{"id":241320,"date":"2020-12-25T16:40:31","date_gmt":"2020-12-25T11:10:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=241320"},"modified":"2020-12-31T19:47:46","modified_gmt":"2020-12-31T14:17:46","slug":"j-order-of-detention-set-aside","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/25\/j-order-of-detention-set-aside\/","title":{"rendered":"J&K HC | Court is not barred from scrutinizing the subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority in any given case; Order of detention set aside"},"content":{"rendered":"

Jammu and Kashmir High Court: <\/strong>Puneet Gupta, J., while setting aside the detention order, reiterated that subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority is not immune from judicial reviewability.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/strong>Background<\/strong><\/p>\n

The petitioner has challenged detention order dated 10-03-2020, passed by respondent 2, whereby the petitioner Mohd. Amin Dar has been detained in terms of Section 3 of Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988 The detention order has been challenged on the ground that<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. The grounds of detention are vague and non-existent.<\/li>\n
  2. That the order has been passed on an alleged single activity of the petitioner.<\/li>\n
  3. That the petitioner was already in custody in FIR No. 27 of 2020 registered with Police Station, Magam and had neither applied for bail nor was bail due to him in view of the provisions of NDPS Act.<\/li>\n
  4. That no reason has been given which compelled the respondents to issue the order of detention.<\/li>\n
  5. That the respondent only relied upon police dossier and the copy of dossier and the material have not been provided to the petitioner while detaining the petitioner.<\/li>\n
  6. That the petitioner only understands Urdu and Kashmiri language whereas the detention order was in English and the translated version of the detention order has not been provided to the petitioner thereby depriving him of making effective representation in the matter.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    \u00a0<\/strong>Issue<\/strong><\/p>\n

    Whether detention order made stands in compliance with the statutory provisions restricting personal liberty?<\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/strong>Observations<\/strong><\/p>\n

    In pursuance of its decision, Court observed,<\/p>\n

    \u201cMerely informing the petitioner that the petitioner has right to be heard in person by the competent authority does not fulfill the responsibility of the respondents unless the petitioner has been provided with the relevant material as stated above. The providing of material by the detaining authority is not mere formality and if the same is not done by the detaining authority the detention order cannot be upheld in law.\u201d <\/em>With respect to the alleged grounds of detention being bad in law, the Court noted, \u201cThe order of detention cannot be passed on mere assumptions and the detaining authority has to address itself to the question if the ordinary law to which the petitioner is subjected to, is sufficient to deal with the situation.\u201d <\/em>Reliance was further placed on, Rekha v. State of Tamil Nadu,<\/em> (2011) 5 SCC 244, wherein the Supreme Court held, \u201cwhenever an order under a preventive detention law is challenged one of the questions the court must ask in deciding its legality is: Was the ordinary law of the land sufficient to deal with the situation? If the answer is in the affirmative, the detention order will be illegal. In the present case, the charge against the detenue was of selling expired drugs after changing their labels. Surely the relevant provisions in the Indian Penal Code and the Drugs and Cosmetics Act were sufficient to deal with this situation. Hence, in our opinion, for this reason also the detention order in question was illegal.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/strong>Decision<\/strong><\/p>\n

    Quashing the said detention order, the Court held, \u201c\u2026the detention order is bad for the reason that the necessary material was not provided to the petitioner, the single alleged act of the petitioner was not sufficient to invoke the detention order and that the petitioner has been deprived of his right to representation before the competent authority in an effective manner as he was deprived of the relevant material which formed basis of detention order.\u201d<\/em>[Mohammad Amin Dar v. UT of J&K, 2020 SCC OnLine J&K 692<\/b><\/a>, decided on 23-12-2020]<\/p>\n

    \n

    Sakshi Shukla, Editorial Assistant hs put this story together<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Jammu and Kashmir High Court: Puneet Gupta, J., while setting aside the detention order, reiterated that subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[32944,12931,29785],"class_list":["post-241320","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-detaining-authority","tag-detention-order","tag-law"],"yoast_head":"\nJ&K HC | Court is not barred from scrutinizing the subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority in any given case; Order of detention set aside | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/25\/j-order-of-detention-set-aside\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"J&K HC | Court is not barred from scrutinizing the subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority in any given case; Order of detention set aside\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: Puneet Gupta, J., while setting aside the detention order, reiterated that subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/25\/j-order-of-detention-set-aside\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-12-25T11:10:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-12-31T14:17:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/JK-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/12\\\/25\\\/j-order-of-detention-set-aside\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/12\\\/25\\\/j-order-of-detention-set-aside\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Editor\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"headline\":\"J&K HC | Court is not barred from scrutinizing the subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority in any given case; Order of detention set aside\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-12-25T11:10:31+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-12-31T14:17:46+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/12\\\/25\\\/j-order-of-detention-set-aside\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":614,\"commentCount\":0,\"keywords\":[\"detaining authority\",\"detention order\",\"law\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/12\\\/25\\\/j-order-of-detention-set-aside\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/12\\\/25\\\/j-order-of-detention-set-aside\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/12\\\/25\\\/j-order-of-detention-set-aside\\\/\",\"name\":\"J&K HC | Court is not barred from scrutinizing the subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority in any given case; Order of detention set aside | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-12-25T11:10:31+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-12-31T14:17:46+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/12\\\/25\\\/j-order-of-detention-set-aside\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/12\\\/25\\\/j-order-of-detention-set-aside\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/12\\\/25\\\/j-order-of-detention-set-aside\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"J&K HC | Court is not barred from scrutinizing the subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority in any given case; Order of detention set aside\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_4\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"J&K HC | Court is not barred from scrutinizing the subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority in any given case; Order of detention set aside | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/25\/j-order-of-detention-set-aside\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"J&K HC | Court is not barred from scrutinizing the subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority in any given case; Order of detention set aside","og_description":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: Puneet Gupta, J., while setting aside the detention order, reiterated that subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/25\/j-order-of-detention-set-aside\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-12-25T11:10:31+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-12-31T14:17:46+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/JK-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/25\/j-order-of-detention-set-aside\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/25\/j-order-of-detention-set-aside\/"},"author":{"name":"Editor","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"headline":"J&K HC | Court is not barred from scrutinizing the subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority in any given case; Order of detention set aside","datePublished":"2020-12-25T11:10:31+00:00","dateModified":"2020-12-31T14:17:46+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/25\/j-order-of-detention-set-aside\/"},"wordCount":614,"commentCount":0,"keywords":["detaining authority","detention order","law"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/25\/j-order-of-detention-set-aside\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/25\/j-order-of-detention-set-aside\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/25\/j-order-of-detention-set-aside\/","name":"J&K HC | Court is not barred from scrutinizing the subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority in any given case; Order of detention set aside | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-12-25T11:10:31+00:00","dateModified":"2020-12-31T14:17:46+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/25\/j-order-of-detention-set-aside\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/25\/j-order-of-detention-set-aside\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/25\/j-order-of-detention-set-aside\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"J&K HC | Court is not barred from scrutinizing the subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority in any given case; Order of detention set aside"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":247940,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/08\/jk-hc-non-application-of-mind-by-detaining-authority-is-fatal-hc-sets-aside-order-of-preventive-detention-for-alleged-involvement-in-militant-activities\/","url_meta":{"origin":241320,"position":0},"title":"J&K HC| \u201cNon-application of mind by detaining authority is fatal\u201d HC sets aside order of preventive detention for alleged involvement in militant activities","author":"Editor","date":"May 8, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: Sanjeev Kumar, J. heard the instant petition against the impugned order passed by District Magistrate (the detaining authority), by which the petitioner had been detained in preventive detention to preventing him from indulging in the activities which were prejudicial to the security of Union Territory.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":247740,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/30\/jamat-i-islami\/","url_meta":{"origin":241320,"position":1},"title":"J&K HC | [Jamat-i-Islami] HC quashes preventive detention order holding opportunity to effective representation an essential pre-requisite","author":"Editor","date":"April 30, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: Sanjeev Kumar, J., heard the instant petition presented by the wife of the Petitioner to assail his detention ordered by District Magistrate, Pulwama under Preventive Detention law. The Bench opined, \u201cTwo FIRs, pertain to the offences under NDPS Act and, therefore, if the petitioner was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":216115,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/26\/jk-hc-preventive-detention-an-invasion-to-personal-liberty-guaranteed-under-article-21-therefore-order-must-be-passed-after-following-procedural-safeguards\/","url_meta":{"origin":241320,"position":2},"title":"J&K HC | Preventive detention: An invasion to personal liberty guaranteed under Art. 21 \u2013 therefore order must be passed after following procedural safeguards","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 26, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: Rashid Ali Dar, J. set aside the detention order passed by respondent 2-District Magistrate, Baramulla and ordered the detenu to be released from preventive custody. In the present case, the petitioner had challenged a detention order passed by respondent 2 whereby the petitioner was taken\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":241660,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/04\/jk-hc-even-in-cases-where-a-person-has-been-prosecuted-in-a-court-of-law-and-has-been-discharged-by-the-magistrate-a-valid-order-of-detention-can-be-passed-against-him-in-connection-with-that-very\/","url_meta":{"origin":241320,"position":3},"title":"J&K HC | Even in cases where a person has been prosecuted in a Court of law and has been discharged by the Magistrate, a valid order of detention can be passed against him in connection with that very incident; HC reiterates","author":"Editor","date":"January 4, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: Rajnesh Oswal, J., while rejecting the present petition on lack of merits, said, \u201c\u2026this Court is of the considered view that the order of detention impugned has been issued by the detaining authority well within the parameters of law and no fault can be found\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":234060,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/18\/jk-hc-mere-reproduction-of-police-dossier-in-detention-order-cannot-justify-judicial-application-of-mind-and-is-reflective-of-callous-attitude-of-authorities\/","url_meta":{"origin":241320,"position":4},"title":"J&K HC | Mere reproduction of police dossier in detention order cannot justify judicial application of mind and is reflective of callous attitude of authorities","author":"Editor","date":"August 18, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: Puneet Gupta, J. dismissed the writ petition and set aside the detention order on the grounds that it did not stand the test of law. According to the factual background of the present case, the petitioner has challenged the order passed by the respondent whereby\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":280682,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/30\/set-aside-detention-order-conservation-foreign-exchange-prevention-smuggling-activities-act-legal-news-legal-research-update\/","url_meta":{"origin":241320,"position":5},"title":"Failure and non-supply of legible\/translated copies of documents despite a request renders the order of detention illegal and bad in law; Delhi High Court sets aside the COFEPOSA detention order","author":"Editor","date":"December 30, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Detaining Authority gravely erred in relying upon the illegible documents which is equivalent to non-placement of translated-RUDs in a language which the detenu understands, which consequently vitiates the \u2018subjective satisfaction\u2019 arrived at by the Detaining Authority.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/241320","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=241320"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/241320\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=241320"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=241320"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=241320"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}