{"id":240201,"date":"2020-12-05T11:45:22","date_gmt":"2020-12-05T06:15:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=240201"},"modified":"2020-12-11T11:53:58","modified_gmt":"2020-12-11T06:23:58","slug":"hp-hc-court-while-discharging-its-duties-in-exercise-of-powers-conferred-under-art-226-r-w-art-227-of-the-constitution-of-india-cannot-permit-illegality-to-remain-on-record-especially-in-exercise","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/05\/hp-hc-court-while-discharging-its-duties-in-exercise-of-powers-conferred-under-art-226-r-w-art-227-of-the-constitution-of-india-cannot-permit-illegality-to-remain-on-record-especially-in-exercise\/","title":{"rendered":"HP HC | Court while discharging its duties in exercise of powers conferred under Art. 226 r\/w Art.227 of Constitution, cannot permit illegality to remain on record, especially in exercise of its power of superintendence"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Himachal Pradesh High Court: <\/strong>Ajay Mohan Goel J., while allowing the present petition, set aside the orders of the preceding authority holding the original election petition as patently defective.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\"><strong>Background<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Facts of the case are briefly mentioned hereunder;<\/p>\n<ol style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li>That the petitioner was declared elected in the elections for the post of Pradhan, Gram Panchayat Hinner, in December 2015.<\/li>\n<li>That an Election Petition was filed by Smt. Radha Devi (respondent herein) under the Himachal Pradesh Panchayati Raj Act, 1995 (hereinafter referred to as \u201c1994 Act\u201d) on the ground that the nomination papers filed by the petitioner concealed the real facts and the petitioner was further involved in unfair election practices along with her family members.<\/li>\n<li>That it was further alleged by the respondent in present case that the police and electoral staff failed to discharge their duties in consonance with law and several persons who were not eligible to cast their vote, were permitted to do so, despite her objections and objection of her Polling<\/li>\n<li>That the election petition was resisted by the elected candidate, on the ground of maintainability, cause of action and the principle of estoppel. It was moreover denied by the elected candidate that she had indulged in any concealment of facts in the nomination paper or there was any infirmity in the nomination paper so filed by her.<\/li>\n<li>That it was further denied by the candidate that the elected Pradhan had indulged in any unfair practice during or after the election process.<\/li>\n<li>That the Sub Divisional Officer (Civil) \u2013 cum \u2013 Appellate Authority (Election Petition), vide order dated 02-03-2019, adjudicated in favour of the respondent herein, finding that the nomination papers of the petitioner was not properly scrutinized as per the norms of H.P. Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 and Himachal Pradesh Panchayati Raj Election Rules, 1994.<\/li>\n<li>That an appeal was thereby preferred before the Deputy Commissioner under Section 181 of the 1994 Act, which was dismissed vide order dated 09-01-2020, concurring with the findings of the Sub Divisional Officer.<\/li>\n<li>That the elected Pradhan, aggrieved by the aforementioned orders, has preferred the present petition praying to quash the same and hold the election of the petitioner herein, legal and valid.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><strong>Contention <\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Counsel for the petitioner primarily argued that the original election petition as filed by the respondent herein was defective and not as per the statutory mandate of the 1994 Act read with relevant rules framed thereunder.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Counsel for the respondent emphasized more on the merits of the case and the rationale upon which the preceding authorities agreed to the contentions of the respondents in the original election petition.<strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><strong>Observations<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court, first, decided to consider the maintainability of the original petition so filed, refraining from making any observation upon the validity\/voidability of the election held, as per Section 175 of the Act of 1994. Considering the mandatory requirements for moving an election petition, the Court referred Section 164 of the Act which provides that <em>\u201can Election Petition shall be signed by the petitioner and verified in the manner laid down in the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for the verification of pleadings. Proviso thereto contains that where the petitioner alleges any corrupt practice, the petition shall also be accompanied by an affidavit in the prescribed form in support of the allegation of such corrupt practice and particulars thereof.\u201d<\/em> The Court further reproduced the language of Order VI Rule 15 which deals with verification of pleadings and noted that, <em>\u201cA perusal of the original record demonstrates that Election Petition has not been verified at the foot by the Election Petitioner.<\/em> <em>In the absence of Election Petition having been verified at the foot, there is no compliance of Order VI, Rule 15(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure. It is not mentioned in the Election Petition as to at which place the same was prepared and signed by the election petitioner, as the Election Petition is conspicuously silent with regard to the place of its preparation\/having been signed by the election petitioner.\u201d <\/em>\u00a0Moreover, it was noted that the Election Petition was not accompanied with an affidavit as required by Section 164(1) of the 1994 Act, supporting the malpractices so alleged. Another inconsistency was noted by the Court in the words, <em>\u201c\u2026 the factum of the purported affidavit (as mandated by Code of Civil Procedure, 1908) sworn in, in support of the election petition having been prepared on 28-01-2016, whereas the Election Petition being prepared and signed on 29-01-2016, cannot be overlooked and ignored by this Court while holding that the Election Petition when filed, was a defective Election Petition.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court also cited the case of <em>G.M. Siddeshwar v. Prasanna Kumar,<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/EaSqqa4P\">(2013) 4 SCC 776<\/a>, acknowledging the settled law that an opportunity to correct the curable defects must be given but at the same time observed, <em>\u201cthis judgment does not come to the rescue of the election petitioner in this case, because as already mentioned hereinabove, the purported affidavit sworn in, in favour of the election petitioner predates the Election Petition, which cannot be said to be substantial compliance of law nor it can be said that the Election Petition accompanied with a predated affidavit entails such defect which can be termed to be curable. It appears that no one took the care or the pain to scrutinize the Election Petition, as it ought to have been done, which has resulted in grave miscarriage of justice to the present petitioner, as she stands non suited on the basis of a defective Election Petition, which not only stood entertained by the Authorized Officer, but also adjudicated upon on merit.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Decision<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">While allowing the present petition, the Court allowed the petitioner to perform her duties as Pradhan, Gram Panchayat Hinner without any unnecessary fetters.[Nisha Thakur v. Radha Devi, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Ty4gCJmI\"><b>2020 SCC OnLine HP 2866<\/b><\/a>, decided on 03-12-2020]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><span style=\"color: #008000;\">Sakshi Shukla, Editorial Assistant has put this story together<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Himachal Pradesh High Court: Ajay Mohan Goel J., while allowing the present petition, set aside the orders of the preceding authority holding <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[3798,14051,25844,29785,33100,44331],"class_list":["post-240201","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-election_petition","tag-elections","tag-gram-panchayat","tag-law","tag-power-of-superintendence","tag-pradhan"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>HP HC | Court while discharging its duties in exercise of powers conferred under Art. 226 r\/w Art.227 of Constitution, cannot permit illegality to remain on record, especially in exercise of its power of superintendence | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/05\/hp-hc-court-while-discharging-its-duties-in-exercise-of-powers-conferred-under-art-226-r-w-art-227-of-the-constitution-of-india-cannot-permit-illegality-to-remain-on-record-especially-in-exercise\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"HP HC | Court while discharging its duties in exercise of powers conferred under Art. 226 r\/w Art.227 of Constitution, cannot permit illegality to remain on record, especially in exercise of its power of superintendence\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Himachal Pradesh High Court: Ajay Mohan Goel J., while allowing the present petition, set aside the orders of the preceding authority holding\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/05\/hp-hc-court-while-discharging-its-duties-in-exercise-of-powers-conferred-under-art-226-r-w-art-227-of-the-constitution-of-india-cannot-permit-illegality-to-remain-on-record-especially-in-exercise\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-12-05T06:15:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-12-11T06:23:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_2.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/05\/hp-hc-court-while-discharging-its-duties-in-exercise-of-powers-conferred-under-art-226-r-w-art-227-of-the-constitution-of-india-cannot-permit-illegality-to-remain-on-record-especially-in-exercise\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/05\/hp-hc-court-while-discharging-its-duties-in-exercise-of-powers-conferred-under-art-226-r-w-art-227-of-the-constitution-of-india-cannot-permit-illegality-to-remain-on-record-especially-in-exercise\/\",\"name\":\"HP HC | Court while discharging its duties in exercise of powers conferred under Art. 226 r\/w Art.227 of Constitution, cannot permit illegality to remain on record, especially in exercise of its power of superintendence | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-12-05T06:15:22+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-12-11T06:23:58+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/05\/hp-hc-court-while-discharging-its-duties-in-exercise-of-powers-conferred-under-art-226-r-w-art-227-of-the-constitution-of-india-cannot-permit-illegality-to-remain-on-record-especially-in-exercise\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/05\/hp-hc-court-while-discharging-its-duties-in-exercise-of-powers-conferred-under-art-226-r-w-art-227-of-the-constitution-of-india-cannot-permit-illegality-to-remain-on-record-especially-in-exercise\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/05\/hp-hc-court-while-discharging-its-duties-in-exercise-of-powers-conferred-under-art-226-r-w-art-227-of-the-constitution-of-india-cannot-permit-illegality-to-remain-on-record-especially-in-exercise\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"HP HC | Court while discharging its duties in exercise of powers conferred under Art. 226 r\/w Art.227 of Constitution, cannot permit illegality to remain on record, especially in exercise of its power of superintendence\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"HP HC | Court while discharging its duties in exercise of powers conferred under Art. 226 r\/w Art.227 of Constitution, cannot permit illegality to remain on record, especially in exercise of its power of superintendence | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/05\/hp-hc-court-while-discharging-its-duties-in-exercise-of-powers-conferred-under-art-226-r-w-art-227-of-the-constitution-of-india-cannot-permit-illegality-to-remain-on-record-especially-in-exercise\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"HP HC | Court while discharging its duties in exercise of powers conferred under Art. 226 r\/w Art.227 of Constitution, cannot permit illegality to remain on record, especially in exercise of its power of superintendence","og_description":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: Ajay Mohan Goel J., while allowing the present petition, set aside the orders of the preceding authority holding","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/05\/hp-hc-court-while-discharging-its-duties-in-exercise-of-powers-conferred-under-art-226-r-w-art-227-of-the-constitution-of-india-cannot-permit-illegality-to-remain-on-record-especially-in-exercise\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-12-05T06:15:22+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-12-11T06:23:58+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_2.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/05\/hp-hc-court-while-discharging-its-duties-in-exercise-of-powers-conferred-under-art-226-r-w-art-227-of-the-constitution-of-india-cannot-permit-illegality-to-remain-on-record-especially-in-exercise\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/05\/hp-hc-court-while-discharging-its-duties-in-exercise-of-powers-conferred-under-art-226-r-w-art-227-of-the-constitution-of-india-cannot-permit-illegality-to-remain-on-record-especially-in-exercise\/","name":"HP HC | Court while discharging its duties in exercise of powers conferred under Art. 226 r\/w Art.227 of Constitution, cannot permit illegality to remain on record, especially in exercise of its power of superintendence | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-12-05T06:15:22+00:00","dateModified":"2020-12-11T06:23:58+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/05\/hp-hc-court-while-discharging-its-duties-in-exercise-of-powers-conferred-under-art-226-r-w-art-227-of-the-constitution-of-india-cannot-permit-illegality-to-remain-on-record-especially-in-exercise\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/05\/hp-hc-court-while-discharging-its-duties-in-exercise-of-powers-conferred-under-art-226-r-w-art-227-of-the-constitution-of-india-cannot-permit-illegality-to-remain-on-record-especially-in-exercise\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/05\/hp-hc-court-while-discharging-its-duties-in-exercise-of-powers-conferred-under-art-226-r-w-art-227-of-the-constitution-of-india-cannot-permit-illegality-to-remain-on-record-especially-in-exercise\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"HP HC | Court while discharging its duties in exercise of powers conferred under Art. 226 r\/w Art.227 of Constitution, cannot permit illegality to remain on record, especially in exercise of its power of superintendence"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":241891,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/07\/hp-hc-interpretation-of-statutes-court-while-drawing-distinction-between-the-terms-block-and-constituency-denies-to-reserve-the-post-of-pradhan-in-gram-panchay\/","url_meta":{"origin":240201,"position":0},"title":"HP HC | [Interpretation of Statutes] Court while drawing distinction between the terms \u2018Block\u2019 and \u2018Constituency\u2019, denies to reserve the post of Pradhan in Gram Panchayat elections for ST category","author":"Editor","date":"January 7, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: A Division Bench of Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J. and Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J. while dismissing the present petition on lack of merits observed,\u201cFor elections in Gram Panchayat, it is the \u2018Block\u2019, which will be the relevant factor for determining the eligibility of the Gram Panchayat for\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":242395,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/18\/hp-hc-court-in-exercise-of-its-writ-jurisdiction-can-interfere-in-the-matters-relating-to-election-only-if-it-subserves-the-progress-of-election-and-facilitates-the-completion-thereof-petition-dism\/","url_meta":{"origin":240201,"position":1},"title":"HP HC | Court in exercise of its writ jurisdiction can interfere in the matters relating to election only if it subserves the progress of election and facilitates the completion thereof; petition dismissed","author":"Editor","date":"January 18, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J., while dismissing the present petition on lack of merits, said, \u201c\u2026 election process has already begun and final voter list has also been published, therefore, entertaining this petition at this stage would amount to obstructing the election process, which is not permissible.\u201d\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":353989,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/21\/uttaranchal-hc-stays-disqualification-pradhan-candidate-malfeasance-returning-officer\/","url_meta":{"origin":240201,"position":2},"title":"\u2018Clear case of malfeasance by the Returning Officer\u2019: Uttaranchal HC stays disqualification of Pradhan candidate over toilet location","author":"Editor","date":"July 21, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cRight to contest the elections is a statutorily guaranteed right, and the same cannot be denied in a completely arbitrary manner and which prima facie appears to be illegal.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Disqualification of Pradhan candidate over toilet location","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Disqualification-of-Pradhan-candidate-over-toilet-location.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Disqualification-of-Pradhan-candidate-over-toilet-location.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Disqualification-of-Pradhan-candidate-over-toilet-location.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Disqualification-of-Pradhan-candidate-over-toilet-location.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":49981,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/01\/stay-on-constitution-of-gram-panchayats-in-80-villages-within-industrial-township-of-yamuna-expressway-industrial-developmental-authority\/","url_meta":{"origin":240201,"position":3},"title":"Stay on constitution of Gram Panchayats in 80 villages within &#8216;industrial township&#8217; of Yamuna Expressway Industrial Developmental  Authority","author":"Sucheta","date":"June 1, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: Deciding a petition challenging the validity of the elections held to the Gram Panchayats in 80 villages included within the territorial limits of Yamuna Expressway Industrial Developmental Authority which was declared to be an 'industrial township' by the Governor of\u00a0 State of Uttar Pradesh vide notification dated\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":343286,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/08\/supreme-court-recount-prayagraj-gram-panchayat-election\/","url_meta":{"origin":240201,"position":4},"title":"\u201cEach vote\u2019s sanctity must be protected, irrespective of its effect on election outcome\u201d; SC orders recount in Prayagraj Gram Panchayat election","author":"Apoorva","date":"March 8, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cRight from the inception of democratic rule, universal adult franchise has found its place in our system of governance. Each election upholding these cherished values of public participation, equality and integrity of the vote is a testament to the vision of the founders.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Prayagraj election","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Prayagraj-election.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Prayagraj-election.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Prayagraj-election.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Prayagraj-election.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":219694,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/18\/utt-hc-art-226-not-ordinarily-extends-to-issuing-a-mandamus-to-legislature-to-make-a-law-writ-dismissed-as-election-commission-has-plenary-power-to-adjudicate\/","url_meta":{"origin":240201,"position":5},"title":"Utt HC | Art. 226 not ordinarily extends to issuing a mandamus to legislature to make a law; Writ dismissed as Election Commission has plenary power to adjudicate","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 18, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: A writ petition was contemplated by Ramesh Ranganathan, CJ and Alok Kumar Verma, J. where the petitioner sought a writ of mandamus to command the respondents to consider the petitioner\u2019s grievances and to consider linking the Voter ID Card of every valid adult voter with his Aadhaar\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/240201","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=240201"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/240201\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=240201"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=240201"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=240201"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}