-exercise-of-supervisory-jurisdiction-which-is-different-from-appellate-jurisdiction-hc-reiterates\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/05\/jhar-hc-interference-under-arti-226-a-writ-of-certiorari-can-be-issued-only-in-exercise-of-supervisory-jurisdiction-which-is-different-from-appellate-jurisdiction-hc-reiterates\/\",\"name\":\"Jhar HC | [Interference under Art. 226] A writ of certiorari can be issued only in exercise of supervisory jurisdiction which is different from appellate jurisdiction; HC reiterates | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-01-05T08:50:11+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-01-08T06:33:00+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/05\/jhar-hc-interference-under-arti-226-a-writ-of-certiorari-can-be-issued-only-in-exercise-of-supervisory-jurisdiction-which-is-different-from-appellate-jurisdiction-hc-reiterates\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/05\/jhar-hc-interference-under-arti-226-a-writ-of-certiorari-can-be-issued-only-in-exercise-of-supervisory-jurisdiction-which-is-different-from-appellate-jurisdiction-hc-reiterates\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/05\/jhar-hc-interference-under-arti-226-a-writ-of-certiorari-can-be-issued-only-in-exercise-of-supervisory-jurisdiction-which-is-different-from-appellate-jurisdiction-hc-reiterates\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jhar HC | [Interference under Art. 226] A writ of certiorari can be issued only in exercise of supervisory jurisdiction which is different from appellate jurisdiction; HC reiterates\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Jhar HC | [Interference under Art. 226] A writ of certiorari can be issued only in exercise of supervisory jurisdiction which is different from appellate jurisdiction; HC reiterates | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/05\/jhar-hc-interference-under-arti-226-a-writ-of-certiorari-can-be-issued-only-in-exercise-of-supervisory-jurisdiction-which-is-different-from-appellate-jurisdiction-hc-reiterates\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Jhar HC | [Interference under Art. 226] A writ of certiorari can be issued only in exercise of supervisory jurisdiction which is different from appellate jurisdiction; HC reiterates","og_description":"Jharkhand High Court: A Division Bench of Dr Ravi Ranjan, CJ. and Sujit Narayan Prasad, J. while dismissing the present appeal, relied","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/05\/jhar-hc-interference-under-arti-226-a-writ-of-certiorari-can-be-issued-only-in-exercise-of-supervisory-jurisdiction-which-is-different-from-appellate-jurisdiction-hc-reiterates\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-01-05T08:50:11+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-01-08T06:33:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/Jharkhand-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/05\/jhar-hc-interference-under-arti-226-a-writ-of-certiorari-can-be-issued-only-in-exercise-of-supervisory-jurisdiction-which-is-different-from-appellate-jurisdiction-hc-reiterates\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/05\/jhar-hc-interference-under-arti-226-a-writ-of-certiorari-can-be-issued-only-in-exercise-of-supervisory-jurisdiction-which-is-different-from-appellate-jurisdiction-hc-reiterates\/","name":"Jhar HC | [Interference under Art. 226] A writ of certiorari can be issued only in exercise of supervisory jurisdiction which is different from appellate jurisdiction; HC reiterates | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-01-05T08:50:11+00:00","dateModified":"2021-01-08T06:33:00+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/05\/jhar-hc-interference-under-arti-226-a-writ-of-certiorari-can-be-issued-only-in-exercise-of-supervisory-jurisdiction-which-is-different-from-appellate-jurisdiction-hc-reiterates\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/05\/jhar-hc-interference-under-arti-226-a-writ-of-certiorari-can-be-issued-only-in-exercise-of-supervisory-jurisdiction-which-is-different-from-appellate-jurisdiction-hc-reiterates\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/05\/jhar-hc-interference-under-arti-226-a-writ-of-certiorari-can-be-issued-only-in-exercise-of-supervisory-jurisdiction-which-is-different-from-appellate-jurisdiction-hc-reiterates\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jhar HC | [Interference under Art. 226] A writ of certiorari can be issued only in exercise of supervisory jurisdiction which is different from appellate jurisdiction; HC reiterates"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":217220,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/23\/utt-hc-error-of-law-can-be-corrected-by-a-writ-but-not-an-error-of-fact-held-the-jurisdiction-to-issue-a-writ-of-certiorari-is-supervisory-and-not-appellate\/","url_meta":{"origin":241779,"position":0},"title":"Utt HC | Error of law can be corrected by a writ but not an error of fact; held, the jurisdiction to issue a writ of certiorari is supervisory and not appellate","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 23, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: A Division Bench of Ramesh Ranganathan, C.J. and Alok Kumar Verma, J. entertained a writ petition which was initially filed in the Allahabad High Court in 1994. Factual matrix of the case was that the petitioner was appointed as a Panchayat Mantri and thereafter the Panchayat Mantries\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":258148,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/06\/can-executing-courts-order-for-enforcement-of-arbitral-award-be-challenged-under-art-226\/","url_meta":{"origin":241779,"position":1},"title":"All HC | Can Executing Court’s order for enforcement of arbitral award be challenged under Art. 226? HC decides","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 6, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: Dr Yogendra Kumar Srivastava, J., held that, Section 36 of the 1996 Act makes the arbitral award capable of being enforced in a like manner as a decree without any further judicial intervention. Instant petition was filed under Section 226 of the Constitution of India principally seeking\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":259557,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/05\/high-court-cannot-treat-itself-a-court-of-appeal-while-entertaining-writ-of-certiorari\/","url_meta":{"origin":241779,"position":2},"title":"Utt HC | High Court cannot treat itself a court of appeal while entertaining writ of certiorari","author":"Editor","date":"January 5, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: The Division Bench of S.K, Mishra ACJ. & N.S. Dhanik J., dismissed a petition filed against Claim Petition No. 05\/NB\/DB\/2014. The petitioners prayed for quashing of the judgment and order dated 20-06-2018 passed by the Uttarakhand Public Services Tribunal and to issue a writ in the nature\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":215755,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/14\/utt-hc-judgment-of-a-competent-court-is-binding-inter-parties-and-cannot-be-re-agitated-in-collateral-proceedings-even-if-erroneous\/","url_meta":{"origin":241779,"position":3},"title":"Utt HC | Judgment of a Competent Court is binding inter-parties and cannot be re-agitated in collateral proceedings even if erroneous","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 14, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: A Division Bench of Ramesh Ranganathan and R.C. Khulbe, JJ. contemplated a writ petition, where the petitioner who was an Assistant Professor, sought certiorari to quash the order of recovery of money along with interest. The petitioner further sought mandamus to direct the respondent-State University to re-examine\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":215570,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/11\/ori-hc-no-ambit-of-writ-of-certiorari-under-article-226-when-there-is-neither-procedural-irregularity-in-conducting-inquiry-nor-violation-of-natural-justice\/","url_meta":{"origin":241779,"position":4},"title":"Ori HC | No ambit of writ of certiorari under Article 226 when there is neither procedural irregularity in conducting inquiry nor violation of natural justice","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 11, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Orissa High Court: A Division Bench of S.K. Mishra and Dr A.K. Mishra, JJ., dismissed the writ petition against the judgment declining interference in the disciplinary proceeding and order imposing the punishment of compulsory retirement. The facts of the case were that appellant-petitioner was appointed as an officer of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":299952,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/24\/supreme-court-discusses-principles-governing-issuance-of-writ-of-certiorari-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":241779,"position":5},"title":"Supreme Court Ruling on the Principles governing issuance of Writ of Certiorari: All you need to know","author":"Editor","date":"August 24, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe purpose of certiorari is only to confine the inferior tribunals within their jurisdiction, so as to avoid the irregular exercise, or the non-exercise or the illegal assumption of it and not to correct errors of finding of fact or interpretation of law committed by them in the exercise of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"writ of certiorari","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/writ-of-certiorari.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/writ-of-certiorari.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/writ-of-certiorari.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/writ-of-certiorari.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/241779","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=241779"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/241779\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=241779"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=241779"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=241779"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}