{"id":240600,"date":"2020-12-12T15:30:04","date_gmt":"2020-12-12T10:00:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=240600"},"modified":"2020-12-12T14:47:58","modified_gmt":"2020-12-12T09:17:58","slug":"texas-bid-to-overturn-the-results-of-us-presidential-election-2020-rejected-due-to-lack-of-standing-under-article-iii-of-the-constitution","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/12\/texas-bid-to-overturn-the-results-of-us-presidential-election-2020-rejected-due-to-lack-of-standing-under-article-iii-of-the-constitution\/","title":{"rendered":"Texas\u2019 bid to overturn the results of US Presidential Election 2020, rejected due to lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Supreme Court of The United States: <\/strong>The Court on Friday <a href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/orders\/courtorders\/121120zr_p860.pdf\">rejected<\/a> a bid from Texas&#8217; Attorney General, supported by President Donald Trump, to block the ballots of millions of voters in battleground states that went in favor of President-elect Joe Biden. Texas\u2019 motion for leave to file a bill of complaint was denied due to lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution. The Court further observed that, \u201c<em>Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections<\/em>\u201d. Although, Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas, JJ., noted that they would have allowed the case to be filed &#8211; \u201c<em>I would therefore grant the motion to file the bill of complaint but would not grant other relief, and I express no view on any other issue<\/em>\u201d.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In the recently held US Presidential Elections, the <em>\u201cSwing States\u201d<\/em> of Pennsylvania, Michigan, Georgia and Wisconsin, swung in favour of Joe Biden. The lawsuit was brought by Texas\u2019 Attorney General, Ken Paxton, who sought to sue the abovementioned States and invalidate their election results.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Incumbent President, Mr. Donald Trump and his allies have repeatedly raised allegations of foul play committed during counting of the votes; especially in the <em>\u201cSwing States\u201d<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">This is not the first instance of thwarting the Republican Party\u2019s efforts to challenge the legitimacy of the Election results. On 08-12-2020, the SCOTUS in a <strong>\u201cone sentence\u201d<\/strong> Order, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/09\/scotus-issues-one-sentence-refusal-to-republicans-seeking-to-overturn-joe-bidens-victory-in-the-state-of-pennsylvania\/\">refused a request<\/a> from Pennsylvania Republicans to overturn Joe Biden\u2019s victory in the state of Pennsylvania. The Republicans have lost about 50 challenges to the presidential election, as Judges in at least eight states have repeatedly rejected a litany of unproven claims \u2014 that mail-in ballots were improperly sent out, that absentee ballots were counted wrongly, that poll observers were not given proper access to the vote count and that foreign powers hacked into and manipulated voting machines.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">[Texas v. Pennsylvania, decided on 11-12-2020]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Source: CNN<\/strong><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><span style=\"color: #008000;\">Sucheta Sarkar, Editorial Assistant has put this story together<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Supreme Court of The United States: The Court on Friday rejected a bid from Texas&#8217; Attorney General, supported by President Donald Trump, <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":32691,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1188,2],"tags":[38932,14051,30014,35935,44447,31919],"class_list":["post-240600","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hot_off_the_press","category-news","tag-donald-trump","tag-elections","tag-scotus","tag-texas","tag-us-presidential-election","tag-votes"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Texas\u2019 bid to overturn the results of US Presidential Election 2020, rejected due to lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/12\/texas-bid-to-overturn-the-results-of-us-presidential-election-2020-rejected-due-to-lack-of-standing-under-article-iii-of-the-constitution\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Texas\u2019 bid to overturn the results of US Presidential Election 2020, rejected due to lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court of The United States: The Court on Friday rejected a bid from Texas&#8217; Attorney General, supported by President Donald Trump,\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/12\/texas-bid-to-overturn-the-results-of-us-presidential-election-2020-rejected-due-to-lack-of-standing-under-article-iii-of-the-constitution\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-12-12T10:00:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/12\\\/12\\\/texas-bid-to-overturn-the-results-of-us-presidential-election-2020-rejected-due-to-lack-of-standing-under-article-iii-of-the-constitution\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/12\\\/12\\\/texas-bid-to-overturn-the-results-of-us-presidential-election-2020-rejected-due-to-lack-of-standing-under-article-iii-of-the-constitution\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Editor\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"headline\":\"Texas\u2019 bid to overturn the results of US Presidential Election 2020, rejected due to lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-12-12T10:00:04+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/12\\\/12\\\/texas-bid-to-overturn-the-results-of-us-presidential-election-2020-rejected-due-to-lack-of-standing-under-article-iii-of-the-constitution\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":351,\"commentCount\":1,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/12\\\/12\\\/texas-bid-to-overturn-the-results-of-us-presidential-election-2020-rejected-due-to-lack-of-standing-under-article-iii-of-the-constitution\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2016\\\/01\\\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Donald Trump\",\"Elections\",\"SCOTUS\",\"Texas\",\"US Presidential Election\",\"Votes\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Hot Off The Press\",\"News\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/12\\\/12\\\/texas-bid-to-overturn-the-results-of-us-presidential-election-2020-rejected-due-to-lack-of-standing-under-article-iii-of-the-constitution\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/12\\\/12\\\/texas-bid-to-overturn-the-results-of-us-presidential-election-2020-rejected-due-to-lack-of-standing-under-article-iii-of-the-constitution\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/12\\\/12\\\/texas-bid-to-overturn-the-results-of-us-presidential-election-2020-rejected-due-to-lack-of-standing-under-article-iii-of-the-constitution\\\/\",\"name\":\"Texas\u2019 bid to overturn the results of US Presidential Election 2020, rejected due to lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/12\\\/12\\\/texas-bid-to-overturn-the-results-of-us-presidential-election-2020-rejected-due-to-lack-of-standing-under-article-iii-of-the-constitution\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/12\\\/12\\\/texas-bid-to-overturn-the-results-of-us-presidential-election-2020-rejected-due-to-lack-of-standing-under-article-iii-of-the-constitution\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2016\\\/01\\\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-12-12T10:00:04+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/12\\\/12\\\/texas-bid-to-overturn-the-results-of-us-presidential-election-2020-rejected-due-to-lack-of-standing-under-article-iii-of-the-constitution\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/12\\\/12\\\/texas-bid-to-overturn-the-results-of-us-presidential-election-2020-rejected-due-to-lack-of-standing-under-article-iii-of-the-constitution\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/12\\\/12\\\/texas-bid-to-overturn-the-results-of-us-presidential-election-2020-rejected-due-to-lack-of-standing-under-article-iii-of-the-constitution\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2016\\\/01\\\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2016\\\/01\\\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887,\"caption\":\"Supreme Court of The United States\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/12\\\/12\\\/texas-bid-to-overturn-the-results-of-us-presidential-election-2020-rejected-due-to-lack-of-standing-under-article-iii-of-the-constitution\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Texas\u2019 bid to overturn the results of US Presidential Election 2020, rejected due to lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_4\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Texas\u2019 bid to overturn the results of US Presidential Election 2020, rejected due to lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/12\/texas-bid-to-overturn-the-results-of-us-presidential-election-2020-rejected-due-to-lack-of-standing-under-article-iii-of-the-constitution\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Texas\u2019 bid to overturn the results of US Presidential Election 2020, rejected due to lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution","og_description":"Supreme Court of The United States: The Court on Friday rejected a bid from Texas&#8217; Attorney General, supported by President Donald Trump,","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/12\/texas-bid-to-overturn-the-results-of-us-presidential-election-2020-rejected-due-to-lack-of-standing-under-article-iii-of-the-constitution\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-12-12T10:00:04+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/12\/texas-bid-to-overturn-the-results-of-us-presidential-election-2020-rejected-due-to-lack-of-standing-under-article-iii-of-the-constitution\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/12\/texas-bid-to-overturn-the-results-of-us-presidential-election-2020-rejected-due-to-lack-of-standing-under-article-iii-of-the-constitution\/"},"author":{"name":"Editor","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"headline":"Texas\u2019 bid to overturn the results of US Presidential Election 2020, rejected due to lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution","datePublished":"2020-12-12T10:00:04+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/12\/texas-bid-to-overturn-the-results-of-us-presidential-election-2020-rejected-due-to-lack-of-standing-under-article-iii-of-the-constitution\/"},"wordCount":351,"commentCount":1,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/12\/texas-bid-to-overturn-the-results-of-us-presidential-election-2020-rejected-due-to-lack-of-standing-under-article-iii-of-the-constitution\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg","keywords":["Donald Trump","Elections","SCOTUS","Texas","US Presidential Election","Votes"],"articleSection":["Hot Off The Press","News"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/12\/texas-bid-to-overturn-the-results-of-us-presidential-election-2020-rejected-due-to-lack-of-standing-under-article-iii-of-the-constitution\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/12\/texas-bid-to-overturn-the-results-of-us-presidential-election-2020-rejected-due-to-lack-of-standing-under-article-iii-of-the-constitution\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/12\/texas-bid-to-overturn-the-results-of-us-presidential-election-2020-rejected-due-to-lack-of-standing-under-article-iii-of-the-constitution\/","name":"Texas\u2019 bid to overturn the results of US Presidential Election 2020, rejected due to lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/12\/texas-bid-to-overturn-the-results-of-us-presidential-election-2020-rejected-due-to-lack-of-standing-under-article-iii-of-the-constitution\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/12\/texas-bid-to-overturn-the-results-of-us-presidential-election-2020-rejected-due-to-lack-of-standing-under-article-iii-of-the-constitution\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg","datePublished":"2020-12-12T10:00:04+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/12\/texas-bid-to-overturn-the-results-of-us-presidential-election-2020-rejected-due-to-lack-of-standing-under-article-iii-of-the-constitution\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/12\/texas-bid-to-overturn-the-results-of-us-presidential-election-2020-rejected-due-to-lack-of-standing-under-article-iii-of-the-constitution\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/12\/texas-bid-to-overturn-the-results-of-us-presidential-election-2020-rejected-due-to-lack-of-standing-under-article-iii-of-the-constitution\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg","width":1330,"height":887,"caption":"Supreme Court of The United States"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/12\/texas-bid-to-overturn-the-results-of-us-presidential-election-2020-rejected-due-to-lack-of-standing-under-article-iii-of-the-constitution\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Texas\u2019 bid to overturn the results of US Presidential Election 2020, rejected due to lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":316190,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/06\/sc-colorado-decision-name-removal-donald-trump-presidential-primary-ballot-scotus-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":240600,"position":0},"title":"SCOTUS reverses Colorado Supreme Court\u2019s decision to remove Donald Trump\u2019s name from the state\u2019s presidential primary ballot","author":"Sucheta","date":"March 6, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"In a unanimous verdict, the SCOTUS held that power to enforce Section 3 of 14th Amendment to the US Constitution against federal officeholders and candidates, lies with the Congress rather than the States.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Donald Trump Colorado Supreme Court presidential primary ballot SCOTUS","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Donald-Trump-Colorado-Supreme-Court-presidential-primary-ballot-SCOTUS.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Donald-Trump-Colorado-Supreme-Court-presidential-primary-ballot-SCOTUS.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Donald-Trump-Colorado-Supreme-Court-presidential-primary-ballot-SCOTUS.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Donald-Trump-Colorado-Supreme-Court-presidential-primary-ballot-SCOTUS.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":240396,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/09\/scotus-issues-one-sentence-refusal-to-republicans-seeking-to-overturn-joe-bidens-victory-in-the-state-of-pennsylvania\/","url_meta":{"origin":240600,"position":1},"title":"SCOTUS issues \u201cone-sentence\u201d refusal to Republicans seeking to overturn Joe Biden\u2019s victory in the state of Pennsylvania","author":"Editor","date":"December 9, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court of The United States (SCOTUS): In a major setback to the Republican Party\u2019s attempts to invalidate the results of recent Presidential Elections, Full Bench of the SCOTUS in a \u201cone sentence\u201d Order, refused a request from Pennsylvania Republicans to overturn Joseph R. Biden Jr.\u2019s victory in the state\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Supreme Court of The United States","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":323291,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/31\/donald-trump-found-guilty-felony-manhattan-jury-hush-money-us-court-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":240600,"position":2},"title":"Hush Money Trial | Manhattan Jury finds former US President, Donald Trump guilty of 34 counts of felony","author":"Sucheta","date":"May 31, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Found guilty of falsifying business records to influence the outcome of the 2016 Presidential Elections, former President Trump becomes the first US President to be convicted of criminal charges in the history of USA.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Donald Trump Hush Money Trial","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Donald-Trump-Hush-Money-Trial.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Donald-Trump-Hush-Money-Trial.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Donald-Trump-Hush-Money-Trial.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Donald-Trump-Hush-Money-Trial.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":309736,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/20\/donald-trump-president-usa-disqualify-presidential-candidate-insurrection-colorado-sc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":240600,"position":3},"title":"Colorado Supreme Court holds former President Trump ineligible for the White House; Removes him from Colorado\u2019s Presidential Primary Ballot","author":"Sucheta","date":"December 20, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"For the first time in history, Section 3 of the 14th Amendment was used by a Court to disqualify a Presidential candidate.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Donald trump white house Colorado supreme court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/Donald-trump-white-house-Colorado-supreme-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/Donald-trump-white-house-Colorado-supreme-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/Donald-trump-white-house-Colorado-supreme-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/Donald-trump-white-house-Colorado-supreme-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":325549,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/02\/donald-trump-immunity-criminal-prosecution-constitutional-authority-scotus-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":240600,"position":4},"title":"[Trump v. United States] Former US Presidents have Absolute Immunity for actions within Conclusive and Preclusive Constitutional Authority: SCOTUS","author":"Sucheta","date":"July 2, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"For the first time in US history, a former President, in this case Donald Trump, had been indicted by a federal grand jury on four counts for conduct that occurred during his Presidency following November 2020 Presidential Elections. The indictment alleged that after losing that election, Trump conspired to overturn\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Donald-Trump-Absolute-Immunity-from-criminal-prosecution","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Donald-Trump-Absolute-Immunity-from-criminal-prosecution.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Donald-Trump-Absolute-Immunity-from-criminal-prosecution.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Donald-Trump-Absolute-Immunity-from-criminal-prosecution.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Donald-Trump-Absolute-Immunity-from-criminal-prosecution.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":141201,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/07\/presidential-election-2017-right-to-vote-or-not-to-vote\/","url_meta":{"origin":240600,"position":5},"title":"Presidential Election, 2017: Right to vote or not to vote","author":"Saba","date":"July 7, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Certain doubts have arisen in the minds of some of the electors at the current Presidential Election, 2017 to the effect whether a member of a political party voting in defiance of the political party\u2019s decision would attract the disqualification on the ground of defection under the Tenth Schedule to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/ElectionCommission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/ElectionCommission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/ElectionCommission.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/ElectionCommission.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/ElectionCommission.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/240600","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=240600"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/240600\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/32691"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=240600"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=240600"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=240600"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}