{"id":239418,"date":"2020-11-20T18:23:43","date_gmt":"2020-11-20T12:53:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=239418"},"modified":"2020-11-21T13:18:21","modified_gmt":"2020-11-21T07:48:21","slug":"mysterious-discrepancy-in-case-details-and-judgement-files-on-supreme-courts-website-creates-confusion","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/20\/mysterious-discrepancy-in-case-details-and-judgement-files-on-supreme-courts-website-creates-confusion\/","title":{"rendered":"Mysterious discrepancy in case details and judgement files on Supreme Court&#8217;s website creates confusion"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">While going through the judgments uploaded on the Supreme Court\u2019s official website, an anomaly has caught our attention. In two of the judgments uploaded on the website, the case details mention the bench strength of three judges but the judgment carries the name of only two.<\/p>\n<p>In<a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/19\/all-is-not-lost-for-shiksha-mitras-as-sc-dismisses-their-plea-challenging-2019-assistant-teachers-recruitment-process-but-asks-up-govt-to-give-them-a-third-chance\/\"> Ram Sharan Maurya v. State of UP<\/a>, C.A. No.-003707-003707 \/ 2020, the bench, as per the case details, consists of Justices UU Lalit, Vineet Saran and S. Ravindra Bhat, however, the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/11198_2020_33_1501_24707_Judgement_18-Nov-2020.pdf\">judgment<\/a>, as originally uploaded on the <a href=\"https:\/\/main.sci.gov.in\/\">Supreme Court\u2019s official website<\/a> on 18.11.2020, has been signed by Justices UU Lalit and MM Shantanagoudar.<\/p>\n<p>Here are the screenshots of the Case Details and the names of the judges mentioned in the judgment:<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_239420\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-239420\" style=\"width: 440px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-239420 \" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/photo_2020-11-20_11-59-56-gg-300x145.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"440\" height=\"213\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/photo_2020-11-20_11-59-56-gg-300x145.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/photo_2020-11-20_11-59-56-gg-60x29.jpg 60w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/photo_2020-11-20_11-59-56-gg.jpg 693w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 440px) 100vw, 440px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-239420\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Case Details: Ram Sharan Maurya v. State of UP, C.A. No.-003707-003707 \/ 2020<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<figure id=\"attachment_239419\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-239419\" style=\"width: 421px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-239419 \" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/photo_2020-11-20_11-59-12-300x258.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"421\" height=\"362\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/photo_2020-11-20_11-59-12-300x258.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/photo_2020-11-20_11-59-12-768x659.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/photo_2020-11-20_11-59-12-60x52.jpg 60w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/photo_2020-11-20_11-59-12.jpg 905w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 421px) 100vw, 421px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-239419\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Judges&#8217; names mentioned in the judgment<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>While this is sure to create confusion as to which bench delivered the judgment, the order in the said case clearly mentions that Justice UU Lalit has pronounced the verdict for himself and Justice MM Shantanagoudar.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\" wp-image-239441 aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/photo_2020-11-20_20-38-01-300x59.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"534\" height=\"105\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/photo_2020-11-20_20-38-01-300x59.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/photo_2020-11-20_20-38-01-768x152.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/photo_2020-11-20_20-38-01-60x12.jpg 60w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/photo_2020-11-20_20-38-01.jpg 907w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 534px) 100vw, 534px\" \/><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>Read the order <a href=\"https:\/\/main.sci.gov.in\/supremecourt\/2020\/11198\/11198_2020_33_1501_24707_Order_18-Nov-2020.pdf\">here<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Similarly, in Jayantilal Verma v. State of Madhya Pradesh (now Chattisgarh), Crl.A. No.-000590-000590 \/ 2015, as per the case details, consists of Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Dinesh Maheshwari and Hrishikesh Roy, however, the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/39602_2014_38_1501_24723_Judgement_19-Nov-2020.pdf\">judgment<\/a>, as originally uploaded on the<a href=\"https:\/\/main.sci.gov.in\/\"> Supreme Court\u2019s official website<\/a> on 19.11.2020, has been signed by Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hrishikesh Roy.<\/p>\n<p>Here are the screenshots of the Case Details and the names of the judges mentioned in the judgment:<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_239433\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-239433\" style=\"width: 401px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\" wp-image-239433\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/photo_2020-11-20_11-59-56-j-300x139.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"401\" height=\"186\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/photo_2020-11-20_11-59-56-j-300x139.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/photo_2020-11-20_11-59-56-j-60x28.jpg 60w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/photo_2020-11-20_11-59-56-j.jpg 715w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 401px) 100vw, 401px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-239433\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Case Details: Jayantilal Verma v. State of Madhya Pradesh (now Chattisgarh), Crl.A. No.-000590-000590 \/ 2015<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<figure id=\"attachment_239421\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-239421\" style=\"width: 410px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-239421\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/photo_2020-11-20_11-59-45-300x282.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"410\" height=\"385\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/photo_2020-11-20_11-59-45-300x282.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/photo_2020-11-20_11-59-45-60x56.jpg 60w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/photo_2020-11-20_11-59-45.jpg 637w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 410px) 100vw, 410px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-239421\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Judges&#8217; names mentioned in the Judgment<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Just like the previous case, the order in this case also clearly mentions that Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul has pronounced the verdict for himself and Justice Hrishikesh Roy.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\" wp-image-239442 aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/photo_2020-11-20_20-49-02-300x51.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"553\" height=\"94\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/photo_2020-11-20_20-49-02-300x51.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/photo_2020-11-20_20-49-02-768x130.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/photo_2020-11-20_20-49-02-886x153.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/photo_2020-11-20_20-49-02-60x10.jpg 60w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/photo_2020-11-20_20-49-02.jpg 905w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 553px) 100vw, 553px\" \/><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>Read the order <a href=\"https:\/\/main.sci.gov.in\/supremecourt\/2014\/39602\/39602_2014_38_1501_24723_Order_19-Nov-2020.pdf\">here<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">While these are just a couple of examples, similar discrepancies continue to appear on the Supreme Court website.<\/p>\n<p>We hope the Supreme Court looks into this and makes sure that the &#8216;Bench&#8217; column in the &#8216;Judgments&#8217; section on the Supreme Court website displays the names of the judges who have delivered the verdict.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>While going through the judgments uploaded on the Supreme Court\u2019s official website, an anomaly has caught our attention. In two of the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121,"featured_media":239471,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1188,2],"tags":[44146,44145,12981,5363,21364],"class_list":["post-239418","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hot_off_the_press","category-news","tag-bench","tag-case-details","tag-judgment","tag-supreme-court","tag-supreme-court-registry"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Mysterious discrepancy in case details and judgement files on Supreme Court&#039;s website creates confusion | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/20\/mysterious-discrepancy-in-case-details-and-judgement-files-on-supreme-courts-website-creates-confusion\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mysterious discrepancy in case details and judgement files on Supreme Court&#039;s website creates confusion\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"While going through the judgments uploaded on the Supreme Court\u2019s official website, an anomaly has caught our attention. In two of the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/20\/mysterious-discrepancy-in-case-details-and-judgement-files-on-supreme-courts-website-creates-confusion\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-11-20T12:53:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-11-21T07:48:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/sc-08-2.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/20\/mysterious-discrepancy-in-case-details-and-judgement-files-on-supreme-courts-website-creates-confusion\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/20\/mysterious-discrepancy-in-case-details-and-judgement-files-on-supreme-courts-website-creates-confusion\/\",\"name\":\"Mysterious discrepancy in case details and judgement files on Supreme Court's website creates confusion | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/20\/mysterious-discrepancy-in-case-details-and-judgement-files-on-supreme-courts-website-creates-confusion\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/20\/mysterious-discrepancy-in-case-details-and-judgement-files-on-supreme-courts-website-creates-confusion\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/sc-08-2.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-11-20T12:53:43+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-11-21T07:48:21+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/20\/mysterious-discrepancy-in-case-details-and-judgement-files-on-supreme-courts-website-creates-confusion\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/20\/mysterious-discrepancy-in-case-details-and-judgement-files-on-supreme-courts-website-creates-confusion\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/20\/mysterious-discrepancy-in-case-details-and-judgement-files-on-supreme-courts-website-creates-confusion\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/sc-08-2.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/sc-08-2.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":888},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/20\/mysterious-discrepancy-in-case-details-and-judgement-files-on-supreme-courts-website-creates-confusion\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mysterious discrepancy in case details and judgement files on Supreme Court&#8217;s website creates confusion\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\",\"name\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"caption\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\"},\"description\":\"Senior Associate Editor\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mysterious discrepancy in case details and judgement files on Supreme Court's website creates confusion | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/20\/mysterious-discrepancy-in-case-details-and-judgement-files-on-supreme-courts-website-creates-confusion\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mysterious discrepancy in case details and judgement files on Supreme Court's website creates confusion","og_description":"While going through the judgments uploaded on the Supreme Court\u2019s official website, an anomaly has caught our attention. In two of the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/20\/mysterious-discrepancy-in-case-details-and-judgement-files-on-supreme-courts-website-creates-confusion\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-11-20T12:53:43+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-11-21T07:48:21+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/sc-08-2.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Prachi Bhardwaj","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/20\/mysterious-discrepancy-in-case-details-and-judgement-files-on-supreme-courts-website-creates-confusion\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/20\/mysterious-discrepancy-in-case-details-and-judgement-files-on-supreme-courts-website-creates-confusion\/","name":"Mysterious discrepancy in case details and judgement files on Supreme Court's website creates confusion | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/20\/mysterious-discrepancy-in-case-details-and-judgement-files-on-supreme-courts-website-creates-confusion\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/20\/mysterious-discrepancy-in-case-details-and-judgement-files-on-supreme-courts-website-creates-confusion\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/sc-08-2.jpg","datePublished":"2020-11-20T12:53:43+00:00","dateModified":"2020-11-21T07:48:21+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/20\/mysterious-discrepancy-in-case-details-and-judgement-files-on-supreme-courts-website-creates-confusion\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/20\/mysterious-discrepancy-in-case-details-and-judgement-files-on-supreme-courts-website-creates-confusion\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/20\/mysterious-discrepancy-in-case-details-and-judgement-files-on-supreme-courts-website-creates-confusion\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/sc-08-2.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/sc-08-2.jpg","width":1331,"height":888},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/20\/mysterious-discrepancy-in-case-details-and-judgement-files-on-supreme-courts-website-creates-confusion\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mysterious discrepancy in case details and judgement files on Supreme Court&#8217;s website creates confusion"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942","name":"Prachi Bhardwaj","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","caption":"Prachi Bhardwaj"},"description":"Senior Associate Editor","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/sc-08-2.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":271250,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/05\/cji-nv-ramana-names-justice-uu-lalit-as-successor-know-your-next-chief-justice-of-india-supreme-court-legal-news-updates-research\/","url_meta":{"origin":239418,"position":0},"title":"CJI NV Ramana names Justice UU Lalit as his successor | Know Justice UU Lalit and his judgments","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"August 5, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"The Chief Justice of India, Justice NV Ramana has named Justice Uday Umesh Lalit as his successor. Set to become the 49th Chief Justice of India, Justice Lalit will retire in November, 2022. Justice Uday Umesh Lalit, was the 6th Senior Advocate to be directly elevated to the Supreme Court\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-44.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-44.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-44.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-44.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-44.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":272454,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/27\/justice-uu-lalit-takes-oath-as-49th-chief-justice-of-india-focuas-areas-judgments-background-supreme-court-ramana-retires-legal-news-updates-research\/","url_meta":{"origin":239418,"position":1},"title":"Justice UU Lalit takes oath as the 49th Chief Justice of India: His Journey, Judgments and Focus Areas as the New Chief\u00a0","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"August 27, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Justice Lalit , who took oath as a Supreme Court judge in 2014, has delivered over 270 judgments so far.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Know thy Judge&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Know thy Judge","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/judges-information\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-60-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-60-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-60-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-60-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-60-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":279479,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/12\/all-collegium-discussion-not-in-public-domain-only-final-decision-to-be-disclosed-supreme-court-right-to-information-legal-research-updates-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":239418,"position":2},"title":"All collegium discussions can&#8217;t be in public domain; only final decisions to be uploaded on SC website: SC\u00a0","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"December 12, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"In the case at hand, a Right to Information application sought the copies of resolution and decision taken in the Supreme Court Collegium\u2019s meeting dated 12.12.2018 regarding elevation of Chief Justices of Two High Courts. However, the application was rejected as no final decision was taken in the said meeting.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-495.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":289887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/17\/sc-directs-all-courts-and-tribunals-to-number-paragraphs-in-orders-and-judgments-in-seriatim-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":239418,"position":3},"title":"SC directs all Courts and Tribunals to number paragraphs in Orders and Judgments in seriatim","author":"Editor","date":"April 17, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court considered the adoption of uniform format for Judgment and Orders, including paragraphing.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"orders and judgments","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/orders-and-judgments.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/orders-and-judgments.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/orders-and-judgments.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/orders-and-judgments.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":317105,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/15\/electoral-bond-case-supreme-court-notice-sbi-disclose-eb-unique-numbers-revealing-link-between-donors-political-parties\/","url_meta":{"origin":239418,"position":4},"title":"[Electoral Bond Case] Supreme Court directs SBI to disclose EB unique numbers revealing link between donors and political parties","author":"Apoorva","date":"March 15, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"On 12-03-2024, SBI has furnished the electoral bonds details to the Election Commission of India in compliance with the court's order. Subsequently, on 14-03-2024 ECI uploaded the electoral bonds data supplied by SBI on its official website.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Electoral Bond Case","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Electoral-Bond-Case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Electoral-Bond-Case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Electoral-Bond-Case.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Electoral-Bond-Case.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":278932,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/02\/supreme-court-november-roundup-2022-cji-chandrachud-uu-lalit-kathua-chhawla-rajiv-gandhi-assassination-legal-research-updates-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":239418,"position":5},"title":"Supreme Court November 2022| CJI Chandrachud&#8217;s to-do list; EWS Quota; Kathua and Chhawla gangrape-murder cases; Rajiv Gandhi assassination case; Never Reported Judgments; and more","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"December 2, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"This roundup revisits the analyses of Supreme Court\u2019s judgments\/orders on constitutionality of EWS Quota and dissent; Juvenility of Kathua gangrape-murder accused; acquittal of all Chhawla gangrape-murder accused; why Rajiv Gandhi assassination convicts were set free, and more. It also covers reports on Justice Chandrachud's appointment as the 50th CJI and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legal RoundUp&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-15.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/239418","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/121"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=239418"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/239418\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/239471"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=239418"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=239418"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=239418"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}