{"id":240888,"date":"2020-12-18T14:20:31","date_gmt":"2020-12-18T08:50:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=240888"},"modified":"2021-02-08T12:09:39","modified_gmt":"2021-02-08T06:39:39","slug":"del-hc-interdigital-v-xiaomi-constitution-of-a-two-tier-confidentiality-club-in-standard-essentials-patent-litigation-read-why-hc-considered-such-an-arrangement-to-be-against","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/18\/del-hc-interdigital-v-xiaomi-constitution-of-a-two-tier-confidentiality-club-in-standard-essentials-patent-litigation-read-why-hc-considered-such-an-arrangement-to-be-against\/","title":{"rendered":"Del HC | [InterDigital v. Xiaomi] Constitution of  a \u201ctwo-tier\u201d Confidentiality Club in Standard Essential Patents Litigation: Read why HC considered such an arrangement to be against the principles of natural justice &#038; fair play"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Delhi High Court:<\/strong> C. Hari Shankar, J., after a wholesome discussion, rejected the idea of the constitution of a &#8220;two-tier&#8221; Confidentiality Club proposed by InterDigital Technology Corporation, and instead suggested the terms for constitution of a single-tier Confidentiality Club.<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #003366;\">Factual Background<\/span><\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Xiaomi Corporation has been sued by Interdigital Technology Corporation alleging infringement of Indian Patents Nos <span style=\"font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;\">262910, 295912, 298719, 313036 and 320182.<\/span><\/p>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Standard Essential Patents (SEPs)<\/span><\/h4>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Xiaomi has been using the technology contained in Standard Essential Patents (SEPs) without obtaining the license from Interdigital.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hence in view of the above, Interdigital has sought a permanent injunction against Xiaomi from manufacturing, selling, assembling, distributing, advertising, exporting, importing or using, in their devices, technology which infringes the SEPs.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In the alternative, a direction has also been sought to XIAOMI, to take a license from Interdigital, for usage of its SEPs, on fair reasonable and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms to be fixed by this Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">InterDigital filed IA&#8217;s under Oder XXXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and Chapter VII Rule 17 of the Delhi High Court (Original Side) Rule, 2018.<\/p>\n<div class=\"page\" title=\"Page 3\">\n<div class=\"layoutArea\">\n<div class=\"column\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\"><strong>Chapter VII Rule 17 of the Original Side Rules reads thus:<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>\u201c17. Confidentiality Club. \u2013<\/strong> <\/span>When parties to a commercial suit wish to rely on documents\/information that are commercially or otherwise confidential in nature, the Court may constitute a Confidentiality Club so as to allow limited access to such documents\/information. In doing so, the Court may set up a structure\/protocol, for the establishment and functioning of such Club, as it may deem appropriate. An illustrative structure\/protocol of the Confidentiality Club is provided in Annexure F. The Court may appropriately mould the structure\/protocol of the Club, based upon the facts and circumstances of each case.\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Confidentiality Club Regime<\/span><\/strong> is standard protocol, especially while dealing with litigations involving allegation of patent infringement.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bench in the instant case is concerned whether the Confidentiality Club could be set up in the manner sought by InterDigital.<\/p>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\">What kind of Confidentiality Club does Interdigital seeks to be set up?<\/span><\/h4>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">It seeks <span style=\"font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;\">setting up of a \u201ctwo-tier\u201d Confidentiality Club, comprising an \u201couter tier\u201d and an \u201cinner tier\u201d. The documents which would be open to the members of the \u201couter tier\u201d, are denoted, in the application of InterDigital, as \u201cConfidential Information\u201d, whereas the documents, to which members of the \u201cinner tier\u201d alone would have access, had been denoted as \u201cLegal Eyes Only (LEO) Confidential Information\u201d.<\/span><\/p>\n<div class=\"page\" title=\"Page 4\">\n<div class=\"layoutArea\">\n<div class=\"column\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Parties, as well as their officials and employees, would have no access to the \u201cinner tier\u201d documents.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>Mr Parvin Anand has stated that the exclusion of representatives of the parties, from having access to the inner tier documents is non-negotiable.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Bench posed two queries to Mr Parvin Anand, which were as follows:<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li>How an advocate could be expected to be appropriately instructed, if he is unable to share, with his clients, the material on which the OP seeks to rely?<\/li>\n<li>How the Court could come between the advocate and his client, insofar as the &#8220;inner tier&#8221; documents were concerned, and injunct the advocate from disclosing the documents to his client?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Wouldn&#8217;t the above-stated amount to an unwelcome and unjustified, incursion by the Court into the sacred space that exists between the client and counsel?<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mr Anand submitted that no occasion would arise for the Court to come in between the client and counsel as, if this Court were to accede to the prayer, of InterDigital, <span style=\"font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;\">for setting up of the \u201ctwo-tier\u201d Confidentiality Club, it would be for Xiaomi to instruct its Counsel not to disclose, to it, the \u201cinner tier\u201d documents.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Court was befuddled with the above response and expressed that it does not understand how the Court could insist on Xiaomi contracting with its counsel to keep documents shown to its counsel and on which InterDigital relies against Xiaomi, undisclosed to Xiaomi itself.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hence, the Court held that it cannot by judicial fiat, impose any such contractual dispensation between Xiaomi and its Counsel.<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\"><strong><u>Bench\u2019s opinion on setting up of \u2018Confidentiality Club\u2019<\/u><\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bench in very clear words opined that the mere fact that Courts, overseas, may have acquiesced to the setting up of such Confidentiality Clubs cannot be of any substantial significance, in deciding the present application of InterDigital.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bench relied on the decision of this Court in <em>M. Sivasamy v. Vestergaard Frandsen A\/S, <\/em>2009 (113) DRJ 820 (DB), wherein the following was the Court\u2019s observation:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>\u201c\u2026with respect to the litigation in India, the Courts in this country would be guided by the provisions of the Laws as applicable in this country and the pleadings in the suit in this court and not by any orders or decisions of the foreign court, unless, the decision of the foreign Court becomes final and so that it can operate as res judicata between the parties and operate in the parameters of Section 13 and Section 44-A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. <\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>No useful purpose will be served in making reference to various orders of the Courts in the different countries as one does not know what are the ingredients\/requirements of causes of action of the different laws of those countries and what were the pleadings of the cases in the foreign courts.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\"><strong>Bench needs to decide on whether \u201ccomparable patent licence agreement\u201d could be justifiably included in an \u2018inner tier\u2019 of confidential documents, to be kept away from the eyes of the defendant, as well as all its officers and employees?<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Court denied the prayer for keeping certain documents, and information, inaccessible to Xiaomi and its personnel, and allow access, thereto, only to the advocates and experts nominated by Xiaomi.<\/p>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\">Whether \u201ctwo tier\u201d Confidentiality Club legally palatable in the mind of the Court or not?<\/span><\/h4>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In case the Court finds the request, of InterDigital, for setting up of a \u201ctwo-tier\u201d Confidentiality Club, to be acceptable, the benefit thereof would, naturally, ensure to Xiaomi as well. The question, therefore, is not whether Xiaomi would also get the benefit of such an arrangement, but of whether such an arrangement is, to the mind of the Court, legally palatable or not.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>No civil suit, be it for enforcement of rights relating to intellectual property, or any other right, can claim innocence to the rigour and discipline of the CPC and the Specific Relief Act, 1963.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Further, the Court observed:<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Whether either of the parties, to litigation, needs, or does not need, to see a particular document, would be a decision which essentially rests with the party itself.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Can InterDigital, simply put, assert that Xiaomi does not need to see a document on which InterDigital places reliance, to contest the case initiated by it against Xiaomi?<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For the above-stated Court\u2019s opinion was in negative and bench relied on the observations in the decision of <em>Transformative Learning Solutions v. Pawajot Kaur Baweja, <\/em><b><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/O7gmk257\">2019 SCC OnLine Del 9229<\/a>, <\/b><em>in paras 23 and 24.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Adding to its observations Court also stated that:<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Patent infringement, in the case of SEPs, has, however, a unique feature. A holder of a SEP is not entitled, of right, to seek an injunction against infringement of its SEP, merely on making out a case of such infringement. This, essentially, means that every holder of a SEP is required, in law, to agree to the licensing of its SEP to willing licensees.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Court noted that the plaintiff desires to include the license agreements in the \u2018inner tier\u2019 to be kept away from the eyes of the defendants as well as all their officers and employees.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>Bench found the above suggestion to be completely antithetical to, and destructive of, the most fundamental notions of natural justice and fair play.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Court <\/strong>again stressed upon the fact that while penning this judgment, it is only addressing the prayer of InterDigital, for the constitution of a two-tier Confidentiality Club, consisting of \u201cinner tier\u201d and \u201couter tier\u201d documents.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In line of the above position, Court remarked:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Permitting the constitution of such a Club would amount to granting blanket permission, to InterDigital, to keep certain documents away from Xiaomi, its officers and its employees.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Adding to the above, Court also stated that in case the parties are able to agree and arrive at a level playing field, then this judgment shall not come in the way of their doing so.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">As the Bench is only concerned with the issue of whether such an arrangement as being discussed can, against its wishes be imposed on Xiaomi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Court further dealt with the Annexure-F to the Original Side Rules which is cited as <strong>\u201can illustrative structure\/protocol of the Confidentiality Club\u201d<\/strong> which may be \u201cappropriately moulded\u201d by the Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Membership of the Confidentiality Club, constituted in the manner envisaged by Annexure F is, clearly, limited to three advocates and not more than two external experts. Mr Anand submitted, relying on this Annexure, that the parties, and their officials and representatives, may legitimately be excluded from the Confidentiality Club constituted by the Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bench asserted that, if InterDigital can come to terms with Xiaomi, and they agree, ad idem, to the constitution of such a Confidentiality Club, in which \u201cinner tier\u201d documents would remain away from the prying eyes of InterDigital and Xiaomi, as well as their officers and employees, this order shall not stand in their way. As of today, however, Xiaomi is not agreeable to such an arrangement.<\/p>\n<h3><span style=\"color: #008000;\">Client-Lawyer Relationship\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Further, stating that the client-lawyer relationship in Indian Law, has its own distinct incidents, Bench relied on the Supreme Court decision in <em>Himalayan Coop. Group Housing Society v. Balwan Singh, <\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/wH16kBmS\">(2015) 7 SCC 373<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Supreme Court in its\u2019 decision of <em>An Advocate v. B.B. Haradara, <\/em>1989 (1) ARC 72 (SC) <em>and Om Prakash v. Suresh Kumar, <\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/KfTCMtpV\">2020 SCC OnLine SC 100<\/a>, iterated that the duty of advocates to act, at all times, under instructions from their clients.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>SEP infringement litigation cannot be treated as a category <em>sui generis<\/em>, to which the principles enunciated in these decisions, as well as the Bar Council of India Rules, would not apply.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Court cannot trust such arrangements discussed above upon Xiaomi, without its consent, in the absence of any clear right having been established by InterDigital, for the imposition, on Xiaomi, of such an arrangement.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">During the course of the hearing, the thought came to the Court several times that \u2013 What if XIAOMI is unwilling &#8212; as it is, in the present case \u2013 for the 3<sup>rd<\/sup> party license agreements, on which InterDigital relies, to be shown only to its advocates and experts, and not its own officials of personnel?<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">What if Xiaomi says that it is not willing to contract, with its counsel, to keep undisclosed, from Xiaomi, the documents which have been shown to him?<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">To the above, Mr Pravin Anand submitted that, having involved Xiaomi in a litigative exercise, by filing the present suit against it, InterDigital can insist on Xiaomi prosecuting the suit, and defending itself against InterDigital, without being shown the documents on which InterDigital proposes to rely.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bench on hearing the above submission summarily rejected it.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Further, in Court\u2019s view, there can be no question of this Court lending its approval to any arrangement in which the third-party license agreements, constituting the very basis of the case set up by InterDigital against Xiaomi, remain undisclosed to Xiaomi, as well as its officials and personnel and are shown only to advocates (who are not in-house counsel) and experts. Any such arrangement would violate the provisions of the Bar Council Rules as well as the law laid down in various decisions including, inter alia, <em>Himalayan Coop. Group Housing Society v. Balwan Singh, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/wH16kBmS\">(2015) 7 SCC 373<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\"><strong>No setting up of a \u201ctwo-tier\u201d Confidentiality Club<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">While concluding its decision, Court held that there is substance in Mr Pravin Anand\u2019s submission that InterDigital cannot, very well, disclose details, in third-party license agreements which, as agreed between InterDigital and such third parties, are required to remain confidential. At the same time, InterDigital cannot, rely on such material against Xiaomi, holding the material back from the representatives of Xiaomi on the plea of confidentiality. InterDigital is, therefore, at liberty to redact, from the documents being treated as confidential, any such detail which, according to it, cannot be disclosed to any third party, including the representatives of Xiaomi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Though if, Xiaomi agrees to the constitution of such a Club, then this Order would not stand in its way.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Bench held that instead of a \u201ctwo-tier\u201d Confidentiality club, a single-tier Confidentiality Club can be constituted in the following terms:<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">(i) Each party shall nominate four advocates, six representatives and two experts, who would constitute the confidentiality club.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">(ii) The members of the confidentiality club alone shall be entitled to inspect the confidential information. In the case of the advocates and experts, such inspection would be to the extent such inspection is required in order to perform their professional duties in relation to the present proceedings on behalf of the party by whom they are engaged.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00a0(iii) The documents, regarded as \u201cconfidential information\u201d would be filed in sealed cover, to be retained with the Registrar General of this Court under seal and in safe custody.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">(iv) The members of the confidentiality club shall be entitled to inspect the confidential information before the Registrar General and, after the inspection is over, the documents and information shall be resealed and returned to the Registrar General.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00a0(v) The members of the confidentiality club shall be bound by confidentiality orders passed by this Court and will not be allowed to make copies, disclose or publish the contents of the confidential information or documents anywhere else or to any individuals who are not privy to the confidential information, including in other legal proceedings or oral and written communications to the press, etc.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">(vi) During the recording of evidence and other proceedings of this Court with respect to the confidential information, or when the confidential information is being looked at, only members of the confidentiality club shall be allowed to remain present. Such proceedings will be conducted in camera.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00a0 (vii) Any evidence, by way of affidavit or witness statement, containing confidential information shall also be kept in a sealed cover reflecting the confidential and designation, with the learned Registrar General, and would be accessible only to the members of the confidentiality club.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">(viii) Neither party would be permitted to rely on any material which is not disclosed to the nominated representatives (as opposed to advocates and experts) of the opposite party. Should either party feel that any details, contained in any document, cannot be shown to the nominated representatives of the opposite party, it is at liberty to redact such details or particulars from the document(s) in question. Needless to say, the party that redacts any particular is, in any document or evidence, shall not be permitted to rely on such a redacted particulars. It shall, however, be open to the opposite party to plead that disclosure of such redacted material is necessary for its defence. In such a case, the court would decide, on a document-to-document basis, whether redacting of the \u201cconfidential\u201d details, in the document, should, or should not, be allowed. This, in Court&#8217;s opinion, is the maximum extent to which the plea, of InterDigital, for keeping away, from the representatives of Xiaomi, \u201cconfidential\u201d details and documents, can be accommodated.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">(ix) The confidential documents\/information shall not be available for inspection after disposal of the matter, except to the parties producing the same.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hence, the application stands disposed of in the above terms. [Interdigital Technology Corpn. v. Xiaomi Corpn., <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/b83PZ4r7\"><b>2020 SCC OnLine Del 1633<\/b><\/a>, decided on 16-12-2020]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\"><strong>Advocates for the parties:<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span style=\"color: #993300;\">For the plaintiffs:<\/span> <span style=\"font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;\">Pravin Anand, Vaishali Mittal, Siddhant Chamola and . Pallavi Bhatnagar, <\/span><span style=\"font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;\">Advocates.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span style=\"color: #993300;\">For the Defendants:<\/span> <span style=\"font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;\">Saikrishna Rajagopal, Siddharth Chopra, Sneha Jain, Garima Sahney, Anu Paarcha, Dr Victor <\/span><span style=\"font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;\">Vaibhav Tandon, Arjun Gadhoke and Charu Grover, Advocates.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Delhi High Court: C. Hari Shankar, J., after a wholesome discussion, rejected the idea of the constitution of a &#8220;two-tier&#8221; Confidentiality Club <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2656,26624,44528,11391,44531,29785,3527,44533,44529,29944,44532,44530],"class_list":["post-240888","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-advocate","tag-bar-council-of-india-rules","tag-confidentiality-club-regime","tag-copyright-infringement","tag-interdigital","tag-law","tag-Lawyer","tag-license-agreements","tag-patent-infringement","tag-patents","tag-sep-infringement-litigation","tag-xiaomi"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Del HC | [InterDigital v. Xiaomi] Constitution of a \u201ctwo-tier\u201d Confidentiality Club in Standard Essential Patents Litigation: Read why HC considered such an arrangement to be against the principles of natural justice &amp; fair play | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/18\/del-hc-interdigital-v-xiaomi-constitution-of-a-two-tier-confidentiality-club-in-standard-essentials-patent-litigation-read-why-hc-considered-such-an-arrangement-to-be-against\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Del HC | [InterDigital v. Xiaomi] Constitution of a \u201ctwo-tier\u201d Confidentiality Club in Standard Essential Patents Litigation: Read why HC considered such an arrangement to be against the principles of natural justice &amp; fair play\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court: C. Hari Shankar, J., after a wholesome discussion, rejected the idea of the constitution of a &#8220;two-tier&#8221; Confidentiality Club\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/18\/del-hc-interdigital-v-xiaomi-constitution-of-a-two-tier-confidentiality-club-in-standard-essentials-patent-litigation-read-why-hc-considered-such-an-arrangement-to-be-against\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-12-18T08:50:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-02-08T06:39:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"13 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/18\/del-hc-interdigital-v-xiaomi-constitution-of-a-two-tier-confidentiality-club-in-standard-essentials-patent-litigation-read-why-hc-considered-such-an-arrangement-to-be-against\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/18\/del-hc-interdigital-v-xiaomi-constitution-of-a-two-tier-confidentiality-club-in-standard-essentials-patent-litigation-read-why-hc-considered-such-an-arrangement-to-be-against\/\",\"name\":\"Del HC | [InterDigital v. Xiaomi] Constitution of a \u201ctwo-tier\u201d Confidentiality Club in Standard Essential Patents Litigation: Read why HC considered such an arrangement to be against the principles of natural justice & fair play | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-12-18T08:50:31+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-02-08T06:39:39+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/18\/del-hc-interdigital-v-xiaomi-constitution-of-a-two-tier-confidentiality-club-in-standard-essentials-patent-litigation-read-why-hc-considered-such-an-arrangement-to-be-against\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/18\/del-hc-interdigital-v-xiaomi-constitution-of-a-two-tier-confidentiality-club-in-standard-essentials-patent-litigation-read-why-hc-considered-such-an-arrangement-to-be-against\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/18\/del-hc-interdigital-v-xiaomi-constitution-of-a-two-tier-confidentiality-club-in-standard-essentials-patent-litigation-read-why-hc-considered-such-an-arrangement-to-be-against\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Del HC | [InterDigital v. Xiaomi] Constitution of a \u201ctwo-tier\u201d Confidentiality Club in Standard Essential Patents Litigation: Read why HC considered such an arrangement to be against the principles of natural justice &#038; fair play\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Del HC | [InterDigital v. Xiaomi] Constitution of a \u201ctwo-tier\u201d Confidentiality Club in Standard Essential Patents Litigation: Read why HC considered such an arrangement to be against the principles of natural justice & fair play | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/18\/del-hc-interdigital-v-xiaomi-constitution-of-a-two-tier-confidentiality-club-in-standard-essentials-patent-litigation-read-why-hc-considered-such-an-arrangement-to-be-against\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Del HC | [InterDigital v. Xiaomi] Constitution of a \u201ctwo-tier\u201d Confidentiality Club in Standard Essential Patents Litigation: Read why HC considered such an arrangement to be against the principles of natural justice & fair play","og_description":"Delhi High Court: C. Hari Shankar, J., after a wholesome discussion, rejected the idea of the constitution of a &#8220;two-tier&#8221; Confidentiality Club","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/18\/del-hc-interdigital-v-xiaomi-constitution-of-a-two-tier-confidentiality-club-in-standard-essentials-patent-litigation-read-why-hc-considered-such-an-arrangement-to-be-against\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-12-18T08:50:31+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-02-08T06:39:39+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"13 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/18\/del-hc-interdigital-v-xiaomi-constitution-of-a-two-tier-confidentiality-club-in-standard-essentials-patent-litigation-read-why-hc-considered-such-an-arrangement-to-be-against\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/18\/del-hc-interdigital-v-xiaomi-constitution-of-a-two-tier-confidentiality-club-in-standard-essentials-patent-litigation-read-why-hc-considered-such-an-arrangement-to-be-against\/","name":"Del HC | [InterDigital v. Xiaomi] Constitution of a \u201ctwo-tier\u201d Confidentiality Club in Standard Essential Patents Litigation: Read why HC considered such an arrangement to be against the principles of natural justice & fair play | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-12-18T08:50:31+00:00","dateModified":"2021-02-08T06:39:39+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/18\/del-hc-interdigital-v-xiaomi-constitution-of-a-two-tier-confidentiality-club-in-standard-essentials-patent-litigation-read-why-hc-considered-such-an-arrangement-to-be-against\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/18\/del-hc-interdigital-v-xiaomi-constitution-of-a-two-tier-confidentiality-club-in-standard-essentials-patent-litigation-read-why-hc-considered-such-an-arrangement-to-be-against\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/18\/del-hc-interdigital-v-xiaomi-constitution-of-a-two-tier-confidentiality-club-in-standard-essentials-patent-litigation-read-why-hc-considered-such-an-arrangement-to-be-against\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Del HC | [InterDigital v. Xiaomi] Constitution of a \u201ctwo-tier\u201d Confidentiality Club in Standard Essential Patents Litigation: Read why HC considered such an arrangement to be against the principles of natural justice &#038; fair play"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":41991,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/05\/direction-giveb-for-constitution-of-confidentiality-club-for-obtaining-patent-licensing-agreements\/","url_meta":{"origin":240888,"position":0},"title":"Directed for Constitution of Confidentiality Club for obtaining Patent Licensing Agreements","author":"Sucheta","date":"April 5, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: In a matter arising out of a suit for permanent injunction to restrain violation and infringement of the plaintiff\u2019s patent rights, a Single Bench of Singh J. ordered the constitution of a Confidentiality Club comprising five persons from each side entitled to see the confidential patent license\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":356012,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/08\/del-hc-can-invoke-sec-104a-patents-act-for-disclosure-manufacturing-process\/","url_meta":{"origin":240888,"position":1},"title":"S. 104A of Patents Act can be invoked at interim stage for disclosure of manufacturing process : Inside Delhi HC verdict in Roche\u2019s plea seeking disclosure of Zydus\u2019s \u2018Sigrima\u2019 process","author":"Editor","date":"August 8, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The intent behind Section 104A of the Act is to shift the onus of proof from the plaintiff to the defendant in cases involving infringement of process patents. This is premised on the fact that the process adopted by a defendant in manufacturing its product would only be known to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi HC Section 104A Patents Act","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/delhi-80197898.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/delhi-80197898.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/delhi-80197898.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/delhi-80197898.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":350733,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/16\/khaitan-inox-interim-injunction-cryogas-copyright-confidentiality\/","url_meta":{"origin":240888,"position":2},"title":"Khaitan &amp; Co. represents Inox India in securing interim injunction against Cryogas in copyright and confidentiality dispute","author":"Editor","date":"June 16, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Khaitan & Co represented Inox India before the Baroda District Court in securing interim injunctive relief against Cryogas Equipment","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Law Firms News&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Law Firms News","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/law-firms-news\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Inox India interim injunction Cryogas","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/Inox-India-interim-injunction-Cryogas.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/Inox-India-interim-injunction-Cryogas.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/Inox-India-interim-injunction-Cryogas.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/Inox-India-interim-injunction-Cryogas.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":289272,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/12\/patent-infringement-requires-copying-only-essential-features-of-suit-patent-delhi-high-court-refuses-to-grant-injunction-legal-news-legal-research-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":240888,"position":3},"title":"Patent infringement requires copying only \u2018essential features\u2019 of suit patent; Delhi High Court refuses to grant injunction","author":"Aastha","date":"April 12, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court observed that \u201cDichotomizing the claims and the accompanying specifications is, therefore, contrary to the most fundamental canons of patent law.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":234394,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/21\/more-power-to-cci-the-delhi-hc-upholds-the-ccis-jurisdiction-to-probe-against-monsantos-abusive-practices\/","url_meta":{"origin":240888,"position":4},"title":"More Power to CCI \u2014 The Delhi HC upholds the CCIs Jurisdiction to probe against Monsanto\u2019s abusive practices","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 21, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Anshuman Sakle, Partner, Ruchi Verma, Associate and Nandini Pahari,Associate, Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas Cite as: (2020) PL (Comp. L) July 61","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/experts_corner\/law-firm\/cam\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Cyril-Amarchand-CAM.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Cyril-Amarchand-CAM.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Cyril-Amarchand-CAM.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Cyril-Amarchand-CAM.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Cyril-Amarchand-CAM.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":378149,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/12\/delhi-hc-allows-dr-reddys-to-make-and-import-semaglutide\/","url_meta":{"origin":240888,"position":5},"title":"Delhi HC upholds rejection of Novo Nordisk\u2019s injunction plea; Allows Dr. Reddy\u2019s to manufacture and import \u2018Semaglutide\u2019","author":"Prarthana Gupta","date":"March 12, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cViewed from the perspective of a person in the know, it is prima facie clear that Semaglutide would be obvious from the teachings contained in the Genius Patent and that, therefore, a credible challenge to the validity of the suit patent, under Section 64(1)(f), is made out.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Semaglutide patent infringement","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/blog-25-24-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/blog-25-24-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/blog-25-24-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/blog-25-24-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/240888","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=240888"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/240888\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=240888"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=240888"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=240888"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}