{"id":239010,"date":"2020-11-11T11:41:57","date_gmt":"2020-11-11T06:11:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=239010"},"modified":"2020-11-11T11:44:24","modified_gmt":"2020-11-11T06:14:24","slug":"cestat-%e2%94%82-goods-under-sfis-scheme-dutiable-and-not-exempted-goods-provisions-of-r-6-3-of-ccr-2004-not-applicable-tribunal-allows-appeal-removing-demand-of-interest-and-penalty","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/11\/cestat-%e2%94%82-goods-under-sfis-scheme-dutiable-and-not-exempted-goods-provisions-of-r-6-3-of-ccr-2004-not-applicable-tribunal-allows-appeal-removing-demand-of-interest-and-penalty\/","title":{"rendered":"CESTAT | Goods under SFIS Scheme dutiable and not exempted goods, provisions of R. 6 (3) of CCR, 2004 not applicable; Tribunal allows appeal removing demand of interest and penalty"},"content":{"rendered":"

Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): <\/strong>Ashok Jindal (Judicial Member), allowed an appeal which was filed to decide over the issue that whether the provisions of Rule 6 (3) of CCR, 2004 were applicable to the facts of this case or not.<\/p>\n

The appellant is engaged in the manufacture of DG sets and enclosures which were being sold by the appellant in open market and to various customers against the Duty Credit Scrips issued to them by DGFT under Served From India Scheme (\u2018SFIS\u2019) in terms of Chapter 3 of the Foreign Trade Policy 2009-2014 (\u2018FTP\u2019). The appellant cleared the goods during the period April 2012 to January 2016. An audit was conducted and it was found that the appellant has cleared DG sets without payment of excise duty under the Status Holder Incentive Scheme by availing the benefit and under SFIS. Further, in terms of CBEC the provisions of Rule 6(3) of the CCR, 2004 were not applicable for the goods cleared. proceedings were initiated against the appellant for recoveries for the goods cleared by the appellant to the goods cleared to the buyers by availing the benefit Two show cause notices were issued and adjudicated; demands were confirmed along with interest and equivalent amount of penalty was imposed. Thus, the instant appeal was filed.<\/p>\n

Counsel for the appellant, Krati Somani submitted that SFIS duty credit scrips\/licenses were issued by the DGFT as per Chapter 3 of the FTP and Para 3.12.8 of the FTP states that duty credit scrips are permitted to be utilized for payment of excise duty in terms of Department of Revenue Notification for procurement from domestic sources, in respect of items permitted for imports under SFIS Duty Credit Scrip. Thus, SFIS scrips provide an alternate way of paying the duty on goods other than discharging the duty liability in cash or through Cenvat. The counsel for the respondent, H.S. Brar submitted that it was a fact on record that the goods had been cleared without payment of duty claiming the benefit of exemption, therefore, the provisions of Rule 6 (3) of CCR, 2004 were applicable when the appellant is engaged in dealing the goods duty-free as well as dutiable goods.<\/p>\n

The Tribunal observed that it was an admitted position by both sides that the goods in question manufactured by the appellant are dutiable under Chapter 85 of the CETA, 1985. The Tribunal considered the judgments of Voltamp Transformers Ltd. v. CCE Vadodara<\/em>, 2011 SCC OnLine CESTAT 2582<\/a> and CCE v. Kirloskar Chillers (P) Ltd<\/em>., 2017 SCC OnLine CESTAT 7633<\/a> relied on by the counsel of the appellant where it was held that the goods supplied under Notification No. 34\/2006-CE dated 14.06.2006 is not exempted, therefore, the provisions of Rule 6 (3) (b) of CCR, 2004 are not applicable.<\/em><\/p>\n

The Tribunal while allowing the appeal held that goods under SFIS Scheme were dutiable and not exempted goods, therefore, the provisions of Rule 6 (3) of the CCR, 2004 were not applicable to the facts of the present case further holding that no demand of interest and penalty was sustainable.[Sudhir Power Ltd. Unit-III v. CCE & ST, Excise Appeal No. 61004 of 2018, decided on 28-10-2020]<\/p>\n

\n

Suchita Shukla, Editorial Assistant has put this story together<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): Ashok Jindal (Judicial Member), allowed an appeal which was filed to decide over the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":201689,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[6651,44042,44041,29785],"class_list":["post-239010","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-cestat","tag-duty-free","tag-exempted-goods","tag-law"],"yoast_head":"\nCESTAT | Goods under SFIS Scheme dutiable and not exempted goods, provisions of R. 6 (3) of CCR, 2004 not applicable; Tribunal allows appeal removing demand of interest and penalty | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/11\/cestat-\u2502-goods-under-sfis-scheme-dutiable-and-not-exempted-goods-provisions-of-r-6-3-of-ccr-2004-not-applicable-tribunal-allows-appeal-removing-demand-of-interest-and-penalty\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"CESTAT | Goods under SFIS Scheme dutiable and not exempted goods, provisions of R. 6 (3) of CCR, 2004 not applicable; Tribunal allows appeal removing demand of interest and penalty\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): Ashok Jindal (Judicial Member), allowed an appeal which was filed to decide over the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/11\/cestat-\u2502-goods-under-sfis-scheme-dutiable-and-not-exempted-goods-provisions-of-r-6-3-of-ccr-2004-not-applicable-tribunal-allows-appeal-removing-demand-of-interest-and-penalty\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-11-11T06:11:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-11-11T06:14:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/11\\\/11\\\/cestat-%e2%94%82-goods-under-sfis-scheme-dutiable-and-not-exempted-goods-provisions-of-r-6-3-of-ccr-2004-not-applicable-tribunal-allows-appeal-removing-demand-of-interest-and-penalty\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/11\\\/11\\\/cestat-%e2%94%82-goods-under-sfis-scheme-dutiable-and-not-exempted-goods-provisions-of-r-6-3-of-ccr-2004-not-applicable-tribunal-allows-appeal-removing-demand-of-interest-and-penalty\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Editor\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"headline\":\"CESTAT | Goods under SFIS Scheme dutiable and not exempted goods, provisions of R. 6 (3) of CCR, 2004 not applicable; Tribunal allows appeal removing demand of interest and penalty\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-11-11T06:11:57+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-11-11T06:14:24+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/11\\\/11\\\/cestat-%e2%94%82-goods-under-sfis-scheme-dutiable-and-not-exempted-goods-provisions-of-r-6-3-of-ccr-2004-not-applicable-tribunal-allows-appeal-removing-demand-of-interest-and-penalty\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":543,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/11\\\/11\\\/cestat-%e2%94%82-goods-under-sfis-scheme-dutiable-and-not-exempted-goods-provisions-of-r-6-3-of-ccr-2004-not-applicable-tribunal-allows-appeal-removing-demand-of-interest-and-penalty\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2018\\\/09\\\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"CESTAT\",\"Duty Free\",\"Exempted Goods\",\"law\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"Tribunals\\\/Commissions\\\/Regulatory Bodies\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/11\\\/11\\\/cestat-%e2%94%82-goods-under-sfis-scheme-dutiable-and-not-exempted-goods-provisions-of-r-6-3-of-ccr-2004-not-applicable-tribunal-allows-appeal-removing-demand-of-interest-and-penalty\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/11\\\/11\\\/cestat-%e2%94%82-goods-under-sfis-scheme-dutiable-and-not-exempted-goods-provisions-of-r-6-3-of-ccr-2004-not-applicable-tribunal-allows-appeal-removing-demand-of-interest-and-penalty\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/11\\\/11\\\/cestat-%e2%94%82-goods-under-sfis-scheme-dutiable-and-not-exempted-goods-provisions-of-r-6-3-of-ccr-2004-not-applicable-tribunal-allows-appeal-removing-demand-of-interest-and-penalty\\\/\",\"name\":\"CESTAT | Goods under SFIS Scheme dutiable and not exempted goods, provisions of R. 6 (3) of CCR, 2004 not applicable; Tribunal allows appeal removing demand of interest and penalty | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/11\\\/11\\\/cestat-%e2%94%82-goods-under-sfis-scheme-dutiable-and-not-exempted-goods-provisions-of-r-6-3-of-ccr-2004-not-applicable-tribunal-allows-appeal-removing-demand-of-interest-and-penalty\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/11\\\/11\\\/cestat-%e2%94%82-goods-under-sfis-scheme-dutiable-and-not-exempted-goods-provisions-of-r-6-3-of-ccr-2004-not-applicable-tribunal-allows-appeal-removing-demand-of-interest-and-penalty\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2018\\\/09\\\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-11-11T06:11:57+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-11-11T06:14:24+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/11\\\/11\\\/cestat-%e2%94%82-goods-under-sfis-scheme-dutiable-and-not-exempted-goods-provisions-of-r-6-3-of-ccr-2004-not-applicable-tribunal-allows-appeal-removing-demand-of-interest-and-penalty\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/11\\\/11\\\/cestat-%e2%94%82-goods-under-sfis-scheme-dutiable-and-not-exempted-goods-provisions-of-r-6-3-of-ccr-2004-not-applicable-tribunal-allows-appeal-removing-demand-of-interest-and-penalty\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/11\\\/11\\\/cestat-%e2%94%82-goods-under-sfis-scheme-dutiable-and-not-exempted-goods-provisions-of-r-6-3-of-ccr-2004-not-applicable-tribunal-allows-appeal-removing-demand-of-interest-and-penalty\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2018\\\/09\\\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2018\\\/09\\\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/11\\\/11\\\/cestat-%e2%94%82-goods-under-sfis-scheme-dutiable-and-not-exempted-goods-provisions-of-r-6-3-of-ccr-2004-not-applicable-tribunal-allows-appeal-removing-demand-of-interest-and-penalty\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"CESTAT | Goods under SFIS Scheme dutiable and not exempted goods, provisions of R. 6 (3) of CCR, 2004 not applicable; Tribunal allows appeal removing demand of interest and penalty\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_4\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"CESTAT | Goods under SFIS Scheme dutiable and not exempted goods, provisions of R. 6 (3) of CCR, 2004 not applicable; Tribunal allows appeal removing demand of interest and penalty | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/11\/cestat-\u2502-goods-under-sfis-scheme-dutiable-and-not-exempted-goods-provisions-of-r-6-3-of-ccr-2004-not-applicable-tribunal-allows-appeal-removing-demand-of-interest-and-penalty\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"CESTAT | Goods under SFIS Scheme dutiable and not exempted goods, provisions of R. 6 (3) of CCR, 2004 not applicable; Tribunal allows appeal removing demand of interest and penalty","og_description":"Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): Ashok Jindal (Judicial Member), allowed an appeal which was filed to decide over the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/11\/cestat-\u2502-goods-under-sfis-scheme-dutiable-and-not-exempted-goods-provisions-of-r-6-3-of-ccr-2004-not-applicable-tribunal-allows-appeal-removing-demand-of-interest-and-penalty\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-11-11T06:11:57+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-11-11T06:14:24+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/11\/cestat-%e2%94%82-goods-under-sfis-scheme-dutiable-and-not-exempted-goods-provisions-of-r-6-3-of-ccr-2004-not-applicable-tribunal-allows-appeal-removing-demand-of-interest-and-penalty\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/11\/cestat-%e2%94%82-goods-under-sfis-scheme-dutiable-and-not-exempted-goods-provisions-of-r-6-3-of-ccr-2004-not-applicable-tribunal-allows-appeal-removing-demand-of-interest-and-penalty\/"},"author":{"name":"Editor","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"headline":"CESTAT | Goods under SFIS Scheme dutiable and not exempted goods, provisions of R. 6 (3) of CCR, 2004 not applicable; Tribunal allows appeal removing demand of interest and penalty","datePublished":"2020-11-11T06:11:57+00:00","dateModified":"2020-11-11T06:14:24+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/11\/cestat-%e2%94%82-goods-under-sfis-scheme-dutiable-and-not-exempted-goods-provisions-of-r-6-3-of-ccr-2004-not-applicable-tribunal-allows-appeal-removing-demand-of-interest-and-penalty\/"},"wordCount":543,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/11\/cestat-%e2%94%82-goods-under-sfis-scheme-dutiable-and-not-exempted-goods-provisions-of-r-6-3-of-ccr-2004-not-applicable-tribunal-allows-appeal-removing-demand-of-interest-and-penalty\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg","keywords":["CESTAT","Duty Free","Exempted Goods","law"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","Tribunals\/Commissions\/Regulatory Bodies"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/11\/cestat-%e2%94%82-goods-under-sfis-scheme-dutiable-and-not-exempted-goods-provisions-of-r-6-3-of-ccr-2004-not-applicable-tribunal-allows-appeal-removing-demand-of-interest-and-penalty\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/11\/cestat-%e2%94%82-goods-under-sfis-scheme-dutiable-and-not-exempted-goods-provisions-of-r-6-3-of-ccr-2004-not-applicable-tribunal-allows-appeal-removing-demand-of-interest-and-penalty\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/11\/cestat-%e2%94%82-goods-under-sfis-scheme-dutiable-and-not-exempted-goods-provisions-of-r-6-3-of-ccr-2004-not-applicable-tribunal-allows-appeal-removing-demand-of-interest-and-penalty\/","name":"CESTAT | Goods under SFIS Scheme dutiable and not exempted goods, provisions of R. 6 (3) of CCR, 2004 not applicable; Tribunal allows appeal removing demand of interest and penalty | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/11\/cestat-%e2%94%82-goods-under-sfis-scheme-dutiable-and-not-exempted-goods-provisions-of-r-6-3-of-ccr-2004-not-applicable-tribunal-allows-appeal-removing-demand-of-interest-and-penalty\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/11\/cestat-%e2%94%82-goods-under-sfis-scheme-dutiable-and-not-exempted-goods-provisions-of-r-6-3-of-ccr-2004-not-applicable-tribunal-allows-appeal-removing-demand-of-interest-and-penalty\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg","datePublished":"2020-11-11T06:11:57+00:00","dateModified":"2020-11-11T06:14:24+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/11\/cestat-%e2%94%82-goods-under-sfis-scheme-dutiable-and-not-exempted-goods-provisions-of-r-6-3-of-ccr-2004-not-applicable-tribunal-allows-appeal-removing-demand-of-interest-and-penalty\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/11\/cestat-%e2%94%82-goods-under-sfis-scheme-dutiable-and-not-exempted-goods-provisions-of-r-6-3-of-ccr-2004-not-applicable-tribunal-allows-appeal-removing-demand-of-interest-and-penalty\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/11\/cestat-%e2%94%82-goods-under-sfis-scheme-dutiable-and-not-exempted-goods-provisions-of-r-6-3-of-ccr-2004-not-applicable-tribunal-allows-appeal-removing-demand-of-interest-and-penalty\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/11\/cestat-%e2%94%82-goods-under-sfis-scheme-dutiable-and-not-exempted-goods-provisions-of-r-6-3-of-ccr-2004-not-applicable-tribunal-allows-appeal-removing-demand-of-interest-and-penalty\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"CESTAT | Goods under SFIS Scheme dutiable and not exempted goods, provisions of R. 6 (3) of CCR, 2004 not applicable; Tribunal allows appeal removing demand of interest and penalty"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":246552,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/06\/cenvat-credit-rules\/","url_meta":{"origin":239010,"position":0},"title":"CESTAT | R. 6(3) of CCR, 2004 applicable only to manufacturers who manufacture two classes of the goods i.e. non-exempted and exempted goods; Tribunal allows appeal sets aside interest and penalty","author":"Editor","date":"April 6, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): Rachna Gupta (Judicial Member) allowed an appeal which was filed against the rejection of appeal in regard to interest and penalty matter under Rule 6 (3) of Cenvat Credit Rules. Appellant was engaged in manufacture of PP woven fabrics and were also\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":239268,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/17\/cestat-procedural-lapse-is-condonable-and-denial-of-substantive-right-is-unjustified-tribunal-allows-appeal-under-r-6-3a-ii-of-cenvat-credit-rules-2004\/","url_meta":{"origin":239010,"position":1},"title":"CESTAT | Procedural lapse is condonable and denial of substantive right is unjustified; Tribunal allows appeal under R. 6 (3A) (ii) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004","author":"Editor","date":"November 17, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): The Coram of Sulekha Beevi (Judicial Member) and P. Anjani Kumar (Technical Member) allowed an appeal which was filed aggrieved by the judgment and order of the Commissioner (Appeals). The appellants had entered into a Business Solutions Agreement and another Business Promotion\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":241102,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/23\/cestat-whether-r-64-credit-of-capital-goods-admissible-if-the-production-and-clearance-of-dutiable-goods-takes-place-within-two-years-from-the-date-of-commencement-of-production-tribunal-explain\/","url_meta":{"origin":239010,"position":2},"title":"CESTAT | Whether R. 6(4) credit of capital goods admissible if the production and clearance of dutiable goods takes place within two years from the date of commencement of production; Tribunal explains while allowing the appeal","author":"Editor","date":"December 23, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): The Coram of Dilip Gupta (President) and P. Anjani Kumar (Technical Member) allowed an appeal where they had to decide whether rule 6(4) credit of capital goods is admissible if the production and clearance of dutiable goods take place within two years\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":241180,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/24\/cestat-whether-a-by-product-from-a-factory-be-considered-as-manufactured-goods-and-should-it-fall-under-excisable-goods-or-exempted-goods-as-provided-in-r-2d-o\/","url_meta":{"origin":239010,"position":3},"title":"CESTAT | Whether a by-product from a factory be considered as manufactured goods and should it fall under \u2018excisable goods\u2019 or \u2018exempted goods\u2019 as provided in R. 2(d) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004; Tribunal answers while dismissing appeal \u00a0","author":"Editor","date":"December 24, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): The Coram of Dilip Gupta (President) and P. Anjani Kumar (Technical Member) dismissed an appeal filed by the Department aggrieved against the order of Commissioner (Appeals). The respondent was engaged in the manufacture of lead and zinc and is also availing CENVAT\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":252612,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/12\/exempted-goods\/","url_meta":{"origin":239010,"position":4},"title":"CESTAT | Is there a requirement to pay 10% of value of exempted goods in terms of Rule 6(3) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004? Tribunal answers","author":"Editor","date":"August 12, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): The Coram of Ramesh Nair (Judicial Member) and Raju (Technical Member) allowed the appeal in which the issue was that whether the appellant was required to pay 10% of value of exempted goods in terms of Rule 6(3) of Cenvat Credit Rules,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":237392,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/13\/cestat-services-as-that-of-cha-cnf-testing-and-sampling-etc-are-eligible-to-be-classified-as-the-input-services-tribunal-entitles-appellant-to-avail-cenvat-credit-for-tax-paid-on-such-input-ser\/","url_meta":{"origin":239010,"position":5},"title":"CESTAT | Services as that of CHA, CNF, testing and sampling, etc. are eligible to be classified as the input services; Tribunal entitles appellant to avail CENVAT Credit for tax paid on such input services","author":"Editor","date":"October 13, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): Rachna Gupta (Judicial Member) allowed an appeal that was filed against the Order-in-Appeal of Commissioner (A). That the appellant who was engaged in the manufacture of Zinc \/ Lead \/ Bulk Concentrate Sulphuric Acid, Zinc Cathode had availed various services at Kandla\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/239010","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=239010"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/239010\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/201689"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=239010"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=239010"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=239010"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}