{"id":240381,"date":"2020-12-09T16:45:43","date_gmt":"2020-12-09T11:15:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=240381"},"modified":"2020-12-11T10:52:08","modified_gmt":"2020-12-11T05:22:08","slug":"raj-hc-appointment-on-contractual-basis-is-subject-to-conditions-of-service-of-contract-court-dismisses-appeal-holding-the-termination-valid","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/09\/raj-hc-appointment-on-contractual-basis-is-subject-to-conditions-of-service-of-contract-court-dismisses-appeal-holding-the-termination-valid\/","title":{"rendered":"Raj HC | Appointment on contractual basis is subject to conditions of service of contract; Court dismisses appeal holding the termination valid"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Rajasthan High Court:<\/strong> Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J., dismissed a petition which was filed assailing the action of respondents who had terminated his services on the ground that the Administration was not satisfied with his work and the competent authority had approved the termination order.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The counsel for the petitioner, R.K.Mathur with Aditya Kiran Mathur submitted that petitioner\u2019s services were extended after a one-year contractual period, however; in between by giving him one month\u2019s notice, his services were terminated wrongfully. The counsel submitted that if there were any allegations either enquiry should have been conducted or a show cause notice should at least have been served upon him. By means of second stay application the counsel pointed out that after terminating his services, the respondents had issued an advertisement to fill up the post of Consultant (Legal) and prayed that the post should not be filled up.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The counsel for the respondent, P.C. Sharma submitted that petition would not be maintainable as against the respondent 1-Railways since it was a service matter and the matter should be taken up before Central Administrative Tribunal. He further submitted that respondent 2- Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India Limited (DFCCIL) was a public sector undertaking having its own separate administration set up and there was no relevance of Ministry of Railways which is why same would not fall within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution of India and writ petition, therefore, would not lie against the DFCCIL. He further contended that the engagement was for a Post of Consultant (Legal), which was a contractual post and the term was extended up to 30th June, 2020. However, as per terms of conditions of service, the petitioner\u2019s services could be terminated in between by giving one month notice by either side.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court relying on the judgment <em>of Pradeep Kumar Biswas v. Indian Institute of Chemical Biology<\/em>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Z1kLWvn7\">(2002) 5 SCC 111<\/a> found that Union of India, Ministry of Railways had been impleaded as a party only with the purpose to show that the DFCCIL was under the Union of India, Ministry of Railways and Ministry of Railways was controlling body for DFCCIL. It would thus come within the ambit of State within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution of India and writ petition would therefore lie. The Court further held that Central Administrative Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to hear such matters as DFCCIL had not been notified under the Central Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 so as to come within CATs jurisdiction.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court while dismissing the petition held that the termination order had been passed strictly in terms of conditions of service of contract. It further explained that engagement of a Consultant (Legal) was purely on contractual basis and subject to satisfaction of the Administration for the services being provided are legal consultancy thus, there should not be any objection, if the concerned employer was not satisfied with the services, to the action of termination it can also be issued during the period of the contract as it is provided under the terms of the contract. [Rajesh Kumar Tiwari v. Union of India, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/mWAaXI1C\"><b>2020 SCC OnLine Raj 1841<\/b><\/a>, decided on 01-12-2020]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><span style=\"color: #008000;\">Suchita Shukla, Editorial Assistant has put this story together.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Rajasthan High Court: Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J., dismissed a petition which was filed assailing the action of respondents who had terminated his <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[6111,33063,29785,30012],"class_list":["post-240381","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-appointment","tag-contractual-employment","tag-law","tag-termination-order"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Raj HC | Appointment on contractual basis is subject to conditions of service of contract; Court dismisses appeal holding the termination valid | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/09\/raj-hc-appointment-on-contractual-basis-is-subject-to-conditions-of-service-of-contract-court-dismisses-appeal-holding-the-termination-valid\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Raj HC | Appointment on contractual basis is subject to conditions of service of contract; Court dismisses appeal holding the termination valid\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court: Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J., dismissed a petition which was filed assailing the action of respondents who had terminated his\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/09\/raj-hc-appointment-on-contractual-basis-is-subject-to-conditions-of-service-of-contract-court-dismisses-appeal-holding-the-termination-valid\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-12-09T11:15:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-12-11T05:22:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3584-e1487939870879.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/09\/raj-hc-appointment-on-contractual-basis-is-subject-to-conditions-of-service-of-contract-court-dismisses-appeal-holding-the-termination-valid\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/09\/raj-hc-appointment-on-contractual-basis-is-subject-to-conditions-of-service-of-contract-court-dismisses-appeal-holding-the-termination-valid\/\",\"name\":\"Raj HC | Appointment on contractual basis is subject to conditions of service of contract; Court dismisses appeal holding the termination valid | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-12-09T11:15:43+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-12-11T05:22:08+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/09\/raj-hc-appointment-on-contractual-basis-is-subject-to-conditions-of-service-of-contract-court-dismisses-appeal-holding-the-termination-valid\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/09\/raj-hc-appointment-on-contractual-basis-is-subject-to-conditions-of-service-of-contract-court-dismisses-appeal-holding-the-termination-valid\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/09\/raj-hc-appointment-on-contractual-basis-is-subject-to-conditions-of-service-of-contract-court-dismisses-appeal-holding-the-termination-valid\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Raj HC | Appointment on contractual basis is subject to conditions of service of contract; Court dismisses appeal holding the termination valid\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Raj HC | Appointment on contractual basis is subject to conditions of service of contract; Court dismisses appeal holding the termination valid | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/09\/raj-hc-appointment-on-contractual-basis-is-subject-to-conditions-of-service-of-contract-court-dismisses-appeal-holding-the-termination-valid\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Raj HC | Appointment on contractual basis is subject to conditions of service of contract; Court dismisses appeal holding the termination valid","og_description":"Rajasthan High Court: Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J., dismissed a petition which was filed assailing the action of respondents who had terminated his","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/09\/raj-hc-appointment-on-contractual-basis-is-subject-to-conditions-of-service-of-contract-court-dismisses-appeal-holding-the-termination-valid\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-12-09T11:15:43+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-12-11T05:22:08+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3584-e1487939870879.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/09\/raj-hc-appointment-on-contractual-basis-is-subject-to-conditions-of-service-of-contract-court-dismisses-appeal-holding-the-termination-valid\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/09\/raj-hc-appointment-on-contractual-basis-is-subject-to-conditions-of-service-of-contract-court-dismisses-appeal-holding-the-termination-valid\/","name":"Raj HC | Appointment on contractual basis is subject to conditions of service of contract; Court dismisses appeal holding the termination valid | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-12-09T11:15:43+00:00","dateModified":"2020-12-11T05:22:08+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/09\/raj-hc-appointment-on-contractual-basis-is-subject-to-conditions-of-service-of-contract-court-dismisses-appeal-holding-the-termination-valid\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/09\/raj-hc-appointment-on-contractual-basis-is-subject-to-conditions-of-service-of-contract-court-dismisses-appeal-holding-the-termination-valid\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/09\/raj-hc-appointment-on-contractual-basis-is-subject-to-conditions-of-service-of-contract-court-dismisses-appeal-holding-the-termination-valid\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Raj HC | Appointment on contractual basis is subject to conditions of service of contract; Court dismisses appeal holding the termination valid"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":237160,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/10\/jhar-hc-%e2%94%82-will-non-service-of-one-months-notice-period-vitiate-termination-of-contractual-services-hc-decides\/","url_meta":{"origin":240381,"position":0},"title":"Jhar HC | Will non-service of one month&#8217;s notice period vitiate termination of contractual services? HC decides","author":"Editor","date":"October 10, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J., dismissed the petition being devoid of merits. The facts of the case are such that the Jharkhand State Aarogya Society issued an advertisement for appointment in different posts by way of walk-in-interview. The said appointment shall be a contractual appointment for a period\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":311228,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/11\/contractual-appointment-cant-be-terminated-without-affording-opportunity-of-hearing-jammu-kashmir-ladakh-hc-reiterates\/","url_meta":{"origin":240381,"position":1},"title":"Contractual Appointment can&#8217;t be terminated without affording opportunity of hearing: Jammu &amp; Kashmir &amp; Ladakh HC reiterates","author":"Editor","date":"January 11, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The High Court observed that terminating contractual appointments is impermissible without providing an opportunity for a hearing, particularly when the termination is grounded in allegations of misconduct that tarnish the employee's reputation.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"jammu and kashmir and ladakh high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/jammu-and-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/jammu-and-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/jammu-and-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/jammu-and-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":212616,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/29\/pak-sc-contractual-employee-cannot-press-for-reinstatement-of-service-can-only-claim-damages-for-unexpired-period-of-his-service\/","url_meta":{"origin":240381,"position":2},"title":"Pak SC | Contractual employee cannot press for reinstatement of service; can only claim damages for unexpired period of his service","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 29, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court of Pakistan: The Three-Judge Bench of Gulzar Ahmed, Faisal Arab And Ijaz Ul Ahsan, JJ., dismissed a petition filed by a contractual employee holding that he had approached the wrong forum for relief. Petitioner herein was appointed as an ECG Technician in District Headquarters Hospital, Rawalpindi on a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":218394,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/20\/ker-hc-contractual-employees-would-have-no-right-to-continuance-or-to-challenge-their-termination-after-the-period-of-contract-is-over\/","url_meta":{"origin":240381,"position":3},"title":"Ker HC | Contractual employees would have no right to continuance or to challenge their termination after the period of contract is over","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 20, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: Anu Sivaraman, J. contemplated a writ petition where the several petitioners worked in different posts in the District Child Protection Units in various districts in the State, they challenged the move to terminate their services in order to induct another set of contract employees. The petitioners contended\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":240018,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/02\/read-why-supreme-court-refused-to-interfere-with-chanda-kochhars-termination-as-icicis-md-ceo\/","url_meta":{"origin":240381,"position":4},"title":"Read why Supreme Court refused to interfere with Chanda Kochhar&#8217;s termination as ICICI&#8217;s MD, CEO","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"December 2, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of Sanjay Kishan Kaul, DInesh Maheshwari and Hrishikesh Roy, JJ has refused to interfere with the termination of Chanda Kochhar as the Managing Director and CEO of ICICI Bank. The bench said, \"We are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order for the reason\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":373242,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/20\/orissa-hc-bars-limitation-act-computation-in-contractual-termination\/","url_meta":{"origin":240381,"position":5},"title":"Orissa High Court bars application of Limitation Act computation method to contractual termination clauses","author":"Soumya Yadav","date":"January 20, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhether the termination would take effect from a particular date has no nexus to the period provided for issuance of the notice.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Limitation Act computation in contractual termination","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Limitation-Act-computation-in-contractual-termination.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Limitation-Act-computation-in-contractual-termination.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Limitation-Act-computation-in-contractual-termination.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Limitation-Act-computation-in-contractual-termination.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/240381","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=240381"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/240381\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=240381"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=240381"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=240381"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}