{"id":238437,"date":"2020-11-03T14:35:18","date_gmt":"2020-11-03T09:05:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=238437"},"modified":"2020-11-12T10:29:29","modified_gmt":"2020-11-12T04:59:29","slug":"madras-hc-succession-madras-hc-stale-claim-resurrected-for-some-other-reason-court-rejects-claim-to-property-filed-by-husband-and-son-of-alleged-coparcener","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/03\/madras-hc-succession-madras-hc-stale-claim-resurrected-for-some-other-reason-court-rejects-claim-to-property-filed-by-husband-and-son-of-alleged-coparcener\/","title":{"rendered":"[Succession] Madras HC | “Stale claim resurrected for some other reason”: Court rejects claim to property filed by husband and son of alleged co-parcener"},"content":{"rendered":"

Madras High Court:\u00a0<\/strong>R. Subramanian, J., dismissed the second appeal filed in regard to suit for partition and granting possession of share to a daughter as coparcener on finding no substantial question of law.<\/p>\n

In the instant second appeal, plaintiffs are aggrieved by the dismissal of their suit for partition and separate possession of their 1\/3rd share.<\/p>\n

What did the plaintiffs contend?<\/span><\/h3>\n

Plaintiffs stated that the suit properties belonged to Rasappa Gounder who died in the year 1980 leaving behind one son and two daughters. One of the daughters is the wife of the first plaintiff and mother of the second plaintiff, died on 20-04-1987.<\/p>\n

Plaintiffs claimed that as the daughter she would become a coparcener upon enactment of Hindu Succession (Amendment Act 39 of 2005) Act, the <\/span>plaintiff\u2019s would seek a 1\/3rd share in the estate of Rasappa Gounder.<\/span><\/p>\n

Defendants Contention<\/span><\/h3>\n

Defendants contended that the predecessor in interest viz., Rasappa Gounder died in the year 1980 and after his death, there was an arrangement under which the daughters and the second defendant Subbayal relinquished their share in Rasappa Gounder’s estate upon receipt of Rs 25,000.<\/p>\n

It was also stated that defendant 1 was in possession of the property as an absolute owner and sold a portion of the properties to the knowledge of Poornam, plaintiffs and second defendant.<\/p>\n

Therefore, it was contended that the plaintiffs were effectively ousted from the enjoyment of the property by the first defendant.<\/p>\n

Second defendant supported the above contentions and stated that she and her sister had received a sum of Rs 25,000 in full quit of their share and have no claim over the properties of the deceased.<\/p>\n

Trial Court<\/span><\/h3>\n

Trial Court had held that since Rasappa Gounder died in 1981, the succession having opened on the death of Rasappa Gounder, Poornam would not become a coparcener.<\/span><\/p>\n

Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma, <\/span><\/em>(2020) SCC Online 641<\/span><\/a><\/h3>\n

Change in law brought by the above-cited decision of the Supreme Court would not have helped the plaintiff, since the daughter herself had died in 1987 even prior to the enactment of the Hindu Succession (Amendment Act 39 of 2005) Act.<\/span><\/p>\n

Hence, the claim that the daughter becomes a coparcener was rejected by the trial court.<\/p>\n

In view of the above, a second appeal was filed.<\/p>\n

Counsel A. Thiyagarajan appeared for the appellants.<\/p>\n

Decision<\/span><\/h3>\n

Bench stated that if the claim of the plaintiffs was to be restricted to Section 8 of the Hindu Succession Act, then the devolution of the estate happened on the death of Rasappa Gounder in the year 1981. The instant suit has been filed 30 years thereafter in the year 2011.<\/p>\n

Hence the Court stated that it is a stale claim which is sought to be resurrected for some other reason.<\/p>\n

Therefore, Court found no substantial question of law and dismissed the second appeal. [C.P. Subramaniam v. Deivasigamami,\u00a0 2020 SCC OnLine Mad 5206<\/b><\/a>, decided on 16-10-2020]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Madras High Court:\u00a0R. Subramanian, J., dismissed the second appeal filed in regard to suit for partition and granting possession of share to <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[3801,43958,17091,3590,35153],"class_list":["post-238437","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-coparcener","tag-devolution-of-estate","tag-hindu-succession-act","tag-property","tag-suit-for-partition"],"yoast_head":"\n[Succession] Madras HC | "Stale claim resurrected for some other reason": Court rejects claim to property filed by husband and son of alleged co-parcener | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/03\/madras-hc-succession-madras-hc-stale-claim-resurrected-for-some-other-reason-court-rejects-claim-to-property-filed-by-husband-and-son-of-alleged-coparcener\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"[Succession] Madras HC | "Stale claim resurrected for some other reason": Court rejects claim to property filed by husband and son of alleged co-parcener\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Madras High Court:\u00a0R. Subramanian, J., dismissed the second appeal filed in regard to suit for partition and granting possession of share to\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/03\/madras-hc-succession-madras-hc-stale-claim-resurrected-for-some-other-reason-court-rejects-claim-to-property-filed-by-husband-and-son-of-alleged-coparcener\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-11-03T09:05:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-11-12T04:59:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/madras-high-court1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/03\/madras-hc-succession-madras-hc-stale-claim-resurrected-for-some-other-reason-court-rejects-claim-to-property-filed-by-husband-and-son-of-alleged-coparcener\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/03\/madras-hc-succession-madras-hc-stale-claim-resurrected-for-some-other-reason-court-rejects-claim-to-property-filed-by-husband-and-son-of-alleged-coparcener\/\",\"name\":\"[Succession] Madras HC | \\\"Stale claim resurrected for some other reason\\\": Court rejects claim to property filed by husband and son of alleged co-parcener | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-11-03T09:05:18+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-11-12T04:59:29+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/03\/madras-hc-succession-madras-hc-stale-claim-resurrected-for-some-other-reason-court-rejects-claim-to-property-filed-by-husband-and-son-of-alleged-coparcener\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/03\/madras-hc-succession-madras-hc-stale-claim-resurrected-for-some-other-reason-court-rejects-claim-to-property-filed-by-husband-and-son-of-alleged-coparcener\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/03\/madras-hc-succession-madras-hc-stale-claim-resurrected-for-some-other-reason-court-rejects-claim-to-property-filed-by-husband-and-son-of-alleged-coparcener\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"[Succession] Madras HC | “Stale claim resurrected for some other reason”: Court rejects claim to property filed by husband and son of alleged co-parcener\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"[Succession] Madras HC | \"Stale claim resurrected for some other reason\": Court rejects claim to property filed by husband and son of alleged co-parcener | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/03\/madras-hc-succession-madras-hc-stale-claim-resurrected-for-some-other-reason-court-rejects-claim-to-property-filed-by-husband-and-son-of-alleged-coparcener\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"[Succession] Madras HC | \"Stale claim resurrected for some other reason\": Court rejects claim to property filed by husband and son of alleged co-parcener","og_description":"Madras High Court:\u00a0R. Subramanian, J., dismissed the second appeal filed in regard to suit for partition and granting possession of share to","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/03\/madras-hc-succession-madras-hc-stale-claim-resurrected-for-some-other-reason-court-rejects-claim-to-property-filed-by-husband-and-son-of-alleged-coparcener\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-11-03T09:05:18+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-11-12T04:59:29+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/madras-high-court1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/03\/madras-hc-succession-madras-hc-stale-claim-resurrected-for-some-other-reason-court-rejects-claim-to-property-filed-by-husband-and-son-of-alleged-coparcener\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/03\/madras-hc-succession-madras-hc-stale-claim-resurrected-for-some-other-reason-court-rejects-claim-to-property-filed-by-husband-and-son-of-alleged-coparcener\/","name":"[Succession] Madras HC | \"Stale claim resurrected for some other reason\": Court rejects claim to property filed by husband and son of alleged co-parcener | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-11-03T09:05:18+00:00","dateModified":"2020-11-12T04:59:29+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/03\/madras-hc-succession-madras-hc-stale-claim-resurrected-for-some-other-reason-court-rejects-claim-to-property-filed-by-husband-and-son-of-alleged-coparcener\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/03\/madras-hc-succession-madras-hc-stale-claim-resurrected-for-some-other-reason-court-rejects-claim-to-property-filed-by-husband-and-son-of-alleged-coparcener\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/03\/madras-hc-succession-madras-hc-stale-claim-resurrected-for-some-other-reason-court-rejects-claim-to-property-filed-by-husband-and-son-of-alleged-coparcener\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"[Succession] Madras HC | “Stale claim resurrected for some other reason”: Court rejects claim to property filed by husband and son of alleged co-parcener"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":258327,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/10\/daughter-of-a-coparcener-will-also-be-a-coparcener-in-hindu-undivided-property\/","url_meta":{"origin":238437,"position":0},"title":"Daughter of a coparcener will also be a coparcener in Hindu Undivided Property? Tis Hazari Courts decides where father died before coming into force of 2005 Amendment to S. 6","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 10, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi: Kirandeep Kaur, Civil Judge \u2013 05, discussed the legal position on a coparcener's daughter also being a coparcener of the Hindu Undivided Property. Factual Matrix The plaintiffs were the lineal descendant of Sunder Lal who died intestate. He was the owner of a property and after\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Tis-hazari","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Tis-hazari.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Tis-hazari.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Tis-hazari.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Tis-hazari.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Tis-hazari.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":245299,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/10\/self-acquired-property\/","url_meta":{"origin":238437,"position":1},"title":"Bom HC | Relinquishment of self-acquired properties of a deceased by legal heirs. Will such release enure to benefit of all other legal heirs? Court explains","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 10, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: R.D. Dhanuka, J., held that relinquishment of properties held by the legal heirs of a person whose properties were self-acquired properties would enure only for those persons in whose favour such deed of relinquishment was executed. The First Appeal was filed under Section 96 of the Code\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":246394,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/02\/partition-suit\/","url_meta":{"origin":238437,"position":2},"title":"Madras HC | Daughters filed partition suit while disowning their registered release deed. As per S. 92 of Evidence Act, burden to adduce evidence sufficient to exclude written evidence will be on the daughters? Read on","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 2, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court: G. Jayachandran, J., the instant suit was filed with regard to the relief of partition and permanent injunction from alienating or encumbering the suit property. Instant suit was filed for partition by daughters of Late Palanisamy Gounder against his sons was dismissed by the trial court while\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":233771,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/11\/daughters-have-coparcenary-rights-even-if-parents-died-before-the-hindu-succession-amendment-act-2005-came-into-force\/","url_meta":{"origin":238437,"position":3},"title":"Daughters have coparcenary rights by birth even if father died before the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 came into force [DETAILED REPORT]","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"August 11, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of Arun Mishra, SA Nazeer and MR Shah, JJ has held that daughters have right in coparcenary by birth and that it is not necessary that the father coparcener should be living when the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 came into force. \u201cThe conferral of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":374558,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/03\/daughters-property-rights-before-and-after-2005-amendment\/","url_meta":{"origin":238437,"position":4},"title":"Daughters’ Property Rights under Hindu Law – Before & After 2005 Amendment","author":"Sunaina","date":"February 3, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"This article offers a clear overview of daughters\u2019 property rights under Hindu law\u2014how the law under Hindu Succession Act, 1956 worked before the 2005 Amendment, and how the amendment transformed daughters into coparceners by birth. It traces the major Supreme Court rulings leading up to Vineeta Sharma (2020) 9 SCC\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Law made Easy"","block_context":{"text":"Law made Easy","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/law-made-easy\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Daughter's property rights","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Daughters-property-rights.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Daughters-property-rights.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Daughters-property-rights.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Daughters-property-rights.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":264895,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/01\/karta\/","url_meta":{"origin":238437,"position":5},"title":"Daughters and widow of a deceased would inherit properties of deceased as tenants in common or joint tenants? \u00a0Bom HC explains","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 1, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: Mangesh S. Patil, J., expressed that, by virtue of Section 19 of the Hindu Succession Act, it has been explicitly made clear that if two and more heirs succeed together to the property and in the estate, they take the property as tenants in common and not\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/238437","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=238437"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/238437\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=238437"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=238437"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=238437"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}