{"id":238505,"date":"2020-11-04T18:30:41","date_gmt":"2020-11-04T13:00:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=238505"},"modified":"2020-11-12T10:22:53","modified_gmt":"2020-11-12T04:52:53","slug":"kar-hc-whether-entering-appearance-by-advocate-but-not-contesting-the-case-be-considered-as-ex-parte-proceedings-under-order-9-rule-13-cpc-court-explains","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/04\/kar-hc-whether-entering-appearance-by-advocate-but-not-contesting-the-case-be-considered-as-ex-parte-proceedings-under-order-9-rule-13-cpc-court-explains\/","title":{"rendered":"Kar HC | Whether entering \u2018appearance\u2019 by Advocate but not contesting the case be considered as Ex-parte proceedings under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC? Court explains"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Karnataka High Court: <\/strong>M. I. Arun J. dismissed the petition without interfering in the discretion exercised by the Appellate Court in the impugned judgment.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>\u00a0<\/em>The facts of the case are that an original suit was filed before Additional Civil Judge, Senior Division, Kolar for a decree of partition and separate possession of 1\/4<sup>th<\/sup> share in the suit schedule properties. The respondents in the original suit i.e. petitioners in the present writ petition entered appearance through their advocate but failed to file the written statement despite several opportunities being given, pursuant to which decree was granted in favour of the plaintiff in the original suit. The judgment was later challenged by a delay of 3 years (condoned by Court) by an appeal which was later prayed for dismissal. Thereafter petition under Order 9 Rule 13 of Code of Civil Procedure i.e. CPC was filed for setting aside the impugned decree and was later dismissed vide order dated 27-06-2011.\u00a0 The dismissal order was further challenged by an appeal which was allowed and the original suit was restored to file. Aggrieved by the said order, this revision petition has been preferred.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Counsel for the respondents submitted that the appearance in the original suit was entered through advocate alone and no written statement was filed or arguments were advanced, therefore they cannot be considered as ex parte and should not be entitled to prefer an application under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><em>Order 9 Rule 13 reads as under:<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><em>\u00a0<\/em><\/strong><strong><em>In any case in which a decree is passed ex parte against a defendant, he may apply to the Court by which the decree was passed for an order to set it aside; and if he satisfies the Court that the summons was not duly served, or that he was prevented by any sufficient cause from appearing when the suit was called on for hearing, the Court shall make an order setting aside the decree as against him upon such terms as to costs, payment into Court or otherwise as it thinks fit, and shall appoint a day for proceeding with the suit;<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><em>Provided that where the decree is of such a nature that it cannot be set aside as against such defendant only it may be set aside as against all or any of the other defendants also:<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><em>Provided further that no Court shall set aside a decree passed ex parte merely on the ground that there has been an irregularity in the service of summons, if it is satisfied that the defendant had notice of the date of hearing and had sufficient time to appear and answer the plaintiff\u2019s claim.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><em>Explanation-<br \/>\nWhere there has been an appeal against a decree passed ex parte under this rule, and the appeal has been disposed of an any ground other than the ground that the appellant has withdrawn the appeal, no application shall lie under this rule for setting aside that ex parte decree.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><em>\u00a0<\/em><\/strong>The Court observed that bare reading of the Explanation to Order 9 Rule 13 CPC makes it clear that when an appeal is preferred against the decree passed Exparte and when the same is disposed of, any ground other than the ground that the appellant has withdrawn the appeal, no application shall lie under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC for setting aside the Exparte decree. It means if the appeal has been disposed as withdrawal, in that event a petition under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC is maintainable.\u00a0 It is immaterial whether the appeal was withdrawn reserving the liberty to prefer an application under Order Rule 13 of CPC or not.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In view of the observations, Court held relied on judgment <em>G. Ratna Raj v. Sri Muthukumarasamy Permanent Fund Ltd.,<\/em>\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/u0XmspZy\">(2019) 11 SCC 301<\/a> and held that when the defendants entered appearance but did not contest the case, it will be treated as Exparte and the defendants can maintain a petition under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In view of the above, the revision petition was dismissed.[M. Krishnappa v. Menasamma, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/A43l7HZX\"><b>2020 SCC OnLine Kar 1648<\/b><\/a>, decided on 23-10-2020]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><span style=\"color: #008000;\">Arunima Bose, Editorial Assistant has put this story together<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court: M. I. Arun J. dismissed the petition without interfering in the discretion exercised by the Appellate Court in the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[27414,28334,29785,26944],"class_list":["post-238505","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-cpc","tag-karnataka-high-court","tag-law","tag-order-9-rule-13-cpc"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Kar HC | Whether entering \u2018appearance\u2019 by Advocate but not contesting the case be considered as Ex-parte proceedings under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC? Court explains | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/04\/kar-hc-whether-entering-appearance-by-advocate-but-not-contesting-the-case-be-considered-as-ex-parte-proceedings-under-order-9-rule-13-cpc-court-explains\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Kar HC | Whether entering \u2018appearance\u2019 by Advocate but not contesting the case be considered as Ex-parte proceedings under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC? Court explains\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Karnataka High Court: M. I. Arun J. dismissed the petition without interfering in the discretion exercised by the Appellate Court in the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/04\/kar-hc-whether-entering-appearance-by-advocate-but-not-contesting-the-case-be-considered-as-ex-parte-proceedings-under-order-9-rule-13-cpc-court-explains\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-11-04T13:00:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-11-12T04:52:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3499-e1487871967209.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/04\/kar-hc-whether-entering-appearance-by-advocate-but-not-contesting-the-case-be-considered-as-ex-parte-proceedings-under-order-9-rule-13-cpc-court-explains\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/04\/kar-hc-whether-entering-appearance-by-advocate-but-not-contesting-the-case-be-considered-as-ex-parte-proceedings-under-order-9-rule-13-cpc-court-explains\/\",\"name\":\"Kar HC | Whether entering \u2018appearance\u2019 by Advocate but not contesting the case be considered as Ex-parte proceedings under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC? Court explains | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-11-04T13:00:41+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-11-12T04:52:53+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/04\/kar-hc-whether-entering-appearance-by-advocate-but-not-contesting-the-case-be-considered-as-ex-parte-proceedings-under-order-9-rule-13-cpc-court-explains\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/04\/kar-hc-whether-entering-appearance-by-advocate-but-not-contesting-the-case-be-considered-as-ex-parte-proceedings-under-order-9-rule-13-cpc-court-explains\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/04\/kar-hc-whether-entering-appearance-by-advocate-but-not-contesting-the-case-be-considered-as-ex-parte-proceedings-under-order-9-rule-13-cpc-court-explains\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Kar HC | Whether entering \u2018appearance\u2019 by Advocate but not contesting the case be considered as Ex-parte proceedings under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC? Court explains\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Kar HC | Whether entering \u2018appearance\u2019 by Advocate but not contesting the case be considered as Ex-parte proceedings under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC? Court explains | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/04\/kar-hc-whether-entering-appearance-by-advocate-but-not-contesting-the-case-be-considered-as-ex-parte-proceedings-under-order-9-rule-13-cpc-court-explains\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Kar HC | Whether entering \u2018appearance\u2019 by Advocate but not contesting the case be considered as Ex-parte proceedings under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC? Court explains","og_description":"Karnataka High Court: M. I. Arun J. dismissed the petition without interfering in the discretion exercised by the Appellate Court in the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/04\/kar-hc-whether-entering-appearance-by-advocate-but-not-contesting-the-case-be-considered-as-ex-parte-proceedings-under-order-9-rule-13-cpc-court-explains\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-11-04T13:00:41+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-11-12T04:52:53+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3499-e1487871967209.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/04\/kar-hc-whether-entering-appearance-by-advocate-but-not-contesting-the-case-be-considered-as-ex-parte-proceedings-under-order-9-rule-13-cpc-court-explains\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/04\/kar-hc-whether-entering-appearance-by-advocate-but-not-contesting-the-case-be-considered-as-ex-parte-proceedings-under-order-9-rule-13-cpc-court-explains\/","name":"Kar HC | Whether entering \u2018appearance\u2019 by Advocate but not contesting the case be considered as Ex-parte proceedings under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC? Court explains | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-11-04T13:00:41+00:00","dateModified":"2020-11-12T04:52:53+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/04\/kar-hc-whether-entering-appearance-by-advocate-but-not-contesting-the-case-be-considered-as-ex-parte-proceedings-under-order-9-rule-13-cpc-court-explains\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/04\/kar-hc-whether-entering-appearance-by-advocate-but-not-contesting-the-case-be-considered-as-ex-parte-proceedings-under-order-9-rule-13-cpc-court-explains\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/04\/kar-hc-whether-entering-appearance-by-advocate-but-not-contesting-the-case-be-considered-as-ex-parte-proceedings-under-order-9-rule-13-cpc-court-explains\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Kar HC | Whether entering \u2018appearance\u2019 by Advocate but not contesting the case be considered as Ex-parte proceedings under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC? Court explains"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":213911,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/24\/ori-hc-order-21-rule-29-cpc-cannot-come-to-the-rescue-unless-sufficient-cause-is-shown-to-stay-the-execution-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":238505,"position":0},"title":"Ori HC | Order 21 Rule 29 CPC cannot come to the rescue unless sufficient cause is shown to stay the execution case","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 24, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Orissa High Court: The Bench of A.K. Rath, J. dismissed the petition filed against the order which rejected the application of the petitioner filed under Order 21 Rule 29 CPC to stay the further proceeding in an execution case till the disposal of another civil suit.\u00a0 The facts of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":219284,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/09\/del-hc-trial-court-cannot-reconsider-issue-of-maintainability-of-suit-under-or-37-cpc-where-once-summons-have-been-issued-and-served-on-defendant\/","url_meta":{"origin":238505,"position":1},"title":"Del HC | Trial court cannot reconsider issue of maintainability of suit under Or. 37 CPC where once summons have been issued and served on defendant","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 9, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. allowed a petition filed against the order of the trial court whereby the suit filed by the petitioner under Order 37\u00a0(summary procedure)\u00a0of the Civil Procedure Code was directed to be treated as an ordinary suit. A suit under Order 37 was filed by the petitioner\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":219680,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/18\/del-hc-objections-under-s-47-cpc-cannot-be-filed-by-signature-of-the-advocate-alone-signature-of-client-necessary\/","url_meta":{"origin":238505,"position":2},"title":"Del HC | Objections under S. 47 CPC cannot be filed by signature of the Advocate alone, signature of client necessary","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 18, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Pratibha M. Singh, J. dismissed a petition filed against the order whereby the objections filed on behalf of the petitioner under Section 47 CPC (questions to be determined by the Court executing decree)\u00a0were rejected. The respondent herein filed a suit against the petitioner under Section 13 read with\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":211647,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/08\/del-hc-wifes-application-for-setting-aside-ex-parte-divorce-decree-rejected-in-absence-of-application-for-condonation-of-more-than-4-years-delay\/","url_meta":{"origin":238505,"position":3},"title":"Del HC | Wife&#8217;s application for setting aside ex-parte divorce decree rejected in absence of application for condonation of more than 4 years&#8217; delay","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 8, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0A Bench of G.S. Sistani and Jyoti Singh, JJ., dismissed an appeal filed by the appellant-wife against the order of the family court rejecting her application under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC for setting aside the ex-parte decree of divorce passed in favour of her husband. The parties\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":247713,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/27\/sufficient-cause\/","url_meta":{"origin":238505,"position":4},"title":"Del HC | Scope of Or. 9 R. 13 CPC application: Whether summons duly served and\/or whether defendant was prevented by &#8216;sufficient cause&#8217; from appearing? Explained","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 27, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Manoj Kumar Ohri, J., expressed that \u201cSufficient Cause\u201d is an elastic expression and no hard and fast guidelines are prescribed. In the present matter, Judgment dated 01-02-2019 was sought to be set aside as well as condonation of delay of 582 days. Factual Matrix Permanent Injunction restraining\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":327401,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/26\/trihc-dismisses-appeal-filed-u-s-100-cpc-as-there-was-no-material-to-formulate-any-substantial-question-of-law\/","url_meta":{"origin":238505,"position":5},"title":"\u2018No material to formulate any substantial question of law\u2019; Tripura HC dismisses appeal filed u\/S 100 of CPC","author":"Simranjeet","date":"July 26, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u2018The contention that the appeal is not maintainable under Section 100 of CPC cannot be accepted, rather the appeal filed by appellant is maintainable before the Court as the order of Additional District Judge is a decree.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Tripura High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Tripura-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Tripura-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Tripura-High-Court-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Tripura-High-Court-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/238505","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=238505"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/238505\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=238505"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=238505"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=238505"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}