{"id":239886,"date":"2020-11-29T16:00:11","date_gmt":"2020-11-29T10:30:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=239886"},"modified":"2020-11-29T15:46:15","modified_gmt":"2020-11-29T10:16:15","slug":"mv-act-kar-hc-mact-must-proactively-invoke-power-under-s-165-evidence-act-in-case-of-inability-of-claimants-to-produce-treating-doctors-as-witnesses","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/29\/mv-act-kar-hc-mact-must-proactively-invoke-power-under-s-165-evidence-act-in-case-of-inability-of-claimants-to-produce-treating-doctors-as-witnesses\/","title":{"rendered":"[MV Act] Kar HC | MACT must proactively invoke power under S. 165 Evidence Act, in case of inability of claimants to produce treating doctors as witnesses"},"content":{"rendered":"

Karnataka High Court: <\/strong>H. T. Narendra Prasad J. allowed the appeal stating that the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal has ample powers under Section 165 of the Evidence Act to summon a court witness and this power must be exercised proactively.<\/p>\n

The facts of the case are such that the claimant who is student studying in Government Polytechnic College and while returning boarded a bus and when she was about to get down from the bus and while her one step was down the driver without any signal moved the bus and the girl fell down sustaining multiple and grievous injuries and was hospitalized thereafter for treatment. A claim petition was filed before the Tribunal and compensation was granted of Rs. 50,000. Being aggrieved by the meagre amount of compensation, instant appeal was filed.<\/p>\n

Counsel for the appellants submitted that the claimant was about 18 years of age at the time of the accident and was studying in Govt. Polytechnic College but due to the accident, has sustained fractures and various other body injuries. It was further submitted that merely because the doctor was not examined the Tribunal has not granted any compensation under the \u2018loss of future income\u2019 and hence it is not justified in granting meagre compensation of Rs. 50,000 and therefore the appeal should be allowed.<\/p>\n

Counsel for the respondents submitted that the claimant has not examined the treating doctor for assessment of disability and therefore the Tribunal on the basis of the materials available on record and wound certificate has granted just and reasonable compensation.<\/p>\n

The Court relied on the judgment Shri Iqbalahmed v. Patel Integrated Logistics Ltd., <\/em>ILR 2017 KAR 3045 wherein it was held that in cases where the claimants are unable to examine the treating doctor as witness, the Presiding Officer of the Tribunal shall play a pro-active role in ensuring the presence of the doctors by invoking the power under Section 165 of The Evidence Act.<\/p>\n

The Court thus observed that the Motor Vehicles Act is a social beneficial piece of legislation which caters to the need of the claimants. The very scope and object of the Act while dealing with the claim, is to protect and promote the interest pf the claimants. The Act, tries to monetarily compensate the injured and the dependents of the deceased who find themselves in a difficult situation after suffering an accident.<\/p>\n

The Court thus held that the matter be remanded back to the Tribunal with a direction to the Presiding Officer of the Tribunal to summon the treating doctor and in case the treating doctor is not available, the matter should be referred to the Medical Board for assessment of disability.<\/p>\n

In view of the above, the appeal was allowed.[Kumari H.P. Shobha v. Managing Director, MFA No. 3668 of 2015, decided on 17-01-2020]<\/p>\n

\n

Arunima Bose, Editorial Assistant has put this story together<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Karnataka High Court: H. T. Narendra Prasad J. allowed the appeal stating that the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal has ample powers under <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[6252,28334,29785,42792],"class_list":["post-239886","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-evidence-act","tag-karnataka-high-court","tag-law","tag-tribunal"],"yoast_head":"\n[MV Act] Kar HC | MACT must proactively invoke power under S. 165 Evidence Act, in case of inability of claimants to produce treating doctors as witnesses | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/29\/mv-act-kar-hc-mact-must-proactively-invoke-power-under-s-165-evidence-act-in-case-of-inability-of-claimants-to-produce-treating-doctors-as-witnesses\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"[MV Act] Kar HC | MACT must proactively invoke power under S. 165 Evidence Act, in case of inability of claimants to produce treating doctors as witnesses\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Karnataka High Court: H. T. Narendra Prasad J. allowed the appeal stating that the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal has ample powers under\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/29\/mv-act-kar-hc-mact-must-proactively-invoke-power-under-s-165-evidence-act-in-case-of-inability-of-claimants-to-produce-treating-doctors-as-witnesses\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-11-29T10:30:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3499-e1487871967209.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/29\/mv-act-kar-hc-mact-must-proactively-invoke-power-under-s-165-evidence-act-in-case-of-inability-of-claimants-to-produce-treating-doctors-as-witnesses\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/29\/mv-act-kar-hc-mact-must-proactively-invoke-power-under-s-165-evidence-act-in-case-of-inability-of-claimants-to-produce-treating-doctors-as-witnesses\/\",\"name\":\"[MV Act] Kar HC | MACT must proactively invoke power under S. 165 Evidence Act, in case of inability of claimants to produce treating doctors as witnesses | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-11-29T10:30:11+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/29\/mv-act-kar-hc-mact-must-proactively-invoke-power-under-s-165-evidence-act-in-case-of-inability-of-claimants-to-produce-treating-doctors-as-witnesses\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/29\/mv-act-kar-hc-mact-must-proactively-invoke-power-under-s-165-evidence-act-in-case-of-inability-of-claimants-to-produce-treating-doctors-as-witnesses\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/29\/mv-act-kar-hc-mact-must-proactively-invoke-power-under-s-165-evidence-act-in-case-of-inability-of-claimants-to-produce-treating-doctors-as-witnesses\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"[MV Act] Kar HC | MACT must proactively invoke power under S. 165 Evidence Act, in case of inability of claimants to produce treating doctors as witnesses\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"[MV Act] Kar HC | MACT must proactively invoke power under S. 165 Evidence Act, in case of inability of claimants to produce treating doctors as witnesses | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/29\/mv-act-kar-hc-mact-must-proactively-invoke-power-under-s-165-evidence-act-in-case-of-inability-of-claimants-to-produce-treating-doctors-as-witnesses\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"[MV Act] Kar HC | MACT must proactively invoke power under S. 165 Evidence Act, in case of inability of claimants to produce treating doctors as witnesses","og_description":"Karnataka High Court: H. T. Narendra Prasad J. allowed the appeal stating that the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal has ample powers under","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/29\/mv-act-kar-hc-mact-must-proactively-invoke-power-under-s-165-evidence-act-in-case-of-inability-of-claimants-to-produce-treating-doctors-as-witnesses\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-11-29T10:30:11+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3499-e1487871967209.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/29\/mv-act-kar-hc-mact-must-proactively-invoke-power-under-s-165-evidence-act-in-case-of-inability-of-claimants-to-produce-treating-doctors-as-witnesses\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/29\/mv-act-kar-hc-mact-must-proactively-invoke-power-under-s-165-evidence-act-in-case-of-inability-of-claimants-to-produce-treating-doctors-as-witnesses\/","name":"[MV Act] Kar HC | MACT must proactively invoke power under S. 165 Evidence Act, in case of inability of claimants to produce treating doctors as witnesses | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-11-29T10:30:11+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/29\/mv-act-kar-hc-mact-must-proactively-invoke-power-under-s-165-evidence-act-in-case-of-inability-of-claimants-to-produce-treating-doctors-as-witnesses\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/29\/mv-act-kar-hc-mact-must-proactively-invoke-power-under-s-165-evidence-act-in-case-of-inability-of-claimants-to-produce-treating-doctors-as-witnesses\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/29\/mv-act-kar-hc-mact-must-proactively-invoke-power-under-s-165-evidence-act-in-case-of-inability-of-claimants-to-produce-treating-doctors-as-witnesses\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"[MV Act] Kar HC | MACT must proactively invoke power under S. 165 Evidence Act, in case of inability of claimants to produce treating doctors as witnesses"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":239741,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/27\/chh-hc-how-is-doctrine-of-preponderance-of-probabilities-applied-in-cases-relating-to-motor-vehicle-act-appeal-allowed\/","url_meta":{"origin":239886,"position":0},"title":"Chh HC | How is \u201cdoctrine of preponderance of probabilities\u201d applied in cases relating to Motor Vehicle Act? Appeal Allowed","author":"Editor","date":"November 27, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court: Parth Prateem Sahu J., set aside the impugned award and allowed the appeal by applying the doctrine of preponderance of probabilities. On 25-01-2010, at about 7.30 AM, when Ghanshyam Baghel was going to his house, on the way, near turn towards Sunder Dera, one Pickup Bolero Jeep\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":205421,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/17\/party-cannot-be-denied-its-right-if-court-doesnt-exhibit-evidence-despite-reference-claimants-awarded-compensation-under-mv-act-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":239886,"position":1},"title":"Party cannot be denied its right if Court doesn’t exhibit evidence despite reference; claimants awarded compensation under MV Act: SC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 17, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cMotor Vehicles Act is a beneficial piece of legislation enacted to give solace to the victims of the motor accident who suffer bodily injury or die untimely.\u201d Supreme Court: The Bench comprising of A.M. Sapre and Indu Malhotra, JJ. allowed the present appeal filed against the decision of Rajasthan High\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":239266,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/17\/mv-act-kar-hc-strict-rules-of-evidence-are-not-required-to-be-followed-in-matters-relating-to-mv-act-1988-petition-allowed\/","url_meta":{"origin":239886,"position":2},"title":"[MV Act] Kar HC | Strict rules of evidence are not required to be followed in matters relating to MV Act, 1988; Petition allowed","author":"Editor","date":"November 17, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: A Division Bench of Alok Aradhe and H.T. Narendra Prasad JJ., allowed the appeal stating that the Tribunal is not expected to take or adopt a nicety of a civil or criminal case. The facts of the case are that the deceased was proceeding on his motorcycle\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":244363,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/25\/accident\/","url_meta":{"origin":239886,"position":3},"title":"[MV Act] Kar HC | Evidence is examined on the touchstone of \u2018preponderance of probabilities\u2019, Standard of proof of accident beyond reasonable doubt to not apply","author":"Editor","date":"February 25, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: A Division Bench of Alok Aradhe and Nataraj Rangaswamy, JJ., disposed of the appeal after modifying the compensation. The facts of the case are such that the deceased Sanjeev M Patil was crossing the road as a pedestrian at 6:00 am in morning when a bus being\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":264969,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/04\/acquittal-criminal-case-disciplinary-proceeding-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":239886,"position":4},"title":"Acquitted in the criminal case but employer still going ahead with the disciplinary proceeding? Read the law laid down by Supreme Court\u00a0","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"April 4, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\"The purpose of a disciplinary proceeding by an employer is to enquire into an allegation of misconduct by an employee which results in a violation of the service rules governing the relationship of employment.\"","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-118-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-118-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-118-3.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-118-3.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-118-3.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":215107,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/28\/ori-hc-filing-of-list-of-witnesses-by-the-petitioner-does-not-preclude-the-arbitral-tribunal-to-accord-approval-for-taking-evidence-if-the-party-assigns-sufficient-reasons\/","url_meta":{"origin":239886,"position":5},"title":"Ori HC | Filing of list of witnesses by petitioner does not preclude Arbitral Tribunal to accord approval for taking evidence if party assigns sufficient reasons","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 28, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Orissa High Court: A petition was filed before Dr A.K. Rath, J., challenging the order passed in an Arbitration Proceeding, whereby the application filed by the petitioner-respondent under Section 27 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to accord approval to the respondent to apply to the court for assistance\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/239886","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=239886"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/239886\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=239886"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=239886"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=239886"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}