{"id":241018,"date":"2020-12-21T12:00:27","date_gmt":"2020-12-21T06:30:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=241018"},"modified":"2020-12-25T11:19:54","modified_gmt":"2020-12-25T05:49:54","slug":"ni-act-kar-hc-in-a-case-where-both-the-complainant-and-the-accused-remained-continuously-absent-court-ought-to-have-dismissed-the-complaint-for-non-prosecution-under-s-256-crpc-and-not","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/21\/ni-act-kar-hc-in-a-case-where-both-the-complainant-and-the-accused-remained-continuously-absent-court-ought-to-have-dismissed-the-complaint-for-non-prosecution-under-s-256-crpc-and-not\/","title":{"rendered":"[NI Act] Kar HC | In a case where both the complainant and the accused remained continuously absent, Court ought to have \u201cdismissed the complaint for non prosecution under S. 256 CrPC and not on merits\u201d"},"content":{"rendered":"

Karnataka High Court:<\/strong> John Michael Cunha J., allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned judgment.<\/p>\n

The case involves default under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 wherein after the complaint was made summons were issued to the respondent. The complainant examined himself and produced 8 documents pertaining to his claim as evidence. However, during the trial accused remained continuously absent. Hence the Trial Court dismissed the complaint stating that further cross-examination of PW1 was taken as \u201cnot tendered for further cross-examination\u201d. When the complainant failed to tender himself for cross-examination, the only course open for the court was to eschew the entire evidence from record and as a result no evidence would have been available before the Trial Court to render a finding on merits of the case, But unfortunately the Trial Court proceeded to discuss the matter on merits and held that the complainant has failed to prove the existence of the debt or other liability and hence acquitted the accused. Aggrieved by the same, present appeal was filed.<\/p>\n

Counsel for the complainant submitted that such procedure is legally untenable and cannot be approved.<\/p>\n

The Court observed that when no legal evidence was available on record, the Trial Court could have passed an order on merits and rejected the claim of the complainant. It was further observed that the order sheet clearly indicates that not only the accused but also the complainant remained continuously absent.<\/p>\n

Thus, the Court held that the trial Court ought to have dismissed the complaint about non-prosecution under Section 256 of the Criminal Procedure Code and not on merits. It further held that complainant is equally responsible for keeping the matter pending for more than 4 years from 2016 onwards.<\/p>\n

In view of the above, the appeal was allowed and the impugned order was set aside. [Karage Gowda v. S. Nagaraj, 2020 SCC OnLine Kar 2012<\/b><\/a>, decided on 11-12-2020]<\/p>\n

\n

Arunima Bose, Editorial Assistant has put this story together<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Karnataka High Court: John Michael Cunha J., allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned judgment. The case involves default under Section <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[8991,9121,28334,29785,36270,30606,44560,7181],"class_list":["post-241018","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-appeal","tag-cross-examination","tag-karnataka-high-court","tag-law","tag-legal-evidence","tag-ni-act","tag-section-256-crpc","tag-trial-court"],"yoast_head":"\n[NI Act] Kar HC | In a case where both the complainant and the accused remained continuously absent, Court ought to have \u201cdismissed the complaint for non prosecution under S. 256 CrPC and not on merits\u201d | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/21\/ni-act-kar-hc-in-a-case-where-both-the-complainant-and-the-accused-remained-continuously-absent-court-ought-to-have-dismissed-the-complaint-for-non-prosecution-under-s-256-crpc-and-not\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"[NI Act] Kar HC | In a case where both the complainant and the accused remained continuously absent, Court ought to have \u201cdismissed the complaint for non prosecution under S. 256 CrPC and not on merits\u201d\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Karnataka High Court: John Michael Cunha J., allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned judgment. The case involves default under Section\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/21\/ni-act-kar-hc-in-a-case-where-both-the-complainant-and-the-accused-remained-continuously-absent-court-ought-to-have-dismissed-the-complaint-for-non-prosecution-under-s-256-crpc-and-not\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-12-21T06:30:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-12-25T05:49:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3499-e1487871967209.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/12\\\/21\\\/ni-act-kar-hc-in-a-case-where-both-the-complainant-and-the-accused-remained-continuously-absent-court-ought-to-have-dismissed-the-complaint-for-non-prosecution-under-s-256-crpc-and-not\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/12\\\/21\\\/ni-act-kar-hc-in-a-case-where-both-the-complainant-and-the-accused-remained-continuously-absent-court-ought-to-have-dismissed-the-complaint-for-non-prosecution-under-s-256-crpc-and-not\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Editor\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"headline\":\"[NI Act] Kar HC | In a case where both the complainant and the accused remained continuously absent, Court ought to have \u201cdismissed the complaint for non prosecution under S. 256 CrPC and not on merits\u201d\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-12-21T06:30:27+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-12-25T05:49:54+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/12\\\/21\\\/ni-act-kar-hc-in-a-case-where-both-the-complainant-and-the-accused-remained-continuously-absent-court-ought-to-have-dismissed-the-complaint-for-non-prosecution-under-s-256-crpc-and-not\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":351,\"commentCount\":0,\"keywords\":[\"Appeal\",\"cross-examination\",\"Karnataka High Court\",\"law\",\"Legal Evidence\",\"NI Act\",\"Section 256 CrPC\",\"Trial Court\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/12\\\/21\\\/ni-act-kar-hc-in-a-case-where-both-the-complainant-and-the-accused-remained-continuously-absent-court-ought-to-have-dismissed-the-complaint-for-non-prosecution-under-s-256-crpc-and-not\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/12\\\/21\\\/ni-act-kar-hc-in-a-case-where-both-the-complainant-and-the-accused-remained-continuously-absent-court-ought-to-have-dismissed-the-complaint-for-non-prosecution-under-s-256-crpc-and-not\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/12\\\/21\\\/ni-act-kar-hc-in-a-case-where-both-the-complainant-and-the-accused-remained-continuously-absent-court-ought-to-have-dismissed-the-complaint-for-non-prosecution-under-s-256-crpc-and-not\\\/\",\"name\":\"[NI Act] Kar HC | In a case where both the complainant and the accused remained continuously absent, Court ought to have \u201cdismissed the complaint for non prosecution under S. 256 CrPC and not on merits\u201d | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-12-21T06:30:27+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-12-25T05:49:54+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/12\\\/21\\\/ni-act-kar-hc-in-a-case-where-both-the-complainant-and-the-accused-remained-continuously-absent-court-ought-to-have-dismissed-the-complaint-for-non-prosecution-under-s-256-crpc-and-not\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/12\\\/21\\\/ni-act-kar-hc-in-a-case-where-both-the-complainant-and-the-accused-remained-continuously-absent-court-ought-to-have-dismissed-the-complaint-for-non-prosecution-under-s-256-crpc-and-not\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/12\\\/21\\\/ni-act-kar-hc-in-a-case-where-both-the-complainant-and-the-accused-remained-continuously-absent-court-ought-to-have-dismissed-the-complaint-for-non-prosecution-under-s-256-crpc-and-not\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"[NI Act] Kar HC | In a case where both the complainant and the accused remained continuously absent, Court ought to have \u201cdismissed the complaint for non prosecution under S. 256 CrPC and not on merits\u201d\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_4\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"[NI Act] Kar HC | In a case where both the complainant and the accused remained continuously absent, Court ought to have \u201cdismissed the complaint for non prosecution under S. 256 CrPC and not on merits\u201d | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/21\/ni-act-kar-hc-in-a-case-where-both-the-complainant-and-the-accused-remained-continuously-absent-court-ought-to-have-dismissed-the-complaint-for-non-prosecution-under-s-256-crpc-and-not\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"[NI Act] Kar HC | In a case where both the complainant and the accused remained continuously absent, Court ought to have \u201cdismissed the complaint for non prosecution under S. 256 CrPC and not on merits\u201d","og_description":"Karnataka High Court: John Michael Cunha J., allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned judgment. The case involves default under Section","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/21\/ni-act-kar-hc-in-a-case-where-both-the-complainant-and-the-accused-remained-continuously-absent-court-ought-to-have-dismissed-the-complaint-for-non-prosecution-under-s-256-crpc-and-not\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-12-21T06:30:27+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-12-25T05:49:54+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3499-e1487871967209.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/21\/ni-act-kar-hc-in-a-case-where-both-the-complainant-and-the-accused-remained-continuously-absent-court-ought-to-have-dismissed-the-complaint-for-non-prosecution-under-s-256-crpc-and-not\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/21\/ni-act-kar-hc-in-a-case-where-both-the-complainant-and-the-accused-remained-continuously-absent-court-ought-to-have-dismissed-the-complaint-for-non-prosecution-under-s-256-crpc-and-not\/"},"author":{"name":"Editor","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"headline":"[NI Act] Kar HC | In a case where both the complainant and the accused remained continuously absent, Court ought to have \u201cdismissed the complaint for non prosecution under S. 256 CrPC and not on merits\u201d","datePublished":"2020-12-21T06:30:27+00:00","dateModified":"2020-12-25T05:49:54+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/21\/ni-act-kar-hc-in-a-case-where-both-the-complainant-and-the-accused-remained-continuously-absent-court-ought-to-have-dismissed-the-complaint-for-non-prosecution-under-s-256-crpc-and-not\/"},"wordCount":351,"commentCount":0,"keywords":["Appeal","cross-examination","Karnataka High Court","law","Legal Evidence","NI Act","Section 256 CrPC","Trial Court"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/21\/ni-act-kar-hc-in-a-case-where-both-the-complainant-and-the-accused-remained-continuously-absent-court-ought-to-have-dismissed-the-complaint-for-non-prosecution-under-s-256-crpc-and-not\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/21\/ni-act-kar-hc-in-a-case-where-both-the-complainant-and-the-accused-remained-continuously-absent-court-ought-to-have-dismissed-the-complaint-for-non-prosecution-under-s-256-crpc-and-not\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/21\/ni-act-kar-hc-in-a-case-where-both-the-complainant-and-the-accused-remained-continuously-absent-court-ought-to-have-dismissed-the-complaint-for-non-prosecution-under-s-256-crpc-and-not\/","name":"[NI Act] Kar HC | In a case where both the complainant and the accused remained continuously absent, Court ought to have \u201cdismissed the complaint for non prosecution under S. 256 CrPC and not on merits\u201d | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-12-21T06:30:27+00:00","dateModified":"2020-12-25T05:49:54+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/21\/ni-act-kar-hc-in-a-case-where-both-the-complainant-and-the-accused-remained-continuously-absent-court-ought-to-have-dismissed-the-complaint-for-non-prosecution-under-s-256-crpc-and-not\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/21\/ni-act-kar-hc-in-a-case-where-both-the-complainant-and-the-accused-remained-continuously-absent-court-ought-to-have-dismissed-the-complaint-for-non-prosecution-under-s-256-crpc-and-not\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/21\/ni-act-kar-hc-in-a-case-where-both-the-complainant-and-the-accused-remained-continuously-absent-court-ought-to-have-dismissed-the-complaint-for-non-prosecution-under-s-256-crpc-and-not\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"[NI Act] Kar HC | In a case where both the complainant and the accused remained continuously absent, Court ought to have \u201cdismissed the complaint for non prosecution under S. 256 CrPC and not on merits\u201d"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/241018","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=241018"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/241018\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=241018"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=241018"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=241018"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}