{"id":239764,"date":"2020-11-27T16:54:05","date_gmt":"2020-11-27T11:24:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=239764"},"modified":"2020-11-27T17:09:15","modified_gmt":"2020-11-27T11:39:15","slug":"mad-hc-partially-deaf-and-mute-victim-voiced-to-have-been-subjected-to-attempt-to-rape-read-hcs-ruling","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/27\/mad-hc-partially-deaf-and-mute-victim-voiced-to-have-been-subjected-to-attempt-to-rape-read-hcs-ruling\/","title":{"rendered":"Madras HC | Partially deaf and mute victim voiced to have been subjected to attempt to rape: Read HC&#8217;s ruling"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Madras High Court: <\/strong>B. Pugalendhi, J., while partly allowing the appeal modified the offence to fall under Section 354 of the Penal Code 1860 from Section 377 IPC.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The instant appeal was filed against the conviction and sentence imposed on the appellant.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Trial Court found the appellant not guilty for the offence under Section 376 of Penal Code, 1860 but found him to be guilty for the offence under Section 377 IPC.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Appellant filed the instant appeal against the trial court&#8217;s decision.<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008080;\">Prosecutions&#8217; Case<\/span><\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Victim who has been stated to be partially deaf and completely dumb was aged 37 years at the time of occurrence and also unmarried.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">While the victim was taking bath in the pump set, the accused went behind and hugged her with an intention to commit rape.<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008080;\">Analysis<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"page\" title=\"Page 13\">\n<div class=\"layoutArea\">\n<div class=\"column\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Though the accused attempted to rape the victim girl, she escaped from such an attempt.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Considering the evidence of the Doctor [PW8] that there was no external injury, other than the injury noted in the shoulder of the victim and also considering the evidence of the Doctor [PW8] and the certificate issued by the Doctor, this Court opined that the said act of the appellant would fall under Section 354 IPC and not under Section 377 IPC.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bench noted that no material on record was placed to show that the accused had committed an unnatural offence.<\/p>\n<div class=\"page\" title=\"Page 14\">\n<div class=\"layoutArea\">\n<div class=\"column\">\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">PW4 an innocent victim thwarted on the accused, the moment he hugged her from back and therefore, she did not suffer any injury on her private parts.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">&#8220;Section 375 IPC: <\/span><\/strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Rape<\/span><\/p>\n<div class=\"page\" title=\"Page 14\">\n<div class=\"layoutArea\">\n<div class=\"column\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A man is said to commit &#8216;rape&#8217; who, except in the case hereinafter excepted, has sexual intercourse with a woman under circumstances falling under any of the six following descriptions:\u2014<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">First \u2014 Against her will.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Secondly \u2014 Without her consent.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Thirdly \u2014 With her consent, when her <span style=\"font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;\">consent has been obtained by putting her or any person in whom she is interested in fear of death or of hurt.<\/span><\/p>\n<div class=\"page\" title=\"Page 15\">\n<div class=\"layoutArea\">\n<div class=\"column\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Fourthly \u2014 With her consent, when the man knows that he is not her husband, and that her consent is given because she believes that he is another man to whom she is or believes herself to be lawfully married.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Fifthly \u2014 With her consent, when, at the time of giving such consent, by reason of unsoundness of mind or intoxication or the administration by him personally or through another of any stupefying or unwholesome substance, she is unable to understand the nature and consequences of that to which she gives consent.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Sixthly \u2014 With or without her consent, when she is under sixteen years of age.\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Section 377 IPC deals with the unnatural offence.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In accordance with the medical evidence, the victim girl suffered an abrasion on her shoulder in the scuffle to protect her from the accused, but no injury on her private parts was caused.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">In view of the above, the question for consideration was whether the said act of the accused would amount to the commission of offence under Section 377 or 375 IPC or will it fall under Section 354 IPC?<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Court held that the overt act attributed as against the accused does not fall under the ingredients for the offence under Sections 375 or 377 IPC. Whereas, the appellant attempted to outrage the modesty of the victim, who is partially deaf and dumb.<\/p>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Section 354 IPC: Assault or criminal force to woman with intent to outrage her modesty<\/span><\/h4>\n<div class=\"page\" title=\"Page 16\">\n<div class=\"layoutArea\">\n<div class=\"column\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>&#8220;Whoever assaults or uses criminal force to any woman, intending to outrage or knowing it to be likely that he will thereby outrage her modesty, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both\u201d.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In view of the above position, Supreme Court&#8217;s decision in <em>Aman Kumar v. State of Haryana,\u00a0<\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/t1hi9MsC\">(2004) 4 SCC 379<\/a> was referred.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Supreme Court&#8217;s decision in\u00a0<em>Tarkeshwar Sahu v. State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand),\u00a0<\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/G0MrTXRQ\">(2006) SCC 8 560<\/a> was referred in regard to the issue that in the absence of charge under <span style=\"font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;\">any other section, whether the accused should be acquitted or convicted for outraging the modesty of a woman. In this decision of the Supreme Court, Section 222 of the CrPC was invoked, which provides that in a case where the accused is charged with a major offence and the said charge is not proved, the accused may be convicted of the minor offence, though he was not charged with it.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In the present case, Court states that though the appellant was prosecuted for the offence under Section 376 IPC, he was <span style=\"font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;\">convicted and sentenced for the offence under Section<\/span><span style=\"font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;\">\u00a0377 IPC.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In view of the occurrence of the incident, the Court held that the said act of the appellant as discussed above would fall under Section 354 IPC.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hence the appeal was partly allowed. [Vairamuthu v. State, Crl. A (MD) No. 357 of 2015, decided on 01-10-2020]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Madras High Court: B. Pugalendhi, J., while partly allowing the appeal modified the offence to fall under Section 354 of the Penal <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[44229,29785,2567,43121,2572,32964,21112,19501,35824],"class_list":["post-239764","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-attempt-to-commit-rape","tag-law","tag-Madras_High_Court","tag-outraging-modesty-of-woman","tag-Rape","tag-section-354-ipc","tag-section-375-ipc","tag-section-377-ipc","tag-unnatural-offence"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Madras HC | Partially deaf and mute victim voiced to have been subjected to attempt to rape: Read HC&#039;s ruling | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/27\/mad-hc-partially-deaf-and-mute-victim-voiced-to-have-been-subjected-to-attempt-to-rape-read-hcs-ruling\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Madras HC | Partially deaf and mute victim voiced to have been subjected to attempt to rape: Read HC&#039;s ruling\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Madras High Court: B. Pugalendhi, J., while partly allowing the appeal modified the offence to fall under Section 354 of the Penal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/27\/mad-hc-partially-deaf-and-mute-victim-voiced-to-have-been-subjected-to-attempt-to-rape-read-hcs-ruling\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-11-27T11:24:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-11-27T11:39:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/madras-high-court1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/27\/mad-hc-partially-deaf-and-mute-victim-voiced-to-have-been-subjected-to-attempt-to-rape-read-hcs-ruling\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/27\/mad-hc-partially-deaf-and-mute-victim-voiced-to-have-been-subjected-to-attempt-to-rape-read-hcs-ruling\/\",\"name\":\"Madras HC | Partially deaf and mute victim voiced to have been subjected to attempt to rape: Read HC's ruling | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-11-27T11:24:05+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-11-27T11:39:15+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/27\/mad-hc-partially-deaf-and-mute-victim-voiced-to-have-been-subjected-to-attempt-to-rape-read-hcs-ruling\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/27\/mad-hc-partially-deaf-and-mute-victim-voiced-to-have-been-subjected-to-attempt-to-rape-read-hcs-ruling\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/27\/mad-hc-partially-deaf-and-mute-victim-voiced-to-have-been-subjected-to-attempt-to-rape-read-hcs-ruling\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Madras HC | Partially deaf and mute victim voiced to have been subjected to attempt to rape: Read HC&#8217;s ruling\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Madras HC | Partially deaf and mute victim voiced to have been subjected to attempt to rape: Read HC's ruling | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/27\/mad-hc-partially-deaf-and-mute-victim-voiced-to-have-been-subjected-to-attempt-to-rape-read-hcs-ruling\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Madras HC | Partially deaf and mute victim voiced to have been subjected to attempt to rape: Read HC's ruling","og_description":"Madras High Court: B. Pugalendhi, J., while partly allowing the appeal modified the offence to fall under Section 354 of the Penal","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/27\/mad-hc-partially-deaf-and-mute-victim-voiced-to-have-been-subjected-to-attempt-to-rape-read-hcs-ruling\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-11-27T11:24:05+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-11-27T11:39:15+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/madras-high-court1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/27\/mad-hc-partially-deaf-and-mute-victim-voiced-to-have-been-subjected-to-attempt-to-rape-read-hcs-ruling\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/27\/mad-hc-partially-deaf-and-mute-victim-voiced-to-have-been-subjected-to-attempt-to-rape-read-hcs-ruling\/","name":"Madras HC | Partially deaf and mute victim voiced to have been subjected to attempt to rape: Read HC's ruling | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-11-27T11:24:05+00:00","dateModified":"2020-11-27T11:39:15+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/27\/mad-hc-partially-deaf-and-mute-victim-voiced-to-have-been-subjected-to-attempt-to-rape-read-hcs-ruling\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/27\/mad-hc-partially-deaf-and-mute-victim-voiced-to-have-been-subjected-to-attempt-to-rape-read-hcs-ruling\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/27\/mad-hc-partially-deaf-and-mute-victim-voiced-to-have-been-subjected-to-attempt-to-rape-read-hcs-ruling\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Madras HC | Partially deaf and mute victim voiced to have been subjected to attempt to rape: Read HC&#8217;s ruling"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":273713,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/14\/allahabad-high-court-code-of-criminal-procedure-indian-penal-code-appeal-imprisonment-cross-examination-attempt-to-rape-informant-victim-complaint-section-376-511-ipc-section-376-ipc-section-161-crpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":239764,"position":0},"title":"Allahabad High Court observes statements of victim and informant unreliable, when not supported by medical evidence; Releases the accused convicted for Rape","author":"Editor","date":"September 14, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: In an appeal against the decision of the Trial Court whereby the accused\/appellant has been convicted and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life for the offence punishable under Section 376 of Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) with a fine of Rs. 10,000\/- and in default thereof, to further\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":341170,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/12\/chhattisgarh-hc-acquits-husband-accused-having-unnatural-sex-under-s-377-ipc-with-wife-leading-her-death\/","url_meta":{"origin":239764,"position":1},"title":"Chhattisgarh HC acquits husband accused of having unnatural sex with wife under S. 377 IPC leading to her death","author":"Editor","date":"February 12, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIf the age of wife is not below the age of 15 years then any sexual intercourse or sexual act by the husband with her wife cannot be termed as rape under the circumstances, as such absence of consent of wife for unnatural act loses its importance, therefore, the offence\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Chhattisgarh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Chhattisgarh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Chhattisgarh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Chhattisgarh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Chhattisgarh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":240766,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/16\/ori-hc-conviction-under-attempt-to-rape-held-in-1990-was-set-aside-in-2020-due-to-lack-of-clear-evidence-appeal-allowed-partly\/","url_meta":{"origin":239764,"position":2},"title":"Ori HC | Conviction under attempt to rape held in 1990 was set aside in 2020 due to lack of clear evidence; Appeal allowed partly","author":"Editor","date":"December 16, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Orissa High Court: S.K. Sahoo J. allowed the appeal in part setting aside conviction under Sections 376\/511, 354 and 457 of\u00a0 Penal Code, 1860 and upholding conviction under Section 448 IPC. The facts of the case are such that on 03-10-1989 at about 9.30 p.m. while the victim\/informant was sleeping\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":222114,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/14\/sikk-hc-prosecutions-failure-to-extract-actual-act-in-victims-deposition-results-in-alteration-of-conviction-for-rape-to-that-under-s-354-ipc\/","url_meta":{"origin":239764,"position":3},"title":"Sikk HC | Prosecution&#8217;s failure to extract actual act in victim&#8217;s deposition results in alteration of conviction for rape to that under S. 354 IPC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 14, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Sikkim High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Meenakshi Madan Rai and Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, JJ., while allowing an appeal, found error in trial court\u2019s decision of convicting the appellant under Section 375 of Penal Code, 1860, as none of the ingredients required for an offence to be established under\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":293614,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/01\/karnataka-high-court-recommends-central-government-make-law-on-necrophilia-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":239764,"position":4},"title":"Government should either amend S. 377 IPC or bring in a new provision to make Necrophilia and sadism punishable with life imprisonment: Karnataka High Court","author":"Sucheta","date":"June 1, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Holding that commission of rape on a woman's dead body would not attract Ss. 375 and 377, Penal Code, 1860, the Court pointed out that its high time for the Central Government to consider amending S. 377 or introduce a specific provision to address necrophilia, sadism.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"karnataka high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":244461,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/26\/megh-hc-no-disrobing-no-penetration-will-nudging-and-putting-the-victim-to-ground-amount-to-attempt-to-rape-read-what-constitutes-an-offence-under-sections-376-511-ipc\/","url_meta":{"origin":239764,"position":5},"title":"Megh HC | No disrobing, no penetration; will nudging and putting the victim to ground amount to attempt to rape? Read what constitutes an offence under Ss. 376\/511 IPC","author":"Editor","date":"February 26, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Meghalaya High Court: W. Diengdoh, J.,\u00a0 has held that the ingredients that are to be seen existing in an allegation of attempt to rape is that there must be firstly an intention to commit, then preparation to commit it and thirdly, to commit it. In the present case, the victim\/complainant\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/239764","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=239764"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/239764\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=239764"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=239764"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=239764"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}