{"id":239006,"date":"2020-11-11T12:02:35","date_gmt":"2020-11-11T06:32:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=239006"},"modified":"2020-11-12T09:42:06","modified_gmt":"2020-11-12T04:12:06","slug":"negotiable-instruments-act-ker-hc-what-determines-commencement-of-period-of-presentation-is-date-of-cheque-and-not-the-date-of-delivery-of-cheque","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/11\/negotiable-instruments-act-ker-hc-what-determines-commencement-of-period-of-presentation-is-date-of-cheque-and-not-the-date-of-delivery-of-cheque\/","title":{"rendered":"[Negotiable Instruments Act] Ker HC | What determines commencement of period of presentation is date of cheque and not the date of delivery of cheque"},"content":{"rendered":"

Kerala High Court:\u00a0<\/strong>A Division Bench of A. Hariprasad and T.V. Anilkumar, JJ., while addressing a review petition,\u00a0 reiterated that the relevant date which makes a postdated cheque payable is the date which the cheque bears.<\/p>\n

In the appeal, the money decree in the respondent’s favour was confirmed rejecting the appellant’s plea that the suit was barred by limitation. It was held that the relevant article in the Limitation Act that applied to the suit was not Article 19 but Article 35 of the said Act.<\/p>\n

\n

Court had laid down the law that the appropriate Article which applied to the suit instituted on a dishonoured cheque is Article 35 of the Limitation Act, 1963.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n
\n
\n

It is trite law that a review is not an appeal in disguise.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

Bench stated that it is true that the cheques were presented to the Bank for encashment after the passage of hardly seven years, since the date of delivery.<\/p>\n

\n

As per Section 84(2) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the reasonableness of time to be taken for presentation from the date of issue of cheque, shall be determined with due regard to the nature of the instrument, the banking and trade usage and also the facts of each particular case.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

In the opinion of the Court, the provision in Section 84(1) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 contemplating time of issue of the cheque as the starting point for determining the reasonable time required for the presentation of cheque, can be given effect to without having regard to the Scheme and purpose of Section 138 NI Act.<\/p>\n

\n

Date on which a cheque is drawn may not be confused with date of issue but must be understood as the date mentioned on the face of the document.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

The reasonable period stipulated in Section 84(1) and (2) of the NI Act shall be read harmoniously with the time prescribed in proviso (a) to Section 138 NI Act.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n

“…what determines the time of commencement of period of presentation is the date of the cheque and not the date of delivery of the cheque.”<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Bench further observed that the date of issue of cheque mentioned in Section 84(1) is not irrelevant and capable of rejection in cases where the date of cheque appearing on its face and the date of issue are one and the same.<\/p>\n

In the instant case, cheques were postdated and they became payable only from the dates endorsed. Even though the dates of presentation and dishonour were not pleaded, the cheques were presented within the period of 2 months since they became payable.<\/p>\n

The review fails in the instant matter as the issue of cheques was as early as in 2001, the presentation made in 2007 in accordance with Section 138(a) cannot be said to offend Section 84(2) of NI Act.<\/p>\n

High Court partly allowed the review petition and ordered that the following sentence which was under review shall stand deleted.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n

\u201cOne of us (Justice A.Hariprasad) had occasion to hold in an unreported decision in Puthenveettil Malathy v. Kuttilakandy Balakrishnan [A.S.No.436 of 2002] that Article 35 is the appropriate provision applicable to a suit brought for recovery of money on dishonour of a cheque issued in discharge of liability of the debtor.\u201d<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n

[Subanamma Ninan v. George Veeran, 2020 SCC OnLine Ker 4151<\/b><\/a>, decided on 18-09-2020]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Kerala High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench of A. Hariprasad and T.V. Anilkumar, JJ., while addressing a review petition,\u00a0 reiterated that the relevant date <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2862,32239,4841,23584,44040],"class_list":["post-239006","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-dishonour_of_cheque","tag-money-decree","tag-review-petition","tag-section-138-ni-act","tag-section-841-ni-act"],"yoast_head":"\n[Negotiable Instruments Act] Ker HC | What determines commencement of period of presentation is date of cheque and not the date of delivery of cheque | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/11\/negotiable-instruments-act-ker-hc-what-determines-commencement-of-period-of-presentation-is-date-of-cheque-and-not-the-date-of-delivery-of-cheque\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"[Negotiable Instruments Act] Ker HC | What determines commencement of period of presentation is date of cheque and not the date of delivery of cheque\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Kerala High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench of A. Hariprasad and T.V. Anilkumar, JJ., while addressing a review petition,\u00a0 reiterated that the relevant date\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/11\/negotiable-instruments-act-ker-hc-what-determines-commencement-of-period-of-presentation-is-date-of-cheque-and-not-the-date-of-delivery-of-cheque\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-11-11T06:32:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-11-12T04:12:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/KeralaHC-e1521442636157.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/11\/negotiable-instruments-act-ker-hc-what-determines-commencement-of-period-of-presentation-is-date-of-cheque-and-not-the-date-of-delivery-of-cheque\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/11\/negotiable-instruments-act-ker-hc-what-determines-commencement-of-period-of-presentation-is-date-of-cheque-and-not-the-date-of-delivery-of-cheque\/\",\"name\":\"[Negotiable Instruments Act] Ker HC | What determines commencement of period of presentation is date of cheque and not the date of delivery of cheque | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-11-11T06:32:35+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-11-12T04:12:06+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/11\/negotiable-instruments-act-ker-hc-what-determines-commencement-of-period-of-presentation-is-date-of-cheque-and-not-the-date-of-delivery-of-cheque\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/11\/negotiable-instruments-act-ker-hc-what-determines-commencement-of-period-of-presentation-is-date-of-cheque-and-not-the-date-of-delivery-of-cheque\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/11\/negotiable-instruments-act-ker-hc-what-determines-commencement-of-period-of-presentation-is-date-of-cheque-and-not-the-date-of-delivery-of-cheque\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"[Negotiable Instruments Act] Ker HC | What determines commencement of period of presentation is date of cheque and not the date of delivery of cheque\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"[Negotiable Instruments Act] Ker HC | What determines commencement of period of presentation is date of cheque and not the date of delivery of cheque | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/11\/negotiable-instruments-act-ker-hc-what-determines-commencement-of-period-of-presentation-is-date-of-cheque-and-not-the-date-of-delivery-of-cheque\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"[Negotiable Instruments Act] Ker HC | What determines commencement of period of presentation is date of cheque and not the date of delivery of cheque","og_description":"Kerala High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench of A. Hariprasad and T.V. Anilkumar, JJ., while addressing a review petition,\u00a0 reiterated that the relevant date","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/11\/negotiable-instruments-act-ker-hc-what-determines-commencement-of-period-of-presentation-is-date-of-cheque-and-not-the-date-of-delivery-of-cheque\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-11-11T06:32:35+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-11-12T04:12:06+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/KeralaHC-e1521442636157.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/11\/negotiable-instruments-act-ker-hc-what-determines-commencement-of-period-of-presentation-is-date-of-cheque-and-not-the-date-of-delivery-of-cheque\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/11\/negotiable-instruments-act-ker-hc-what-determines-commencement-of-period-of-presentation-is-date-of-cheque-and-not-the-date-of-delivery-of-cheque\/","name":"[Negotiable Instruments Act] Ker HC | What determines commencement of period of presentation is date of cheque and not the date of delivery of cheque | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-11-11T06:32:35+00:00","dateModified":"2020-11-12T04:12:06+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/11\/negotiable-instruments-act-ker-hc-what-determines-commencement-of-period-of-presentation-is-date-of-cheque-and-not-the-date-of-delivery-of-cheque\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/11\/negotiable-instruments-act-ker-hc-what-determines-commencement-of-period-of-presentation-is-date-of-cheque-and-not-the-date-of-delivery-of-cheque\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/11\/negotiable-instruments-act-ker-hc-what-determines-commencement-of-period-of-presentation-is-date-of-cheque-and-not-the-date-of-delivery-of-cheque\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"[Negotiable Instruments Act] Ker HC | What determines commencement of period of presentation is date of cheque and not the date of delivery of cheque"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":223585,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/25\/madras-hc-s-1422-of-negotiable-instruments-amendment-act-2015-not-ultra-vires-of-art-14-of-constitution-legislation-can-take-away-the-basis-of-a-judgment\/","url_meta":{"origin":239006,"position":0},"title":"Madras HC | S. 142(2) of Negotiable Instruments Amendment Act, 2015 — not ultra vires of Art. 14 of Constitution; Legislation can take away the basis of a Judgment","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 25, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court: A Division Bench of A.P. Sahi, CJ and Subramonium Prasad, J., while deciding a petition filed in regard to declaring Section 142(2) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 as ultra vires Article 14 of Constitution, held by placing reliance on certain cases that, \u201cParliament is competent to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":286710,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/11\/ni-act-cheque-bounce-notice-explainer-legal-research-knowledge\/","url_meta":{"origin":239006,"position":1},"title":"Section 138 of NI Act, 1881: All you need to know about Cheque Bounce Notice","author":"Ridhi","date":"March 11, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"A cheque bounce notice lays the foundation of a Court case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Explore the rules, format, and frequently asked questions around the legal notice for cheque bounce.","rel":"","context":"In "Law made Easy"","block_context":{"text":"Law made Easy","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/law-made-easy\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"cheque bounce notice","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-700.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-700.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-700.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-700.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":301197,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/11\/whether-debt-was-time-barred-or-not-by-limitation-in-cheque-bounce-to-be-decided-by-evidence-sc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":239006,"position":2},"title":"Whether debt was barred by limitation or not in cheque bounce cases, is a question of evidence: SC","author":"Editor","date":"September 11, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe question of debt barred by limitation is to be decided on basis of evidence as, limitation is a mixed question of law and fact\u201d.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"debt barred by limitation","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/debt-barred-by-limitation.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/debt-barred-by-limitation.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/debt-barred-by-limitation.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/debt-barred-by-limitation.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":208819,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/28\/mad-hc-unlawful-for-holder-of-cheque-to-fill-date-and-amount-in-blank-cheque-beyond-knowledge-of-accused-execution-of-cheque-explained\/","url_meta":{"origin":239006,"position":3},"title":"Madras HC | Unlawful for holder of cheque to fill date and amount in blank cheque beyond knowledge of accused; execution of cheque explained","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 28, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court: The Bench of M.V. Muralidharan, J. upheld the order of respondent's\u00a0acquittal for an offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 while holding that\u00a0\"the different ink, pen, and manipulation of the amount would show that the complainant had failed to demonstrate due execution of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":243938,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/16\/section-138-ni-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":239006,"position":4},"title":"All HC | Summons sent to Director for dishonour of cheque under S. 138 NI Act, without prosecution against the Company. Is it permissible? Court answers","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 16, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: Ravi Nath Tilhari, J., addressed a matter wherein a person being the director of the company signed a cheque on behalf of the company and since the said cheque got dishonoured, he was made liable, without the company being made liable under the offence of Section 138\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":207213,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/25\/presumption-under-section-118-of-ni-act-may-legally-be-inferred-where-where-signature-on-cheque-admitted-by-accused\/","url_meta":{"origin":239006,"position":5},"title":"Presumption under Section 118 of NI Act may legally be inferred where signature on cheque admitted by accused","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 25, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: A Single Judge bench comprising of M.G. Giratkar, J. dismissed a revision petition filed against the judgment of Judicial Magistrate and confirmed by Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur whereby the petitioner was convicted for offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The petitioner and the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/239006","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=239006"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/239006\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=239006"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=239006"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=239006"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}