{"id":240696,"date":"2020-12-15T14:30:28","date_gmt":"2020-12-15T09:00:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=240696"},"modified":"2020-12-15T18:16:07","modified_gmt":"2020-12-15T12:46:07","slug":"chh-hc-in-a-case-where-question-of-recovery-of-loan-amount-is-based-on-the-deed-of-ikrarnama-where-does-the-burden-of-proof-lie-regarding-its-authenticity-hc-decides","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/15\/chh-hc-in-a-case-where-question-of-recovery-of-loan-amount-is-based-on-the-deed-of-ikrarnama-where-does-the-burden-of-proof-lie-regarding-its-authenticity-hc-decides\/","title":{"rendered":"Chh HC | In a case where question of recovery of loan amount is based on the deed of \u2018ikrarnama\u2019 where does the burden of proof lie regarding its authenticity; HC decides"},"content":{"rendered":"

Chattisgarh High Court:<\/strong> Sanjay S. Agarwal J., dismissed the appeal being devoid of merits.<\/p>\n

The facts of the case are such that the defendants had borrowed an amount of loan from the plaintiffs to meet their household affairs, like marriage purpose, and executed an ‘Ikrarnama’ in this regard agreeing to refund the same within a period of two months. Despite his oral demand of the said loan amount and also of issuing a demand notice dated 18-06-2008 immediately after completion of the said period of two months, it was not refunded. Hence a recovery suit was instituted wherein the defendant denied the claim of the ikrarnama and contended further that they, in fact, obtained the loan amount from the Durg Rajnandgaon Gramin Bank in order to run the hotel business where the plaintiff was made as a guarantor. It is contended further that the alleged ‘Ikrarnama’ was a forged and fabricated document, and therefore the suit deserves to be dismissed. The Trial Court held that it was held that the Defendants have borrowed the alleged loan amount from the plaintiff after executing an ‘Ikrarnama’ and has failed to refund the same despite his demand. In consequence, decreed the claim. Aggrieved by the same, present appeal was preferred under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as ‘CPC’), questioning the legality and propriety of the impugned judgment.<\/p>\n

Counsel for the appellants submitted that at the most the transaction was made some time in the year 2005 and cannot be said to be made in the year 2008, and therefore, the Trial Court has erred in decreeing the claim of the Plaintiff based upon the alleged deed of ‘Ikrarnama’. It was further contended that the trial Court, while placing the burden of proof upon the Defendants with regard to the execution of the alleged ‘Ikrarnama\u201d has committed a serious illegality in decreeing the Plaintiff’s claim.<\/p>\n

The Court observed that the alleged transaction was made on 28-03-2008 and the alleged loan amount was given to the Defendants in his presence. It appears further from the testimony that the alleged stamp paper was brought by the Defendant Teerath Das himself and which has not been controverted by the Defendants and that apart no question was, however, put to him by the Defendants that the Plaintiff has obtained their signatures on the blank stamp paper, as alleged by them in their written statement. The initial burden was thus discharged by the Plaintiff regarding the execution of the alleged \u2018Ikrarnama\u2019 whereby the alleged loan amount of Rs 60,000\/- was given to the Defendants in presence of the two witnesses. Since the Defendants have admitted their signatures on it, therefore, it was the duty of the Defendants to disprove its execution by way of cogent and reliable evidence. However, the witnesses of theirs are the hearsay witnesses and based upon their testimonies, it cannot be said that the alleged deed of ‘Ikrarnama’ was a forged and fabricated one, as alleged by the defendants.<\/p>\n

The Court thus held that \u201cthe trial Court has not committed any illegality in upholding the due execution of the alleged document by decreeing the Plaintiff’s claim and I do not find any infirmity in the same.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

In view of the above, appeal was dismissed.[Ganpat Lal Sahu v. Manrakhan Kannauje, First Appeal No. 176 of 2011, decided on 08-12-2020]<\/p>\n

\n

Arunima Bose, Editorial Assistant has put this story together<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Chattisgarh High Court: Sanjay S. Agarwal J., dismissed the appeal being devoid of merits. The facts of the case are such that <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[44482,29785,44483,20111],"class_list":["post-240696","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-ikrarnama","tag-law","tag-recovery-of-loan","tag-section-96-cpc"],"yoast_head":"\nChh HC | In a case where question of recovery of loan amount is based on the deed of \u2018ikrarnama\u2019 where does the burden of proof lie regarding its authenticity; HC decides | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/15\/chh-hc-in-a-case-where-question-of-recovery-of-loan-amount-is-based-on-the-deed-of-ikrarnama-where-does-the-burden-of-proof-lie-regarding-its-authenticity-hc-decides\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Chh HC | In a case where question of recovery of loan amount is based on the deed of \u2018ikrarnama\u2019 where does the burden of proof lie regarding its authenticity; HC decides\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Chattisgarh High Court: Sanjay S. Agarwal J., dismissed the appeal being devoid of merits. The facts of the case are such that\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/15\/chh-hc-in-a-case-where-question-of-recovery-of-loan-amount-is-based-on-the-deed-of-ikrarnama-where-does-the-burden-of-proof-lie-regarding-its-authenticity-hc-decides\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-12-15T09:00:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-12-15T12:46:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/chattisgarh_high_court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/15\/chh-hc-in-a-case-where-question-of-recovery-of-loan-amount-is-based-on-the-deed-of-ikrarnama-where-does-the-burden-of-proof-lie-regarding-its-authenticity-hc-decides\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/15\/chh-hc-in-a-case-where-question-of-recovery-of-loan-amount-is-based-on-the-deed-of-ikrarnama-where-does-the-burden-of-proof-lie-regarding-its-authenticity-hc-decides\/\",\"name\":\"Chh HC | In a case where question of recovery of loan amount is based on the deed of \u2018ikrarnama\u2019 where does the burden of proof lie regarding its authenticity; HC decides | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-12-15T09:00:28+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-12-15T12:46:07+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/15\/chh-hc-in-a-case-where-question-of-recovery-of-loan-amount-is-based-on-the-deed-of-ikrarnama-where-does-the-burden-of-proof-lie-regarding-its-authenticity-hc-decides\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/15\/chh-hc-in-a-case-where-question-of-recovery-of-loan-amount-is-based-on-the-deed-of-ikrarnama-where-does-the-burden-of-proof-lie-regarding-its-authenticity-hc-decides\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/15\/chh-hc-in-a-case-where-question-of-recovery-of-loan-amount-is-based-on-the-deed-of-ikrarnama-where-does-the-burden-of-proof-lie-regarding-its-authenticity-hc-decides\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Chh HC | In a case where question of recovery of loan amount is based on the deed of \u2018ikrarnama\u2019 where does the burden of proof lie regarding its authenticity; HC decides\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Chh HC | In a case where question of recovery of loan amount is based on the deed of \u2018ikrarnama\u2019 where does the burden of proof lie regarding its authenticity; HC decides | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/15\/chh-hc-in-a-case-where-question-of-recovery-of-loan-amount-is-based-on-the-deed-of-ikrarnama-where-does-the-burden-of-proof-lie-regarding-its-authenticity-hc-decides\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Chh HC | In a case where question of recovery of loan amount is based on the deed of \u2018ikrarnama\u2019 where does the burden of proof lie regarding its authenticity; HC decides","og_description":"Chattisgarh High Court: Sanjay S. Agarwal J., dismissed the appeal being devoid of merits. The facts of the case are such that","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/15\/chh-hc-in-a-case-where-question-of-recovery-of-loan-amount-is-based-on-the-deed-of-ikrarnama-where-does-the-burden-of-proof-lie-regarding-its-authenticity-hc-decides\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-12-15T09:00:28+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-12-15T12:46:07+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/chattisgarh_high_court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/15\/chh-hc-in-a-case-where-question-of-recovery-of-loan-amount-is-based-on-the-deed-of-ikrarnama-where-does-the-burden-of-proof-lie-regarding-its-authenticity-hc-decides\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/15\/chh-hc-in-a-case-where-question-of-recovery-of-loan-amount-is-based-on-the-deed-of-ikrarnama-where-does-the-burden-of-proof-lie-regarding-its-authenticity-hc-decides\/","name":"Chh HC | In a case where question of recovery of loan amount is based on the deed of \u2018ikrarnama\u2019 where does the burden of proof lie regarding its authenticity; HC decides | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-12-15T09:00:28+00:00","dateModified":"2020-12-15T12:46:07+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/15\/chh-hc-in-a-case-where-question-of-recovery-of-loan-amount-is-based-on-the-deed-of-ikrarnama-where-does-the-burden-of-proof-lie-regarding-its-authenticity-hc-decides\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/15\/chh-hc-in-a-case-where-question-of-recovery-of-loan-amount-is-based-on-the-deed-of-ikrarnama-where-does-the-burden-of-proof-lie-regarding-its-authenticity-hc-decides\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/15\/chh-hc-in-a-case-where-question-of-recovery-of-loan-amount-is-based-on-the-deed-of-ikrarnama-where-does-the-burden-of-proof-lie-regarding-its-authenticity-hc-decides\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Chh HC | In a case where question of recovery of loan amount is based on the deed of \u2018ikrarnama\u2019 where does the burden of proof lie regarding its authenticity; HC decides"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":192144,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/02\/26\/delhi-hc-questions-deduction-80-salary-lieu-recovery-loan-taken-department\/","url_meta":{"origin":240696,"position":0},"title":"Delhi HC questions deduction of over 80% of salary in lieu of recovery of loan taken from department","author":"Saba","date":"February 26, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Hima Kohli and Pratibha Rani, JJ., listed a writ petition before it for next hearing on 14.03.2018. The petitioner was recruited in the SSB on the post of GD\/Ct on 01.02.2006 and while on employ had undergone a surgery for a kidney\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":223865,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/06\/ker-hc-art-226-petition-against-sarfaesi-recovery-proceedings-entertained-court-gives-peremptory-orders-cannot-be-challenged-in-any-court-or-forum\/","url_meta":{"origin":240696,"position":1},"title":"Ker HC | Art. 226 petition against SARFAESI recovery proceedings entertained; Court gives peremptory orders, cannot be challenged in any Court or Forum","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 6, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: C.S. Dias, J. disposed of a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner is the wife of one Senthil Kumar, accused under the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. The husband of the petitioner\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":194316,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/03\/22\/accused-under-s-138-of-ni-act-acquitted-on-grounds-of-limitation\/","url_meta":{"origin":240696,"position":2},"title":"Accused under S. 138 of NI Act acquitted on grounds of limitation","author":"Saba","date":"March 22, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of K. Somashekar, J., decided a criminal appeal, wherein order of acquittal of the accused passed by the trial court was upheld holding that the recovery of loan in the given case was hit by limitation. The petitioner was prosecuted for offence\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":240806,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/17\/ker-hc-sarfaesi-act-whether-the-state-has-better-right-in-comparison-to-banks-and-other-financial-institutions-over-secured-assets-for-recovery-of-its-dues-legal-position-reiterated\/","url_meta":{"origin":240696,"position":3},"title":"Ker HC | [SARFAESI Act] Whether the State has better right in comparison to Banks and other Financial Institutions over secured assets for recovery of its dues; legal position reiterated","author":"Editor","date":"December 17, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: A.M. Badar J., allowing the present petition, quashes the attachment made by the State authorities to recover tax dues. Background Counsel appearing for the petitioner argued that for repayment of loan availed by its borrower, the property comprised in Mannanchery village was mortgaged by the borrower. As\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":244948,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/04\/sale-notice\/","url_meta":{"origin":240696,"position":4},"title":"Telangana HC | If the bank sends sale notice following due procedure on the addresses mentioned in loan agreement, will the same amount to ‘service’ under Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules? Read on","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 4, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Telangana High Court: The Division Bench of A. Rajasheker Reddy and T. Vinod Kumar, JJ., dismissed a petition challenging the sale notice issued by the respondent Bank pursuant to proceedings under the SARFAESI Act. In the present matter, respondent 2 -- Company had borrowed a term loan from respondent 1\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":342759,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/03\/cci-notifies-cci-manner-of-recovery-of-monetary-penalty-regulations\/","url_meta":{"origin":240696,"position":5},"title":"CCI notifies CCI (Manner of Recovery of Monetary Penalty) Regulations, 2025 repealing 2011 regulations","author":"Kriti","date":"March 3, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Interest of Penalty has to be paid at Simple interest of 1% on outstanding amount.","rel":"","context":"In "Legislation Updates"","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Competition Commission of India","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Competition-Commission-of-India-2.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Competition-Commission-of-India-2.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Competition-Commission-of-India-2.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Competition-Commission-of-India-2.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/240696","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=240696"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/240696\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=240696"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=240696"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=240696"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}