{"id":239640,"date":"2020-11-25T19:00:31","date_gmt":"2020-11-25T13:30:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=239640"},"modified":"2020-11-27T09:39:58","modified_gmt":"2020-11-27T04:09:58","slug":"contractual-employment-chh-hc%e2%94%82-whether-it-is-justified-to-limit-the-number-of-persons-to-be-considered-in-view-of-the-requirement-and-nature-of-recruitmen","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/25\/contractual-employment-chh-hc%e2%94%82-whether-it-is-justified-to-limit-the-number-of-persons-to-be-considered-in-view-of-the-requirement-and-nature-of-recruitmen\/","title":{"rendered":"[Contractual Employment] Chh HC | Whether it is justified to limit the number of persons to be considered in view of the \u2018requirement\u2019 and \u2018nature\u2019 of recruitment? Appeal rejected"},"content":{"rendered":"

Chhattisgarh High Court: <\/strong>A Division Bench of P.R. Ramachandra Menon and Parth Prateem Sahu JJ., rejected the appeal finding no tenable ground to interdict the impugned verdict.<\/p>\n

The factual matrix reveals that a post of Librarian was sought to be filled up on contract basis. The Appellant, who is a Graduate in Library Science and a Post Graduate in Commerce, besides having the qualification of Post Graduate Diploma in Computer Applications, participated and was declared as ‘not eligible’ for the post on the ground that she has secured only less marks in the Graduation. Consequently, she filed objection asserting that no minimum percentage of marks for Graduation is stipulated in Chhattisgarh School Education Services (Educational and Administrative Cadre) Recruitment and Promotion Rules, 2019 for appointment to the post of Librarian. Further, the grievance not being redressed the Petitioner approached the Court by filing the writ petition contending that, since Rules do not stipulate any minimum marks for Graduation even for regular appointment, it cannot be insisted for appointment to the post on a contract basis. The prayer sought for is to quash\/set aside the condition of minimum qualification of 50% marks in Graduation for the post of Librarian.<\/p>\n

Counsel for the appellants submitted that there is no dispute with regard to \u2018Rules\u2019 which governs the appointment to the post in question. But the stipulation of qualification in Advertisement is stated as not in conformity with the said \u2018Rules\u2019.<\/p>\n

Counsel for the respondents relied on judgment Maharashtra Public Service Commission v. Sandeep Shriram Warade<\/em> (2019) 6 SCC 362<\/a> submitted that the merit was never sought to be compromised or diluted and it is very much within the purview of the power and prerogative of the Respondents to stipulate minimum 50% marks for Graduation, which was never against the Rules; as the Rules only prescribed the ‘minimum’ qualification. It was also contended by reliying on judgment Madras Institute of Development Studies v.. K. Sivasubramaniyan <\/em>(2016) 1 SCC 454<\/a> that the writ petitioner having participated in the process of selection cannot take a ‘u-turn’ and challenge the process after coming to know that she has not been selected.<\/p>\n

Rule 6 of \u2018Rules\u2019 dealing with ‘method of recruitment’ reads as follow:<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201c6. Method of recruitment. – (1) Recruitment to the service, after the commencement of these rules, shall be made by the following methods, namely:-<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

(a) By direct recruitment through selection (competitive examination\/interview) and Limited Departmental Examination;<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

(b) By promotion of members of the service;<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

(c) By transfer\/deputation of persons who hold in a substantive capacity such posts in such services as may be specified in this behalf;<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

(d) By absorption of person \/ persons who hold in such services an serve on any equivalent salary\/post in any Government service.\u201d<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/em><\/strong>The Court observed that \u201cthe appointment could be made by Direct Recruitment through selection (Competitive examination \/ Interview) and when such selection is made to the limited number of post notified, it may not be necessary or possible to call all persons who are having the minimum qualifications stipulated in the Rules, that too, for appointment on ‘contract basis’. Even in the case of a selection process having both the written test and interview, it is settled law that all the persons who get qualified in the written test need not be called for the interview and that the number can be limited to appropriate extent, based on the number of vacancies available.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

The Court further observed that the Appellant can not be heard to say that she is actually aggrieved because of considering persons having better merits (who have secured more than 50% of marks for Graduation) for the post, as appointment has to be made by identifying the most meritorious candidate. It was further observed that the Appellant was aware of the contents of the\u00a0 Notification right from the beginning and it was in her open eyes that she participated in the selection process and protested her selection only after the merit list was released.<\/p>\n

In view of the above, interference was rejected and appeal was dismissed.[Sajida Khan v. State of Chhattisgarh, 2020 SCC OnLine Chh 668<\/b><\/a>, decided on 19-11-2020]<\/p>\n

\n

Arunima Bose, Editorial Assistant has put this story together<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Chhattisgarh High Court: A Division Bench of P.R. Ramachandra Menon and Parth Prateem Sahu JJ., rejected the appeal finding no tenable ground <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[33063,29785,3106],"class_list":["post-239640","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-contractual-employment","tag-law","tag-recruitment"],"yoast_head":"\n[Contractual Employment] Chh HC | Whether it is justified to limit the number of persons to be considered in view of the \u2018requirement\u2019 and \u2018nature\u2019 of recruitment? Appeal rejected | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/25\/contractual-employment-chh-hc\u2502-whether-it-is-justified-to-limit-the-number-of-persons-to-be-considered-in-view-of-the-requirement-and-nature-of-recruitmen\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"[Contractual Employment] Chh HC | Whether it is justified to limit the number of persons to be considered in view of the \u2018requirement\u2019 and \u2018nature\u2019 of recruitment? Appeal rejected\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Chhattisgarh High Court: A Division Bench of P.R. Ramachandra Menon and Parth Prateem Sahu JJ., rejected the appeal finding no tenable ground\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/25\/contractual-employment-chh-hc\u2502-whether-it-is-justified-to-limit-the-number-of-persons-to-be-considered-in-view-of-the-requirement-and-nature-of-recruitmen\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-11-25T13:30:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-11-27T04:09:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/chattisgarh_high_court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/11\\\/25\\\/contractual-employment-chh-hc%e2%94%82-whether-it-is-justified-to-limit-the-number-of-persons-to-be-considered-in-view-of-the-requirement-and-nature-of-recruitmen\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/11\\\/25\\\/contractual-employment-chh-hc%e2%94%82-whether-it-is-justified-to-limit-the-number-of-persons-to-be-considered-in-view-of-the-requirement-and-nature-of-recruitmen\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Editor\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"headline\":\"[Contractual Employment] Chh HC | Whether it is justified to limit the number of persons to be considered in view of the \u2018requirement\u2019 and \u2018nature\u2019 of recruitment? Appeal rejected\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-11-25T13:30:31+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-11-27T04:09:58+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/11\\\/25\\\/contractual-employment-chh-hc%e2%94%82-whether-it-is-justified-to-limit-the-number-of-persons-to-be-considered-in-view-of-the-requirement-and-nature-of-recruitmen\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":716,\"commentCount\":0,\"keywords\":[\"Contractual Employment\",\"law\",\"recruitment\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/11\\\/25\\\/contractual-employment-chh-hc%e2%94%82-whether-it-is-justified-to-limit-the-number-of-persons-to-be-considered-in-view-of-the-requirement-and-nature-of-recruitmen\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/11\\\/25\\\/contractual-employment-chh-hc%e2%94%82-whether-it-is-justified-to-limit-the-number-of-persons-to-be-considered-in-view-of-the-requirement-and-nature-of-recruitmen\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/11\\\/25\\\/contractual-employment-chh-hc%e2%94%82-whether-it-is-justified-to-limit-the-number-of-persons-to-be-considered-in-view-of-the-requirement-and-nature-of-recruitmen\\\/\",\"name\":\"[Contractual Employment] Chh HC | Whether it is justified to limit the number of persons to be considered in view of the \u2018requirement\u2019 and \u2018nature\u2019 of recruitment? Appeal rejected | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-11-25T13:30:31+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-11-27T04:09:58+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/11\\\/25\\\/contractual-employment-chh-hc%e2%94%82-whether-it-is-justified-to-limit-the-number-of-persons-to-be-considered-in-view-of-the-requirement-and-nature-of-recruitmen\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/11\\\/25\\\/contractual-employment-chh-hc%e2%94%82-whether-it-is-justified-to-limit-the-number-of-persons-to-be-considered-in-view-of-the-requirement-and-nature-of-recruitmen\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/11\\\/25\\\/contractual-employment-chh-hc%e2%94%82-whether-it-is-justified-to-limit-the-number-of-persons-to-be-considered-in-view-of-the-requirement-and-nature-of-recruitmen\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"[Contractual Employment] Chh HC | Whether it is justified to limit the number of persons to be considered in view of the \u2018requirement\u2019 and \u2018nature\u2019 of recruitment? Appeal rejected\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_4\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"[Contractual Employment] Chh HC | Whether it is justified to limit the number of persons to be considered in view of the \u2018requirement\u2019 and \u2018nature\u2019 of recruitment? Appeal rejected | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/25\/contractual-employment-chh-hc\u2502-whether-it-is-justified-to-limit-the-number-of-persons-to-be-considered-in-view-of-the-requirement-and-nature-of-recruitmen\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"[Contractual Employment] Chh HC | Whether it is justified to limit the number of persons to be considered in view of the \u2018requirement\u2019 and \u2018nature\u2019 of recruitment? Appeal rejected","og_description":"Chhattisgarh High Court: A Division Bench of P.R. Ramachandra Menon and Parth Prateem Sahu JJ., rejected the appeal finding no tenable ground","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/25\/contractual-employment-chh-hc\u2502-whether-it-is-justified-to-limit-the-number-of-persons-to-be-considered-in-view-of-the-requirement-and-nature-of-recruitmen\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-11-25T13:30:31+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-11-27T04:09:58+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/chattisgarh_high_court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/25\/contractual-employment-chh-hc%e2%94%82-whether-it-is-justified-to-limit-the-number-of-persons-to-be-considered-in-view-of-the-requirement-and-nature-of-recruitmen\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/25\/contractual-employment-chh-hc%e2%94%82-whether-it-is-justified-to-limit-the-number-of-persons-to-be-considered-in-view-of-the-requirement-and-nature-of-recruitmen\/"},"author":{"name":"Editor","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"headline":"[Contractual Employment] Chh HC | Whether it is justified to limit the number of persons to be considered in view of the \u2018requirement\u2019 and \u2018nature\u2019 of recruitment? Appeal rejected","datePublished":"2020-11-25T13:30:31+00:00","dateModified":"2020-11-27T04:09:58+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/25\/contractual-employment-chh-hc%e2%94%82-whether-it-is-justified-to-limit-the-number-of-persons-to-be-considered-in-view-of-the-requirement-and-nature-of-recruitmen\/"},"wordCount":716,"commentCount":0,"keywords":["Contractual Employment","law","recruitment"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/25\/contractual-employment-chh-hc%e2%94%82-whether-it-is-justified-to-limit-the-number-of-persons-to-be-considered-in-view-of-the-requirement-and-nature-of-recruitmen\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/25\/contractual-employment-chh-hc%e2%94%82-whether-it-is-justified-to-limit-the-number-of-persons-to-be-considered-in-view-of-the-requirement-and-nature-of-recruitmen\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/25\/contractual-employment-chh-hc%e2%94%82-whether-it-is-justified-to-limit-the-number-of-persons-to-be-considered-in-view-of-the-requirement-and-nature-of-recruitmen\/","name":"[Contractual Employment] Chh HC | Whether it is justified to limit the number of persons to be considered in view of the \u2018requirement\u2019 and \u2018nature\u2019 of recruitment? Appeal rejected | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-11-25T13:30:31+00:00","dateModified":"2020-11-27T04:09:58+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/25\/contractual-employment-chh-hc%e2%94%82-whether-it-is-justified-to-limit-the-number-of-persons-to-be-considered-in-view-of-the-requirement-and-nature-of-recruitmen\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/25\/contractual-employment-chh-hc%e2%94%82-whether-it-is-justified-to-limit-the-number-of-persons-to-be-considered-in-view-of-the-requirement-and-nature-of-recruitmen\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/25\/contractual-employment-chh-hc%e2%94%82-whether-it-is-justified-to-limit-the-number-of-persons-to-be-considered-in-view-of-the-requirement-and-nature-of-recruitmen\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"[Contractual Employment] Chh HC | Whether it is justified to limit the number of persons to be considered in view of the \u2018requirement\u2019 and \u2018nature\u2019 of recruitment? Appeal rejected"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":216721,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/11\/kar-hc-right-to-regularisation-of-person-on-purely-contractual-basis-depends-on-express-or-implied-terms-of-appointment\/","url_meta":{"origin":239640,"position":0},"title":"Kar HC | Right to regularisation of person on purely contractual basis depends on express or implied terms of appointment","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 11, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: P.B. Bajanthri J., dismissed the petition for regularisation of the service on the ground that statutory rule recognizing such right was not in their favor. A petition was made to quash the endorsement issued to the petitioner and to seek respondent to regularize their services in the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":215789,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/15\/pat-hc-late-submission-of-non-creamy-layer-caste-certificate-not-a-ground-for-rejection-of-candidature\/","url_meta":{"origin":239640,"position":1},"title":"Pat HC | Late submission of non-creamy layer caste certificate \u2013 not a ground for rejection of candidature","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 15, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: Mohit Kumar Shah, J. allowed a petition seeking consideration of candidature against the Backward Caste category. Petitioner was working as Agriculture Coordinator since the date of his appointment on contractual basis. The contractual service of the petitioner had been extended from time to time and in the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":6791,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/09\/24\/pil-seeking-to-ban-campus-recruitments-made-by-psus-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":239640,"position":2},"title":"PIL seeking to ban campus recruitments made by PSUs, dismissed","author":"Sucheta","date":"September 24, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court: While dismissing the present PIL seeking to ban campus recruitment's and restrain the Central and State Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) from taking part in campus interviews, the Division Bench of S.K. Kaul, C.J. and T.S. Sivagnanam, J., held that, given the current climate of competition, the process\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "High Courts"","block_context":{"text":"High Courts","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/highcourts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":253235,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/26\/guest-lecturer\/","url_meta":{"origin":239640,"position":3},"title":"Chh HC | \u201cPetitioners’ status is that of a Guest Lecturer but that does not mean that they do not have any right\u201d; Protection granted to contractual Guest Lecturer from being replaced by another set of Guest lectures","author":"Editor","date":"August 26, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court: P. Sam Koshy, J. held that protection granted to the petitioner will not preclude the State Government from going in for filling up of the post by way of a regular appointment or by way of engaging contractual teachers under the rules for contractual employment.\u00a0 The instant\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":222305,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/19\/ph-hc-court-upholds-bars-decision-to-deny-enrollment-to-a-law-graduate-who-failed-to-get-cut-off-marks\/","url_meta":{"origin":239640,"position":4},"title":"P&H HC | Court upholds Bar\u2019s decision to deny enrollment to a law graduate who failed to get cut off marks","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 19, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: Declining to grant relief to a law graduate who had failed to obtain the cutoff marks in the LL.B course for enrollment into the Bar, a bench comprising of Rajiv Narain Raina, J. held that it would not be possible to accept the plea of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":268602,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/17\/ker-hc-professionalism-hc-declares-ntpcs-notification-mandating-appearance-in-clat-pg-2021-for-law-officer-appointment-is-violative-of-artic\/","url_meta":{"origin":239640,"position":5},"title":"Ker HC| Professionalism & competence not a fiefdom of elite institutions; HC declares NTPC\u2019s notification mandating appearance in CLAT PG-2021 for Law Officer appointment is violative of Article 16","author":"Editor","date":"June 17, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: In a significant relief to non-NLU law graduates seeking job opportunities in PSUs, V.G. Arun, J., declared that NTPC\u2019s notification for the recruitment of Assistant Law Officers is discriminatory and violates Article 16 of the Constitution for confining the selection process only to CLAT PG-2021 candidates.\u00a0\u00a0 The\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-273.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-273.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-273.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-273.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-273.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/239640","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=239640"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/239640\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=239640"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=239640"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=239640"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}