{"id":238881,"date":"2020-11-09T11:08:29","date_gmt":"2020-11-09T05:38:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=238881"},"modified":"2020-11-09T11:08:29","modified_gmt":"2020-11-09T05:38:29","slug":"all-hc-disconcerting-that-one-party-should-change-faith-just-for-sake-of-matrimony-and-nothing-more-read-courts-opinion-on-religious-conversion-in-light-of-matrimonial-matters","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/09\/all-hc-disconcerting-that-one-party-should-change-faith-just-for-sake-of-matrimony-and-nothing-more-read-courts-opinion-on-religious-conversion-in-light-of-matrimonial-matters\/","title":{"rendered":"All HC | &#8220;Disconcerting that one party should change faith just for sake of matrimony and nothing more&#8221;: Read Court&#8217;s opinion on &#8216;religious conversion&#8217; in light of matrimonial matters"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Allahabad High Court:\u00a0<\/strong>J.J. Munir, J., observed that, in matrimonial matters, it is disconcerting to note that parties change his\/her faith to the others just for the purpose of matrimony and nothing more.<\/p>\n<p>Detenue Pooja, in compliance with the\u00a0<em>rule nisi\u00a0<\/em>issued by the Court on 24-09-2020, was produced before the Court.<\/p>\n<p>Court ascertained the detenue&#8217;s stand in the instant matter, which is recorded\u00a0<em>verbatim:<\/em><\/p>\n<div class=\"page\" title=\"Page 1\">\n<div class=\"layoutArea\">\n<div class=\"column\">\n<blockquote><p>Q. Aapka nam?<br \/>\nA. Pooja alias Zoya.<br \/>\nQ. Aapki aayu?<br \/>\nA. 19 saal.<br \/>\nQ. Aapke pita ji ka nam?<br \/>\nA. Pramod.<br \/>\nQ. Aapne shadi ki hai?<br \/>\nA. Haa.<br \/>\nQ. Kab ki hai?<br \/>\nA. 5.8.2020 ko.<br \/>\nQ Aapke pati ka nam?<br \/>\nA. Shahwej.<br \/>\nQ. Aap kisake sath jana chahti hai?<\/p>\n<p>A. Apane pati ke sath.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bench noted that Pooja had forsaken her native religion which is Hinduism and converted to Islam in order to marry Shavez.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Though under the Constitution, a citizen has the right to profess practise or propagate the religion of his\/her choice but it is disconcerting that in matrimonial matters one party should change his\/her faith to the others just for the of matrimony and nothing more.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bench stated that <span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">&#8220;If two citizens of India professing different religions wish to marry, it is open to them to do so under the Special Marriage Act, 1954, which is one of the earliest endeavours towards a Uniform Civil Code.&#8221;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Detenue by her statement indicated her clear choice to stay with her husband with whom she claimed to have married and since she is a major she is free to do so.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In view of the above, Court stated that the\u00a0<em>rule nisi\u00a0<\/em>is made absolute. Hence, detenue is ordered to be set at liberty and she is free to stay with whomsoever she wants and go wherever she likes.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Therefore, petition was allowed.[Pooja v. State of U.P., Habeas Corpus WP No. 446 of 2020, decided on 8-10-2020]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Allahabad High Court:\u00a0J.J. Munir, J., observed that, in matrimonial matters, it is disconcerting to note that parties change his\/her faith to the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[44007,42669,41378,36031,44006,29789,10401],"class_list":["post-238881","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-habeas-corpus-writ-petition","tag-hinduism","tag-islam","tag-matrimonial-matters","tag-religion-conversion","tag-special-marriage-act","tag-uniform-civil-code"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>All HC | &quot;Disconcerting that one party should change faith just for sake of matrimony and nothing more&quot;: Read Court&#039;s opinion on &#039;religious conversion&#039; in light of matrimonial matters | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/09\/all-hc-disconcerting-that-one-party-should-change-faith-just-for-sake-of-matrimony-and-nothing-more-read-courts-opinion-on-religious-conversion-in-light-of-matrimonial-matters\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"All HC | &quot;Disconcerting that one party should change faith just for sake of matrimony and nothing more&quot;: Read Court&#039;s opinion on &#039;religious conversion&#039; in light of matrimonial matters\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Allahabad High Court:\u00a0J.J. Munir, J., observed that, in matrimonial matters, it is disconcerting to note that parties change his\/her faith to the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/09\/all-hc-disconcerting-that-one-party-should-change-faith-just-for-sake-of-matrimony-and-nothing-more-read-courts-opinion-on-religious-conversion-in-light-of-matrimonial-matters\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-11-09T05:38:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/Allahabad-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/09\/all-hc-disconcerting-that-one-party-should-change-faith-just-for-sake-of-matrimony-and-nothing-more-read-courts-opinion-on-religious-conversion-in-light-of-matrimonial-matters\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/09\/all-hc-disconcerting-that-one-party-should-change-faith-just-for-sake-of-matrimony-and-nothing-more-read-courts-opinion-on-religious-conversion-in-light-of-matrimonial-matters\/\",\"name\":\"All HC | \\\"Disconcerting that one party should change faith just for sake of matrimony and nothing more\\\": Read Court's opinion on 'religious conversion' in light of matrimonial matters | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-11-09T05:38:29+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/09\/all-hc-disconcerting-that-one-party-should-change-faith-just-for-sake-of-matrimony-and-nothing-more-read-courts-opinion-on-religious-conversion-in-light-of-matrimonial-matters\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/09\/all-hc-disconcerting-that-one-party-should-change-faith-just-for-sake-of-matrimony-and-nothing-more-read-courts-opinion-on-religious-conversion-in-light-of-matrimonial-matters\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/09\/all-hc-disconcerting-that-one-party-should-change-faith-just-for-sake-of-matrimony-and-nothing-more-read-courts-opinion-on-religious-conversion-in-light-of-matrimonial-matters\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"All HC | &#8220;Disconcerting that one party should change faith just for sake of matrimony and nothing more&#8221;: Read Court&#8217;s opinion on &#8216;religious conversion&#8217; in light of matrimonial matters\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"All HC | \"Disconcerting that one party should change faith just for sake of matrimony and nothing more\": Read Court's opinion on 'religious conversion' in light of matrimonial matters | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/09\/all-hc-disconcerting-that-one-party-should-change-faith-just-for-sake-of-matrimony-and-nothing-more-read-courts-opinion-on-religious-conversion-in-light-of-matrimonial-matters\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"All HC | \"Disconcerting that one party should change faith just for sake of matrimony and nothing more\": Read Court's opinion on 'religious conversion' in light of matrimonial matters","og_description":"Allahabad High Court:\u00a0J.J. Munir, J., observed that, in matrimonial matters, it is disconcerting to note that parties change his\/her faith to the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/09\/all-hc-disconcerting-that-one-party-should-change-faith-just-for-sake-of-matrimony-and-nothing-more-read-courts-opinion-on-religious-conversion-in-light-of-matrimonial-matters\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-11-09T05:38:29+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/Allahabad-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/09\/all-hc-disconcerting-that-one-party-should-change-faith-just-for-sake-of-matrimony-and-nothing-more-read-courts-opinion-on-religious-conversion-in-light-of-matrimonial-matters\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/09\/all-hc-disconcerting-that-one-party-should-change-faith-just-for-sake-of-matrimony-and-nothing-more-read-courts-opinion-on-religious-conversion-in-light-of-matrimonial-matters\/","name":"All HC | \"Disconcerting that one party should change faith just for sake of matrimony and nothing more\": Read Court's opinion on 'religious conversion' in light of matrimonial matters | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-11-09T05:38:29+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/09\/all-hc-disconcerting-that-one-party-should-change-faith-just-for-sake-of-matrimony-and-nothing-more-read-courts-opinion-on-religious-conversion-in-light-of-matrimonial-matters\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/09\/all-hc-disconcerting-that-one-party-should-change-faith-just-for-sake-of-matrimony-and-nothing-more-read-courts-opinion-on-religious-conversion-in-light-of-matrimonial-matters\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/09\/all-hc-disconcerting-that-one-party-should-change-faith-just-for-sake-of-matrimony-and-nothing-more-read-courts-opinion-on-religious-conversion-in-light-of-matrimonial-matters\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"All HC | &#8220;Disconcerting that one party should change faith just for sake of matrimony and nothing more&#8221;: Read Court&#8217;s opinion on &#8216;religious conversion&#8217; in light of matrimonial matters"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":249663,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/11\/matrimonial-dispute\/","url_meta":{"origin":238881,"position":0},"title":"Bom HC | Whether HC should quash an FIR arising out of matrimonial dispute on ground of same being settled amicably? Gian Singh v. State of Punjab referred","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 11, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: The Division Bench of S.S. Shinde and Abhay Ahuja, JJ., reiterated the observation of Supreme Court in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab, (2012) 10 SCC 303, while quashing an FIR registered for offences under Sections 498(A), 406, 504, 323, 34 of the Penal Code and Sections\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":244138,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/19\/divorce\/","url_meta":{"origin":238881,"position":1},"title":"Del HC | Permanent residents of Singapore, residing there since 2012, wife seeks an injunction for suit filed in Singapore by husband regarding matrimonial dispute. HC rejects appeal. Why? Read on","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 19, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: The Division Bench of Vipin Sanghi and Rekha Palli, JJ., upheld the Family Court\u2019s decision and directed the parties approach the local Court of Singapore with regard to sorting out their matrimonial dispute.\u00a0 Issue Present appeal was filed seeking a direction against the Family Court\u2019s decision, wherein\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":258578,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/16\/honour-killing\/","url_meta":{"origin":238881,"position":2},"title":"[Honour Killing] &#8216;Could have cut off relations, instead opted to commit cold blooded murder&#8217;: Bom HC upholds death penalty of brother for pre-planned murder of sister and lover","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 16, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: \u00a0Division Bench of V.K. Jadhav and Shrikant D. Kulkarni, JJ., addressed a case of \u2018Honour Killing\u2019 by a brother of his own real sister and upheld the sentence of the death penalty. Appellant Accused\u2019s sister who was married had a love affair with another person prior to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":242741,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/23\/sc-allows-video-conferencing-in-matrimonial-matter-though-not-as-a-matter-of-course\/","url_meta":{"origin":238881,"position":3},"title":"SC allows video conferencing in matrimonial matter, though not as a matter of course","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 23, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The 3-Judge Bench of S.A. Bobde, CJ and L. Nageswara Rao and Vineet Saran, JJ., dismissed a review petition while directing the Family Court, Gautam Budh Nagar, to conduct proceedings by video conferencing. Petitioner preferred the instant petition seeking transfer of HMA No. 487 of 2015 filed by\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":233820,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/12\/chh-hc-in-a-matrimonial-dispute-cause-of-action-can-arise-several-times-even-if-the-dispute-is-settled-and-case-has-been-withdrawn\/","url_meta":{"origin":238881,"position":4},"title":"Chh HC | In a matrimonial dispute, cause of action can arise several times, even if the dispute is settled and case has been withdrawn","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 12, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court:\u00a0Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant, J., while addressing a petition made an observation with regard to matrimonial disputes that, \"...in a matrimonial dispute, the cause of action can arise again and again, even if the dispute is settled and compromised before the court and the case has been withdrawn.\"\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":239129,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/13\/chh-hc-s-320-crpc-is-no-bar-to-the-exercise-of-power-of-quashing-of-fir-in-matrimonial-matters-petition-allowed\/","url_meta":{"origin":238881,"position":5},"title":"Chh HC | S. 320 CrPC is no bar to the exercise of power of quashing of FIR in matrimonial matters; Petition allowed","author":"Editor","date":"November 13, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court: Sanjay K Agrawal J., allowed the petition based on the settled principle of law. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioners seeking quashment of FIR No. 02\/2020 dated 10-01-2020 for offence punishable under Section 420 read with Section 34 of Penal Code, 1860 i.e.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/238881","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=238881"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/238881\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=238881"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=238881"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=238881"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}